objtool fixes
Linus,
Please pull the latest core-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core-urgent-for-linus
# HEAD: 4e4636cf981b5b629fbfb78aa9f232e015f7d521 objtool: Enclose contents of unreachable() macro in a block
A handful of objtool fixes related to unreachable code, plus a build fix for out of tree modules.
Thanks,
Ingo
------------------>
Josh Poimboeuf (4):
objtool: Fix CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y warning for out-of-tree modules
objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends
objtool: Prevent GCC from merging annotate_unreachable()
objtool: Enclose contents of unreachable() macro in a block
Makefile | 24 ++++++++--------- arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 1 + include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 14 +++++++++- tools/objtool/arch.h | 5 ++-- tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 3 --- tools/objtool/builtin-check.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 6 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Makefile +12 -12
@@ -908,6 +908,18 @@ mod_sign_cmd = true endif export mod_sign_cmd +ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION + has_libelf := $(call try-run,\ + echo "int main() {}" | $(HOSTCC) -xc -o /dev/null -lelf -,1,0) + ifeq ($(has_libelf),1) + objtool_target := tools/objtool FORCE + else + $(warning "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel") + SKIP_STACK_VALIDATION := 1 + export SKIP_STACK_VALIDATION + endif +endif + ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) core-y += kernel/ certs/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/ block/
@@ -1035,18 +1047,6 @@ prepare0: archprepare gcc-plugins # All the preparing.. prepare: prepare0 prepare-objtool -ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION - has_libelf := $(call try-run,\ - echo "int main() {}" | $(HOSTCC) -xc -o /dev/null -lelf -,1,0) - ifeq ($(has_libelf),1) - objtool_target := tools/objtool FORCE - else - $(warning "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel") - SKIP_STACK_VALIDATION := 1 - export SKIP_STACK_VALIDATION - endif -endif - PHONY += prepare-objtool prepare-objtool: $(objtool_target)
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +1 -0
@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ SECTIONS /DISCARD/ : { *(.eh_frame) *(__func_stack_frame_non_standard) + *(__unreachable) } }
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +13 -1
@@ -195,6 +195,17 @@#endif #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION +#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ + asm("%c0:\t\n" \ + ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ + ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ +}) +#else +#define annotate_unreachable () +#endif +/* * Mark a position in code as unreachable. This can be used to * suppress control flow warnings after asm blocks that transfer
@@ -204,7 +215,8 @@* this in the preprocessor, but we can live with this because they're * unreleased. Really, we need to have autoconf for the kernel. */ -#define unreachable () __builtin_unreachable() +#define unreachable () \ + do { annotate_unreachable(); __builtin_unreachable(); } while (0)/* Mark a function definition as prohibited from being cloned. */ #define __noclone __attribute__((__noclone__, __optimize__("no-tracer")))
tools/objtool/arch.h +2 -3
@@ -31,9 +31,8 @@#define INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC 8#define INSN_RETURN 9#define INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH 10 -#define INSN_BUG 11 -#define INSN_NOP 12 -#define INSN_OTHER 13 +#define INSN_NOP 11 +#define INSN_OTHER 12#define INSN_LAST INSN_OTHER int arch_decode_instruction(struct elf *elf, struct section *sec,
tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c +0 -3
@@ -118,9 +118,6 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct elf *elf, struct section *sec, op2 == 0x35)/* sysenter, sysret */ *type =INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH ; - else if (op2 == 0x0b || op2 == 0xb9) -/* ud2 */ - *type =INSN_BUG ; else if (op2 == 0x0d || op2 == 0x1f)/* nopl/nopw */ *type =INSN_NOP ;
tools/objtool/builtin-check.c +56 -4
88 lines not on this page · raw message
Guys,
the recent 'objtool' pull request broke things.
