qt5base: fix misspelling of "directfb"

package/qt5/qt5base/Config.in config BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_DIRECTFB · line 184

Quoted 3 lines · Matt Kraai

package/qt5/qt5base/Config.in +1 -1

-comment "directfb backend if directb is enabled"
+comment "directfb backend if directfb is enabled"
 	depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_DIRECTFB

Thanks, but this sentence in fact doesn't make a lot of sense. It should be something like:

directfb backend needs directfb to be enabled

Or perhaps no comment at all because it's completely obvious that to use DirectFB functionality, you need DirectFB.

If the comment is removed, then there is no indication that a directfb backend is available if directfb is disabled. That's inconsistent with the handling of the other backends, which have the following comments if they're not available:

* X.org XCB backend available if X.org is enabled
* eglfs backend available if OpenGL and EGL are enabled

Should I still remove the comment? Or make the message consistent with the other backends (i.e., "directfb backend available if directfb is enabled")?