Skip to contentSkip to conversation

xfs: for-next branch updated to a444d72e6090

ANNOUNCE Dave Chinner 3 participants 5 messages Dec 7, 2016 – Dec 8, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated. This update contains a bunch of verification enhancments to detect field corruptions as metadata is read from disk, faster CRC calculations, a faster buffer cache indexing structure and some cleanups.

With the merge window likely to open next week, this may be the last update for the 4.10-rc1 cycle. Let me know if there's anything critical that I've missed for 4.10 so I can sort it out before the end of the week.

-Dave.

The new head of the for-next branch is commit:

a444d72e6090 Merge branch 'xfs-4.10-misc-fixes-3' into for-next

New Commits:

Darrick J. Wong (7):
[d2a047f31e86] xfs: forbid AG btrees with level == 0
[bb3be7e7c1c1] xfs: check for bogus values in btree block headers [356a3225222e] xfs: complain if we don't get nextents bmap records [96a3aefb8ffd] xfs: don't crash if reading a directory results in an unexpected hole [0f352f8ee841] xfs: error out if trying to add attrs and anextents > 0 [ef388e2054fe] xfs: don't allow di_size with high bit set [1bb33a98702d] xfs: don't cap maximum dedupe request length

Dave Chinner (3):
[11ef38afe98c] xfs: make xfs btree stats less huge [cae028df5344] xfs: optimise CRC updates [a444d72e6090] Merge branch 'xfs-4.10-misc-fixes-3' into for-next

Eric Sandeen (5):
[6b10b23ca944] xfs: set AGI buffer type in xlog_recover_clear_agi_bucket [200237d6746f] xfs: Move AGI buffer type setting to xfs_read_agi [7710517fc37b] xfs: pass state not whichfork to trace_xfs_extlist [c44a1f22626c] xfs: handle cow fork in xfs_bmap_trace_exlist [f7a136aee3c1] xfs: several xattr functions can be void

Lucas Stach (1):
[6031e73a5b3f] xfs: use rhashtable to track buffer cache

Code Diffstat:

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c          |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c    |   4 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.h      |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c           |  14 ++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c     |   1 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c          |  20 ++++
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h          |  43 +-------
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h          |  26 ++++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c      |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c         |  13 ++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c   |   2 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c      |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount_btree.c |   1 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c     |   1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h                  |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c             |  59 ++++-------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                   | 120 +++++++++++++---------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h                   |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c                  |   9 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c                 |   2 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h                 |   1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c                   |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c           |  12 ++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c                 |   7 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h                 |   7 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c                 |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_stats.h                 | 200 +++++++++++++++----------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_xattr.c                 |  23 ++---
 28 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 301 deletions(-)
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]
#1 lore raw

Hi Dave,

Quoted 11 lines · Dave Chinner

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated. This update contains a bunch of verification enhancments to detect field corruptions as metadata is read from disk, faster CRC calculations, a faster buffer cache indexing structure and some cleanups.

Quoted 4 lines

With the merge window likely to open next week, this may be the last update for the 4.10-rc1 cycle. Let me know if there's anything critical that I've missed for 4.10 so I can sort it out before the end of the week.

I didn't see patch "xfs: use xfs_vn_setattr_size to check on new size" was included in this update nor folded into other commits, do you want to take it for 4.10?

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg02529.html

Thanks,
Eryu

#2 lore raw
Quoted 19 lines · Eryu Guan

Hi Dave,

Quoted 11 lines · Dave Chinner

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated. This update contains a bunch of verification enhancments to detect field corruptions as metadata is read from disk, faster CRC calculations, a faster buffer cache indexing structure and some cleanups.

Quoted 4 lines

With the merge window likely to open next week, this may be the last update for the 4.10-rc1 cycle. Let me know if there's anything critical that I've missed for 4.10 so I can sort it out before the end of the week.

Quoted 5 lines

I didn't see patch "xfs: use xfs_vn_setattr_size to check on new size" was included in this update nor folded into other commits, do you want to take it for 4.10?

