PCI: Add PCI device flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT
PATCH v2 1/2 PCI: Add PCI device flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT
Add a new flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT to limit the DMA alias search to go no further than the bridge where the IOMMU is attached.
This has been added to support Broadcom's Vulcan which has the SMMUv3 and GIC ITS associated with an intermediate bridge in the PCI topology. Traversing to buses above would hit internal glue bridges which will change the RID.
Update the function pci_for_each_dma_alias() to stop when it see a bridge with this flag set.
---
Here is v2 of the patch, the previous discussion is at
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-February/015668.html
v1->v2 changes:
- dropped the BAR quirk (not needed)
- moved from using the 'skip' flag for some bridges to using similar approach to stop the traversal at the bridge with PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT
Comments and suggestions are welcome
JC.
drivers/pci/search.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
drivers/pci/search.c +4 -0
@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ int pci_for_each_dma_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, tmp = bus->self; +/* stop at bridge where translation unit is associated */ +if (tmp->dev_flags &PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT ) +return ret; +/* * PCIe-to-PCI/X bridges alias transactions from downstream * devices using the subordinate bus number (PCI Express to
include/linux/pci.h +2 -0
@@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_PM_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 <<7 ),/* Get VPD from function 0 VPD */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 <<8 ), +/* a non-root bridge where translation occurs, stop alias search here */ + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 9), }; enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH v2 2/2 PCI: Handle Broadcom Vulcan DMA alias calculation quirk
The Broadcom Vulcan PCI topology is slightly unusual, for a multi-node system, it looks like:
[bus 0]
|
+--[node 0 PCI bridge 0.0.0]
| |
| [bus 1]
| +---[SoC PCI devices 1.4.x, 1.5.x] ........
| +---[Glue bridges 1.a.x, 1.b.x] \
| | .....{node 0 GIC ITS}
| | /
| +----[SoC PCIe controller root ports]
| | \...... {SMMUv3 0..3}
| |
| +---- [external PCI devices]
+- [node 1 PCI bridge 0.0.1]
| |
| [bus n - similar to bus 1 above]
...The for_each_dma_alias call for external PCI devices should not go beyond the PCIe controllers where the SMMU and ITS is associated, going further above to the glue bridges or the node bridges will find aliases which are not valid. For internal devices, the association is at the node level bridge and the alias search should not go further.
To handle this quirk, we mark the SoC PCIe bridges and node PCI bridge with flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT so that the alias and RID calculations are correct.
--- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
drivers/pci/quirks.c +14 -0
@@ -3734,6 +3734,20 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(0x1283, 0x8892, quirk_use_pcie_bridge_dma_alias);DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (0x8086 ,0x244e , quirk_use_pcie_bridge_dma_alias);/* +* The IOMMU and interrupt controller of Broadcom vulcan are associated +* not at the root bus, but at a bridge below. The DMA alias search should +* not go above the bridge at which the association exists. +*/ +static void quirk_bridge_brcm_vulcan_pcie_root (struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + pdev->dev_flags |=PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT ; +} +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM ,0x9000 , + quirk_bridge_brcm_vulcan_pcie_root); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM ,0x9084 , + quirk_bridge_brcm_vulcan_pcie_root); + +/* * Intersil/Techwell TW686[4589]-based video capture cards have an empty (zero) * class code. Fix it. */
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Handle Broadcom Vulcan DMA alias calculation quirk
Quoted 21 lines · Jayachandran C
The Broadcom Vulcan PCI topology is slightly unusual, for a multi-node system, it looks like:
[bus 0]
| +--[node 0 PCI bridge 0.0.0] | | | [bus 1] | +---[SoC PCI devices 1.4.x, 1.5.x] ........ | +---[Glue bridges 1.a.x, 1.b.x] \ | | .....{node 0 GIC ITS} | | / | +----[SoC PCIe controller root ports] | | \...... {SMMUv3 0..3} | | | +---- [external PCI devices] +- [node 1 PCI bridge 0.0.1] | | | [bus n - similar to bus 1 above] ...
Quoted 5 lines
The
for_each_dma_aliascall for external PCI devices should not go beyond the PCIe controllers where the SMMU and ITS is associated, going further above to the glue bridges or the node bridges will find aliases which are not valid. For internal devices, the association is at the node level bridge and the alias search should not go further.
I like the line of reasoning that we should not iterate higher in the hierarchy than where the translation hardware is attached. That seems like a reasonable thing in general, not just for this hardware.
