tpm_ts: Consolidate the platform and acpi probe flow
PATCH 1/1 tpm_ts: Consolidate the platform and acpi probe flow
Now that the platform device was merged for OF support we can use the platform device to match ACPI devices as well and run everything through tpm_tis_init.
pnp_acpi_device is replaced with ACPI_COMPANION, and ACPI_HANDLE is pushed further down.
platform_get_resource is used instead of acpi_dev_get_resources.
The itpm global module parameter is no longer changed during itpm detection, instead the phy specific bit is set directly.
--- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 167 +++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
Jarkko,
As discussed, here is a patch that combines the ACPI and platform drivers into one.
I do not have ACPI hardware so this is only compile tested, perhaps you are able to test it, particularly with a CRB device would be intersting to check that the acpi_match_device/etc transformation is working properly.
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +54 -113
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static int has_hid(struct acpi_device *dev, const char *hid)static inline int is_itpm (struct acpi_device *dev) { +if (!dev) +return 0 ;return has_hid (dev,"INTC0102" ); }#else
@@ -89,6 +91,47 @@ static inline int is_itpm(struct acpi_device *dev) }#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI ) +#define DEVICE_IS_TPM2 1 + +static const struct acpi_device_id tpm_acpi_tbl[] = { + {"MSFT0101" ,DEVICE_IS_TPM2 }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, tpm_acpi_tbl); + +static int check_acpi_tpm2 (struct device *dev) +{ +const struct acpi_device_id *aid =acpi_match_device (tpm_acpi_tbl, dev); +struct acpi_table_tpm2 *tbl; +acpi_status st; + +if (!aid || aid->driver_data !=DEVICE_IS_TPM2 ) +return 0 ; + +/* If the ACPI TPM2 signature is matched then a global ACPI_SIG_TPM2 +* table is mandatory +*/ + st = +acpi_get_table (ACPI_SIG_TPM2 ,1 , (struct acpi_table_header **)&tbl); +if (ACPI_FAILURE (st) || tbl->header.length <sizeof (*tbl)) { +dev_err (dev,FW_BUG "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +/* The tpm2_crb driver handles this device */ +if (tbl->start_method !=ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ) +return -ENODEV ; + +return 0 ; +} +#else +static int check_acpi_tpm2 (struct acpi_device *dev) +{ +return 0 ; +} +#endif +static int tpm_tcg_read_bytes (struct tpm_tis_data *data,u32 addr,u16 len,u8 *result) {
@@ -141,11 +184,15 @@ static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops tpm_tcg = { .write32 = tpm_tcg_write32, }; -static int tpm_tis_init (struct device *dev,struct tpm_info *tpm_info, -acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle) +static int tpm_tis_init (struct device *dev,struct tpm_info *tpm_info) {struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy;int irq =-1 ; +int rc; + + rc =check_acpi_tpm2 (dev); +if (rc) +return rc; phy =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy ),GFP_KERNEL );if (phy ==NULL )
@@ -158,11 +205,11 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_info *tpm_info,if (interrupts) irq = tpm_info->irq; -if (itpm) +if (itpm ||is_itpm (ACPI_COMPANION (dev))) phy->priv.flags |=TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND ;return tpm_tis_core_init (dev, &phy->priv, irq, &tpm_tcg, - acpi_dev_handle); +ACPI_HANDLE (dev)); } static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_tis_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_tis_resume);
@@ -171,7 +218,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev, const struct pnp_device_id *pnp_id) {struct tpm_info tpm_info = {}; -acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle =NULL ;struct resource *res; res =pnp_get_resource (pnp_dev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,0 );
@@ -184,14 +230,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev,else tpm_info.irq =-1 ; -if (pnp_acpi_device (pnp_dev)) { -if (is_itpm (pnp_acpi_device (pnp_dev))) - itpm = true; - - acpi_dev_handle =ACPI_HANDLE (&pnp_dev->dev); - } - -return tpm_tis_init (&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info, acpi_dev_handle); +return tpm_tis_init (&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info); }static struct pnp_device_id tpm_pnp_tbl[] = {
