iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync
Subsystems (5)
Robin Murphy
reviewerPATCH 1/2 iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync
Now that the core API issues its own post-unmap TLB sync call, push that operation out from the io-pgtable-arm internals into the users. For now, we leave the invalidation implicit in the unmap operation, since none of the current users would benefit much from any change to that.
--- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 7 +------ drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +6 -0
@@ -1743,6 +1743,11 @@ arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, size_t size)return ops->unmap (ops, iova, size); } +static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) +{ +__arm_smmu_tlb_sync (to_smmu_domain (domain)->smmu); +} +static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys (struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova) {
@@ -1963,6 +1968,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = { .map = arm_smmu_map, .unmap = arm_smmu_unmap, .map_sg = default_iommu_map_sg, + .iotlb_sync = arm_smmu_iotlb_sync, .iova_to_phys = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys, .add_device = arm_smmu_add_device, .remove_device = arm_smmu_remove_device,
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c +13 -5
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ enum arm_smmu_domain_stage {struct arm_smmu_domain {struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; +const struct iommu_gather_ops *tlb_ops;struct arm_smmu_cfg cfg;enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage;struct mutex init_mutex;/* Protects smmu pointer */
@@ -735,7 +736,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain,enum io_pgtable_fmt fmt;struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain =to_smmu_domain (domain);struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg; -const struct iommu_gather_ops *tlb_ops;mutex_lock (&smmu_domain->init_mutex);if (smmu_domain->smmu)
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain, ias =min (ias,32UL ); oas =min (oas,32UL ); } - tlb_ops = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_ops; + smmu_domain->tlb_ops = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_ops;break ;case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED :/*
@@ -833,9 +833,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain, oas =min (oas,40UL ); }if (smmu->version ==ARM_SMMU_V2 ) - tlb_ops = &arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v2; + smmu_domain->tlb_ops = &arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v2;else - tlb_ops = &arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v1; + smmu_domain->tlb_ops = &arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v1;break ;default : ret = -EINVAL ;
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain, .pgsize_bitmap = smmu->pgsize_bitmap, .ias = ias, .oas = oas, - .tlb = tlb_ops, + .tlb = smmu_domain->tlb_ops, .iommu_dev = smmu->dev, };
@@ -1259,6 +1259,13 @@ static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,return ops->unmap (ops, iova, size); } +static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) +{ +struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain =to_smmu_domain (domain); + + smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_sync (smmu_domain); +} +static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys_hard (struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova) {
@@ -1562,6 +1569,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = { .map = arm_smmu_map, .unmap = arm_smmu_unmap, .map_sg = default_iommu_map_sg, + .iotlb_sync = arm_smmu_iotlb_sync, .iova_to_phys = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys, .add_device = arm_smmu_add_device, .remove_device = arm_smmu_remove_device,
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c +1 -6
@@ -609,7 +609,6 @@ static int __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,static int arm_lpae_unmap (struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,unsigned long iova,size_t size) { -size_t unmapped;struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data =io_pgtable_ops_to_data (ops);arm_lpae_iopte *ptep = data->pgd;int lvl =ARM_LPAE_START_LVL (data);
@@ -617,11 +616,7 @@ static int arm_lpae_unmap(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova,if (WARN_ON (iova >= (1ULL << data->iop.cfg.ias)))return 0 ; - unmapped =__arm_lpae_unmap (data, iova, size, lvl, ptep); -if (unmapped) -io_pgtable_tlb_sync (&data->iop); - -return unmapped; +return __arm_lpae_unmap (data, iova, size, lvl, ptep); } static phys_addr_t arm_lpae_iova_to_phys(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,
drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c +6 -0
@@ -619,6 +619,11 @@ static size_t ipmmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *io_domain, unsigned long iova,return domain->iop->unmap (domain->iop, iova, size); } +static void ipmmu_iotlb_sync (struct iommu_domain *io_domain) +{ +ipmmu_tlb_flush_all (to_vmsa_domain (io_domain)); +} +static phys_addr_t ipmmu_iova_to_phys (struct iommu_domain *io_domain,dma_addr_t iova) {
@@ -876,6 +881,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops ipmmu_ops = { .detach_dev = ipmmu_detach_device, .map = ipmmu_map, .unmap = ipmmu_unmap, + .iotlb_sync = ipmmu_iotlb_sync, .map_sg = default_iommu_map_sg, .iova_to_phys = ipmmu_iova_to_phys, .add_device = ipmmu_add_device_dma,
Signature · 1 line
2.13.4.dirty
Robin Murphy
reviewerPATCH 2/2 iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync
Now that the core API issues its own post-unmap TLB sync call, push that operation out from the io-pgtable-arm-v7s internals into the users. For now, we leave the invalidation implicit in the unmap operation, since none of the current users would benefit much from any change to that.