Is there some generic way to learn where the translation hardware is attached? If there is, we could make pci_for_each_dma_alias() use that information, and maybe we could solve the problem for other systems as well as for Vulcan.
Quoted 37 lines
To handle this quirk, we mark the SoC PCIe bridges and node PCI bridge with flag
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTso that the alias and RID calculations are correct.Signed-off-by Jayachandran C <[email protected]>--- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)drivers/pci/quirks.c +14
-0@@ -3734,6 +3734,20 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(0x1283, 0x8892, quirk_use_pcie_bridge_dma_alias);DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (0x8086 ,0x244e , quirk_use_pcie_bridge_dma_alias);/* +* The IOMMU and interrupt controller of Broadcom vulcan are associated +* not at the root bus, but at a bridge below. The DMA alias search should +* not go above the bridge at which the association exists. +*/ +static void quirk_bridge_brcm_vulcan_pcie_root (struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + pdev->dev_flags |=PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT ; +} +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM ,0x9000 , + quirk_bridge_brcm_vulcan_pcie_root); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM ,0x9084 , + quirk_bridge_brcm_vulcan_pcie_root); + +/* * Intersil/Techwell TW686[4589]-based video capture cards have an empty (zero) * class code. Fix it. */ Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: Handle Broadcom Vulcan DMA alias calculation quirk
[Adding ARM GIC and SMMU maintainers]
Quoted 28 lines · Bjorn Helgaas
Quoted 21 lines · Jayachandran C
The Broadcom Vulcan PCI topology is slightly unusual, for a multi-node system, it looks like:
[bus 0]
| +--[node 0 PCI bridge 0.0.0] | | | [bus 1] | +---[SoC PCI devices 1.4.x, 1.5.x] ........ | +---[Glue bridges 1.a.x, 1.b.x] \ | | .....{node 0 GIC ITS} | | / | +----[SoC PCIe controller root ports] | | \...... {SMMUv3 0..3} | | | +---- [external PCI devices] +- [node 1 PCI bridge 0.0.1] | | | [bus n - similar to bus 1 above] ...Quoted 5 lines
The
for_each_dma_aliascall for external PCI devices should not go beyond the PCIe controllers where the SMMU and ITS is associated, going further above to the glue bridges or the node bridges will find aliases which are not valid. For internal devices, the association is at the node level bridge and the alias search should not go further.
Quoted 8 lines
I like the line of reasoning that we should not iterate higher in the hierarchy than where the translation hardware is attached. That seems like a reasonable thing in general, not just for this hardware.
Is there some generic way to learn where the translation hardware is attached? If there is, we could make
pci_for_each_dma_alias()use that information, and maybe we could solve the problem for other systems as well as for Vulcan.
There was discussion on using the return value of the callback function to stop the alias search when we reach the bridge to which the IOMMU or MSI controller is attached[1]. There was an iommu patch proposed to handle this for the device tree case[2], It is possible that we can do something similar for MSI and extend it to work when ACPI IORT is used as well.
I will spend some time to see if this can be done.
JC.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg51093.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg508266.html
Quoted 7 lines · Jayachandran C via iommu
Add a new flag
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTto limit the DMA alias search to go no further than the bridge where the IOMMU is attached.This has been added to support Broadcom's Vulcan which has the SMMUv3 and GIC ITS associated with an intermediate bridge in the PCI topology. Traversing to buses above would hit internal glue bridges which will change the RID.
Can you not just have the relevant callback function detect the relevant node and terminate the walk of its own accord? That's what I was aiming for in this patch for the IOMMU setup:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/12456
Is there some flaw in that approach I've missed?
Robin.
Quoted 52 lines
Update the function
pci_for_each_dma_alias()to stop when it see a bridge with this flag set.Signed-off-by Jayachandran C <[email protected]>---
Here is v2 of the patch, the previous discussion is at
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-February/015668.html
v1->v2changes:
- dropped the BAR quirk (not needed)
- moved from using the 'skip' flag for some bridges to using similar approach to stop the traversal at the bridge withPCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTComments and suggestions are welcome
JC.
drivers/pci/search.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)drivers/pci/search.c +4
-0@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ int pci_for_each_dma_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, tmp = bus->self; +/* stop at bridge where translation unit is associated */ +if (tmp->dev_flags &PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT ) +return ret; +/* * PCIe-to-PCI/X bridges alias transactions from downstream * devices using the subordinate bus number (PCI Express to include/linux/pci.h +2
-0@@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_PM_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 <<7 ),/* Get VPD from function 0 VPD */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 <<8 ), +/* a non-root bridge where translation occurs, stop alias search here */ + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 9), }; enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Quoted 8 lines · Jayachandran C via iommu
Add a new flag
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTto limit the DMA alias search to go no further than the bridge where the IOMMU is attached.This has been added to support Broadcom's Vulcan which has the SMMUv3 and GIC ITS associated with an intermediate bridge in the PCI topology. Traversing to buses above would hit internal glue bridges which will change the RID.