@@ -231,93 +270,6 @@ module_param_string(hid, tpm_pnp_tbl[TIS_HID_USR_IDX].id, sizeof(tpm_pnp_tbl[TIS_HID_USR_IDX].id), 0444);MODULE_PARM_DESC (hid,"Set additional specific HID for this driver to probe" ); -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -static int tpm_check_resource (struct acpi_resource *ares,void *data) -{ -struct tpm_info *tpm_info = (struct tpm_info *) data; -struct resource res; - -if (acpi_dev_resource_interrupt (ares,0 , &res)) - tpm_info->irq = res.start; -else if (acpi_dev_resource_memory (ares, &res)) { - tpm_info->res = res; - tpm_info->res.name =NULL ; - } - -return 1 ; -} - -static int tpm_tis_acpi_init (struct acpi_device *acpi_dev) -{ -struct acpi_table_tpm2 *tbl; -acpi_status st; -struct list_head resources; -struct tpm_info tpm_info = {}; -int ret; - - st =acpi_get_table (ACPI_SIG_TPM2 ,1 , - (struct acpi_table_header **) &tbl); -if (ACPI_FAILURE (st) || tbl->header.length <sizeof (*tbl)) { -dev_err (&acpi_dev->dev, -FW_BUG "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } - -if (tbl->start_method !=ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ) -return -ENODEV ; - -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&resources); - tpm_info.irq =-1 ; - ret =acpi_dev_get_resources (acpi_dev, &resources, tpm_check_resource, - &tpm_info); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; - -acpi_dev_free_resource_list (&resources); - -if (resource_type (&tpm_info.res) !=IORESOURCE_MEM ) { -dev_err (&acpi_dev->dev, -FW_BUG "TPM2 ACPI table does not define a memory resource\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } - -if (is_itpm (acpi_dev)) - itpm = true; - -return tpm_tis_init (&acpi_dev->dev, &tpm_info, acpi_dev->handle); -} - -static int tpm_tis_acpi_remove (struct acpi_device *dev) -{ -struct tpm_chip *chip =dev_get_drvdata (&dev->dev); - -tpm_chip_unregister (chip); -tpm_tis_remove (chip); - -return 0 ; -} - -static struct acpi_device_id tpm_acpi_tbl[] = { - {"MSFT0101" ,0 },/* TPM 2.0 */ -/* Add new here */ - {"" ,0 },/* User Specified */ - {"" ,0 }/* Terminator */ -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, tpm_acpi_tbl); - -static struct acpi_driver tis_acpi_driver = { - .name ="tpm_tis" , - .ids = tpm_acpi_tbl, - .ops = { - .add = tpm_tis_acpi_init, - .remove = tpm_tis_acpi_remove, - }, - .drv = { - .pm = &tpm_tis_pm, - }, -}; -#endif -static struct platform_device *force_pdev;static int tpm_tis_plat_probe (struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -343,7 +295,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) tpm_info.irq =0 ; } -return tpm_tis_init (&pdev->dev, &tpm_info,NULL ); +return tpm_tis_init (&pdev->dev, &tpm_info); }static int tpm_tis_plat_remove (struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -371,6 +323,7 @@ static struct platform_driver tis_drv = { .name = "tpm_tis", .pm = &tpm_tis_pm, .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tis_of_platform_match), + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(tpm_acpi_tbl), }, };
@@ -413,11 +366,6 @@ static int __init init_tis(void)if (rc) goto err_platform; -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI - rc =acpi_bus_register_driver (&tis_acpi_driver); -if (rc) - goto err_acpi; -#endif if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PNP )) { rc =pnp_register_driver (&tis_pnp_driver);
@@ -428,10 +376,6 @@ static int __init init_tis(void)return 0 ; err_pnp: -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -acpi_bus_unregister_driver (&tis_acpi_driver); -err_acpi: -#endif platform_driver_unregister (&tis_drv); err_platform:if (force_pdev)
@@ -443,9 +387,6 @@ static int __init init_tis(void) static void __exit cleanup_tis(void) {pnp_unregister_driver (&tis_pnp_driver); -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -acpi_bus_unregister_driver (&tis_acpi_driver); -#endif platform_driver_unregister (&tis_drv);if (force_pdev)
Signature · 5 lines
2.7.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20170503164857.GA20369-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
Quoted 290 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Now that the platform device was merged for OF support we can use the platform device to match ACPI devices as well and run everything through
tpm_tis_init.
pnp_acpi_deviceis replaced withACPI_COMPANION, andACPI_HANDLEis pushed further down.
platform_get_resourceis used instead ofacpi_dev_get_resources.The itpm global module parameter is no longer changed during itpm detection, instead the phy specific bit is set directly.
