gfs2: allow testing with gfs2
PATCH 1/1 gfs2: allow testing with gfs2
From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
For now, just have it avoid locking. With a fixed kernel, generic/441 now passes.
--- common/config | 1 + common/rc | 7 +++++++ tests/generic/441 | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
common/config +1 -0
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ case "$HOSTOS" in export MKFS_REISER4_PROG="`set_prog_path mkfs.reiser4`" export E2FSCK_PROG="`set_prog_path e2fsck`" export TUNE2FS_PROG="`set_prog_path tune2fs`" + export MKFS_GFS2_PROG="`set_prog_path mkfs.gfs2`" ;; esac
common/rc +7 -0
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ case "$FSTYP" in ext4) [ "$MKFS_EXT4_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.ext4 not found" ;; + gfs2) + [ "$MKFS_GFS2_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.gfs2 not found" + ;; f2fs) [ "$MKFS_F2FS_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.f2fs not found" ;;
@@ -861,6 +864,10 @@ _scratch_mkfs() mkfs_cmd="yes | $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP --" mkfs_filter="grep -v -e ^mkfs\.ocfs2" ;; + gfs2) + mkfs_cmd="$MKFS_GFS2_PROG -p lock_nolock -O" + mkfs_filter="cat" + ;; *) mkfs_cmd="yes | $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP --" mkfs_filter="cat"
tests/generic/441 +1 -1
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ case $FSTYP in btrfs) _notrun "btrfs has a specialized test for this" ;; - ext3|ext4|xfs) + ext3|ext4|gfs2|xfs) # Do the more thorough test if we have a logdev _has_logdev && sflag='' ;;
Signature · 1 line
2.13.3
PATCH 1/1 gfs2: allow testing with gfs2
Quoted 29 lines · Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
For now, just have it avoid locking. With a fixed kernel, generic/441 now passes.
Signed-off-by Jeff Layton <[email protected]>--- common/config | 1 + common/rc | 7 +++++++ tests/generic/441 | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)common/config +1
-0@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ case "$HOSTOS" in export MKFS_REISER4_PROG="`set_prog_path mkfs.reiser4`" export E2FSCK_PROG="`set_prog_path e2fsck`" export TUNE2FS_PROG="`set_prog_path tune2fs`" + export MKFS_GFS2_PROG="`set_prog_path mkfs.gfs2`" ;; esaccommon/rc +0
-0
common/rc case "$FSTYP" in · line 163
Quoted 6 lines
common/rc +3
-0@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ case "$FSTYP" in ext4) [ "$MKFS_EXT4_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.ext4 not found" ;; + gfs2) + [ "$MKFS_GFS2_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.gfs2 not found" + ;;
The above two changes seem fine.
common/rc _scratch_mkfs() · line 870
Quoted 11 lines
common/rc +4
-0f2fs) [ "$MKFS_F2FS_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.f2fs not found" ;;@@ -861,6 +864,10 @@ _scratch_mkfs() mkfs_cmd="yes | $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP --" mkfs_filter="grep -v -e ^mkfs\.ocfs2" ;; + gfs2) + mkfs_cmd="$MKFS_GFS2_PROG -p lock_nolock -O" + mkfs_filter="cat" + ;;
This seems unnecessary, we already have gfs2 support and the "-p lock_nolock -O" part is already added to MKFS_OPTIONS in _mkfs_opts() in common/config (when MKFS_OPTIONS is empty).
generic/411 runs and fails (fails due to kernel bug, not test config issue) now on gfs2 even without this change.
tests/generic/441 case $FSTYP in · line 58
Quoted 13 lines
common/rc +0
-0*) mkfs_cmd="yes | $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP --" mkfs_filter="cat"tests/generic/441 +1
-1@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ case $FSTYP in btrfs) _notrun "btrfs has a specialized test for this" ;; - ext3|ext4|xfs) + ext3|ext4|gfs2|xfs)
Without external log device support in _scratch_mkfs for gfs2, this doesn't seem right to me. Perhaps we should add external log support for gfs2 then update this test, in different patches?
Thanks,
Eryu
Quoted 6 lines
tests/generic/441 +0
-0# Do the more thorough test if we have a logdev _has_logdev && sflag='' ;;Signature · 1 line
2.13.3