[dm-crypt] [[email protected]: Re: Does luksFormat write the full size of the device?]
This message of yesterday doesn't seem to have gone through to the list, trying again...
Quoted 3 lines · Milan Broz
On 06/26/2016 05:39 AM, Charles Cazabon wrote:
No, format doesn't write the whole device.
Ok, thanks. That explains why I don't remember it taking this long before.
Quoted 1 line
Can you please post output of running commant with added --debug switch?
Sure:
---------------------------
# cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0 # cryptsetup 1.4.3 processing "cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0" # Running command luksFormat. # Locking memory.
WARNING!
========
This will overwrite data on /dev/md0 irrevocably.
Are you sure? (Type uppercase yes): YES
# Allocating crypt device /dev/md0 context.
# Trying to open and read device /dev/md0.
# Initialising device-mapper backend, UDEV is enabled.
# Detected dm-crypt version 1.14.1, dm-ioctl version 4.34.0.
# Timeout set to 0 miliseconds.
# Iteration time set to 1000 miliseconds.
# Interactive passphrase entry requested.
Enter LUKS passphrase:
Verify passphrase:
# Formatting device /dev/md0 as type LUKS1.
# Crypto backend (gcrypt 1.5.0) initialized.
# Topology: IO (524288/3145728), offset = 0; Required alignment is 3145728
# bytes. # Generating LUKS header version 1 using hash sha1, aes, cbc-essiv:sha256, MK # 32 bytes ^C ---------------------------
I aborted it after a couple of minutes this time.
I've compiled 1.7.2 from the source tarball, and it does the same thing, spinning on one CPU. One difference is that it doesn't seem to respond to a ctrl-C; it's still running after trying to abort it. I haven't tried to kill it with other signals yet. Here's the output from it:
---------------------------
# ~xxxxxxx/software/cryptsetup-1.7.2/src/.libs/cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0
# cryptsetup 1.7.2 processing # "/home/xxxxxxx/software/cryptsetup-1.7.2/src/.libs/cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0" # Running command luksFormat. # Locking memory. # Installing SIGINT/SIGTERM handler. # Unblocking interruption on signal.
WARNING!
========
This will overwrite data on /dev/md0 irrevocably.
Are you sure? (Type uppercase yes): YES
# Allocating crypt device /dev/md0 context.
# Trying to open and read device /dev/md0.
# Initialising device-mapper backend, UDEV is enabled.
# Detected dm-crypt version 1.14.1, dm-ioctl version 4.34.0.
# Timeout set to 0 miliseconds.
# Iteration time set to 2000 miliseconds.
# Interactive passphrase entry requested.
Enter passphrase:
Verify passphrase:
# Formatting device /dev/md0 as type LUKS1.
# Crypto backend (gcrypt 1.5.0) initialized.
# Topology: IO (524288/3145728), offset = 0; Required alignment is 3145728
# bytes. # Generating LUKS header version 1 using hash sha256, aes, xts-plain64, MK 32 # bytes ---------------------------
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Is this long runtime normal for initialization of a device of this size?
No. If the default iteration time (1 or 2 seconds) is not changes, format should be done in max 4-5 seconds.
Ok, then something is definitely still wrong here. I'm guessing the newish kernel is related?
Thanks,
Charles
Signature · 4 lines
------------------------------------------------------------------ Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ ------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: [dm-crypt] luksFormat still spinning/hanging with large array on kernel 4.6.2
Quoted 28 lines · Charles Cazabon
Quoted 2 lines
Can you please post output of running commant with added --debug switch?
Sure:
---------------------------
# cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0 # cryptsetup 1.4.3 processing "cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0" # Running command luksFormat. # Locking memory.WARNING!
========
This will overwrite data on/dev/md0irrevocably.Are you sure? (Type uppercase yes): YES
# Allocating crypt device/dev/md0context.
# Trying to open and read device/dev/md0.
# Initialising device-mapper backend, UDEV is enabled.
# Detected dm-crypt version 1.14.1, dm-ioctl version 4.34.0.
# Timeout set to 0 miliseconds.
# Iteration time set to 1000 miliseconds.
# Interactive passphrase entry requested.
Enter LUKS passphrase:
Verify passphrase:
# Formatting device/dev/md0as type LUKS1.
# Crypto backend (gcrypt 1.5.0) initialized.
# Topology: IO (524288/3145728), offset = 0; Required alignment is 3145728
Quoted 5 lines
# bytes. # Generating LUKS header version 1 using hash sha1, aes, cbc-essiv:sha256, MK # 32 bytes ^C ---------------------------
I've since moved the array over to another machine, also running Wheezy with the mainline 4.6.2 kernel. cryptsetup luksFormat behaves the same there, spinning forever and taking one full CPU.
So is this a known or new incompatibility between cryptsetup and the newer kernel? Or some other known issue?