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c| 167 +++++++++++++++------------------------------1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)Jarkko,
As discussed, here is a patch that combines the ACPI and platform drivers into one.
I do not have ACPI hardware so this is only compile tested, perhaps you are able to test it, particularly with a CRB device would be intersting to check that the acpi_match_device/etc transformation is working properly.
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +54
-106@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static int has_hid(struct acpi_device *dev, const char *hid)static inline int is_itpm (struct acpi_device *dev) { +if (!dev) +return 0 ;return has_hid (dev,"INTC0102" ); }#else @@ -89,6 +91,47 @@ static inline int is_itpm(struct acpi_device *dev) }#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI ) +#define DEVICE_IS_TPM2 1 + +static const struct acpi_device_id tpm_acpi_tbl[] = { + {"MSFT0101" ,DEVICE_IS_TPM2 }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, tpm_acpi_tbl); + +static int check_acpi_tpm2 (struct device *dev) +{ +const struct acpi_device_id *aid =acpi_match_device (tpm_acpi_tbl, dev); +struct acpi_table_tpm2 *tbl; +acpi_status st; + +if (!aid || aid->driver_data !=DEVICE_IS_TPM2 ) +return 0 ; + +/* If the ACPI TPM2 signature is matched then a global ACPI_SIG_TPM2 +* table is mandatory +*/ + st = +acpi_get_table (ACPI_SIG_TPM2 ,1 , (struct acpi_table_header **)&tbl); +if (ACPI_FAILURE (st) || tbl->header.length <sizeof (*tbl)) { +dev_err (dev,FW_BUG "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +/* The tpm2_crb driver handles this device */ +if (tbl->start_method !=ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ) +return -ENODEV ; + +return 0 ; +} +#else +static int check_acpi_tpm2 (struct acpi_device *dev) +{ +return 0 ; +} +#endif +static int tpm_tcg_read_bytes (struct tpm_tis_data *data,u32 addr,u16 len,u8 *result) {@@ -141,11 +184,15 @@ static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops tpm_tcg = { .write32 = tpm_tcg_write32, }; -static int tpm_tis_init (struct device *dev,struct tpm_info *tpm_info, -acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle) +static int tpm_tis_init (struct device *dev,struct tpm_info *tpm_info) {struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy;int irq =-1 ; +int rc; + + rc =check_acpi_tpm2 (dev); +if (rc) +return rc; phy =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy ),GFP_KERNEL );if (phy ==NULL )@@ -158,11 +205,11 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_info *tpm_info,if (interrupts) irq = tpm_info->irq; -if (itpm) +if (itpm ||is_itpm (ACPI_COMPANION (dev))) phy->priv.flags |=TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND ;return tpm_tis_core_init (dev, &phy->priv, irq, &tpm_tcg, - acpi_dev_handle); +ACPI_HANDLE (dev)); } static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_tis_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_tis_resume);@@ -171,7 +218,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev, const struct pnp_device_id *pnp_id) {struct tpm_info tpm_info = {}; -acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle =NULL ;struct resource *res; res =pnp_get_resource (pnp_dev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,0 );@@ -184,14 +230,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev,else tpm_info.irq =-1 ; -if (pnp_acpi_device (pnp_dev)) { -if (is_itpm (pnp_acpi_device (pnp_dev))) - itpm = true; - - acpi_dev_handle =ACPI_HANDLE (&pnp_dev->dev); - } - -return tpm_tis_init (&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info, acpi_dev_handle); +return tpm_tis_init (&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info); }static struct pnp_device_id tpm_pnp_tbl[] = {@@ -231,93 +270,6 @@ module_param_string(hid, tpm_pnp_tbl[TIS_HID_USR_IDX].id, sizeof(tpm_pnp_tbl[TIS_HID_USR_IDX].id), 0444);MODULE_PARM_DESC (hid,"Set additional