smp: do not send IPI if call_single_queue not empty
PATCH 1/1 smp: do not send IPI if call_single_queue not empty
For smp_call_function_many(), whenever a CPU queues a CSD to a target CPU, it will send an IPI to let the target CPU to handle the work. This isn't necessary - we need only send IPI when queueing a CSD to an empty call_single_queue.
The reason:flush_smp_call_function_queue() that is called upon a CPU receiving an IPI will empty the queue and then handle all of the CSDs there. So if the target CPU's call_single_queue is not empty, we know that:
i. An IPI for the target CPU has already been sent by previous queuers*; ii. flush_smp_call_function_queue() hasn't emptied that CPU's queue yet. Thus, it's safe for us to just queue our CSD there without sending an addtional IPI.
*For previous queuers, we can limit it to the first queuer.
The workload used to see the effectiveness of this change is vm-scalability's case-swap-w-seq-mt:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/vm-scalability.git/tree/case-anon-w-seq-mt
What it does is to spawn 88 threads to do continous anonymous memory consumption. The test machine is a 2-node Broadwell EP with 88 threads and 32G memory. The test size is 100G so a lot of swap out happened after available memory is used up. Due to:
i. shrink_page_list() will need to
try_to_unmap_flush() -> flush_tlb_others();
ii. this process' mm_cpumask() is almost full. the number of IPI sent during the workload is huge.
Base:
"interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts": 819388170.0, "vm-scalability.throughput": 5051472.0,
This patch:
"interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts": 92214434.66666667, ↓88.7% "vm-scalability.throughput": 5991764.333333333 ↑18.6%
Interrupts dropped a lot and performance increased 18.6%.
--- kernel/smp.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/smp.c +12 -2
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum {struct call_function_data {struct call_single_data __percpu *csd;cpumask_var_t cpumask; +cpumask_var_t cpumask_ipi; }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
@@ -45,9 +46,15 @@ int smpcfd_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node (&cfd->cpumask,GFP_KERNEL ,cpu_to_node (cpu)))return -ENOMEM ; +if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node (&cfd->cpumask_ipi,GFP_KERNEL , +cpu_to_node (cpu))) { +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +return -ENOMEM ; + } cfd->csd = alloc_percpu(struct call_single_data);if (!cfd->csd) {free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask_ipi);return -ENOMEM ; }
@@ -59,6 +66,7 @@ int smpcfd_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)struct call_function_data *cfd = &per_cpu (cfd_data, cpu);free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask_ipi);free_percpu (cfd->csd);return 0 ; }
@@ -434,6 +442,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,if (unlikely (!cpumask_weight (cfd->cpumask)))return ; +cpumask_clear (cfd->cpumask_ipi);for_each_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask) {struct call_single_data *csd =per_cpu_ptr (cfd->csd, cpu);
@@ -442,11 +451,12 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, csd->flags |=CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS ; csd->func = func; csd->info = info; -llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu)); +if (llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu))) +cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */ -arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (cfd->cpumask); +arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (cfd->cpumask_ipi);if (wait) {for_each_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
Signature · 1 line
2.9.3
PATCH RESEND 1/1 smp: avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
Inter-Processor-Interrupt(IPI) is needed when a page is unmapped and the process' mm_cpumask() shows the process has ever run on other CPUs. page migration, page reclaim all need IPIs. The number of IPI needed to send to different CPUs is especially large for multi-threaded workload since mm_cpumask() is per process.
For smp_call_function_many(), whenever a CPU queues a CSD to a target CPU, it will send an IPI to let the target CPU to handle the work. This isn't necessary - we need only send IPI when queueing a CSD to an empty call_single_queue.
The reason:flush_smp_call_function_queue() that is called upon a CPU receiving an IPI will empty the queue and then handle all of the CSDs there. So if the target CPU's call_single_queue is not empty, we know that:
i. An IPI for the target CPU has already been sent by 'previous queuers'; ii. flush_smp_call_function_queue() hasn't emptied that CPU's queue yet. Thus, it's safe for us to just queue our CSD there without sending an addtional IPI. And for the 'previous queuers', we can limit it to the first queuer.
To demonstrate the effect of this patch, a multi-thread workload that spawns 80 threads to equally consume 100G memory is used. This is tested on a 2 node broadwell-EP which has 44cores/88threads and 32G memory. So after 32G memory is used up, page reclaiming starts to happen a lot.