I haven't bisected it, but I'm pretty sure that this part is pure garbage:
Quoted 21 lines · Ingo Molnar
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +1
-0@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ SECTIONS /DISCARD/ : { *(.eh_frame) *(__func_stack_frame_non_standard) + *(__unreachable) } }include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +0
-0@@ -195,6 +195,17 @@#endif #endif
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h line 207
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +10
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION +#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ + asm("%c0:\t\n" \ + ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ + ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ +}) +#else +#define annotate_unreachable () +#endif
and I think the above is what breaks module loading for me right now on my laptop.
I get this during bootup:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
(and similar errors for other modules too), but those modules very much *are* compiled with all the normal kernel build flags, including -mcmodel=kernel.
Now, relocation type 10 is R_X86_64_32, so the warning is very true:
that address would fit in a _signed_ 32-bit value, but that's supposedly a 32-bit unsigned relocation.
Trying to figure out what the hell is going on, I do:
objdump -r nvme.ko | grep 64_32
and what do I find? I find
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [__unreachable]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000000c81 0000000000000004 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000000cb5 0000000000000008 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001a18 000000000000000c R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001a36 0000000000000010 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001e38 0000000000000014 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001ec2 0000000000000018 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x00000000000034e2 000000000000001c R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000003536
and then when I look more closely (objdump --disassemble), I see that the offset 000c81 in the module refers to this:
0000000000000c60 <nvme_admin_init_request>:
....
c7f: 0f 0b ud2
c81: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)so it very much looks like those relocations are still around on modules, and so module loading fails.
Anyway, those annotations are completely bogus anyway, it looks. You guys should use relative offsets in order to be able to specify a kernel address. So doing
.long %c0
is garbage - either it needs to be a .quad, or it needs to be relative to the text section to fit in a .long.
Hmm? Revert or fix, but please quickly...
Linus
Quoted 86 lines · Linus Torvalds
Guys,
the recent 'objtool' pull request broke things.I haven't bisected it, but I'm pretty sure that this part is pure garbage:
Quoted 21 lines · Ingo Molnar
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +1
-0@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ SECTIONS /DISCARD/ : { *(.eh_frame) *(__func_stack_frame_non_standard) + *(__unreachable) } }include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +0
-0@@ -195,6 +195,17 @@#endif #endif include/linux/compiler-gcc.h line 207
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +10
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION +#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ + asm("%c0:\t\n" \ + ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ + ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ +}) +#else +#define annotate_unreachable () +#endif and I think the above is what breaks module loading for me right now on my laptop.
I get this during bootup:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel(and similar errors for other modules too), but those modules very much *are* compiled with all the normal kernel build flags, including -mcmodel=kernel.
Now, relocation type 10 is
R_X86_64_32, so the warning is very true:
that address would fit in a _signed_ 32-bit value, but that's supposedly a 32-bit unsigned relocation.Trying to figure out what the hell is going on, I do:
objdump -r nvme.ko | grep 64_32and what do I find? I find
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [
__unreachable]:OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000000c81 0000000000000004 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000000cb5 0000000000000008 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001a18 000000000000000c R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001a36 0000000000000010 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001e38 0000000000000014 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000001ec2 0000000000000018 R_X86_64_32 .text+0x00000000000034e2 000000000000001c R_X86_64_32 .text+0x0000000000003536and then when I look more closely (objdump --disassemble), I see that the offset 000c81 in the module refers to this:
0000000000000c60<nvme_admin_init_request>:.... c7f: 0f 0b ud2 c81: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)so it very much looks like those relocations are still around on modules, and so module loading fails.
Anyway, those annotations are completely bogus anyway, it looks. You guys should use relative offsets in order to be able to specify a kernel address. So doing
Quoted 6 lines
.long %c0is garbage - either it needs to be a .quad, or it needs to be relative to the text section to fit in a .long.
Hmm? Revert or fix, but please quickly...
Yuck, sorry about that. Patch to fix it below.
This also highlights another (minor) issue: the '__unreachable' section is meant to be a compile-time-only thing. It's supposed to be discarded at link time, but apparently that isn't happening for modules.
I tried excluding it from linking with the .pushsection "e" flag, but no luck. I'll try to figure out how to fix that shortly.
In the meantime, here's the fix you need. It now uses X86_64_64 relocations.