Quoted 7 lines
Can you not just have the relevant callback function detect the relevant node and terminate the walk of its own accord? That's what I was aiming for in this patch for the IOMMU setup:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/12456
Is there some flaw in that approach I've missed?
Not flaw as such, but:
- We need to support OF as well as ACPI, so the firmware dependent approach will not work. The ACPI code does not exist right now, but there are patches for this in development.
- GICv3 ITS also uses the RIDs. I need to replicate the same logic in pci/msi.c and irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c for MSI. For IOMMU, I have to update iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c and in other places in iommu code where pci_for_each_dma_alias is called.
- since it is non-standard PCIe topology for the processor, a quirk seemed to be the right way to handle it.
I am still figuring out the right approach here, so comments are welcome.
JC.
Quoted 57 lines
Quoted 56 lines
Update the function
pci_for_each_dma_alias()to stop when it see a bridge with this flag set.Signed-off-by Jayachandran C <[email protected]>---
Here is v2 of the patch, the previous discussion is at
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-February/015668.html
v1->v2changes:
- dropped the BAR quirk (not needed)
- moved from using the 'skip' flag for some bridges to using similar approach to stop the traversal at the bridge withPCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTComments and suggestions are welcome
JC.
drivers/pci/search.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)drivers/pci/search.c +4
-0@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ int pci_for_each_dma_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, tmp = bus->self; +/* stop at bridge where translation unit is associated */ +if (tmp->dev_flags &PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT ) +return ret; +/* * PCIe-to-PCI/X bridges alias transactions from downstream
* devices using the subordinate bus number (PCI Express
toinclude/linux/pci.h +1
-0@@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_PM_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 <<7 ),/* Get VPD from function 0 VPD */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 8), +/* a non-root bridge where translation occurs, stop alias search here */
+PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT= (__forcepci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 9),
};enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {
Quoted 31 lines · Jayachandran C
Quoted 11 lines · Robin Murphy
Quoted 8 lines · Jayachandran C via iommu
Add a new flag
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTto limit the DMA alias search to go no further than the bridge where the IOMMU is attached.This has been added to support Broadcom's Vulcan which has the SMMUv3 and GIC ITS associated with an intermediate bridge in the PCI topology. Traversing to buses above would hit internal glue bridges which will change the RID.
Quoted 7 lines
Can you not just have the relevant callback function detect the relevant node and terminate the walk of its own accord? That's what I was aiming for in this patch for the IOMMU setup:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/12456
Is there some flaw in that approach I've missed?
Not flaw as such, but:
- We need to support OF as well as ACPI, so the firmware dependent approach will not work. The ACPI code does not exist right now, but there are patches for this in development.
- GICv3 ITS also uses the RIDs. I need to replicate the same logic inpci/msi.candirqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.cfor MSI. For IOMMU, I have to updateiommu/arm-smmu-v3.cand in other places in iommu code wherepci_for_each_dma_aliasis called.
- since it is non-standard PCIe topology for the processor, a quirk seemed to be the right way to handle it.
Quoted 1 line
I am still figuring out the right approach here, so comments are welcome.
Oh for sure, I didn't mean to imply that that code is a complete ready-made solution, just that in general it seems a fairly straightforward thing to handle without touching the PCI core:
- We already have to know whichever parent device has the msi-map/iommu-map/IORT table.
- We're aware of that parent at the point we're doing the DMA/MSI configuration.
- Therefore those operations already have everything they need for their callback to be able to stop when it reaches the relevant parent device. Doing it in a firmware-agnostic manner is merely an implementation detail.
