spl: dfu: compilation fixes for spl-dfu
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH 1/1 spl: dfu: compilation fixes for spl-dfu
Hi Ravi,
Please add u-boot mailing list to CC, when sending patches.
Quoted 30 lines
This patch fixes the compilation error
common/cli_hush.c:3349: undefined reference to 'realloc_simple'The dfu does not depend on
HUSH_PARSER. The dfu, fastboot usesrun_command(), it is part ofcli.cand usecli_simple_run_command().Signed-off-by Ravi Babu <[email protected]>--- common/Makefile | 1 - common/cli.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)common/Makefile +0
-1@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ endif # !CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT) += dfu.o -obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT) += cli_hush.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_HASH_SUPPORT) += hash.o obj-$(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) += env_flash.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_YMODEM_SUPPORT) += xyzModem.ocommon/cli.c +0
-0
common/cli.c DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; · line 34
Quoted 8 lines
common/cli.c +1
-1@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;*/ int run_command (const char *cmd,int flag) { -#ifndef CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ) || !defined(CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER )/* * cli_run_command can return 0 or 1 for success, so clean up * its result.
So for the initial support of the DFU in SPL you did not needed the HUSH parser.
What is the motivation to enable it now? Enabling the HUSH in SPL should make the binary even bigger - hence it is counterintuitive.
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
B
PATCH 1/1 spl: dfu: compilation fixes for spl-dfu
Hi Lukasz
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 20 lines
common/Makefile index bcd2486..dc5cb1d renamed from common/Makefile +0
-0100644
common/Makefile +0
-1@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ endif # !CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT) += dfu.o -obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT) += cli_hush.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_HASH_SUPPORT) += hash.o obj-$(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) += env_flash.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_YMODEM_SUPPORT) += xyzModem.o diff --git
a/common/cli.cb/common/cli.cindex a433ef2..3dd4c2b 100644common/cli.c +0
-0@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;*/ int run_command(const char *cmd, int flag) { -#ifndef
CONFIG_HUSH_PARSERcommon/cli.c
Quoted 4 lines
common/cli.c +1
-0+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ) || !defined(CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER )/* * cli_run_command can return 0 or 1 for success, so clean up * its result. So for the initial support of the DFU in SPL you did not needed the HUSH parser.
Quoted 1 line
What is the motivation to enable it now? Enabling the HUSH in SPL should make the binary even bigger - hence it is counterintuitive.
The CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER is enabled in dra7xx_evm_defconfig by commit: adad96e: configs: Re-sync HUSH options Hence CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER included for both SPL and u-boot as well.
The cli.c is common for both SPL & u-boot.
Regards
Ravi
B
PATCH 1/1 spl: dfu: compilation fixes for spl-dfu
In reply to Lukasz MajewskiHi Lukasz
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 13 lines
common/cli.c
Quoted 11 lines
a/common/cli.cb/common/cli.cindex a433ef2..3dd4c2b 100644common/cli.c +0
-0@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;*/ int run_command(const char *cmd, int flag) { -#ifndef
CONFIG_HUSH_PARSERcommon/cli.c +1
-0+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ) || !defined(CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER )/* * cli_run_command can return 0 or 1 for success, so clean up * its result. So for the initial support of the DFU in SPL you did not needed the HUSH parser.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
What is the motivation to enable it now? Enabling the HUSH in SPL should make the binary even bigger - hence it is counterintuitive.
The
CONFIG_HUSH_PARSERis enabled indra7xx_evm_defconfigby commit: adad96e: configs: Re-sync HUSH options HenceCONFIG_HUSH_PARSERincluded for both SPL and u-boot as well. Thecli.cis common for both SPL & u-boot.
Since by default HUSH_PARSER is defined for all *_evm_defconfigs, which affect for both SPL/U-Boot. There is no way to select simple_cli() in run_command(). I feel this would be simple solution to use CONFIG_SPL_BUILD. Even any Kconfig tweaks also would endup in similar way.
Let me know any alternate option.
Another point:
The SPL_DFU_SUPPORT is depends on SPL_RAM_SUPPORT. I will send separate patch to add the dependency in Kconfig selection that SPL_DFU_SUPPORT is selected only if SPL_RAM_SUPPORT is selected.
Thanks & Regards
Ravi