----
From: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] objtool: fix __unreachable section relocation size
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends")
It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
The problem is that the __unreachable section addresses are stored using the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use '.quad' instead.
--- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1 -1
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".quad %c0b\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
merge bot[tip:core/urgent] objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Commit-ID: 90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5 Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100
objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends")
It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
The problem is that the __unreachable section addresses are stored using the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use '.quad' instead.
--- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1 -1
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".quad %c0b\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else
[email protected]
reviewerRe: [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Quoted 45 lines · tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Commit-ID:
90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100objtool: Fix
__unreachablesection relocation sizeLinus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernelThe problem is that the
__unreachablesection addresses are stored using
the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use '.quad' instead.Suggested-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Reported-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Fixes d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and otherdead ends")
Signed-off-by Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>---
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h| 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +0
-0
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h line 207
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1
-1@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".quad %c0b\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else
Or perhaps better use relative addresses, so:
.long foo - (.+4)
Signature · 1 line
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Quoted 57 lines · On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:15:38AM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 45 lines · tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Commit-ID:
90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100objtool: Fix
__unreachablesection relocation sizeLinus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernelThe problem is that the
__unreachablesection addresses are stored using
the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use '.quad' instead.Suggested-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Reported-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Fixes d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and otherdead ends")
Signed-off-by Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>---
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h| 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +0
-0include/linux/compiler-gcc.h line 207
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1
-1@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".quad %c0b\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else Or perhaps better use relative addresses, so:
Quoted 1 line
.long foo - (.+4)
Hm, yeah, something like that would indeed be better as it only needs 4 bytes instead of 8. For this use case, the following seems to work:
".long %c0b - .\t\n"
It produces the same relocation section+addend as before but with a X86_64_PC32 relocation.
It looks like the above patch was already merged so I'll add that change to the TODO list unless Ingo can squash it with the above patch.
Signature · 1 line
Josh
PATCH 1/1 objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Quoted 63 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 57 lines · On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:15:38AM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 45 lines · tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Commit-ID:
90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100objtool: Fix
__unreachablesection relocation sizeLinus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernelThe problem is that the
__unreachablesection addresses are stored using
the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use '.quad' instead.Suggested-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Reported-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Fixes d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and otherdead ends")
Signed-off-by Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>---
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h| 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +0
-0include/linux/compiler-gcc.h line 207
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1
-1@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".quad %c0b\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else Or perhaps better use relative addresses, so:
Quoted 1 line
.long foo - (.+4)
Hm, yeah, something like that would indeed be better as it only needs 4 bytes instead of 8. For this use case, the following seems to work:
Quoted 7 lines
".long %c0b - .\t\n"
It produces the same relocation section+addend as before but with a
X86_64_PC32relocation.It looks like the above patch was already merged so I'll add that change to the TODO list unless Ingo can squash it with the above patch.
I've squashed it - attached the latest version. Does this look good to everyone?
Thanks,
Ingo
================>
Quoted 1 line
From
a6ae17f553bf9b4a0c7f8534e5f0f983bc7955c7Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends")
It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
The problem is that the __unreachable section addresses are stored using the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use relative addresses instead:
".long %c0b - .\t\n"
--- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1 -1
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".long %c0b - .\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else
Re: [PATCH] objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Quoted 90 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 63 lines · Josh Poimboeuf
Quoted 57 lines · On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:15:38AM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 45 lines · tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Commit-ID:
90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100objtool: Fix
__unreachablesection relocation sizeLinus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernelThe problem is that the
__unreachablesection addresses are stored using
the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use '.quad' instead.Suggested-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Reported-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Fixes d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and otherdead ends")
Signed-off-by Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>---
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h| 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +0
-0include/linux/compiler-gcc.h line 207
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1
-1@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".quad %c0b\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else Or perhaps better use relative addresses, so:
Quoted 1 line
.long foo - (.+4)
Hm, yeah, something like that would indeed be better as it only needs 4 bytes instead of 8. For this use case, the following seems to work:
Quoted 7 lines
".long %c0b - .\t\n"
It produces the same relocation section+addend as before but with a
X86_64_PC32relocation.It looks like the above patch was already merged so I'll add that change to the TODO list unless Ingo can squash it with the above patch.