Since we'll basically be funnelling both MSI and IOMMU RID translation through a common code path, there should only need to be be one place to handle the DMA alias walk - with that first cut of my PCI/generic IOMMU bindings series I didn't try very hard to refactor things - v2 (probably post-merge-window now) will be a bit more thorough, now that I have a better idea of what thing should look like
Ignore what arm-smmu-v3.c does, because it's wrong anyway. I need to fix that in the next version as well, even if it's just calling out directly to of_pci_map_rid rather than a proper of_xlate implementation.
Now what I realise I *have* missed is the alias detection in iommu_get_group_for_dev, to which the "known parent device" reasoning doesn't apply, and phantom aliasing might well muck things up. Thinking further, if these upstream bridges exist but don't affect the outgoing RID, then might it make sense to quirk them as transparent? (I have no actual objection to this patch, though, and at this point I'm just chucking ideas about).
Robin.
Quoted 60 lines
JC.
Quoted 57 lines
Quoted 56 lines
Update the function
pci_for_each_dma_alias()to stop when it see a bridge with this flag set.Signed-off-by Jayachandran C <[email protected]>---
Here is v2 of the patch, the previous discussion is at
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-February/015668.html
v1->v2changes:
- dropped the BAR quirk (not needed)
- moved from using the 'skip' flag for some bridges to using similar approach to stop the traversal at the bridge withPCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTComments and suggestions are welcome
JC.
drivers/pci/search.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)drivers/pci/search.c +4
-0@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ int pci_for_each_dma_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, tmp = bus->self; +/* stop at bridge where translation unit is associated */ +if (tmp->dev_flags &PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT ) +return ret; +/* * PCIe-to-PCI/X bridges alias transactions from downstream
* devices using the subordinate bus number (PCI Express
toinclude/linux/pci.h +1
-0@@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_PM_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 <<7 ),/* Get VPD from function 0 VPD */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 8), +/* a non-root bridge where translation occurs, stop alias search here */
+PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOT= (__forcepci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 9),
};enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {
Quoted 65 lines · Robin Murphy
Quoted 38 lines · Jayachandran C
Quoted 14 lines · Robin Murphy
Quoted 9 lines · Jayachandran C via iommu
Add a new flag
PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_ROOTto limit the DMA alias search to go no further than the bridge where the IOMMU is attached.This has been added to support Broadcom's Vulcan which has the SMMUv3 and GIC ITS associated with an intermediate bridge in the PCI topology. Traversing to buses above would hit internal glue bridges which will change the RID.
Quoted 8 lines
Can you not just have the relevant callback function detect the relevant node and terminate the walk of its own accord? That's what I was aiming for
in this patch for the IOMMU setup:http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/12456
Is there some flaw in that approach I've missed?
Not flaw as such, but:
- We need to support OF as well as ACPI, so the firmware dependent approach will not work. The ACPI code does not exist right now, but there are patches for this in development.
- GICv3 ITS also uses the RIDs. I need to replicate the same logic inpci/msi.candirqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.cfor MSI. For IOMMU, I have to updateiommu/arm-smmu-v3.cand in other places in iommu code wherepci_for_each_dma_aliasis called.
- since it is non-standard PCIe topology for the processor, a quirk
seemed
to be the right way to handle it.Quoted 1 line
I am still figuring out the right approach here, so comments are welcome.
Oh for sure, I didn't mean to imply that that code is a complete ready-made solution, just that in general it seems a fairly straightforward thing to handle without touching the PCI core:
- We already have to know whichever parent device has the msi-map/iommu-map/IORT table.
- We're aware of that parent at the point we're doing the DMA/MSI configuration.
- Therefore those operations already have everything they need for their callback to be able to stop when it reaches the relevant parent device. Doing it in a firmware-agnostic manner is merely an implementation detail.Since we'll basically be funnelling both MSI and IOMMU RID translation through a common code path, there should only need to be be one place to handle the DMA alias walk - with that first cut of my PCI/generic IOMMU bindings series I didn't try very hard to refactor things - v2 (probably post-merge-window now) will be a bit more thorough, now that I have a better idea of what thing should look like
Ignore what
arm-smmu-v3.cdoes, because it's wrong anyway. I need to fix that in the next version as well, even if it's just calling out directly toof_pci_map_ridrather than a properof_xlateimplementation.
Quoted 7 lines
Now what I realise I *have* missed is the alias detection in
iommu_get_group_for_dev, to which the "known parent device" reasoning doesn't apply, and phantom aliasing might well muck things up. Thinking further, if these upstream bridges exist but don't affect the outgoing RID, then might it make sense to quirk them as transparent? (I have no actual objection to this patch, though, and at this point I'm just chucking ideas about).