specific HID for this driver to probe" ); -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -static int tpm_check_resource (struct acpi_resource *ares,void *data) -{ -struct tpm_info *tpm_info = (struct tpm_info *) data; -struct resource res; - -if (acpi_dev_resource_interrupt (ares,0 , &res)) - tpm_info->irq = res.start; -else if (acpi_dev_resource_memory (ares, &res)) { - tpm_info->res = res; - tpm_info->res.name =NULL ; - } - -return 1 ; -} - -static int tpm_tis_acpi_init (struct acpi_device *acpi_dev) -{ -struct acpi_table_tpm2 *tbl; -acpi_status st; -struct list_head resources; -struct tpm_info tpm_info = {}; -int ret; - - st =acpi_get_table (ACPI_SIG_TPM2 ,1 , - (struct acpi_table_header **) &tbl); -if (ACPI_FAILURE (st) || tbl->header.length <sizeof (*tbl)) { -dev_err (&acpi_dev->dev, -FW_BUG "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } - -if (tbl->start_method !=ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ) -return -ENODEV ; - -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&resources); - tpm_info.irq =-1 ; - ret =acpi_dev_get_resources (acpi_dev, &resources, tpm_check_resource, - &tpm_info); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; - -acpi_dev_free_resource_list (&resources); - -if (resource_type (&tpm_info.res) !=IORESOURCE_MEM ) { -dev_err (&acpi_dev->dev, -FW_BUG "TPM2 ACPI table does not define a memory resource\n" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } - -if (is_itpm (acpi_dev)) - itpm = true; - -return tpm_tis_init (&acpi_dev->dev, &tpm_info, acpi_dev->handle); -} - -static int tpm_tis_acpi_remove (struct acpi_device *dev) -{ -struct tpm_chip *chip =dev_get_drvdata (&dev->dev); - -tpm_chip_unregister (chip); -tpm_tis_remove (chip); - -return 0 ; -} - -static struct acpi_device_id tpm_acpi_tbl[] = { - {"MSFT0101" ,0 },/* TPM 2.0 */ -/* Add new here */ - {"" ,0 },/* User Specified */ - {"" ,0 }/* Terminator */ -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (acpi, tpm_acpi_tbl); - -static struct acpi_driver tis_acpi_driver = { - .name ="tpm_tis" , - .ids = tpm_acpi_tbl, - .ops = { - .add = tpm_tis_acpi_init, - .remove = tpm_tis_acpi_remove, - }, - .drv = { - .pm = &tpm_tis_pm, - }, -}; -#endif -static struct platform_device *force_pdev;static int tpm_tis_plat_probe (struct platform_device *pdev)@@ -343,7 +295,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) tpm_info.irq =0 ; } -return tpm_tis_init (&pdev->dev, &tpm_info,NULL ); +return tpm_tis_init (&pdev->dev, &tpm_info); }static int tpm_tis_plat_remove (struct platform_device *pdev)@@ -371,6 +323,7 @@ static struct platform_driver tis_drv = { .name = "tpm_tis", .pm = &tpm_tis_pm, .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tis_of_platform_match), + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(tpm_acpi_tbl), }, };@@ -413,11 +366,6 @@ static int __init init_tis(void)if (rc) goto err_platform; -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI - rc =acpi_bus_register_driver (&tis_acpi_driver); -if (rc) - goto err_acpi; -#endif if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_PNP )) { rc =pnp_register_driver (&tis_pnp_driver);@@ -428,10 +376,6 @@ static int __init init_tis(void)return 0 ;
err_pnp:drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +0
-4-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -acpi_bus_unregister_driver (&tis_acpi_driver); -err_acpi: -#endif platform_driver_unregister(&tis_drv);
err_platform:
if (force_pdev)drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +0
-3@@ -443,9 +387,6 @@ static int __init init_tis(void) static void __exit cleanup_tis(void) {pnp_unregister_driver (&tis_pnp_driver); -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI -acpi_bus_unregister_driver (&tis_acpi_driver); -#endif platform_driver_unregister (&tis_drv);if (force_pdev)Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
I haven't had a chance to dig into it yet, but I'm seeing this with the patch on top of tpmdd/next:
