Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

PATCH New Vladimir Murzin 4 participants 7 messages Jul 22, 2016 – Aug 15, 2016

Subsystems (3)
Arm (32-bit) Arm sub-architectures Arm i.MX and Layerscape
lore
Share & tools
lore

Vladimir Murzin

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

SMP_ON_UP is already defaulted to "y" and has all dependencies expressed
- no need to select it per platform level

Signed-off-by Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>

---

This time sent to LAKML

 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig      |    3 ---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig |    1 -
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig +0 -3
index dd905b9..cfb1120 100644
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ config SOC_IMX31
 	select CPU_V6
 	select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_MXC_RNGA
 	select MXC_AVIC
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 config SOC_IMX35
 	bool

@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ config SOC_IMX35
 	select HAVE_EPIT
 	select MXC_AVIC
 	select PINCTRL_IMX35
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 if ARCH_MULTI_V4T
 

@@ -589,7 +587,6 @@ config SOC_VF610
 	select ARM_GIC if ARCH_MULTI_V7
 	select PINCTRL_VF610
 	select PL310_ERRATA_769419 if CACHE_L2X0
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 	help
 	  This enables support for Freescale Vybrid VF610 processor.
arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig +0 -1
index 70ab4a2..739800e 100644
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ config REALVIEW_DT
 	select POWER_RESET
 	select POWER_RESET_VERSATILE
 	select POWER_SUPPLY
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 	select SOC_REALVIEW
 	select USE_OF
 	help
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

Quoted 10 lines · Vladimir Murzin

SMP_ON_UP is already defaulted to "y" and has all dependencies expressed
- no need to select it per platform level

Signed-off-by Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>

---

This time sent to LAKML

 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig      |    3 ---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig |    1 -

I cannot take mach-realview changes. I think you need to ether split the changes, or ask arm-soc folks to apply. In case of the latter, here is my ACK:

Acked-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Quoted 50 lines
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig +0 -3
index dd905b9..cfb1120 100644
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ config SOC_IMX31
 	select CPU_V6
 	select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_MXC_RNGA
 	select MXC_AVIC
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 config SOC_IMX35
 	bool

@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ config SOC_IMX35
 	select HAVE_EPIT
 	select MXC_AVIC
 	select PINCTRL_IMX35
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 if ARCH_MULTI_V4T
 

@@ -589,7 +587,6 @@ config SOC_VF610
 	select ARM_GIC if ARCH_MULTI_V7
 	select PINCTRL_VF610
 	select PL310_ERRATA_769419 if CACHE_L2X0
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 	help
 	  This enables support for Freescale Vybrid VF610 processor.
arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig +0 -1
index 70ab4a2..739800e 100644
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ config REALVIEW_DT
 	select POWER_RESET
 	select POWER_RESET_VERSATILE
 	select POWER_SUPPLY
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 	select SOC_REALVIEW
 	select USE_OF
 	help
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.9.5


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

Quoted 9 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 8 lines · Vladimir Murzin

SMP_ON_UP is already defaulted to "y" and has all dependencies expressed
- no need to select it per platform level

Signed-off-by Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>

---

This time sent to LAKML

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig      |    3 ---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig |    1 -

I cannot take mach-realview changes. I think you need to ether split the changes, or ask arm-soc folks to apply. In case of the latter, here is my ACK:

Acked-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>

Thanks!

RealView is not mentioned under MAINTAINERS, so it'd be easier if arm-soc team pick this patch.

Arnd, what is your preference?

Cheers
Vladimir

Quoted 53 lines
Quoted 51 lines
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig +0 -3
index dd905b9..cfb1120 100644
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ config SOC_IMX31
 	select CPU_V6
 	select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_MXC_RNGA
 	select MXC_AVIC
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 config SOC_IMX35
 	bool

@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ config SOC_IMX35
 	select HAVE_EPIT
 	select MXC_AVIC
 	select PINCTRL_IMX35
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 if ARCH_MULTI_V4T
 

@@ -589,7 +587,6 @@ config SOC_VF610
 	select ARM_GIC if ARCH_MULTI_V7
 	select PINCTRL_VF610
 	select PL310_ERRATA_769419 if CACHE_L2X0
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 
 	help
 	  This enables support for Freescale Vybrid VF610 processor.
arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig +0 -1
index 70ab4a2..739800e 100644
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ config REALVIEW_DT
 	select POWER_RESET
 	select POWER_RESET_VERSATILE
 	select POWER_SUPPLY
-	select SMP_ON_UP if SMP
 	select SOC_REALVIEW
 	select USE_OF
 	help
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.9.5


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

Quoted 17 lines · CEST Vladimir Murzin
Quoted 16 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 10 lines · Vladimir Murzin

SMP_ON_UP is already defaulted to "y" and has all dependencies expressed
- no need to select it per platform level

Signed-off-by Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>

---

This time sent to LAKML

 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig      |    3 ---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig |    1 -

I cannot take mach-realview changes. I think you need to ether split the changes, or ask arm-soc folks to apply. In case of the latter, here is my ACK:

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Acked-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>

Thanks!

RealView is not mentioned under MAINTAINERS, so it'd be easier if arm-soc team pick this patch.

Arnd, what is your preference?

Linus Walleij is the person that has sent most patches for realview, so I'll let him decide. We can pick it up directly, or he can aggregate it with other patches that he might have.

Arnd

#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

Quoted 22 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 21 lines · CEST Vladimir Murzin
Quoted 9 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 8 lines · Vladimir Murzin

SMP_ON_UP is already defaulted to "y" and has all dependencies expressed
- no need to select it per platform level

Signed-off-by Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>

---

This time sent to LAKML

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig      |    3 ---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig |    1 -

I cannot take mach-realview changes. I think you need to ether split the changes, or ask arm-soc folks to apply. In case of the latter, here is my ACK:

Acked-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>

Thanks!

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

RealView is not mentioned under MAINTAINERS, so it'd be easier if arm-soc team pick this patch.

Arnd, what is your preference?

Linus Walleij is the person that has sent most patches for realview, so I'll let him decide. We can pick it up directly, or he can aggregate it with other patches that he might have.

I have queued this with a bunch of other RealView clean-ups and board file removal patches and will send a pull request for it shortly.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

author
#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

Quoted 26 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 25 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 24 lines · CEST Vladimir Murzin
Quoted 9 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 8 lines · Vladimir Murzin

SMP_ON_UP is already defaulted to "y" and has all dependencies expressed
- no need to select it per platform level

Signed-off-by Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>

---

This time sent to LAKML

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig      |    3 ---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig |    1 -

I cannot take mach-realview changes. I think you need to ether split the changes, or ask arm-soc folks to apply. In case of the latter, here is my ACK:

Acked-by Shawn Guo <[email protected]>

Thanks!

RealView is not mentioned under MAINTAINERS, so it'd be easier if arm-soc team pick this patch.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Arnd, what is your preference?

Linus Walleij is the person that has sent most patches for realview, so I'll let him decide. We can pick it up directly, or he can aggregate it with other patches that he might have.

I have queued this with a bunch of other RealView clean-ups and board file removal patches and will send a pull request for it shortly.

Thanks!

Shawn, since Linus picked up realview part only do you want me resubmit remaining imx part?

Cheers
Vladimir

Quoted 5 lines

Yours,
Linus Walleij

#6 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: no need to select SMP_ON_UP explicitly

Quoted 2 lines · Vladimir Murzin

Shawn, since Linus picked up realview part only do you want me resubmit remaining imx part?

I just applied the IMX part, thanks.