makedevs: resync device creation with upstream busybox
PATCH 1/2 makedevs: resync device creation with upstream busybox
In upstream busbyox, the code to create devices has been simplified:
the code for a single and for multiple devices is no longer duplicated.
Since we are going to change the device creation code next, it's convenient to have only one copy to modify.
There are two behavioural changes with this, but they were introduced silently together with other commits in upstream busybox.
- When mknod() fails, the chmod was still done. This is pointless so it is no longer done now.
- There was a check for mode != -1; however, a mode of -1 would not have worked anyway because all bits would be set for mknod(), which would fail. So this check is redundant.
--- package/makedevs/makedevs.c | 47 +++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
package/makedevs/makedevs.c +15 -32
@@ -599,6 +599,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) }else {dev_t rdev; +unsigned i; +char *full_name_inc;if (type =='p' ) { mode |=S_IFIFO ;
@@ -614,43 +616,24 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) goto loop; } -if (count >0 ) { -int i; -char *full_name_inc; - - full_name_inc =xmalloc (strlen (full_name) +8 ); -for (i =0 ; i < count; i++) { -sprintf (full_name_inc,"%s%d" , full_name, start + i); - rdev =makedev (major, minor + i * increment); -if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: Couldnt create node %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); - ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -else if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chown failed for %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); - ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -if ((mode !=-1 ) && (chmod (full_name_inc, mode) <0 )){ -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chmod failed for %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); - ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } - } -free (full_name_inc); - }else { - rdev =makedev (major, minor); -if (mknod (full_name, mode, rdev) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: Couldnt create node %s" , linenum, full_name); + full_name_inc =xmalloc (strlen (full_name) +sizeof (int )*3 +2 ); +if (count) + count--; +for (i = start; i <= start + count; i++) { +sprintf (full_name_inc, count ?"%s%u" :"%s" , full_name, i); + rdev =makedev (major, minor + (i - start) * increment); +if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) <0 ) { +bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't create node %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -else if (chown (full_name, uid, gid) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chown failed for %s" , linenum, full_name); + }else if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) <0 ) { +bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't chown %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -if ((mode !=-1 ) && (chmod (full_name, mode) <0 )){ -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chmod failed for %s" , linenum, full_name); + }else if (chmod (full_name_inc, mode) <0 ) { +bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't chmod %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; } } +free (full_name_inc); } loop:free (line);
Signature · 1 line
2.9.3
PATCH 2/2 makedevs: make device node creation idempotent
We use makedevs to create device nodes in the target rootfs. However, this can be called several times, e.g. when building several filesystem images or when rebuilding. When makedevs is called the second time, the device node already exists so mknod() errors out.
This wasn't noticed before because fakeroot's mknod() wrapper (incorrectly) does _not_ error out when the file exists already. Now we switched from fakeroot to pseudo, the problem becomes apparent.
Before creating the device node, check if it already exists and if so, if it has the correct device type and number. Change of mode and ownership is still done.
This approach was preferred over removing the target files before creating them, which would be simpler. However, when e.g. a file exists as a normal file and makedevs specifies it as a device node, that really is an error so we should detect it.
The other types don't have to be changed. The 'd' (directory) type is already OK because it already only creates directories if they don't exist yet. The 'f' (file mode) and 'r' (recursive) types only operate on files and directories that exist already.
Patch also sent upstream to busybox.
---
v2: check if pre-existing file is of correct type instead of simply
unlinking (Yann).