I had an earlier patch that had a quirk which marked some bridges to be skipped https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/582633/ which is similar to the transparent idea. The discussion on that patch seems to indicate that having a "root" flag may be better.
Quoted 1 line
Robin.
[...]
JC.
Quoted 2 lines · Robin Murphy
(I have no actual objection to this patch, though, and at this point I'm just chucking ideas about).
Can I ask what the next steps are here? We're looking for upstream direction to guide some internal activities and could really do with understanding how you'd like to solve this one longer term as well as what interim solution could be acceptable until we get there.
Jon.
Signature · 1 line
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 037404e2-3168-8f99-0bdb-bb929776108e-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Quoted 8 lines · Jon Masters
Quoted 2 lines · Robin Murphy
(I have no actual objection to this patch, though, and at this point I'm just chucking ideas about).
Can I ask what the next steps are here? We're looking for upstream direction to guide some internal activities and could really do with understanding how you'd like to solve this one longer term as well as what interim solution could be acceptable until we get there.
Well, for now I'm planning to leave the explicit "terminate the alias walk from the callback function" behaviour in the DT-parsing code[1], since there doesn't seem any good reason not to. As Bjorn says, though, it probably is generally useful for the PCI code to have its own knowledge of exactly where DMA can escape the PCI hierarchy - I now wonder if we could actually just do that from the DT/IORT code; if firmware says a particular bridge/etc. has a relationship with an ITS or SMMU, then presumably it's reasonable to infer that DMA can come out of it, thus we could inform the PCI code there and then without it having to quirk things on its own?
Robin.
[1]:http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/13932
Quoted 3 lines
Jon.
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quick reply (sorry about top post): I am just getting online so I might discover that this callback is shared by both - in which case, cool - but if not, we need an interim ACPI solution.
Aside: Current RHEL Server for ARM (RHELSA) explicitly disables SMMUv3 support because (I warned the folks involved more than a year ago), we will only support ACPI/IORT, and as you can imagine, many people would like us to enable support for device passthrough and robustness, not to mention 32-bit devices (32-bit DMA mask). Nonetheless, that will only happen when the upstream kernel has IORT and quirks in place.
Signature · 1 line
Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone
Quoted 21 lines · Robin Murphy
Quoted 10 lines · Jon Masters
Quoted 3 lines · Robin Murphy
(I have no actual objection to this patch, though, and at this point I'm just chucking ideas about).
Can I ask what the next steps are here? We're looking for upstream direction to guide some internal activities and could really do with understanding how you'd like to solve this one longer term as well as what interim solution could be acceptable until we get there.
Well, for now I'm planning to leave the explicit "terminate the alias walk from the callback function" behaviour in the DT-parsing code[1], since there doesn't seem any good reason not to. As Bjorn says, though, it probably is generally useful for the PCI code to have its own knowledge of exactly where DMA can escape the PCI hierarchy - I now wonder if we could actually just do that from the DT/IORT code; if firmware says a particular bridge/etc. has a relationship with an ITS or SMMU, then presumably it's reasonable to infer that DMA can come out of it, thus we could inform the PCI code there and then without it having to quirk things on its own?
Robin.
[1]:http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/13932
Quoted 2 lines
Jon.
Quoted 21 lines · Robin Murphy
Quoted 8 lines · Jon Masters
Quoted 2 lines · Robin Murphy
(I have no actual objection to this patch, though, and at this point I'm just chucking ideas about).
Can I ask what the next steps are here? We're looking for upstream direction to guide some internal activities and could really do with understanding how you'd like to solve this one longer term as well as what interim solution could be acceptable until we get there.
Well, for now I'm planning to leave the explicit "terminate the alias walk from the callback function" behaviour in the DT-parsing code[1], since there doesn't seem any good reason not to. As Bjorn says, though, it probably is generally useful for the PCI code to have its own knowledge of exactly where DMA can escape the PCI hierarchy - I now wonder if we could actually just do that from the DT/IORT code; if firmware says a particular bridge/etc. has a relationship with an ITS or SMMU, then presumably it's reasonable to infer that DMA can come out of it, thus we could inform the PCI code there and then without it having to quirk things on its own?
Quoted 3 lines
Robin.
Just a reminder that I'm going to be on vacation for about the next three weeks, so it's not that I'm ignoring this, but it seems like it's not fully baked quite yet.
Bjorn