Fix kfree bug in sendmsg and recvmsg
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 Fix kfree bug in sendmsg and recvmsg
Fix kfree bug in recvmsg and sendmsg.
We cannot kfree(iov) when iov points to an array on the stack, as that has the potential of corrupting memory.
So re-introduce the if-stmt that used to protect kfree from this condition, code that was removed as part of a larger set of changes made by git commit da184284.
net/socket.c +4 -2
@@ -1960,7 +1960,8 @@ out_freectl:if (ctl_buf != ctl)sock_kfree_s (sock->sk, ctl_buf, ctl_len); out_freeiov: -kfree (iov); +if (iov != iovstack) +kfree (iov);return err; }
@@ -2125,7 +2126,8 @@ static int ___sys_recvmsg(struct socket err = len; out_freeiov: -kfree (iov); +if (iov != iovstack) +kfree (iov);return err; }
Quoted 8 lines · Joe Korty
Fix kfree bug in recvmsg and sendmsg.
We cannot kfree(iov) when iov points to an array on the stack, as that has the potential of corrupting memory.
So re-introduce the if-stmt that used to protect kfree from this condition, code that was removed as part of a larger set of changes made by git commit
da184284.
NAK. You are misreading import_iovec():
*iov = p == *iov ? NULL : p;
in the end will have iov replaced with NULL if we ended up using what it originally pointed to.
Quoted 6 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 5 lines · Joe Korty
Fix kfree bug in recvmsg and sendmsg.
We cannot kfree(iov) when iov points to an array on the stack, as that has the potential of corrupting memory.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
So re-introduce the if-stmt that used to protect kfree from this condition, code that was removed as part of a larger set of changes made by git commit
da184284.NAK. You are misreading
import_iovec():*iov = p == *iov ? NULL : p;in the end will have iov replaced with NULL if we ended up using what it originally pointed to.
PS: that's absolutely deliberate - cleanup after import_iovec() (and its wrappers) is *always* of the same sort; that way we avoid the checks completely. The rules are much simpler that way: after the call of import_iovec() cleanup is always kfree(iov), no matter what and that's the only thing iov should be used after that call.
Your "restored" check won't harm anything, precisely because it'll never be satisfied. Note that this is the normal codepath - we go through out_freeiov on success as well. If iov remained pointing to on-stack array in case of short vector, we would've been ears-deep in oopsen. The reason why we are not is that in this case iov ends up being NULL.
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Joe Korty <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:38:05 -0500
Quoted 10 lines
Fix kfree bug in recvmsg and sendmsg.
We cannot kfree(iov) when iov points to an array on the stack, as that has the potential of corrupting memory.
So re-introduce the if-stmt that used to protect kfree from this condition, code that was removed as part of a larger set of changes made by git commit
da184284.Signed-off-by Joe Korty <[email protected]>
Please submit networking patches to [email protected], thank you.