Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 2 participants 3 messages Jun 23, 2016 – Jun 24, 2016

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 1086bbe97a074844188c6c988fa0b1a98c3ccbb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:55:17 -0400
Subject: netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()

From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

commit 1086bbe97a074844188c6c988fa0b1a98c3ccbb9 upstream.

After improving setsockopt() coverage in trinity, I started triggering vmalloc failures pretty reliably from this code path:

warn_alloc_failed+0xe9/0x140
__vmalloc_node_range+0x1be/0x270
vzalloc+0x4b/0x50
__do_replace+0x52/0x260 [ip_tables]
do_ipt_set_ctl+0x15d/0x1d0 [ip_tables]
nf_setsockopt+0x65/0x90
ip_setsockopt+0x61/0xa0
raw_setsockopt+0x16/0x60
sock_common_setsockopt+0x14/0x20
SyS_setsockopt+0x71/0xd0

It turns out we don't validate that the num_counters field in the struct we pass in from userspace is initialized.

The same problem also exists in ebtables, arptables, ipv6, and the compat variants.

---
 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c |    4 ++++
 net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c |    6 ++++++
 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c  |    6 ++++++
 net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c |    6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +4 -0
@@ -1105,6 +1105,8 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, c
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct ebt_counter))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name) - 1] = 0;
 
@@ -2150,6 +2152,8 @@ static int compat_copy_ebt_replace_from_
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct ebt_counter))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	memcpy(repl, &tmp, offsetof(struct ebt_replace, hook_entry));
 
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c +6 -0
@@ -1081,6 +1081,9 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, c
 	/* overflow check */
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
 
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
@@ -1495,6 +1498,9 @@ static int compat_do_replace(struct net
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
 
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c +6 -0
@@ -1267,6 +1267,9 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, const void _
 	/* overflow check */
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
 
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
@@ -1802,6 +1805,9 @@ compat_do_replace(struct net *net, void
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
 
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c +6 -0
@@ -1277,6 +1277,9 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, const void _
 	/* overflow check */
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
 
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
@@ -1811,6 +1814,9 @@ compat_do_replace(struct net *net, void
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
 
 	newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-3.14/netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch

#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:47:06PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 6 lines

The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Make sure you pick up d26e2c9ffa385dd1b646f43c1397ba12af9ed431 too, or ebtables will break.

Dave

author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Dave Jones
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:47:06PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines

The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Make sure you pick up d26e2c9ffa385dd1b646f43c1397ba12af9ed431 too, or ebtables will break.

Yes, now got it, thanks.

greg k-h