Linux 3.14.61-rt63-rc1
Subsystems (9)
Steven Rostedt
maintainercover Linux 3.14.61-rt63-rc1
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.61-rt63-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
Note, I'm bringing this tree up to stable patches in 4.1.7-rt8. Then I'll be pulling 4.1-rt into stable, as development is now on 4.4-rt. After that, I'll be pulling the 4.1-rt stable changes into the stable trees.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release candidate).
The pre-releases will not be pushed to the git repository, only the final release is.
If all goes well, this patch will be converted to the next main release on 2/29/2016.
Enjoy,
-- Steve
To build 3.14.61-rt63-rc1 directly, the following patches should be applied:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/linux-3.14.tar.xz
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/patch-3.14.61.xz
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.14/patch-3.14.61-rt63-rc1.patch.xz
You can also build from 3.14.61-rt62 by applying the incremental patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.14/incr/patch-3.14.61-rt62-rt63-rc1.patch.xz
Changes from 3.14.61-rt62:
---
Grygorii Strashko (2):
ARM: smp: Move clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() call to __cpu_die() net/core/cpuhotplug: Drain input_pkt_queue lockless
Josh Cartwright (1):
net: Make synchronize_rcu_expedited() conditional on !RT_FULL
Peter Zijlstra (1):
sched: Introduce the trace_sched_waking tracepoint
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2):
cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_rwsem
dump stack: don't disable preemption during trace
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (1):
Linux 3.14.61-rt63-rc1
Thomas Gleixner (2):
rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully
irqwork: Move irq safe work to irq context
[email protected] (1):
rtmutex: Use chainwalking control enum
----
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 5 +++-- arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 +++------------------------------- include/linux/irq_work.h | 6 ++++++ include/trace/events/sched.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- kernel/irq_work.c | 9 +++++++++ kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 4 ++-- kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++--- kernel/timer.c | 6 ++---- kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c | 2 +- kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 2 +- lib/dump_stack.c | 4 ++-- localversion-rt | 2 +- net/core/dev.c | 4 ++-- 14 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 1/10 cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_rwsem
3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
cpufreq_rwsem was introduced in commit 6eed9404ab3c4 ("cpufreq: Use rwsem for protecting critical sections) in order to replace try_module_get() on the cpu-freq driver. That try_module_get() worked well until the refcount was so heavily used that module removal became more or less impossible.
Though when looking at the various (undocumented) protection mechanisms in that code, the randomly sprinkeled around cpufreq_rwsem locking sites are superfluous.
The policy, which is acquired in cpufreq_cpu_get() and released in cpufreq_cpu_put() is sufficiently protected already.
cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu)
/* Protects against concurrent driver removal */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
kobject_get(&policy->kobj);
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);The reference on the policy serializes versus module unload already:
cpufreq_unregister_driver()
subsys_interface_unregister()
__cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data) = NULL;
cpufreq_policy_put_kobj()If there is a reference held on the policy, i.e. obtained prior to the unregister call, then cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() will wait until that reference is dropped. So once subsys_interface_unregister() returns there is no policy pointer in flight and no new reference can be obtained. So that rwsem protection is useless.
The other usage of cpufreq_rwsem in show()/store() of the sysfs interface is redundant as well because sysfs already does the proper kobject_get()/put() pairs.
That leaves CPU hotplug versus module removal. The current down_write() around the write_lock() in cpufreq_unregister_driver() is silly at best as it protects actually nothing.
The trivial solution to this is to prevent hotplug across cpufreq_unregister_driver completely.