--- package/makedevs/makedevs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/makedevs/makedevs.c +16 -2
@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)dev_t rdev;unsigned i;char *full_name_inc; +struct stat st;if (type =='p' ) { mode |=S_IFIFO ;
@@ -622,10 +623,23 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)for (i = start; i <= start + count; i++) {sprintf (full_name_inc, count ?"%s%u" :"%s" , full_name, i); rdev =makedev (major, minor + (i - start) * increment); -if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) <0 ) { +if (stat (full_name_inc, &st) ==0 ) { +if ((mode &S_IFMT ) != (st.st_mode &S_IFMT )) { +bb_error_msg ("line %d: node %s exists but is of wrong file type" , linenum, full_name_inc); + ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; +continue ; + } +if (st.st_rdev != rdev) { +bb_error_msg ("line %d: node %s exists but is wrong device number" , linenum, full_name_inc); + ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; +continue ; + } + }else if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) <0 ) {bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't create node %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - }else if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) <0 ) { +continue ; + } +if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) <0 ) {bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't chown %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; }else if (chmod (full_name_inc, mode) <0 ) {
Signature · 1 line
2.9.3
PATCH 2/2 makedevs: make device node creation idempotent
Hi Arnout,
Quoted 23 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
We use makedevs to create device nodes in the target rootfs. However, this can be called several times, e.g. when building several filesystem images or when rebuilding. When makedevs is called the second time, the device node already exists so
mknod()errors out.This wasn't noticed before because fakeroot's
mknod()wrapper (incorrectly) does _not_ error out when the file exists already. Now we switched from fakeroot to pseudo, the problem becomes apparent.Before creating the device node, check if it already exists and if so, if it has the correct device type and number. Change of mode and ownership is still done.
This approach was preferred over removing the target files before creating them, which would be simpler. However, when e.g. a file exists as a normal file and makedevs specifies it as a device node, that really is an error so we should detect it.
The other types don't have to be changed. The 'd' (directory) type is already OK because it already only creates directories if they don't exist yet. The 'f' (file mode) and 'r' (recursive) types only operate on files and directories that exist already.
Quoted 4 lines
Patch also sent upstream to busybox.
Reported-by Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
This fixes the build error I was seeing, thanks:
PATCH 2/2 makedevs: make device node creation idempotent
In reply to Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)Arnout, All,
On 2016-11-05 14:38 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) spake thusly:
Quoted 23 lines
We use makedevs to create device nodes in the target rootfs. However, this can be called several times, e.g. when building several filesystem images or when rebuilding. When makedevs is called the second time, the device node already exists so
mknod()errors out.This wasn't noticed before because fakeroot's
mknod()wrapper (incorrectly) does _not_ error out when the file exists already. Now we switched from fakeroot to pseudo, the problem becomes apparent.Before creating the device node, check if it already exists and if so, if it has the correct device type and number. Change of mode and ownership is still done.
This approach was preferred over removing the target files before creating them, which would be simpler. However, when e.g. a file exists as a normal file and makedevs specifies it as a device node, that really is an error so we should detect it.
The other types don't have to be changed. The 'd' (directory) type is already OK because it already only creates directories if they don't exist yet. The 'f' (file mode) and 'r' (recursive) types only operate on files and directories that exist already.
Quoted 4 lines
Patch also sent upstream to busybox.
Reported-by Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Thank you! :-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 52 lines
---
v2: check if pre-existing file is of correct type instead of simply
unlinking (Yann).--- package/makedevs/makedevs.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)package/makedevs/makedevs.c +16
-2@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)dev_t rdev;unsigned i;char *full_name_inc; +struct stat st;if (type =='p' ) { mode |=S_IFIFO ;@@ -622,10 +623,23 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)for (i = start; i <= start + count; i++) {sprintf (full_name_inc, count ?"%s%u" :"%s" , full_name, i); rdev =makedev (major, minor + (i - start) * increment); -if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) <0 ) { +if (stat (full_name_inc, &st) ==0 ) { +if ((mode &S_IFMT ) != (st.st_mode &S_IFMT )) { +bb_error_msg ("line %d: node %s exists but is of wrong file type" , linenum, full_name_inc); + ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; +continue ; + } +if (st.st_rdev != rdev) { +bb_error_msg ("line %d: node %s exists but is wrong device number" , linenum, full_name_inc); + ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; +continue ; + } + }else if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) <0 ) {bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't create node %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - }else if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) <0 ) { +continue ; + } +if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) <0 ) {bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't chown %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; }else if (chmod (full_name_inc, mode) <0 ) {Signature · 6 lines
2.9.3 _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/2 makedevs: resync device creation with upstream busybox
In reply to Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)Quoted 9 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
In upstream busbyox, the code to create devices has been simplified:
the code for a single and for multiple devices is no longer duplicated.Since we are going to change the device creation code next, it's convenient to have only one copy to modify.
