Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 6 messages Sep 9, 2016 – Sep 11, 2016 5 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 301709c17bc50faa7f2c77797e454f3286d8ba39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in
mraid_mm_ioctl

[ Upstream commit 7296f62f0322d808362b21064deb34f20799c20d ]

This adds the needed check after the call to the function mraid_mm_alloc_kioc in order to make sure that this function has not returned NULL and therefore makes sure we do not deference a NULL pointer if one is returned by mraid_mm_alloc_kioc. Further more add needed comments explaining that this function call can return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer passed in order to allow furture users to understand this required pointer check.

---
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +4 -0
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsig
 
 	/*
 	 * The following call will block till a kioc is available
+	 * or return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer
+	 * of type mraid_mmapt passed to mraid_mm_alloc_kioc
 	 */
 	kioc = mraid_mm_alloc_kioc(adp);
+	if (!kioc)
+		return -ENXIO;
 
 	/*
 	 * User sent the old mimd_t ioctl packet. Convert it to uioc_t.

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 63 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 60 lines · On September 9, 2016 9:38:13 AM EDT, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From 301709c17bc50faa7f2c77797e454f3286d8ba39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in
mraid_mm_ioctl

[ Upstream commit 7296f62f0322d808362b21064deb34f20799c20d ]

This adds the needed check after the call to the function mraid_mm_alloc_kioc in order to make sure that this function has not returned NULL and therefore makes sure we do not deference a NULL pointer if one is returned by mraid_mm_alloc_kioc. Further more add needed comments explaining that this function call can return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer passed in order to allow furture users to understand this required pointer check.

---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c | 4 ++++

1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +4 -0
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsig
 
 	/*
 	 * The following call will block till a kioc is available
+	 * or return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer
+	 * of type mraid_mmapt passed to mraid_mm_alloc_kioc
 	 */
 	kioc = mraid_mm_alloc_kioc(adp);
+	if (!kioc)
+		return -ENXIO;
 
 	/*
 	 * User sent the old mimd_t ioctl packet. Convert it to uioc_t.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch

I do not wish any of my work to
touch the stable kernel tree.

Hahaha, sure, gladly deleted, too funny...

greg k-h

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

author maintainer
#4 lore raw
Quoted 81 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 78 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 3 lines · Nicholas Krause

On September 9, 2016 9:38:13 AM EDT, [email protected]

Quoted 19 lines · wrote:
Quoted 6 lines

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 11 lines

The filename of the patch is:
0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From 301709c17bc50faa7f2c77797e454f3286d8ba39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

2001

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

From: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer

deference

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines

in
mraid_mm_ioctl

[ Upstream commit 7296f62f0322d808362b21064deb34f20799c20d ]

This adds the needed check after the call to the function mraid_mm_alloc_kioc in order to make sure that this function has not returned NULL and therefore makes sure we do not deference a NULL pointer if one is returned by mraid_mm_alloc_kioc. Further more add needed comments explaining that this function call can return NULL

if

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

the list head is empty for the pointer passed in order to allow

furture

Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 28 lines

users to understand this required pointer check.

---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c | 4 ++++

1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +4 -0
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsig
 
 	/*
 	 * The following call will block till a kioc is available
+	 * or return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer
+	 * of type mraid_mmapt passed to mraid_mm_alloc_kioc
 	 */
 	kioc = mraid_mm_alloc_kioc(adp);
+	if (!kioc)
+		return -ENXIO;
 
 	/*
 	 * User sent the old mimd_t ioctl packet. Convert it to uioc_t.
Quoted 3 lines

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch I do not wish any of my work to
touch the stable kernel tree.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Hahaha, sure, gladly deleted, too funny...

greg k-h

On top of that please revert the regression fix. That is also my work and therefore shouldn't be touching the stable tree either.

What exactly are you referring to?

