Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples
Subsystems (2)
v3 cover Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples
These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial bit.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/7/417
Joel Fernandes (4):
samples/bpf: Use getppid instead of getpgrp for array map stress samples/bpf: Enable cross compiler support samples/bpf: Fix pt_regs issues when cross-compiling samples/bpf: Add documentation on cross compilation
samples/bpf/Makefile | 7 +++- samples/bpf/README.rst | 10 ++++++ samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c | 2 +- samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1.581.gf28d330327-goog
Quoted 5 lines · Joel Fernandes
These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial bit.
All patches in this set look good to me.
When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my:
Hi Alexei,
Quoted 10 lines · Alexei Starovoitov
Quoted 5 lines · Joel Fernandes
These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial bit.
All patches in this set look good to me.
When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my:
Thanks a lot! will do.
Regards,
Joel