With this patch, IPI number dropped 88% and throughput increased about 15% for the above workload.
---
resend: code has no change, only patch subject and description changes to better describe the patch.
kernel/smp.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/smp.c +12 -2
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum {struct call_function_data {struct call_single_data __percpu *csd;cpumask_var_t cpumask; +cpumask_var_t cpumask_ipi; }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
@@ -45,9 +46,15 @@ int smpcfd_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node (&cfd->cpumask,GFP_KERNEL ,cpu_to_node (cpu)))return -ENOMEM ; +if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node (&cfd->cpumask_ipi,GFP_KERNEL , +cpu_to_node (cpu))) { +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +return -ENOMEM ; + } cfd->csd = alloc_percpu(struct call_single_data);if (!cfd->csd) {free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask_ipi);return -ENOMEM ; }
@@ -59,6 +66,7 @@ int smpcfd_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)struct call_function_data *cfd = &per_cpu (cfd_data, cpu);free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask_ipi);free_percpu (cfd->csd);return 0 ; }
@@ -434,6 +442,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,if (unlikely (!cpumask_weight (cfd->cpumask)))return ; +cpumask_clear (cfd->cpumask_ipi);for_each_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask) {struct call_single_data *csd =per_cpu_ptr (cfd->csd, cpu);
@@ -442,11 +451,12 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, csd->flags |=CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS ; csd->func = func; csd->info = info; -llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu)); +if (llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu))) +cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */ -arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (cfd->cpumask); +arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (cfd->cpumask_ipi);if (wait) {for_each_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
Signature · 1 line
2.9.4
Re: [PATCH resend] smp: avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
Quoted 26 lines · Aaron Lu
Inter-Processor-Interrupt(IPI) is needed when a page is unmapped and the process'
mm_cpumask()shows the process has ever run on other CPUs. page migration, page reclaim all need IPIs. The number of IPI needed to send to different CPUs is especially large for multi-threaded workload sincemm_cpumask()is per process.For
smp_call_function_many(), whenever a CPU queues a CSD to a target CPU, it will send an IPI to let the target CPU to handle the work. This isn't necessary - we need only send IPI when queueing a CSD to an emptycall_single_queue.The reason:
flush_smp_call_function_queue()that is called upon a CPU receiving an IPI will empty the queue and then handle all of the CSDs there. So if the target CPU'scall_single_queueis not empty, we know that:
i. An IPI for the target CPU has already been sent by 'previous queuers'; ii.flush_smp_call_function_queue()hasn't emptied that CPU's queue yet. Thus, it's safe for us to just queue our CSD there without sending an addtional IPI. And for the 'previous queuers', we can limit it to the first queuer.To demonstrate the effect of this patch, a multi-thread workload that spawns 80 threads to equally consume 100G memory is used. This is tested on a 2 node broadwell-EP which has 44cores/88threads and 32G memory. So after 32G memory is used up, page reclaiming starts to happen a lot.
Quoted 4 lines
With this patch, IPI number dropped 88% and throughput increased about 15% for the above workload.
Signed-off-by Aaron Lu <[email protected]>
Seems fine to me, I'll queue it.
Quoted 9 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-0@@ -434,6 +442,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(cfd->cpumask))) return; + cpumask_clear(cfd->cpumask_ipi); for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) { struct call_single_data *csd = per_cpu_ptr(cfd->csd, cpu);
Review void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, · line 456
Quoted 7 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-1@@ -442,11 +451,12 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, csd->flags |= CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS; csd->func = func; csd->info = info; - llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)); + if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu))) + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }
But looking at this I wonder why cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu() are atomic ops while most other cpumask ops are not.
This seems to suggest we want __cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu() and use those here. Because those LOCK prefixes sure are pointless.
Review void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, · line 461
Quoted 7 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */ - arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask); + arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi); if (wait) { for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {
Something like so on top I suppose.
Anybody?