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

author maintainer
#6 lore raw
Quoted 87 lines · nick
Quoted 84 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 83 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 80 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 3 lines · Nicholas Krause

On September 9, 2016 9:38:13 AM EDT, [email protected]

Quoted 19 lines · wrote:
Quoted 6 lines

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer deference in

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 11 lines

The filename of the patch is:
0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From 301709c17bc50faa7f2c77797e454f3286d8ba39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

2001

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

From: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer

deference

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines

in
mraid_mm_ioctl

[ Upstream commit 7296f62f0322d808362b21064deb34f20799c20d ]

This adds the needed check after the call to the function mraid_mm_alloc_kioc in order to make sure that this function has not returned NULL and therefore makes sure we do not deference a NULL pointer if one is returned by mraid_mm_alloc_kioc. Further more add needed comments explaining that this function call can return NULL

if

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

the list head is empty for the pointer passed in order to allow

furture

Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 28 lines

users to understand this required pointer check.

---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c | 4 ++++

1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +4 -0
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsig
 
 	/*
 	 * The following call will block till a kioc is available
+	 * or return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer
+	 * of type mraid_mmapt passed to mraid_mm_alloc_kioc
 	 */
 	kioc = mraid_mm_alloc_kioc(adp);
+	if (!kioc)
+		return -ENXIO;
 
 	/*
 	 * User sent the old mimd_t ioctl packet. Convert it to uioc_t.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch I do not wish any of my work to
touch the stable kernel tree.

Hahaha, sure, gladly deleted, too funny...

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

greg k-h

On top of that please revert the regression fix. That is also my work and therefore shouldn't be touching the stable tree either.

What exactly are you referring to?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=fbedcaf43fba35677c01a4ae51e6f79edf4049ba
This commit I want removed from stable as I refuse to have any of my work in the stable tree for now.

Please learn a bit more about git, and how this specific commit isn't in a "stable tree" before saying stuff like this, there is nothing to do, unless you want us to revert your changes entirely (and even then, you can't rewrite history...)

sorry,

greg k-h

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

author maintainer
#8 lore raw
Quoted 121 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 118 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 7 lines · nick
Quoted 4 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 3 lines · Nicholas Krause

On September 10, 2016 4:15:05 AM EDT, Greg KH

Quoted 7 lines · <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 3 lines

On September 9, 2016 9:38:13 AM EDT, [email protected]

Quoted 2 lines · wrote:
Quoted 2 lines

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch

titled

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer

deference in

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

The filename of the patch is:

0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the

stable

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From 301709c17bc50faa7f2c77797e454f3286d8ba39 Mon Sep 17

00:00:00

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines

2001

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

From: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

deference

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines

in
mraid_mm_ioctl

[ Upstream commit 7296f62f0322d808362b21064deb34f20799c20d ]

This adds the needed check after the call to the function mraid_mm_alloc_kioc in order to make sure that this function

has not

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

returned NULL and therefore makes sure we do not deference a

NULL

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

pointer if one is returned by mraid_mm_alloc_kioc. Further

more add

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

needed comments explaining that this function call can return

NULL

Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines

if

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

the list head is empty for the pointer passed in order to allow

furture

Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 24 lines

users to understand this required pointer check.

---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c | 4 ++++

1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +4 -0
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsig
 
 	/*
 	 * The following call will block till a kioc is available
+	 * or return NULL if the list head is empty for the pointer
+	 * of type mraid_mmapt passed to mraid_mm_alloc_kioc
 	 */
 	kioc = mraid_mm_alloc_kioc(adp);
+	if (!kioc)
+		return -ENXIO;
 
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsig · line 190

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +0 -0
 	/*
 	 * User sent the old mimd_t ioctl packet. Convert it to

uioc_t.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I do not wish any of my work to
touch the stable kernel tree.

Hahaha, sure, gladly deleted, too funny...

greg k-h

On top of that please revert the regression fix. That is also my work and therefore shouldn't be touching the stable tree either.

What exactly are you referring to?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=fbedcaf43fba35677c01a4ae51e6f79edf4049ba

Quoted 1 line

This commit I want removed from stable as I refuse to have any of my

work in the stable tree for now.

