x86/e820: fix e820_search_gap() error handling on x86-32
PATCH 1/1 x86/e820: fix e820_search_gap() error handling on x86-32
gcc correctly points out that on 32-bit kernels, e820_search_gap() not finding a start now leads to pci_mem_start being set to an uninitialized value:
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: In function 'e820_setup_gap':arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:641:16: error: 'gapstart' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
This restores the behavior from before the cleanup, defaulting to address 0x10000000 if nothing was found.
--- arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c +4 -2
@@ -626,14 +626,16 @@ __init void e820_setup_gap(void) gapsize =0x400000 ; found =e820_search_gap (&gapstart, &gapsize); -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 if (!found) { +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 gapstart = (max_pfn <<PAGE_SHIFT ) +1024 *1024 ;printk (KERN_ERR "e820: cannot find a gap in the 32bit address range\n" "e820: PCI devices with unassigned 32bit BARs may break!\n" ); - } +#else + gapstart =0x10000000 ;#endif + }/* * e820_reserve_resources_late protect stolen RAM already
Signature · 1 line
2.9.0
tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
merge bot[tip:x86/boot] x86/e820/32: Fix e820_search_gap() error handling on x86-32
x86/e820/32: Fix e820_search_gap() error handling on x86-32
Commit-ID: c19a5f35e315837170ee337eed21c7087ea94192 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c19a5f35e315837170ee337eed21c7087ea94192 Author: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:49:04 +0100 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:40:06 +0100
x86/e820/32: Fix e820_search_gap() error handling on x86-32
GCC correctly points out that on 32-bit kernels, e820_search_gap() not finding a start now leads to pci_mem_start ('gapstart') being set to an uninitialized value:
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: In function 'e820_setup_gap':
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:641:16: error: 'gapstart' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
This restores the behavior from before this cleanup:
b4ed1d15b453 ("x86/e820: Make e820_search_gap() static and remove unused variables")
... defaulting to address 0x10000000 if nothing was found.
--- arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c +4 -2
@@ -626,14 +626,16 @@ __init void e820_setup_gap(void) gapsize =0x400000 ; found =e820_search_gap (&gapstart, &gapsize); -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 if (!found) { +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 gapstart = (max_pfn <<PAGE_SHIFT ) +1024 *1024 ;printk (KERN_ERR "e820: cannot find a gap in the 32bit address range\n" "e820: PCI devices with unassigned 32bit BARs may break!\n" ); - } +#else + gapstart =0x10000000 ;#endif + }/* * e820_reserve_resources_late protect stolen RAM already
You are right. Thanks :-)
Quoted 41 lines · Arnd Bergmann
gcc correctly points out that on 32-bit kernels,
e820_search_gap()not finding a start now leads topci_mem_startbeing set to an uninitialized value:
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: In function 'e820_setup_gap':arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:641:16: error: 'gapstart' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]This restores the behavior from before the cleanup, defaulting to address
0x10000000if nothing was found.Fixes b4ed1d15b453 ("x86/e820: Make e820_search_gap() static and remove unused variables")Signed-off-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c| 6 ++++--1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/x86/kernel/e820.c +4
-2@@ -626,14 +626,16 @@ __init void e820_setup_gap(void) gapsize =0x400000 ; found =e820_search_gap (&gapstart, &gapsize); -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 if (!found) { +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 gapstart = (max_pfn <<PAGE_SHIFT ) +1024 *1024 ;printk (KERN_ERR "e820: cannot find a gap in the 32bit address range\n" "e820: PCI devices with unassigned 32bit BARs may break!\n" ); - } +#else + gapstart =0x10000000 ;#endif + }/* * e820_reserve_resources_late protect stolen RAM already Signature · 1 line
2.9.0
Signature · 2 lines
Wei Yang Help you, Help me