xfs: avoid -Wint-in-bool-context warning in xfs_bmap_util.c
PATCH 1/1 xfs: avoid -Wint-in-bool-context warning in xfs_bmap_util.c
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
XFS triggers gcc 7's -Wint-in-bool-context warning (on by default with -Wall), which warns about arithmetic in a boolean context that has no effect on the result:
In file included from fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h:22:0,
from fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:29:
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c: In function ‘xfs_swap_extents_check_format’:
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h:90:30: warning: ‘<<’ in boolean context, did you mean ‘<’ ? [-Wint-in-bool-context]
#define XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) ((int)((ip)->i_d.di_forkoff << 3))
~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1620:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘XFS_IFORK_BOFF’
if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) &&
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h:90:30: warning: ‘<<’ in boolean context, did you mean ‘<’ ? [-Wint-in-bool-context]
#define XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) ((int)((ip)->i_d.di_forkoff << 3))
~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1630:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘XFS_IFORK_BOFF’
if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(tip) &&
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~This is more or less a false positive, because the useless arithmetic is just the left shift in XFS_IFORK_BOFF(). Use XFS_IFORK_Q() instead to make the warnings go away, while having the same behavior and being more consistent with other places in XFS which also use XFS_IFORK_Q().
--- fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c +2 -2
@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents_check_format(* extent format... */ if (tip->i_d.di_format ==XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ) { -if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF (ip) && +if (XFS_IFORK_Q (ip) &&XFS_BMAP_BMDR_SPACE (tip->i_df.if_broot) >XFS_IFORK_BOFF (ip))return -EINVAL ; if (XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(tip, XFS_DATA_FORK) <=
@@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents_check_format(/* Reciprocal target->temp btree format checks */ if (ip->i_d.di_format ==XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ) { -if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF (tip) && +if (XFS_IFORK_Q (tip) &&XFS_BMAP_BMDR_SPACE (ip->i_df.if_broot) >XFS_IFORK_BOFF (tip))return -EINVAL ; if (XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK) <=
Signature · 1 line
2.13.0
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
XFS triggers gcc 7's -Wint-in-bool-context warning (on by default with -Wall), which warns about arithmetic in a boolean context that has no effect on the result:
In file included from fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h:22:0, from fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:29: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c: In function ‘xfs_swap_extents_check_format’: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h:90:30: warning: ‘<<’ in boolean context, did you mean ‘<’ ? [-Wint-in-bool-context] #define XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) ((int)((ip)->i_d.di_forkoff << 3)) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1620:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘XFS_IFORK_BOFF’ if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) && ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h:90:30: warning: ‘<<’ in boolean context, did you mean ‘<’ ? [-Wint-in-bool-context] #define XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) ((int)((ip)->i_d.di_forkoff << 3)) ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1630:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘XFS_IFORK_BOFF’ if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(tip) && ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quoted 6 lines
This is more or less a false positive, because the useless arithmetic is just the left shift in
XFS_IFORK_BOFF(). UseXFS_IFORK_Q()instead to make the warnings go away, while having the same behavior and being more consistent with other places in XFS which also useXFS_IFORK_Q().Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Arnd Bergmann already sent the exact same patch[1] for 4.13, but, er, thanks for spotting this! :)
--D
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=149498134833721&w=2
Quoted 33 lines
--- fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c +2
-2@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents_check_format(* extent format... */ if (tip->i_d.di_format ==XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ) { -if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF (ip) && +if (XFS_IFORK_Q (ip) &&XFS_BMAP_BMDR_SPACE (tip->i_df.if_broot) >XFS_IFORK_BOFF (ip))return -EINVAL ; if (XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(tip, XFS_DATA_FORK) <=@@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents_check_format(/* Reciprocal target->temp btree format checks */ if (ip->i_d.di_format ==XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ) { -if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF (tip) && +if (XFS_IFORK_Q (tip) &&XFS_BMAP_BMDR_SPACE (ip->i_df.if_broot) >XFS_IFORK_BOFF (tip))return -EINVAL ; if (XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK) <=Signature · 6 lines
2.13.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 8 lines · Darrick J. Wong
Arnd Bergmann already sent the exact same patch[1] for 4.13, but, er, thanks for spotting this! :)
--D
Oh, okay. I didn't see anything ingit://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git#for-next; I guess it hasn't been pushed out yet.
Eric