Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Shipping/Cloning encrypted disks

dm-crypt [email protected] 3 participants 3 messages May 18, 2017

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

I was thinking about a project which basically involves linux images with full disk encryption. The images should be shipped to or downloaded by multiple users. Since the end users are likely linux novices the setup should be as easy as possible. At the moment I see two options.

1.: Filesystem image with non-encrypted boot and encrypted main filesystem.
     The image should be dd'ed to a hdd or usb drive and resized to fill the whole drive. Then the master key will be changed with cryptsetup-reencrypt.

2.: Like 1 but the filesystem has also a non-encrypted main filesystem.
Encryption will be done either as described here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt/Device_encryption#Encrypt_an_unencrypted_filesystem or with this tool : https://johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc

Currently I am strongly in favor of option 1 since it forces the end user to use full disk encryption. With option 2 it could just be skipped. Also the required effort seems to be the same for both options. Is there anything else to consider for option 1? Is changing the master key enough? Best practices/build options for the encrypted filesystem?
Maybe an option 3 ... ?

Vasili

#1 lore raw

You also need to change the passphrase(s) with option
1. or anybody with access to the default passhprase can get in.

In principle, full-disk encryption is not more secure against a competent attacker than data-partition only encryption. The attack just takes a bit more effort for FDE, like manipulating the kernel image or the initrd. Of course, if logs or the like are confidental, they need to go into the encrypted part.

Regards,
Arno

Quoted 34 lines · On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 15:26:02 CEST, [email protected] wrote:

Hello,
I was thinking about a project which basically involves linux images with full disk encryption. The images should be shipped to or downloaded by multiple users. Since the end users are likely linux novices the setup should be as easy as possible.
At the moment I see two options.
1.: Filesystem image with non-encrypted boot and encrypted main filesystem.
The image should be dd'ed to a hdd or usb drive and resized to
fill the whole drive. Then the master key will be changed with cryptsetup-reencrypt.
2.: Like 1 but the filesystem has also a non-encrypted main filesystem. Encryption will be done either as described here:
[1]https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt/Device_encryption#Encr ypt_an_unencrypted_filesystem or with this tool :
[2]https://johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc
Currently I am strongly in favor of option 1 since it forces the end user to use full disk encryption. With option 2 it could just be skipped. Also the required effort seems to be the same for both options.
Is there anything else to consider for option 1? Is changing the master key enough? Best practices/build options for the encrypted filesystem? Maybe an option 3 ... ?
Vasili

References

1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt/Device_encryption#Encrypt_an_unencrypted_filesystem
2. https://johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc/

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

Signature · 7 lines
Arno Wagner,     Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform.,    Email: [email protected]
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718  FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF  B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
#2 lore raw
In reply to [email protected]
Quoted 2 lines · On 05/18/2017 08:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:

1.: Filesystem image with non-encrypted boot and encrypted main filesystem.
The image should be dd'ed to a hdd or usb drive and resized to fill the whole drive. Then the master key will be changed with cryptsetup-reencrypt.

That's going to take at least 3 times as long as it needs to. The cryptsetup-reencrypt operation is slow. Because it's reading and writing the same disk, it takes about 2X the time it took to copy the original image.

Format the LUKS destination container, then open the source and destination containers and "dd" from one to the other. You've already got a new master key and whatever passphrase you chose at the destination. You can resize the filesystem after you've done the copying.

Signature · 2 lines
Bob Nichols     "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
                Do NOT delete it.