Skip to contentSkip to conversation

xfs: disallow rw remount on fs with unknown ro-compat features

PATCH In review Eric Sandeen 3 participants 4 messages Mar 29, 2016 – Mar 30, 2016 XFS filesystem

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xfs: disallow rw remount on fs with unknown ro-compat features

Today, a kernel which refuses to mount a filesystem read-write due to unknown ro-compat features can still transition to read-write via the remount path. The old kernel is most likely none the wiser, because it's unaware of the new feature, and isn't using it. However, writing to the filesystem may well corrupt metadata related to that new feature, and moving to a newer kernel which understand the feature will have problems.

Right now the only ro-compat feature we have is the free inode btree, which showed up in v3.16. It would be good to push this back to all the active stable kernels, I think, so that if anyone is using newer mkfs (which enables the finobt feature) with older kernel releases, they'll be protected.

---

fs/xfs/xfs_super.c +10 -0
index d760934..ca058a1 100644
@@ -1276,6 +1276,16 @@ xfs_fs_remount(
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
+		if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) == XFS_SB_VERSION_5 &&
+		    xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(sbp,
+					XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
+			xfs_warn(mp,
+"ro->rw transition prohibited on unknown (0x%x) ro-compat filesystem",
+				(sbp->sb_features_ro_compat &
+					XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN));
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY;
 
 		/*

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Eric Sandeen

Today, a kernel which refuses to mount a filesystem read-write due to unknown ro-compat features can still transition to read-write via the remount path. The old kernel is most likely none the wiser, because it's unaware of the new feature, and isn't using it. However, writing to the filesystem may well corrupt metadata related to that new feature, and moving to a newer kernel which understand the feature will have problems.

Right now the only ro-compat feature we have is the free inode btree, which showed up in v3.16. It would be good to push this back to all the active stable kernels, I think, so that if anyone is using newer mkfs (which enables the finobt feature) with older kernel releases, they'll be protected.

Quoted 3 lines

---

Quoted 23 lines
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c +10 -0
index d760934..ca058a1 100644
@@ -1276,6 +1276,16 @@ xfs_fs_remount(
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
+		if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) == XFS_SB_VERSION_5 &&
+		    xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(sbp,
+					XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN)) {
+			xfs_warn(mp,
+"ro->rw transition prohibited on unknown (0x%x) ro-compat filesystem",
+				(sbp->sb_features_ro_compat &
+					XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN));
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 		mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY;
 
 		/*
Quoted 4 lines

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

#2 lore raw
In reply to Eric Sandeen
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Sandeen

Today, a kernel which refuses to mount a filesystem read-write due to unknown ro-compat features can still transition to read-write via the remount path. The old kernel is most likely none the wiser, because it's unaware of the new feature, and isn't using it. However, writing to the filesystem may well corrupt metadata related to that new feature, and moving to a newer kernel which understand the feature will have problems.

Quoted 5 lines

Right now the only ro-compat feature we have is the free inode btree, which showed up in v3.16. It would be good to push this back to all the active stable kernels, I think, so that if anyone is using newer mkfs (which enables the finobt feature) with older kernel releases, they'll be protected.

Ok, so the bug was introduced with the original extended feature masks in commit e721f50 ("xfs: implement extended feature masks"), which was introduced in 3.10. So it will need to go back to stable kernels all the way back to 3.10, right?

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
#3 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Sandeen

Today, a kernel which refuses to mount a filesystem read-write due to unknown ro-compat features can still transition to read-write via the remount path. The old kernel is most likely none the wiser, because it's unaware of the new feature, and isn't using it. However, writing to the filesystem may well corrupt metadata related to that new feature, and moving to a newer kernel which understand the feature will have problems.

Quoted 5 lines

Right now the only ro-compat feature we have is the free inode btree, which showed up in v3.16. It would be good to push this back to all the active stable kernels, I think, so that if anyone is using newer mkfs (which enables the finobt feature) with older kernel releases, they'll be protected.

Quoted 9 lines

Ok, so the bug was introduced with the original extended feature masks in commit e721f50 ("xfs: implement extended feature masks"), which was introduced in 3.10. So it will need to go back to stable kernels all the way back to 3.10, right?

Cheers,

Dave.

Yeah, that seems right; it's not when the first ro-compat feature was introduced, it was when the handling was introduced, right?

If you need to massage the cc:stable line feel free, of course.

ie:

     Cc:  <[email protected]> # 3.10.x-

I think.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs