Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Typos, no semantics changed

PATCH In review Sanjeev 2 participants 2 messages Nov 6, 2016 – Nov 13, 2016 1 message not in the archive Documentation

lore
Share & tools
lore

Sanjeev

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Typos, no semantics changed

Signed-off-by Sanjeev Gupta <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/development-process/1.Intro.rst         | 4 ++--
 Documentation/development-process/6.Followthrough.rst | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Documentation/development-process/1.Intro.rst +2 -2
index 22642b3..e782ae2 100644
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-Introdution
-===========
+Introduction
+============
 
 Executive summary
 -----------------
Documentation/development-process/6.Followthrough.rst +2 -2
index a173cd5..ef8b73b 100644
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 .. _development_followthrough:
 
-Followthrough
-=============
+Follow through
+==============
 
 At this point, you have followed the guidelines given so far and, with the
 addition of your own engineering skills, have posted a perfect series of
Signature · 1 line
2.9.3

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): CAHZk5Wcv_a6zcpcsD9K8M4cjKHE_GRL3rO7BA1nALGu6FHMZkg@mail.gmail.com

maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:08:30 +0800 Sanjeev Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi, can you see if this (trivial) patch applies cleanly?

You don't need us to tell you whether a patch applies, right?

If you want this change to be merged, please send a proper patch with a correct subject line and a changelog. Also note that "followthrough" is as intended.

Thanks,

jon