--- include/linux/cpumask.h | 11 +++++++++++ kernel/smp.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/cpumask.h +11 -0
@@ -293,6 +293,12 @@ static inline void cpumask_set_cpu(unsigset_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); } +static inline void __cpumask_set_cpu (unsigned int cpu,struct cpumask *dstp) +{ +__set_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); +} + +/** * cpumask_clear_cpu - clear a cpu in a cpumask * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
@@ -303,6 +309,11 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(intclear_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); } +static inline void __cpumask_clear_cpu (int cpu,struct cpumask *dstp) +{ +__clear_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); +} +/** * cpumask_test_cpu - test for a cpu in a cpumask * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
kernel/smp.c +2 -2
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cfd =this_cpu_ptr (&cfd_data);cpumask_and (cfd->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask); -cpumask_clear_cpu (this_cpu, cfd->cpumask); +__cpumask_clear_cpu (this_cpu, cfd->cpumask);/* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */ if (unlikely (!cpumask_weight (cfd->cpumask)))
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct csd->func = func; csd->info = info;if (llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu))) -cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); +__cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
Re: [PATCH resend] smp: avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
Quoted 55 lines · Peter Zijlstra
Quoted 26 lines · Aaron Lu
Inter-Processor-Interrupt(IPI) is needed when a page is unmapped and the process'
mm_cpumask()shows the process has ever run on other CPUs. page migration, page reclaim all need IPIs. The number of IPI needed to send to different CPUs is especially large for multi-threaded workload sincemm_cpumask()is per process.For
smp_call_function_many(), whenever a CPU queues a CSD to a target CPU, it will send an IPI to let the target CPU to handle the work. This isn't necessary - we need only send IPI when queueing a CSD to an emptycall_single_queue.The reason:
flush_smp_call_function_queue()that is called upon a CPU receiving an IPI will empty the queue and then handle all of the CSDs there. So if the target CPU'scall_single_queueis not empty, we know that:
i. An IPI for the target CPU has already been sent by 'previous queuers'; ii.flush_smp_call_function_queue()hasn't emptied that CPU's queue yet. Thus, it's safe for us to just queue our CSD there without sending an addtional IPI. And for the 'previous queuers', we can limit it to the first queuer.To demonstrate the effect of this patch, a multi-thread workload that spawns 80 threads to equally consume 100G memory is used. This is tested on a 2 node broadwell-EP which has 44cores/88threads and 32G memory. So after 32G memory is used up, page reclaiming starts to happen a lot.
Quoted 4 lines
With this patch, IPI number dropped 88% and throughput increased about 15% for the above workload.
Signed-off-by Aaron Lu <[email protected]>Seems fine to me, I'll queue it.
Quoted 9 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-0@@ -434,6 +442,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(cfd->cpumask))) return; + cpumask_clear(cfd->cpumask_ipi); for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) { struct call_single_data *csd = per_cpu_ptr(cfd->csd, cpu);Review void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, · line 456
Quoted 7 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-1@@ -442,11 +451,12 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, csd->flags |= CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS; csd->func = func; csd->info = info; - llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)); + if (llist_add(&csd->llist, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu))) + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }But looking at this I wonder why cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu() are atomic ops while most other cpumask ops are not.
Quoted 2 lines
This seems to suggest we want __cpumask_{set,clear}_cpu() and use those here. Because those LOCK prefixes sure are pointless.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */ - arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask); + arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
Quoted 6 lines
Review void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, · line 461
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0if (wait) { for_each_cpu(cpu, cfd->cpumask) {Something like so on top I suppose.
Anybody?
With the below patch applied on top, the workload still works fine. Performance is about the same.
Thanks,
Aaron
Quoted 52 lines
--- include/linux/cpumask.h | 11 +++++++++++ kernel/smp.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)include/linux/cpumask.h +11
-0@@ -293,6 +293,12 @@ static inline void cpumask_set_cpu(unsigset_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); } +static inline void __cpumask_set_cpu (unsigned int cpu,struct cpumask *dstp) +{ +__set_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); +} + +/** * cpumask_clear_cpu - clear a cpu in a cpumask * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids) @@ -303,6 +309,11 @@ static inline void cpumask_clear_cpu(intclear_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); } +static inline void __cpumask_clear_cpu (int cpu,struct cpumask *dstp) +{ +__clear_bit (cpumask_check (cpu),cpumask_bits (dstp)); +} +/** * cpumask_test_cpu - test for a cpu in a cpumask * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids) kernel/smp.c +2
-2@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cfd =this_cpu_ptr (&cfd_data);cpumask_and (cfd->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask); -cpumask_clear_cpu (this_cpu, cfd->cpumask); +__cpumask_clear_cpu (this_cpu, cfd->cpumask);/* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */ if (unlikely (!cpumask_weight (cfd->cpumask)))@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct csd->func = func; csd->info = info;if (llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu))) -cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); +__cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
Re: [PATCH resend] smp: avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
In reply to Aaron Lukernel/smp.c void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, · line 443
Quoted 3 lines · Aaron Lu
kernel/smp.c +0
-0@@ -434,6 +442,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,if (unlikely (!cpumask_weight (cfd->cpumask)))return ;
Another thing that occurred to me while staring at that function, is that we could move:
cpumask_and(cfd->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
to the very begin of that function, that would then obviate the need for that cpumask_weight() test afaict.
