WTF: patch "[PATCH] x86/xen: allow userspace access during hypercalls" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 4.12-stable tree?
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.12-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable_kernel_rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <[email protected]> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
c54590cac51db8ab5fd30156bdaba34af915e629Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?=
<[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:49:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: allow userspace access during hypercalls
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Userspace application can do a hypercall through /dev/xen/privcmd, and some for some hypercalls argument is a pointers to user-provided structure. When SMAP is supported and enabled, hypervisor can't access. So, lets allow it.
The same applies to HYPERVISOR_dm_op, where additionally privcmd driver carefully verify buffer addresses.
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h +8 -1
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@#include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/pgtable.h> +#include <asm/smap.h> #include <xen/interface/xen.h> #include <xen/interface/sched.h>
@@ -216,10 +217,12 @@ privcmd_call(unsigned call, __HYPERCALL_DECLS;__HYPERCALL_5ARG (a1, a2, a3, a4, a5); +stac (); asmvolatile ("call *%[call]" : __HYPERCALL_5PARAM : [call]"a" (&hypercall_page[call]) : __HYPERCALL_CLOBBER5); +clac ();return (long )__res; }
@@ -478,7 +481,11 @@ static inline intHYPERVISOR_dm_op ( domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs) { - return _hypercall3(int, dm_op, dom, nr_bufs, bufs); + int ret; +stac (); + ret =_hypercall3 (int, dm_op, dom, nr_bufs, bufs); +clac (); +return ret; } static inline void
Quoted 9 lines · On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:45:02PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.12-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable_kernel_rules.rst.I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <[email protected]> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.
This is a fix for -EFAULT on (any?) usage of /dev/xen/privcmd from inside of Xen HVM guest with SMAP enabled. Details in this thread:
http://markmail.org/message/b6wxaipxbjyhiueg
Quoted 67 lines
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From
c54590cac51db8ab5fd30156bdaba34af915e629Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?=
<[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:49:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: allow userspace access during hypercalls
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bitUserspace application can do a hypercall through
/dev/xen/privcmd, and some for some hypercalls argument is a pointers to user-provided structure. When SMAP is supported and enabled, hypervisor can't access. So, lets allow it.The same applies to
HYPERVISOR_dm_op, where additionally privcmd driver carefully verify buffer addresses.Signed-off-by Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Juergen Gross <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Juergen Gross <[email protected]>arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h +8
-1@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@#include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/pgtable.h> +#include <asm/smap.h> #include <xen/interface/xen.h> #include <xen/interface/sched.h> @@ -216,10 +217,12 @@ privcmd_call(unsigned call, __HYPERCALL_DECLS;__HYPERCALL_5ARG (a1, a2, a3, a4, a5); +stac (); asmvolatile ("call *%[call]" : __HYPERCALL_5PARAM : [call]"a" (&hypercall_page[call]) : __HYPERCALL_CLOBBER5); +clac ();return (long )__res; }@@ -478,7 +481,11 @@ static inline intHYPERVISOR_dm_op ( domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs) { - return _hypercall3(int, dm_op, dom, nr_bufs, bufs); + int ret; +stac (); + ret =_hypercall3 (int, dm_op, dom, nr_bufs, bufs); +clac (); +return ret; } static inline void
Signature · 5 lines
Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Marek Marczykowski-G�recki
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:45:02PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.12-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable_kernel_rules.rst.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to <[email protected]> and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again.
This is a fix for
-EFAULTon (any?) usage of/dev/xen/privcmdfrom inside of Xen HVM guest with SMAP enabled. Details in this thread:
http://markmail.org/message/b6wxaipxbjyhiueg
Why wasn't that information in the changelog itself? As it is it lookes like a "here's a new feature" type of patch...
I'll go queue this up now, thanks.
greg k-h