[ 1.041046] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1A, rev-id 16) [ 1.293032] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 9. 00000000 (tpm0) vs. 00000080 (acpi) [ 1.293059] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc4+ #2 [ 1.293060] Hardware name: /NUC5i5MYBE, BIOS MYBDWi5v.86A.0034.2017.0116.2148 01/16/2017 [ 1.293060] Call Trace: [ 1.293066] dump_stack+0x63/0x86 [ 1.293068] __setup_irq+0x5c2/0x610 [ 1.293070] request_threaded_irq+0x10b/0x1a0 [ 1.293072] ? tpm_tis_send+0x110/0x110 [ 1.293074] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x69/0xc0 [ 1.293075] tpm_tis_probe_irq_single+0x4d/0x1b0 [ 1.293076] ? tpm_tcg_read_bytes+0x39/0x50 [ 1.293077] tpm_tis_core_init+0x472/0x650 [ 1.293079] tpm_tis_init.part.1+0x96/0x110 [ 1.293080] tpm_tis_plat_probe+0xb0/0xf0 [ 1.293082] platform_drv_probe+0x3b/0xa0 [ 1.293083] ? device_links_check_suppliers+0x6b/0xc0 [ 1.293086] driver_probe_device+0x1c8/0x460 [ 1.293088] __driver_attach+0xd1/0xf0 [ 1.293089] ? driver_probe_device+0x460/0x460 [ 1.293091] bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0xa0 [ 1.293093] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [ 1.293094] bus_add_driver+0x1c3/0x280 [ 1.293097] ? set_debug_rodata+0x12/0x12 [ 1.293098] driver_register+0x60/0xe0 [ 1.293099] ? tpm_init+0xd1/0xd1 [ 1.293101] __platform_driver_register+0x36/0x40 [ 1.293102] init_tis+0x6b/0xa9 [ 1.293103] ? kobject_uevent+0xb/0x10 [ 1.293106] ? driver_register+0x8e/0xe0 [ 1.293108] ? agp_sis_init+0x2a/0x2a [ 1.293110] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0x50 [ 1.293111] ? tpm_init+0xd1/0xd1 [ 1.293113] do_one_initcall+0x52/0x1a0 [ 1.293114] ? set_debug_rodata+0x12/0x12 [ 1.293116] kernel_init_freeable+0x190/0x218 [ 1.293118] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 1.293119] kernel_init+0xe/0x100 [ 1.293121] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1.293124] tpm tpm0: Unable to request irq: 9 for probe
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Quoted 4 lines · Jerry Snitselaar
I haven't had a chance to dig into it yet, but I'm seeing this with the patch on top of tpmdd/next:
[ 1.041046] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1A, rev-id 16) [ 1.293032] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 9. 00000000 (tpm0) vs. 00000080 (acpi)
Hum.
I think this means that
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
Did not return the IRQ for the TPM when the platform device matched via ACPI? Can you confirm that?
I see there is a bug here, and it should be using platform_get_irq.. I think this incremental patch will make the driver load for you.
However, can you confirm that same IRQ setting (eg no IRQ) is selected before/after this patch?
Quoted 1 line
From
233d05aad66cbb828892f65b4dd722f3a7042241Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 15:24:32 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Use platform_get_irq
Replace the open coded IORESOURCE_IRQ with platform_get_irq, which supports more cases.
This also fixes a typo with force mode - IRQ autoprobing was being turned on for failure to get an IRQ in normal mode, which is backwards to the comment and intent.
--- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +3 -5
@@ -284,11 +284,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } tpm_info.res = *res; - res =platform_get_resource (pdev,IORESOURCE_IRQ ,0 ); -if (res) { - tpm_info.irq = res->start; - }else { -if (pdev == force_pdev) + tpm_info.irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 ); +if (tpm_info.irq <=0 ) { +if (pdev != force_pdev) tpm_info.irq =-1 ;else /* When forcing auto probe the IRQ */
Signature · 6 lines
2.7.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20170503212605.GA26863-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
Yes, that works. I am seeing tpm_info.irq is -1 both before and after the patches.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot