ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: remove duplicate definition
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/2 ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: remove duplicate definition
This was introduced in commit 18e2b50407fb ("ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc:
more defines").
Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h +0 -1
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@#define MX25_PAD_A22__A22 0x030 0x000 0x000 0x00 0x000#define MX25_PAD_A22__GPIO_2_8 0x030 0x000 0x000 0x05 0x000 -#define MX25_PAD_A22__FEC_TDATA2 0x030 0x000 0x000 0x07 0x000#define MX25_PAD_A22__SIM2_VEN1 0x030 0x000 0x000 0x06 0x000#define MX25_PAD_A22__FEC_TDATA2 0x030 0x000 0x000 0x07 0x000
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH 2/2 ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Move MX25_PAD_TDO__TDO to a more sensible place
The pinfunc definitions are ordered by mux_reg and so automatically by conf_reg, too. PAD_TDO is the only pad that has a conf_reg but no mux_reg. Put it to the place where it its in the order of conf_regs instead of the top.
Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h +2 -2
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@* <mux_reg conf_reg input_reg mux_mode input_val> */ -#define MX25_PAD_TDO__TDO 0x000 0x3e8 0x000 0x00 0x000 -#define MX25_PAD_A10__A10 0x008 0x000 0x000 0x00 0x000#define MX25_PAD_A10__GPIO_4_0 0x008 0x000 0x000 0x05 0x000
@@ -541,6 +539,8 @@#define MX25_PAD_RTCK__OWIRE 0x1ec 0x3e4 0x000 0x01 0x000#define MX25_PAD_RTCK__GPIO_3_14 0x1ec 0x3e4 0x000 0x05 0x000 +#define MX25_PAD_TDO__TDO 0x000 0x3e8 0x000 0x00 0x000 +#define MX25_PAD_DE_B__DE_B 0x1f0 0x3ec 0x000 0x00 0x000#define MX25_PAD_DE_B__GPIO_2_20 0x1f0 0x3ec 0x000 0x05 0x000
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
Shawn Guo
AppliedPATCH 1/2 ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: remove duplicate definition
In reply to Uwe Kleine-KönigQuoted 4 lines · Uwe Kleine-K?nig
This was introduced in commit
18e2b50407fb("ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc:
more defines").Signed-off-by Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
Applied both, thanks.