Skip to contentSkip to conversation

LTP Release

LTP Cyril Hrubis 4 participants 7 messages Sep 14, 2016 – Sep 19, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi!
I'm more or less finished with pre-release testing. What is the status for the rest of you?

I guess that we slould fix the lsmod test failing on NFS before the release.

Anything else? Can we proceed with the release later this week?

Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]
#1 lore raw

----- Original Message -----

Quoted 8 lines

From: "Cyril Hrubis" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September, 2016 1:29:47 PM
Subject: [LTP] LTP Release

Hi!
I'm more or less finished with pre-release testing. What is the status for the rest of you?

Results from RHEL6.2/6.7, RHEL7.0/7.1/7.3 across all arches look good here.

Quoted 5 lines

I guess that we slould fix the lsmod test failing on NFS before the release.

Anything else?

There was a report about readahead02 using wrong path for "read_ahead_kb", when running on raw partitions. Patch seems simple, I just need to test it, I'll try to do that today.

Regards,
Jan

Quoted 9 lines

Can we proceed with the release later this week?

--
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]

--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

#2 lore raw

Hi!

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

I guess that we slould fix the lsmod test failing on NFS before the release.

Anything else?

There was a report about readahead02 using wrong path for "read_ahead_kb", when running on raw partitions. Patch seems simple, I just need to test it, I'll try to do that today.

Ah that one. I should fix it for Btrfs as well as Btrfs uses anonymous block devices and the sysfs is not populated for these. We have to get link to the device from /sys/fs/btrfs/<fsid>/devices.

Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]
#3 lore raw
In reply to Cyril Hrubis

Hi,

Quoted 8 lines · Cyril Hrubis

Hi!
I'm more or less finished with pre-release testing. What is the status for the rest of you?

I guess that we slould fix the lsmod test failing on NFS before the release.

Anything else? Can we proceed with the release later this week?

Network tests looks good, I have sent patches with new/rewritten tests that could be part of release.
All are well tested on OL6 and OL7 except NFS multi-mount test:

* busy_poll: new busy_poll03 test over UDP + added support for UDP in tcp_fastopen (I guess we should rename it later to a more generic name):
patch-set "network/tcp_fastopen: use UDP optionally"

* arp: rewritten arp01 test + added support for IPv6 ndisc:
patch-set "network/tcp_cmds/arp01: use test_net.sh and add test-cases
with 'ip neigh'";

* ping: new ping02 test instead of removed perf_lan:
patch-set: "network/ping01: rename file and update runtest files";

* nfs: added support for multiple mounts in nfs_lib.sh, rewritten nfs06 test:
patch-set "network/nfs_lib: add support for multiple mounts"

Thanks,
Alexey

#4 lore raw

Hi!

Quoted 12 lines

Network tests looks good, I have sent patches with new/rewritten tests that could be part of release.
All are well tested on OL6 and OL7 except NFS multi-mount test:

* busy_poll: new busy_poll03 test over UDP + added support for UDP in tcp_fastopen (I guess we should rename it later to a more generic name):
patch-set "network/tcp_fastopen: use UDP optionally"

* arp: rewritten arp01 test + added support for IPv6 ndisc:
patch-set "network/tcp_cmds/arp01: use test_net.sh and add test-cases
with 'ip neigh'";

Quoted 6 lines

* ping: new ping02 test instead of removed perf_lan:

   patch-set: "network/ping01: rename file and update runtest files";

* nfs: added support for multiple mounts in nfs_lib.sh, rewritten nfs06 test:
patch-set "network/nfs_lib: add support for multiple mounts"

I've commented some minor issue for the ping tests, the rest looks good to me.

Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]
#5 lore raw

Cyril,

Quoted 13 lines · Cyril Hrubis

Hi!

Quoted 12 lines

Network tests looks good, I have sent patches with new/rewritten tests that could be part of release.
All are well tested on OL6 and OL7 except NFS multi-mount test:

* busy_poll: new busy_poll03 test over UDP + added support for UDP in tcp_fastopen (I guess we should rename it later to a more generic name):
patch-set "network/tcp_fastopen: use UDP optionally"

* arp: rewritten arp01 test + added support for IPv6 ndisc:
patch-set "network/tcp_cmds/arp01: use test_net.sh and add test-cases
with 'ip neigh'";

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines

* ping: new ping02 test instead of removed perf_lan:

    patch-set: "network/ping01: rename file and update runtest files";

* nfs: added support for multiple mounts in nfs_lib.sh, rewritten nfs06 test:
patch-set "network/nfs_lib: add support for multiple mounts"

I've commented some minor issue for the ping tests, the rest looks good to me.

Thank you for reviewing these patch-sets! I've corrected ping and nfs06 tests.

Patches applied.

Best regards,
Alexey

#6 lore raw
In reply to Cyril Hrubis
Quoted 3 lines · Cyril Hrubis

Hi!
I'm more or less finished with pre-release testing. What is the status for the rest of you?

Tried the latest master in my sparc setup. Didn't observe any unexpected failures/issues. Though I use a relatively old kernel, so many test cases finish with TCONF.

Quoted 3 lines

I guess that we slould fix the lsmod test failing on NFS before the release.

I will not be able to proceed with lsmod + NFSv4, since I'll be on vacation next week. If nobody objects, I'd not treat this as a blocker, and fix it sometimes after the release.

Quoted 3 lines

Anything else? Can we proceed with the release later this week?