There are two behavioural changes with this, but they were introduced silently together with other commits in upstream busybox.
Quoted 8 lines
- When
mknod()fails, the chmod was still done. This is pointless so it is no longer done now.- There was a check for mode != -1; however, a mode of -1 would not have worked anyway because all bits would be set for
mknod(), which would fail. So this check is redundant.
PATCH 1/2 makedevs: resync device creation with upstream busybox
In reply to Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)Arnout, All,
On 2016-11-05 14:38 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) spake thusly:
Quoted 9 lines
In upstream busbyox, the code to create devices has been simplified:
the code for a single and for multiple devices is no longer duplicated.Since we are going to change the device creation code next, it's convenient to have only one copy to modify.
There are two behavioural changes with this, but they were introduced silently together with other commits in upstream busybox.
Quoted 8 lines
- When
mknod()fails, the chmod was still done. This is pointless so it is no longer done now.- There was a check for mode != -1; however, a mode of -1 would not have worked anyway because all bits would be set for
mknod(), which would fail. So this check is redundant.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 81 lines
--- package/makedevs/makedevs.c | 47 +++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)package/makedevs/makedevs.c +15
-32@@ -599,6 +599,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) }else {dev_t rdev; +unsigned i; +char *full_name_inc;if (type =='p' ) { mode |=S_IFIFO ;@@ -614,43 +616,24 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) goto loop; } -if (count >0 ) { -int i; -char *full_name_inc; - - full_name_inc =xmalloc (strlen (full_name) +8 ); -for (i =0 ; i < count; i++) { -sprintf (full_name_inc,"%s%d" , full_name, start + i); - rdev =makedev (major, minor + i * increment); -if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: Couldnt create node %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); - ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -else if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chown failed for %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); - ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -if ((mode !=-1 ) && (chmod (full_name_inc, mode) <0 )){ -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chmod failed for %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); - ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } - } -free (full_name_inc); - }else { - rdev =makedev (major, minor); -if (mknod (full_name, mode, rdev) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: Couldnt create node %s" , linenum, full_name); + full_name_inc =xmalloc (strlen (full_name) +sizeof (int )*3 +2 ); +if (count) + count--; +for (i = start; i <= start + count; i++) { +sprintf (full_name_inc, count ?"%s%u" :"%s" , full_name, i); + rdev =makedev (major, minor + (i - start) * increment); +if (mknod (full_name_inc, mode, rdev) <0 ) { +bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't create node %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -else if (chown (full_name, uid, gid) ==-1 ) { -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chown failed for %s" , linenum, full_name); + }else if (chown (full_name_inc, uid, gid) <0 ) { +bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't chown %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; - } -if ((mode !=-1 ) && (chmod (full_name, mode) <0 )){ -bb_perror_msg ("line %d: chmod failed for %s" , linenum, full_name); + }else if (chmod (full_name_inc, mode) <0 ) { +bb_perror_msg ("line %d: can't chmod %s" , linenum, full_name_inc); ret =EXIT_FAILURE ; } } +free (full_name_inc); } loop:free (line);Signature · 6 lines
2.9.3 _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/2 makedevs: resync device creation with upstream busybox
In reply to Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)Hello,
Quoted 12 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
In upstream busbyox, the code to create devices has been simplified:
the code for a single and for multiple devices is no longer duplicated.Since we are going to change the device creation code next, it's convenient to have only one copy to modify.
There are two behavioural changes with this, but they were introduced silently together with other commits in upstream busybox.
- When
mknod()fails, the chmod was still done. This is pointless so it is no longer done now.
Quoted 8 lines
- There was a check for mode != -1; however, a mode of -1 would not have worked anyway because all bits would be set for
mknod(), which would fail. So this check is redundant.--- package/makedevs/makedevs.c | 47 +++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Both applied to master, thanks a lot!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com