Basically I'm wondering what I should be doing to get this working. It *used* to work, given that I have another identical array running on this particular machine, and I did the cryptsetup luksFormat on it some six months ago with no issues. The only changes between then and now are that the kernel and other system packages have been updated since.
Anyone have any advice for what to try here? I'm willing to help compile with debugging patches or whatever if that would help track down where the problem lies.
Thanks,
Charles
Quoted 61 lines
I aborted it after a couple of minutes this time.
I've compiled 1.7.2 from the source tarball, and it does the same thing, spinning on one CPU. One difference is that it doesn't seem to respond to a ctrl-C; it's still running after trying to abort it. I haven't tried to kill it with other signals yet. Here's the output from it:
---------------------------
# ~xxxxxxx/software/cryptsetup-1.7.2/src/.libs/cryptsetup --debug luksFormat/dev/md0# cryptsetup 1.7.2 processing # "/home/xxxxxxx/software/cryptsetup-1.7.2/src/.libs/cryptsetup --debug luksFormat /dev/md0" # Running command luksFormat. # Locking memory. # Installing SIGINT/SIGTERM handler. # Unblocking interruption on signal.WARNING!
========
This will overwrite data on/dev/md0irrevocably.Are you sure? (Type uppercase yes): YES
# Allocating crypt device/dev/md0context.
# Trying to open and read device/dev/md0.
# Initialising device-mapper backend, UDEV is enabled.
# Detected dm-crypt version 1.14.1, dm-ioctl version 4.34.0.
# Timeout set to 0 miliseconds.
# Iteration time set to 2000 miliseconds.
# Interactive passphrase entry requested.
Enter passphrase:
Verify passphrase:
# Formatting device/dev/md0as type LUKS1.
# Crypto backend (gcrypt 1.5.0) initialized.
# Topology: IO (524288/3145728), offset = 0; Required alignment is 3145728# bytes. # Generating LUKS header version 1 using hash sha256, aes, xts-plain64, MK 32 # bytes ---------------------------Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Is this long runtime normal for initialization of a device of this size?
No. If the default iteration time (1 or 2 seconds) is not changes, format should be done in max 4-5 seconds.
Ok, then something is definitely still wrong here. I'm guessing the newish kernel is related?
Thanks,
Charles
Signature · 8 lines
------------------------------------------------------------------ Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list [email protected] http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
Signature · 4 lines
------------------------------------------------------------------ Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ ------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: [dm-crypt] luksFormat still spinning/hanging with large array on kernel 4.6.2
Hi,
thanks for the info.
Quoted 6 lines · Charles Cazabon
I've since moved the array over to another machine, also running Wheezy with the mainline 4.6.2 kernel. cryptsetup luksFormat behaves the same there, spinning forever and taking one full CPU.
So is this a known or new incompatibility between cryptsetup and the newer kernel? Or some other known issue?
Not (yet). It is perhaps some recent incompatibility but we have to reproduce and track to proper component.
Quoted 9 lines
Basically I'm wondering what I should be doing to get this working. It *used* to work, given that I have another identical array running on this particular machine, and I did the cryptsetup luksFormat on it some six months ago with no issues. The only changes between then and now are that the kernel and other system packages have been updated since.
Anyone have any advice for what to try here? I'm willing to help compile with debugging patches or whatever if that would help track down where the problem lies.
That would be great. Please if you can compile cryptsetup from the branch "bench" with added print inside PBKDF2 benchmark (https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/tree/bench)
and run the command again with --debug switch and send me the output.
I need to verify that it is the same problem (if it is, then getrusage() call return all zeroed values).
Thanks,
Milan
Re: [dm-crypt] luksFormat still spinning/hanging with large array on kernel 4.6.2
Quoted 4 lines · Milan Broz
Quoted 3 lines · Charles Cazabon
I've since moved the array over to another machine, also running Wheezy with the mainline 4.6.2 kernel. cryptsetup luksFormat behaves the same there, spinning forever and taking one full CPU.
[...]
Quoted 2 lines
I need to verify that it is the same problem (if it is, then
getrusage()call return all zeroed values).
[...]
Quoted 4 lines
Just noticed this here - you are testing new cryptsetup binary but according to debug output it uses system old libcryptsetup library.
Please use src/cryptsetup not directly src/.libs/cryptsetup ...
And this, indeed, fixed the problem. luksFormat completed in normal time. Sorry, I wasn't sure which of the built cryptsetup files was the one to use (in fact, I had assumed without checking that they would be hardlinks to the same file).
Thanks muchly for the help. So whatever bug I hit is indeed the one you've already fixed in newer versions.
Charles
Signature · 4 lines
------------------------------------------------------------------ Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> Software, consulting, and services available at http://pyropus.ca/ ------------------------------------------------------------------