I'm not sure its worth the trouble, but it would make the function slightly easier to look at.
tip-bot for Aaron Lu
merge bot[tip:sched/core] smp: Avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
In reply to Aaron Lusmp: Avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
Commit-ID: 3fc5b3b6a80b2e08a0fec0056208c5dff757e547 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3fc5b3b6a80b2e08a0fec0056208c5dff757e547 Author: Aaron Lu <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:53:31 +0800 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:01:32 +0200
smp: Avoid sending needless IPI in smp_call_function_many()
Inter-Processor-Interrupt(IPI) is needed when a page is unmapped and the process' mm_cpumask() shows the process has ever run on other CPUs. page migration, page reclaim all need IPIs. The number of IPI needed to send to different CPUs is especially large for multi-threaded workload since mm_cpumask() is per process.
For smp_call_function_many(), whenever a CPU queues a CSD to a target CPU, it will send an IPI to let the target CPU to handle the work. This isn't necessary - we need only send IPI when queueing a CSD to an empty call_single_queue.
The reason:
flush_smp_call_function_queue() that is called upon a CPU receiving an IPI will empty the queue and then handle all of the CSDs there. So if the target CPU's call_single_queue is not empty, we know that:
i. An IPI for the target CPU has already been sent by 'previous queuers'; ii. flush_smp_call_function_queue() hasn't emptied that CPU's queue yet. Thus, it's safe for us to just queue our CSD there without sending an addtional IPI. And for the 'previous queuers', we can limit it to the first queuer.
To demonstrate the effect of this patch, a multi-thread workload that spawns 80 threads to equally consume 100G memory is used. This is tested on a 2 node broadwell-EP which has 44cores/88threads and 32G memory. So after 32G memory is used up, page reclaiming starts to happen a lot.
With this patch, IPI number dropped 88% and throughput increased about 15% for the above workload.
--- kernel/smp.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/smp.c +12 -2
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum {struct call_function_data {struct call_single_data __percpu *csd;cpumask_var_t cpumask; +cpumask_var_t cpumask_ipi; }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
@@ -45,9 +46,15 @@ int smpcfd_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node (&cfd->cpumask,GFP_KERNEL ,cpu_to_node (cpu)))return -ENOMEM ; +if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node (&cfd->cpumask_ipi,GFP_KERNEL , +cpu_to_node (cpu))) { +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +return -ENOMEM ; + } cfd->csd = alloc_percpu(struct call_single_data);if (!cfd->csd) {free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask_ipi);return -ENOMEM ; }
@@ -59,6 +66,7 @@ int smpcfd_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)struct call_function_data *cfd = &per_cpu (cfd_data, cpu);free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask); +free_cpumask_var (cfd->cpumask_ipi);free_percpu (cfd->csd);return 0 ; }
@@ -434,6 +442,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,if (unlikely (!cpumask_weight (cfd->cpumask)))return ; +cpumask_clear (cfd->cpumask_ipi);for_each_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask) {struct call_single_data *csd =per_cpu_ptr (cfd->csd, cpu);
@@ -442,11 +451,12 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, csd->flags |=CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS ; csd->func = func; csd->info = info; -llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu)); +if (llist_add (&csd->llist, &per_cpu (call_single_queue, cpu))) +cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask_ipi); }/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */ -arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (cfd->cpumask); +arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask (cfd->cpumask_ipi);if (wait) {for_each_cpu (cpu, cfd->cpumask) {