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg02529.html

Ok, I missed that one - I did intend to pick it up. Will fix.

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]
#3 lore raw
In reply to Dave Chinner
Quoted 11 lines · Dave Chinner

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated. This update contains a bunch of verification enhancments to detect field corruptions as metadata is read from disk, faster CRC calculations, a faster buffer cache indexing structure and some cleanups.

Quoted 4 lines

With the merge window likely to open next week, this may be the last update for the 4.10-rc1 cycle. Let me know if there's anything critical that I've missed for 4.10 so I can sort it out before the end of the week.

Well I /was/ sorta hoping that you'd have time to review the online scrub patches for 4.10, but unless you're already digging through them I probably ought to just put out a call for online scrub reviewers for 4.11.

You're not missing anything critical from my trees, however.

--D

Quoted 72 lines

-Dave.

The new head of the for-next branch is commit:

a444d72e6090 Merge branch 'xfs-4.10-misc-fixes-3' into for-next

New Commits:

Darrick J. Wong (7):
[d2a047f31e86] xfs: forbid AG btrees with level == 0
[bb3be7e7c1c1] xfs: check for bogus values in btree block headers [356a3225222e] xfs: complain if we don't get nextents bmap records [96a3aefb8ffd] xfs: don't crash if reading a directory results in an unexpected hole [0f352f8ee841] xfs: error out if trying to add attrs and anextents > 0 [ef388e2054fe] xfs: don't allow di_size with high bit set [1bb33a98702d] xfs: don't cap maximum dedupe request length

Dave Chinner (3):
[11ef38afe98c] xfs: make xfs btree stats less huge [cae028df5344] xfs: optimise CRC updates [a444d72e6090] Merge branch 'xfs-4.10-misc-fixes-3' into for-next

Eric Sandeen (5):
[6b10b23ca944] xfs: set AGI buffer type in xlog_recover_clear_agi_bucket [200237d6746f] xfs: Move AGI buffer type setting to xfs_read_agi [7710517fc37b] xfs: pass state not whichfork to trace_xfs_extlist [c44a1f22626c] xfs: handle cow fork in xfs_bmap_trace_exlist [f7a136aee3c1] xfs: several xattr functions can be void

Lucas Stach (1):
[6031e73a5b3f] xfs: use rhashtable to track buffer cache

Code Diffstat:

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c          |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c    |   4 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.h      |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c           |  14 ++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c     |   1 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c          |  20 ++++
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h          |  43 +-------
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h          |  26 ++++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_data.c      |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c         |  13 ++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c   |   2 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c      |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_refcount_btree.c |   1 +
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c     |   1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h                  |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c             |  59 ++++-------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                   | 120 +++++++++++++---------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h                   |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c                  |   9 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c                 |   2 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h                 |   1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c                   |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c           |  12 ++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c                 |   7 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h                 |   7 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_stats.c                 |  10 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_stats.h                 | 200 +++++++++++++++----------------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_xattr.c                 |  23 ++---
 28 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 301 deletions(-)
Signature · 6 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#4 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Quoted 11 lines · Dave Chinner

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated. This update contains a bunch of verification enhancments to detect field corruptions as metadata is read from disk, faster CRC calculations, a faster buffer cache indexing structure and some cleanups.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

With the merge window likely to open next week, this may be the last update for the 4.10-rc1 cycle. Let me know if there's anything critical that I've missed for 4.10 so I can sort it out before the end of the week.

Well I /was/ sorta hoping that you'd have time to review the online scrub patches for 4.10, but unless you're already digging through them I probably ought to just put out a call for online scrub reviewers for 4.11.

I started on them, but I just haven't been able to spend any substantial time reading them or testing them so, unfortunately, it's going to have to miss 4.10 at this point.

Quoted 1 line

You're not missing anything critical from my trees, however.

Thanks for checking!

-Dave.

Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner
[email protected]