Patch "netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Subsystems (4)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
1086bbe97a074844188c6c988fa0b1a98c3ccbb9Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:55:17 -0400
Subject: netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()
From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
commit 1086bbe97a074844188c6c988fa0b1a98c3ccbb9 upstream.
After improving setsockopt() coverage in trinity, I started triggering vmalloc failures pretty reliably from this code path:
warn_alloc_failed+0xe9/0x140 __vmalloc_node_range+0x1be/0x270 vzalloc+0x4b/0x50 __do_replace+0x52/0x260 [ip_tables] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x15d/0x1d0 [ip_tables] nf_setsockopt+0x65/0x90 ip_setsockopt+0x61/0xa0 raw_setsockopt+0x16/0x60 sock_common_setsockopt+0x14/0x20 SyS_setsockopt+0x71/0xd0
It turns out we don't validate that the num_counters field in the struct we pass in from userspace is initialized.
The same problem also exists in ebtables, arptables, ipv6, and the compat variants.
--- net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 4 ++++ net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 6 ++++++ net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 6 ++++++ net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c +4 -0
@@ -1105,6 +1105,8 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, creturn -ENOMEM ;if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct ebt_counter ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name) -1 ] =0 ;
@@ -2150,6 +2152,8 @@ static int compat_copy_ebt_replace_from_return -ENOMEM ;if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct ebt_counter ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ;memcpy (repl, &tmp, offsetof(struct ebt_replace , hook_entry));
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c +6 -0
@@ -1081,6 +1081,9 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, c/* overflow check */ if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct xt_counters ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name)-1 ] =0 ; newinfo =xt_alloc_table_info (tmp.size);
@@ -1495,6 +1498,9 @@ static int compat_do_replace(struct netreturn -ENOMEM ;if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct xt_counters ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name)-1 ] =0 ; newinfo =xt_alloc_table_info (tmp.size);
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c +6 -0
@@ -1267,6 +1267,9 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, const void _/* overflow check */ if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct xt_counters ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name)-1 ] =0 ; newinfo =xt_alloc_table_info (tmp.size);
@@ -1802,6 +1805,9 @@ compat_do_replace(struct net *net, voidreturn -ENOMEM ;if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct xt_counters ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name)-1 ] =0 ; newinfo =xt_alloc_table_info (tmp.size);
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c +6 -0
@@ -1277,6 +1277,9 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, const void _/* overflow check */ if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct xt_counters ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name)-1 ] =0 ; newinfo =xt_alloc_table_info (tmp.size);
@@ -1811,6 +1814,9 @@ compat_do_replace(struct net *net, voidreturn -ENOMEM ;if (tmp.num_counters >=INT_MAX /sizeof (struct xt_counters ))return -ENOMEM ; +if (tmp.num_counters ==0 ) +return -EINVAL ; + tmp.name[sizeof (tmp.name)-1 ] =0 ; newinfo =xt_alloc_table_info (tmp.size);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-3.14/netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:47:06PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in
do_replace()to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
Quoted 6 lines
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Make sure you pick up d26e2c9ffa385dd1b646f43c1397ba12af9ed431 too, or ebtables will break.
Dave
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Dave Jones
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:47:06PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in
do_replace()to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-ensure-number-of-counters-is-0-in-do_replace.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Make sure you pick up
d26e2c9ffa385dd1b646f43c1397ba12af9ed431too, or ebtables will break.
Yes, now got it, thanks.
greg k-h