sched/fair: WARN and refuse to set buddy when !se->on_rq
PATCH 1/1 sched/fair: WARN and refuse to set buddy when !se->on_rq
If we set a next or last buddy for a se that is not on_rq, we will end up taking a NULL pointer dereference in wakeup_preempt_entity via pick_next_task_fair.
Detect when we would be about to do that, throw a warning and then refuse to actually set it.
This has been suggested at least twice[0][1]: just do it.
[0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146651668921468&w=2
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/16/663
---
I recently had to debug a problem with these (we hadn't backported Konstantin's patches in this area) and this would have saved a lot of time/pain.
--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/fair.c +8 -2
@@ -6168,8 +6168,11 @@ static void set_last_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)if (entity_is_task (se) &&unlikely (task_of (se)->policy ==SCHED_IDLE ))return ; -for_each_sched_entity (se) +for_each_sched_entity (se) { +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!se->on_rq)) +return ;cfs_rq_of (se)->last = se; + } }static void set_next_buddy (struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -6177,8 +6180,11 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)if (entity_is_task (se) &&unlikely (task_of (se)->policy ==SCHED_IDLE ))return ; -for_each_sched_entity (se) +for_each_sched_entity (se) { +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!se->on_rq)) +return ;cfs_rq_of (se)->next = se; + } }static void set_skip_buddy (struct sched_entity *se)
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
Quoted 18 lines · Daniel Axtens
If we set a next or last buddy for a se that is not
on_rq, we will end up taking a NULL pointer dereference inwakeup_preempt_entityviapick_next_task_fair.Detect when we would be about to do that, throw a warning and then refuse to actually set it.
This has been suggested at least twice[0][1]: just do it.
[0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146651668921468&w=2
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/16/663Cc Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>Cc Ben Segall <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Daniel Axtens <[email protected]>
Quoted 5 lines
---
I recently had to debug a problem with these (we hadn't backported Konstantin's patches in this area) and this would have saved a lot of time/pain.
Yep, this is worth debug. But I think it should be under compile-time config option.
Something like CONFIG_DEBUG_VM which enables VM_BUG_ON and VM_WARN_ON.
Quoted 37 lines
--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)kernel/sched/fair.c +8
-3@@ -6168,8 +6168,11 @@ static void set_last_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)if (entity_is_task (se) &&unlikely (task_of (se)->policy ==SCHED_IDLE ))return ; -for_each_sched_entity (se) +for_each_sched_entity (se) { +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!se->on_rq)) +return ;cfs_rq_of (se)->last = se; + } }static void set_next_buddy (struct sched_entity *se)@@ -6177,8 +6180,11 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)if (entity_is_task (se) &&unlikely (task_of (se)->policy ==SCHED_IDLE ))return ; -for_each_sched_entity (se) +for_each_sched_entity (se) { +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!se->on_rq)) +return ;cfs_rq_of (se)->next = se; + } }static void set_skip_buddy (struct sched_entity *se) --2.11.0
Quoted 21 lines · Konstantin Khlebnikov
Quoted 20 lines · Daniel Axtens
If we set a next or last buddy for a se that is not
on_rq, we will end up taking a NULL pointer dereference inwakeup_preempt_entityviapick_next_task_fair.Detect when we would be about to do that, throw a warning and then refuse to actually set it.
This has been suggested at least twice[0][1]: just do it.
[0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146651668921468&w=2
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/16/663Cc Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>Cc Ben Segall <[email protected]>Cc Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Daniel Axtens <[email protected]>---
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I recently had to debug a problem with these (we hadn't backported Konstantin's patches in this area) and this would have saved a lot of time/pain.
Yep, this is worth debug. But I think it should be under compile-time config option.
Something likeCONFIG_DEBUG_VMwhich enablesVM_BUG_ONandVM_WARN_ON.
OK, will respin.
Regards,
Daniel
Quoted 38 lines
Quoted 38 lines
--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)kernel/sched/fair.c +8
-3@@ -6168,8 +6168,11 @@ static void set_last_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)if (entity_is_task (se) &&unlikely (task_of (se)->policy ==SCHED_IDLE ))return ; -for_each_sched_entity (se) +for_each_sched_entity (se) { +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!se->on_rq)) +return ;cfs_rq_of (se)->last = se; + } }static void set_next_buddy (struct sched_entity *se)@@ -6177,8 +6180,11 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se)if (entity_is_task (se) &&unlikely (task_of (se)->policy ==SCHED_IDLE ))return ; -for_each_sched_entity (se) +for_each_sched_entity (se) { +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!se->on_rq)) +return ;cfs_rq_of (se)->next = se; + } }static void set_skip_buddy (struct sched_entity *se) --2.11.0
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Konstantin Khlebnikov
Quoted 3 lines · Daniel Axtens
I recently had to debug a problem with these (we hadn't backported Konstantin's patches in this area) and this would have saved a lot of time/pain.
Yep, this is worth debug. But I think it should be under compile-time config option.
Something likeCONFIG_DEBUG_VMwhich enablesVM_BUG_ONandVM_WARN_ON.
See SCHED_WARN_ON() and feel free to introduce SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE() if you feel that's needed.