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 +++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +3 -31
@@ -52,12 +52,6 @@ static inline bool has_target(void)return cpufreq_driver->target_index || cpufreq_driver->target; } -/* -* rwsem to guarantee that cpufreq driver module doesn't unload during critical -* sections -*/ -static DECLARE_RWSEM (cpufreq_rwsem); -/* internal prototypes */ static int __cpufreq_governor (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,unsigned int event);
@@ -198,9 +192,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)if (cpufreq_disabled () || (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))return NULL ; -if (!down_read_trylock (&cpufreq_rwsem)) -return NULL ; -/* get the cpufreq driver */ read_lock_irqsave (&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -213,9 +204,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)read_unlock_irqrestore (&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); -if (!policy) -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem); -return policy; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (cpufreq_cpu_get);
@@ -226,7 +214,6 @@ void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)return ;kobject_put (&policy->kobj); -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (cpufreq_cpu_put);
@@ -710,9 +697,6 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)struct freq_attr *fattr =to_attr (attr);ssize_t ret; -if (!down_read_trylock (&cpufreq_rwsem)) -return -EINVAL ; -down_read (&policy->rwsem);if (fattr->show)
@@ -721,7 +705,6 @@ static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf) ret = -EIO ;up_read (&policy->rwsem); -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem);return ret; }
@@ -738,9 +721,6 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,if (!cpu_online (policy->cpu)) goto unlock; -if (!down_read_trylock (&cpufreq_rwsem)) - goto unlock; -down_write (&policy->rwsem);if (fattr->store)
@@ -749,8 +729,6 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, ret = -EIO ;up_write (&policy->rwsem); - -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem); unlock:put_online_cpus ();
@@ -1065,9 +1043,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif, }#endif -if (!down_read_trylock (&cpufreq_rwsem)) -return 0 ; -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU /* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */ read_lock_irqsave (&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
@@ -1075,7 +1050,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,if (cpumask_test_cpu (cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) {read_unlock_irqrestore (&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); ret =cpufreq_add_policy_cpu (tpolicy, cpu, dev); -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem);return ret; } }
@@ -1223,7 +1197,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,up_write (&policy->rwsem);kobject_uevent (&policy->kobj,KOBJ_ADD ); -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem);pr_debug ("initialization complete\n" );
@@ -1249,8 +1222,6 @@ err_set_policy_cpu:cpufreq_policy_free (policy); nomem_out: -up_read (&cpufreq_rwsem); -return ret; }
@@ -2399,19 +2370,20 @@ int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver)pr_debug ("unregistering driver %s\n" , driver->name); +/* Protect against concurrent cpu hotplug */ +get_online_cpus ();subsys_interface_unregister (&cpufreq_interface);if (cpufreq_boost_supported ())cpufreq_sysfs_remove_file (&boost.attr);unregister_hotcpu_notifier (&cpufreq_cpu_notifier); -down_write (&cpufreq_rwsem);write_lock_irqsave (&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); cpufreq_driver =NULL ;write_unlock_irqrestore (&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); -up_write (&cpufreq_rwsem); +put_online_cpus ();return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 2/10 ARM: smp: Move clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() call to __cpu_die()
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]>
When running with the RT-kernel (4.1.5-rt5) on TI OMAP dra7-evm and trying to do Suspend to RAM, the following backtrace occurs:
Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 7.295 msecs Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 18, name: migration/1 INFO: lockdep is turned off. irq event stamp: 122 hardirqs last enabled at (121): [<c06ac0ac>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x88/0x90 hardirqs last disabled at (122): [<c06abed0>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x28/0x5c softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c003d294>] copy_process.part.52+0x410/0x19d8 softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null) Preemption disabled at:[< (null)>] (null) CPU: 1 PID: 18 Comm: migration/1 Tainted: G W 4.1.4-rt3-01046-g96ac8da #204 Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) [<c0019134>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0014774>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [<c0014774>] (show_stack) from [<c06a70f4>] (dump_stack+0x88/0xdc) [<c06a70f4>] (dump_stack) from [<c006cab8>] (___might_sleep+0x198/0x2a8) [<c006cab8>] (___might_sleep) from [<c06ac4dc>] (rt_spin_lock+0x30/0x70) [<c06ac4dc>] (rt_spin_lock) from [<c013f790>] (find_lock_task_mm+0x9c/0x174) [<c013f790>] (find_lock_task_mm) from [<c00409ac>] (clear_tasks_mm_cpumask+0xb4/0x1ac) [<c00409ac>] (clear_tasks_mm_cpumask) from [<c00166a4>] (__cpu_disable+0x98/0xbc) [<c00166a4>] (__cpu_disable) from [<c06a2e8c>] (take_cpu_down+0x1c/0x50) [<c06a2e8c>] (take_cpu_down) from [<c00f2600>] (multi_cpu_stop+0x11c/0x158) [<c00f2600>] (multi_cpu_stop) from [<c00f2a9c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc4/0x184) [<c00f2a9c>] (cpu_stopper_thread) from [<c0069058>] (smpboot_thread_fn+0x18c/0x324) [<c0069058>] (smpboot_thread_fn) from [<c00649c4>] (kthread+0xe8/0x104) [<c00649c4>] (kthread) from [<c0010058>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) CPU1: shutdown PM: Calling sched_clock_suspend+0x0/0x40 PM: Calling timekeeping_suspend+0x0/0x2e0 PM: Calling irq_gc_suspend+0x0/0x68 PM: Calling fw_suspend+0x0/0x2c PM: Calling cpu_pm_suspend+0x0/0x28
Also, sometimes system stucks right after displaying "Disabling non-boot CPUs ...". The root cause of above backtrace is task_lock() which takes a sleeping lock on -RT.
To fix the issue, move clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() call from __cpu_disable() to __cpu_die() which is called on the thread which is asking for a target CPU to be shutdown. In addition, this change restores CPUhotplug functionality on TI OMAP dra7-evm and CPU1 can be unplugged/plugged many times.
--- arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c +3 -2
@@ -209,8 +209,6 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)flush_cache_louis ();local_flush_tlb_all (); -clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (cpu); -return 0 ; }
@@ -226,6 +224,9 @@ void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)pr_err ("CPU%u: cpu didn't die\n" , cpu);return ; } + +clear_tasks_mm_cpumask (cpu); +printk (KERN_NOTICE "CPU%u: shutdown\n" , cpu);/*
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 3/10 rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Yimin debugged that in case of a PI wakeup in progress when rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() calls task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() the latter returns -EAGAIN and in consequence the remove_waiter() call runs into a BUG_ON() because there is nothing to remove.
Guard it with rt_mutex_has_waiters(). This is a quick fix which is easy to backport. The proper fix is to have a central check in remove_waiter() so we can call it unconditionally.
--- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +1 -1
@@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, ret =0 ; } -if (unlikely (ret)) +if (ret &&rt_mutex_has_waiters (lock))remove_waiter (lock, waiter);raw_spin_unlock (&lock->wait_lock);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 4/10 rtmutex: Use chainwalking control enum
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
In 8930ed80 (rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic), chainwalking control enums were introduced to limit the deadlock detection logic. One of the calls to task_blocks_on_rt_mutex was missed when converting to use the enums.
--- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +1 -1
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ static void noinline __sched rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)__set_current_state (TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE );pi_unlock (&self->pi_lock); - ret =task_blocks_on_rt_mutex (lock, &waiter, self,0 ); + ret =task_blocks_on_rt_mutex (lock, &waiter, self,RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK );BUG_ON (ret);for (;;) {
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 5/10 dump stack: dont disable preemption during trace
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
I see here large latencies during a stack dump on x86. The preempt_disable() and get_cpu() should forbid moving the task to another CPU during a stack dump and avoiding two stack traces in parallel on the same CPU. However a stack trace from a second CPU may still happen in parallel. Also nesting is allowed so a stack trace happens in process-context and we may have another one from IRQ context. With migrate disable we keep this code preemptible and allow a second backtrace on the same CPU by another task.
--- arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 8 ++++---- lib/dump_stack.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c +4 -4
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data) { - const unsigned cpu = get_cpu(); + const unsigned cpu = get_cpu_light();unsigned long *irq_stack_end = (unsigned long *)per_cpu (irq_stack_ptr, cpu);unsigned used =0 ;
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,* This handles the process stack: */ bp = ops->walk_stack (tinfo, stack, bp, ops, data,NULL , &graph); -put_cpu (); +put_cpu_light (); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (dump_trace);
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,int cpu;int i; -preempt_disable (); +migrate_disable (); cpu =smp_processor_id (); irq_stack_end = (unsigned long *)(per_cpu (irq_stack_ptr, cpu));
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,pr_cont (" %016lx" , *stack++);touch_nmi_watchdog (); } -preempt_enable (); +migrate_enable ();pr_cont ("\n" );show_trace_log_lvl (task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
lib/dump_stack.c +2 -2
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ asmlinkage void dump_stack(void)* Permit this cpu to perform nested stack dumps while serialising * against other CPUs */ -preempt_disable (); +migrate_disable (); retry: cpu =smp_processor_id ();
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ retry:if (!was_locked)atomic_set (&dump_lock,-1 ); -preempt_enable (); +migrate_enable (); }#else asmlinkage void dump_stack(void)
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 6/10 net: Make synchronize_rcu_expedited() conditional on !RT_FULL
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josh Cartwright <[email protected]>
While the use of synchronize_rcu_expedited() might make synchronize_net() "faster", it does so at significant cost on RT systems, as expediting a grace period forcibly preempts any high-priority RT tasks (via the stop_machine() mechanism).
Without this change, we can observe a latency spike up to 30us with cyclictest by rapidly unplugging/reestablishing an ethernet link.
--- net/core/dev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/core/dev.c +1 -1
@@ -6638,7 +6638,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_netdev);void synchronize_net (void ) {might_sleep (); -if (rtnl_is_locked ()) +if (rtnl_is_locked () && !IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL ))synchronize_rcu_expedited ();else synchronize_rcu ();
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 7/10 net/core/cpuhotplug: Drain input_pkt_queue lockless
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]>
I can constantly see below error report with 4.1 RT-kernel on TI ARM dra7-evm if I'm trying to unplug cpu1:
[ 57.737589] CPU1: shutdown [ 57.767537] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, sh/137 [ 57.767546] lock: 0xee994730, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0 [ 57.767552] CPU: 0 PID: 137 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.1.10-rt8-01700-g2c38702-dirty #55 [ 57.767555] Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) [ 57.767568] [<c001acd0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001534c>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [ 57.767579] [<c001534c>] (show_stack) from [<c075560c>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xa0) [ 57.767593] [<c075560c>] (dump_stack) from [<c00aca48>] (spin_dump+0x84/0xac) [ 57.767603] [<c00aca48>] (spin_dump) from [<c00acaa4>] (spin_bug+0x34/0x38) [ 57.767614] [<c00acaa4>] (spin_bug) from [<c00acc10>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x168/0x1c0) [ 57.767624] [<c00acc10>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c075b4cc>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x4c/0x54) [ 57.767631] [<c075b4cc>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c07599fc>] (rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x5c/0x374) [ 57.767638] [<c07599fc>] (rt_spin_lock_slowlock) from [<c075bcf4>] (rt_spin_lock+0x38/0x70) [ 57.767649] [<c075bcf4>] (rt_spin_lock) from [<c06333c0>] (skb_dequeue+0x28/0x7c) [ 57.767662] [<c06333c0>] (skb_dequeue) from [<c06476ec>] (dev_cpu_callback+0x1b8/0x240) [ 57.767673] [<c06476ec>] (dev_cpu_callback) from [<c007566c>] (notifier_call_chain+0x3c/0xb4)
The reason is that skb_dequeue is taking skb->lock, but RT changed the core code to use a raw spinlock. The non-raw lock is not initialized on purpose to catch exactly this kind of problem.
--- net/core/dev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/core/dev.c +1 -1
@@ -6890,7 +6890,7 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,netif_rx_internal (skb);input_queue_head_incr (oldsd); } -while ((skb =skb_dequeue (&oldsd->input_pkt_queue))) { +while ((skb =__skb_dequeue (&oldsd->input_pkt_queue))) {netif_rx_internal (skb);input_queue_head_incr (oldsd); }
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 8/10 irqwork: Move irq safe work to irq context
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
On architectures where arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() returns false, we end up running the irq safe work from the softirq context. That results in a potential deadlock in the scheduler irq work which expects that function to be called with interrupts disabled.
Split the irq_work_tick() function into a hard and soft variant. Call the hard variant from the tick interrupt and add the soft variant to the timer softirq.
--- include/linux/irq_work.h | 6 ++++++ kernel/irq_work.c | 9 +++++++++ kernel/timer.c | 6 ++---- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
include/linux/irq_work.h +6 -0
@@ -44,4 +44,10 @@ bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void);static inline bool irq_work_needs_cpu (void ) {return false; }#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK ) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL ) +void irq_work_tick_soft (void ); +#else +static inline void irq_work_tick_soft (void ) { } +#endif +#endif /* _LINUX_IRQ_WORK_H */
kernel/irq_work.c +9 -0
@@ -163,8 +163,17 @@ void irq_work_tick(void)if (!llist_empty (raised) && !arch_irq_work_has_interrupt ())irq_work_run_list (raised); + +if (!IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL )) +irq_work_run_list (this_cpu_ptr (&lazy_list)); +} + +#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK ) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL ) +void irq_work_tick_soft (void ) +{irq_work_run_list (this_cpu_ptr (&lazy_list)); } +#endif /* * Synchronize against the irq_work @entry, ensures the entry is not
kernel/timer.c +2 -4
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ void update_process_times(int user_tick)scheduler_tick ();run_local_timers ();rcu_check_callbacks (cpu, user_tick); -#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK ) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL ) +#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK )if (in_irq ())irq_work_run ();#endif
@@ -1466,9 +1466,7 @@ static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)hrtimer_run_pending (); -#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK ) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL ) -irq_work_tick (); -#endif +irq_work_tick_soft ();if (time_after_eq (jiffies, base->timer_jiffies))__run_timers (base);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 9/10 sched: Introduce the trace_sched_waking tracepoint
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Upstream commit fbd705a0c6184580d0e2fbcbd47a37b6e5822511
Mathieu reported that since 317f394160e9 ("sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu") trace_sched_wakeup() can happen out of context of the waker.
This is a problem when you want to analyse wakeup paths because it is now very hard to correlate the wakeup event to whoever issued the wakeup.
OTOH trace_sched_wakeup() is issued at the point where we set p->state = TASK_RUNNING, which is right were we hand the task off to the scheduler, so this is an important point when looking at scheduling behaviour, up to here its been the wakeup path everything hereafter is due to scheduler policy.
To bridge this gap, introduce a second tracepoint: trace_sched_waking. It is guaranteed to be called in the waker context.
[ Ported to linux-4.1.y-rt kernel by Mathieu Desnoyers. Resolved
conflict: try_to_wake_up_local() does not exist in -rt kernel. Removed its instrumentation hunk. ]
--- include/trace/events/sched.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++--- kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c | 2 +- kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
include/trace/events/sched.h +21 -9
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_kthread_stop_ret,*/ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template, - TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success), + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p), - TP_ARGS(__perf_task(p), success), + TP_ARGS(__perf_task(p)), TP_STRUCT__entry( __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
@@ -71,25 +71,37 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(sched_wakeup_template,memcpy (__entry->comm, p->comm,TASK_COMM_LEN ); __entry->pid = p->pid; __entry->prio = p->prio; - __entry->success = success; + __entry->success =1 ;/* rudiment, kill when possible */ __entry->target_cpu =task_cpu (p); ), -TP_printk ("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d success=%d target_cpu=%03d" , +TP_printk ("comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d target_cpu=%03d" , __entry->comm, __entry->pid, __entry->prio, - __entry->success, __entry->target_cpu) + __entry->target_cpu) ); +/* +* Tracepoint called when waking a task; this tracepoint is guaranteed to be +* called from the waking context. +*/ +DEFINE_EVENT (sched_wakeup_template, sched_waking, + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p), +TP_ARGS (p)); + +/* +* Tracepoint called when the task is actually woken; p->state == TASK_RUNNNG. +* It it not always called from the waking context. +*/ DEFINE_EVENT (sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup, - TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success), -TP_ARGS (p, success)); + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p), +TP_ARGS (p));/* * Tracepoint for waking up a new task: */ DEFINE_EVENT (sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new, - TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p, int success), -TP_ARGS (p, success)); + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *p), +TP_ARGS (p));#ifdef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state (struct task_struct *p)
kernel/sched/core.c +5 -3
@@ -1481,9 +1481,9 @@ static void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags) {check_preempt_curr (rq, p, wake_flags); -trace_sched_wakeup (p, true); - p->state =TASK_RUNNING ; +trace_sched_wakeup (p); +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (p->sched_class->task_woken) p->sched_class->task_woken (rq, p);
@@ -1676,6 +1676,8 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)if (!(wake_flags &WF_LOCK_SLEEPER )) p->saved_state =TASK_RUNNING ; +trace_sched_waking (p); + success =1 ;/* we're going to change ->state */ cpu =task_cpu (p);
@@ -2078,7 +2080,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p) rq =__task_rq_lock (p);activate_task (rq, p,0 ); p->on_rq =1 ; -trace_sched_wakeup_new (p, true); +trace_sched_wakeup_new (p);check_preempt_curr (rq, p,WF_FORK );#ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (p->sched_class->task_woken)
kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c +1 -1
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_array *tr, }static void -probe_sched_wakeup (void *ignore,struct task_struct *wakee,int success) +probe_sched_wakeup (void *ignore,struct task_struct *wakee) {struct trace_array_cpu *data;unsigned long flags;
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c +1 -1
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void wakeup_reset(struct trace_array *tr) }static void -probe_wakeup (void *ignore,struct task_struct *p,int success) +probe_wakeup (void *ignore,struct task_struct *p) {struct trace_array_cpu *data;int cpu =smp_processor_id ();
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0
Steven Rostedt
maintainerPATCH 10/10 Linux 3.14.61-rt63-rc1
In reply to Steven Rostedt3.14.61-rt63-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <[email protected]>
--- localversion-rt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
localversion-rt +1 -1
@@ -1 +1 @@ --rt62 +-rt63-rc1
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0