I've squashed it - attached the latest version. Does this look good to everyone?
Thanks,
Ingo
================>
Froma6ae17f553bf9b4a0c7f8534e5f0f983bc7955c7Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] objtool,compiler.h: Fix__unreachablesection relocation sizeLinus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")
Quoted 8 lines
It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernelThe problem is that the
__unreachablesection addresses are stored using the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use relative addresses instead:
Maybe remove the first "relative" in the last line. Otherwise it looks good to me. Thanks Ingo!
Signature · 1 line
Josh
Re: [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
In reply to tip-bot for Josh PoimboeufQuoted 9 lines · tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Commit-ID: 90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5 Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100objtool: Fix
__unreachablesection relocation size
Quoted 8 lines
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
BTW., beyond inadequate testing, another mistake I failed to notice during review is that the title of the patch was actively misleading: an "objtool: " prefix suggests a change that only affects objtool, while the changes here were to compiler-gcc.h, affecting pretty much everyone...
So a better, more informative commit title would have been:
objtool, compiler.h: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends
... to at least warn people about the wider impact. (To be honest I personally probably would still not have noticed the bug, but maybe others.)
Along the same lines I'll fix the title of this fix patch as well, once a final version has been reached.
Thanks,
Ingo
Re: [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Quoted 28 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 9 lines · tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Commit-ID: 90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/90a7e63a31b8f7d630d12ef0d8d37d3ab87f76e5 Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:38:25 +0100objtool: Fix
__unreachablesection relocation sizeQuoted 8 lines
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5("objtool: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends")It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val
ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernelBTW., beyond inadequate testing, another mistake I failed to notice during review is that the title of the patch was actively misleading: an "objtool: " prefix suggests a change that only affects objtool, while the changes here were to
compiler-gcc.h, affecting pretty much everyone...So a better, more informative commit title would have been:
Quoted 7 lines
objtool,
compiler.h: Improve detection ofBUG()and other dead ends... to at least warn people about the wider impact. (To be honest I personally probably would still not have noticed the bug, but maybe others.)
Along the same lines I'll fix the title of this fix patch as well, once a final version has been reached.
Yeah, that would have been a more informative title indeed.
For what seemed (to me) like a straightforward improvement, which was 90% objtool and 10% kernel, that commit introduced a surprising number of subtle bugs in the kernel.
Signature · 1 line
Josh
tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
merge bot[tip:core/urgent] objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
In reply to Josh Poimboeufobjtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Commit-ID: 55149d06534ae2a7ba5f7a078353deb89b3fe891 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/55149d06534ae2a7ba5f7a078353deb89b3fe891 Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:20:18 +0100
objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends")
It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
The problem is that the __unreachable section addresses are stored using the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section kernel addresses. Use relative addresses instead:
".long %c0b - .\t\n"
--- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1 -1
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".long %c0b - .\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else
tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
merge bot[tip:core/urgent] objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
In reply to Josh Poimboeufobjtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Commit-ID: a6ae17f553bf9b4a0c7f8534e5f0f983bc7955c7 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a6ae17f553bf9b4a0c7f8534e5f0f983bc7955c7 Author: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:05:04 -0600 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:43:05 +0100
objtool, compiler.h: Fix __unreachable section relocation size
Linus reported the following commit broke module loading on his laptop:
d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends")
It showed errors like the following:
module: overflow in relocation type 10 val ffffffffc02afc81
module: 'nvme' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
The problem is that the __unreachable section addresses are stored using the '.long' asm directive, which isn't big enough for .text section relative kernel addresses. Use relative addresses instead:
".long %c0b - .\t\n"
--- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +1 -1
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@#define annotate_unreachable () ({ \ asm("%c0:\t\n" \ ".pushsection __unreachable, \"a\"\t\n" \ - ".long %c0b\t\n" \ + ".long %c0b - .\t\n" \ ".popsection\t\n" : : "i" (__LINE__)); \ })#else