ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: fix of_irq_get() result checks
Subsystems (4)
PATCH v2 2/2 ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: fix of_irq_get() result checks
of_irq_get() may return 0 as well as a nagative error number on failure, (and never on success), however omap44xx_prm_late_init() regards 0 as a valid IRQ -- fix this.
---
Changes ion version 2:
- added the "Fixes:" tag for the commit introducing of_irq_get() call;
- rebased to the 'omap-for-v4.13/fixes' branch;
- fixed Rajendra Nayak's email;
- added + to OMAP4 in the patch subject.
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm44xx.c +2 -2
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int omap44xx_prm_late_init(void)* Already have OMAP4 IRQ num. For all other platforms, we need * IRQ numbers from DT */ -if (irq_num <0 && !(prm_init_data->flags &PRM_IRQ_DEFAULT )) { +if (irq_num <=0 && !(prm_init_data->flags &PRM_IRQ_DEFAULT )) {if (irq_num == -EPROBE_DEFER )return irq_num;
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static int omap44xx_prm_late_init(void) }/* Once OMAP4 DT is filled as well */ -if (irq_num >=0 ) { +if (irq_num >0 ) { omap4_prcm_irq_setup.irq = irq_num; omap4_prcm_irq_setup.xlate_irq =NULL ; }
PATCH v2 2/2 ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: fix of_irq_get() result checks
Quoted 1 line · Sergei Shtylyov
of_irq_get()may return 0 as well as a nagative error number on failure,
Oops, forgot to kill comma...
Quoted 6 lines
(and never on success), however
omap44xx_prm_late_init()regards 0 as a valid IRQ -- fix this.Fixes a8f83aefcd5a ("ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: register interrupt information from DT")Fixes c5b3955828ba ("ARM: OMAP4: Fix legacy code clean-up regression")Signed-off-by Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Tony Lindgren
maintainerPATCH v2 2/2 ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: fix of_irq_get() result checks
Quoted 5 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Quoted 1 line · Sergei Shtylyov
of_irq_get()may return 0 as well as a nagative error number on failure,Oops, forgot to kill comma...
I can fix that while applying.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(and never on success), however
omap44xx_prm_late_init()regards 0 as a valid IRQ -- fix this.Fixes a8f83aefcd5a ("ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: register interrupt information from DT")Fixes c5b3955828ba ("ARM: OMAP4: Fix legacy code clean-up regression")Signed-off-by Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>[...]
Seems these both should be safe to apply into fixes-not-urgent for v4.14 merge window as we have not seen any issues with this? Or are there some known bugs related to this?
Regards,
Tony
PATCH v2 2/2 ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: fix of_irq_get() result checks
Quoted 5 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
of_irq_get()may return 0 as well as a nagative error number on failure,Oops, forgot to kill comma...
I can fix that while applying.
Thanks!
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(and never on success), however
omap44xx_prm_late_init()regards 0 as a valid IRQ -- fix this.Fixes a8f83aefcd5a ("ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: register interrupt information from DT")Fixes c5b3955828ba ("ARM: OMAP4: Fix legacy code clean-up regression")Signed-off-by Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>[...]
Seems these both should be safe to apply into fixes-not-urgent for v4.14 merge window as we have not seen any issues with this? Or
Yes, probably.
Quoted 1 line
are there some known bugs related to this?
Dunno, I was just auditing the call sites of of_irq_get[_byname]()...
Quoted 3 lines
Regards,
Tony
MBR, Sergei
Tony Lindgren
maintainerPATCH v2 2/2 ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: fix of_irq_get() result checks
Quoted 18 lines · Sergei Shtylyov
Quoted 5 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
of_irq_get()may return 0 as well as a nagative error number on failure,Oops, forgot to kill comma...
I can fix that while applying.
Thanks!
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
(and never on success), however
omap44xx_prm_late_init()regards 0 as a valid IRQ -- fix this.Fixes a8f83aefcd5a ("ARM: OMAP4+: PRM: register interrupt information from DT")Fixes c5b3955828ba ("ARM: OMAP4: Fix legacy code clean-up regression")Signed-off-by Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Seems these both should be safe to apply into fixes-not-urgent for v4.14 merge window as we have not seen any issues with this? Or
Yes, probably.
Quoted 1 line
are there some known bugs related to this?
Dunno, I was just auditing the call sites of of_irq_get[_byname]()...
OK thanks I'll apply both into omap-for-v4.14/fixes-not-urgent.
Tony