Skip to contentSkip to conversation

u-boot-rockchip: update require path

PATCH In review Trevor Woerner 3 participants 5 messages Jul 22, 2017 – Jul 24, 2017 Arm Rockchip

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 u-boot-rockchip: update require path

The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05.

---
 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rockchip_git.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rockchip_git.bb +1 -1
index c0b1ff6..1f4a644 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # Released under the MIT license (see COPYING.MIT for the terms)
 
 require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
-require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.05.inc
+require recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc
 
 DESCRIPTION = "Rockchip next-dev U-Boot"
 COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(firefly-rk3288|rock2-square)"
Signature · 1 line
2.13.0
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Trevor Woerner

The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05.

Not an objection, but, what's missing to move to just using upstream u-boot?

Signature · 1 line
Tom
#2 lore raw

Hey Tom,

Quoted 10 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 5 lines · Trevor Woerner

The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05.

Not an objection, but, what's missing to move to just using upstream u-boot?

Excellent question! I was just thinking the same thing myself as I was preparing this patch :-)

This patch is a maintenance patch that will allow builds to succeed, but I admit it isn't ideal.

At this point I'm hoping
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-July/139974.html
goes in so I can make 2 sets of recipes: one for rockchip components and one for upstream. At that point I'll evaluate all the upstream things and all the rockchip things to make sure they work on the boards I have. At that point I can clean all this up.

Hopefully I'll also be able to add the tinker board rk3288 and the firefly 3399.

#3 lore raw
Quoted 18 lines · Trevor Woerner

Hey Tom,

Quoted 9 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 5 lines · Trevor Woerner

The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05.

Not an objection, but, what's missing to move to just using upstream u-boot?

Excellent question! I was just thinking the same thing myself as I was preparing this patch :-)

This patch is a maintenance patch that will allow builds to succeed, but I admit it isn't ideal.

Quoted 8 lines

At this point I'm hoping
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-July/139974.html
goes in so I can make 2 sets of recipes: one for rockchip components and one for upstream. At that point I'll evaluate all the upstream things and all the rockchip things to make sure they work on the boards I have. At that point I can clean all this up.

Hopefully I'll also be able to add the tinker board rk3288 and the firefly 3399.

I have a small layer I use for booting mainline components on the tinker, so i can confirm that works with current upstream.

https://github.com/jackmitch/meta-tinker