ARM: dts: imx50: imx50-esdhc use imx53-esdhc
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v2 1/1 ARM: dts: imx50: imx50-esdhc use imx53-esdhc
According to the reference manuals, both imx50/imx53 SOC seem to share the same eSDHC controller, especially the section on "Multi-block Read" mentioned in commit 361b8482026c ("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix multiblock reads on i.MX53") is identical for both SOC.
Hence, let imx50 use imx53-esdhc.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx50.dtsi | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx50.dtsi +4 -4
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ ranges; esdhc1: esdhc at 50004000 { - compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc"; + compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc", "fsl,imx53-esdhc"; reg = <0x50004000 0x4000>; interrupts = <1>; clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC1_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ }; esdhc2: esdhc at 50008000 { - compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc"; + compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc", "fsl,imx53-esdhc"; reg = <0x50008000 0x4000>; interrupts = <2>; clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC2_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ }; esdhc3: esdhc at 50020000 { - compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc"; + compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc", "fsl,imx53-esdhc"; reg = <0x50020000 0x4000>; interrupts = <3>; clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC3_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ }; esdhc4: esdhc at 50024000 { - compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc"; + compatible = "fsl,imx50-esdhc", "fsl,imx53-esdhc"; reg = <0x50024000 0x4000>; interrupts = <4>; clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC4_IPG_GATE>,
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
Fabio Estevam
reviewerPATCH v2 1/1 ARM: dts: imx50: imx50-esdhc use imx53-esdhc
Quoted 7 lines · Alexander Kurz
According to the reference manuals, both imx50/imx53 SOC seem to share the same eSDHC controller, especially the section on "Multi-block Read" mentioned in commit
361b8482026c("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix multiblock reads on i.MX53") is identical for both SOC.
Hence, let imx50 use imx53-esdhc.Signed-off-by Alexander Kurz <[email protected]>
Shawn Guo
AppliedPATCH v2 1/1 ARM: dts: imx50: imx50-esdhc use imx53-esdhc
In reply to Alexander KurzQuoted 7 lines · Alexander Kurz
According to the reference manuals, both imx50/imx53 SOC seem to share the same eSDHC controller, especially the section on "Multi-block Read" mentioned in commit
361b8482026c("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix multiblock reads on i.MX53") is identical for both SOC.
Hence, let imx50 use imx53-esdhc.Signed-off-by Alexander Kurz <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.