Please learn a bit more about git, and how this specific commit isn't in
a "stable tree" before saying stuff like this, there is nothing to do, unless you want us to revert your changes entirely (and even then, you can't rewrite history...)

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines

sorry,

greg k-h

Then revert it from all git trees then.

Please define "all git trees".

And once you send in a patch, you sometimes don't have a say in where it ends up, sorry, that's just how open source development works :)

best of luck!

greg k-h

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

author maintainer
#10 lore raw
Quoted 155 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 152 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 3 lines · Nicholas Krause

On September 10, 2016 11:49:03 AM EDT, Greg KH

Quoted 10 lines · <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 10 lines · nick
Quoted 7 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 4 lines · Nicholas Krause
Quoted 3 lines

On September 10, 2016 4:15:05 AM EDT, Greg KH

Quoted 1 line · <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:08:36PM -0400, Nicholas Krause

Quoted 3 lines · wrote:
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

On September 9, 2016 9:38:13 AM EDT,

[email protected]

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines · wrote:
Quoted 2 lines

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the

patch

Quoted 42 lines
Quoted 8 lines

titled

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

[PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer

deference in

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

The filename of the patch is:

0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the

stable

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From 301709c17bc50faa7f2c77797e454f3286d8ba39 Mon Sep 17

00:00:00

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines

2001

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

From: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 062/135] megaraid: Fix possible NULL pointer

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

deference

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines

in
mraid_mm_ioctl

[ Upstream commit 7296f62f0322d808362b21064deb34f20799c20d ]

This adds the needed check after the call to the function mraid_mm_alloc_kioc in order to make sure that this function

has not

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

returned NULL and therefore makes sure we do not deference a

NULL

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

pointer if one is returned by mraid_mm_alloc_kioc. Further

more add

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

needed comments explaining that this function call can

return

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

NULL

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

if

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

the list head is empty for the pointer passed in order to

allow

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines

furture

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

users to understand this required pointer check.

Signed-off-by Martin K. Petersen

<[email protected]>

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman

<[email protected]>

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines

drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep,

Quoted 7 lines

---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c | 4 ++++

1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +0 -0
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep,

unsig

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines

drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, · line 181

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +1 -0
 	/*
 	 * The following call will block till a kioc is available
+	 * or return NULL if the list head is empty for the

pointer

Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c mraid_mm_ioctl(struct file *filep, · line 189

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c +3 -0
+	 * of type mraid_mmapt passed to mraid_mm_alloc_kioc
 	 */
 	kioc = mraid_mm_alloc_kioc(adp);
+	if (!kioc)
+		return -ENXIO;
 
 	/*
 	 * User sent the old mimd_t ioctl packet. Convert it to

uioc_t.

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0062-megaraid-Fix-possible-NULL-pointer-deference-in-mrai.patch

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I do not wish any of my work to
touch the stable kernel tree.

Hahaha, sure, gladly deleted, too funny...

greg k-h

On top of that please revert the regression fix. That is also

my

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

work and therefore shouldn't be touching the stable tree

either.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines

What exactly are you referring to?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=fbedcaf43fba35677c01a4ae51e6f79edf4049ba

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

This commit I want removed from stable as I refuse to have any of

my

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

work in the stable tree for now.

Please learn a bit more about git, and how this specific commit

isn't

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

in
a "stable tree" before saying stuff like this, there is nothing to

do,

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

unless you want us to revert your changes entirely (and even then,

you

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines

can't rewrite history...)

sorry,

greg k-h

Then revert it from all git trees then.

Please define "all git trees".

And once you send in a patch, you sometimes don't have a say in where it
ends up, sorry, that's just how open source development works :)

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

best of luck!

greg k-h

From now I don't want any of patches being used as I refuse for my work to be used by such a toxic community toward me. Nick

One of the properties of the GPL is that once you have released your code, or patch, under that license, you can't dictate the rules of "use", sorry.

Again, I have already dropped this patch from the stable queue so I don't understand what more we can do here.

Best of luck in the future,

greg k-h