Note that the conversion of msm_iommu is implicit, since that apparently has no specific TLB sync operation anyway.
--- drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c | 7 +------ drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c +1 -6
@@ -660,16 +660,11 @@ static int arm_v7s_unmap(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova, size_t size) {struct arm_v7s_io_pgtable *data =io_pgtable_ops_to_data (ops); -size_t unmapped;if (WARN_ON (upper_32_bits (iova)))return 0 ; - unmapped =__arm_v7s_unmap (data, iova, size,1 , data->pgd); -if (unmapped) -io_pgtable_tlb_sync (&data->iop); - -return unmapped; +return __arm_v7s_unmap (data, iova, size,1 , data->pgd); } static phys_addr_t arm_v7s_iova_to_phys(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,
drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c +6 -0
@@ -391,6 +391,11 @@ static size_t mtk_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain,return unmapsz; } +static void mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) +{ +mtk_iommu_tlb_sync (mtk_iommu_get_m4u_data ()); +} +static phys_addr_t mtk_iommu_iova_to_phys (struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova) {
@@ -490,6 +495,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops mtk_iommu_ops = { .map = mtk_iommu_map, .unmap = mtk_iommu_unmap, .map_sg = default_iommu_map_sg, + .iotlb_sync = mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync, .iova_to_phys = mtk_iommu_iova_to_phys, .add_device = mtk_iommu_add_device, .remove_device = mtk_iommu_remove_device,
drivers/iommu/qcom_iommu.c +12 -0
@@ -443,6 +443,17 @@ static size_t qcom_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,return ret; } +static void qcom_iommu_iotlb_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) +{ +struct qcom_iommu_domain *qcom_domain =to_qcom_iommu_domain (domain); +struct io_pgtable *pgtable =container_of (qcom_domain->pgtbl_ops, + struct io_pgtable, ops); + +pm_runtime_get_sync (qcom_domain->iommu->dev); +qcom_iommu_tlb_sync (pgtable->cookie); +pm_runtime_put_sync (qcom_domain->iommu->dev); +} +static phys_addr_t qcom_iommu_iova_to_phys (struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova) {
@@ -570,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops qcom_iommu_ops = { .map = qcom_iommu_map, .unmap = qcom_iommu_unmap, .map_sg = default_iommu_map_sg, + .iotlb_sync = qcom_iommu_iotlb_sync, .iova_to_phys = qcom_iommu_iova_to_phys, .add_device = qcom_iommu_add_device, .remove_device = qcom_iommu_remove_device,
Signature · 1 line
2.13.4.dirty
PATCH 1/2 iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync
In reply to Robin MurphyQuoted 44 lines · Robin Murphy
Now that the core API issues its own post-unmap TLB sync call, push that operation out from the io-pgtable-arm internals into the users. For now, we leave the invalidation implicit in the unmap operation, since none of the current users would benefit much from any change to that.
CC Magnus Damm <[email protected]>CC Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 7 +------ drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +6
-0@@ -1743,6 +1743,11 @@ arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, size_t size)return ops->unmap (ops, iova, size); } +static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) +{ +__arm_smmu_tlb_sync (to_smmu_domain (domain)->smmu); +} +static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys (struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova) {@@ -1963,6 +1968,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = { .map = arm_smmu_map, .unmap = arm_smmu_unmap, .map_sg = default_iommu_map_sg, + .iotlb_sync = arm_smmu_iotlb_sync, .iova_to_phys = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys, .add_device = arm_smmu_add_device, .remove_device = arm_smmu_remove_device,drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c +0
-0
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c enum arm_smmu_domain_stage { · line 253
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c +1
-0@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ enum arm_smmu_domain_stage {struct arm_smmu_domain {struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; +const struct iommu_gather_ops *tlb_ops;
Hmmm.... I *suppose* that means there's a way to the TLB invalidation functions from the iommu_device field of the io_pgtable_cfg via something like iommu_ops_from_fwnode, but it feels horribly ugly doing that so I'm happy to keep the extra gather_ops pointer in the io_pgtable_cfg for now.
This patch and the subsequent one look fine to me, but I'd like to go a step further and hook-up the add_flush callback too so that it can be (mostly) removed from the io_pgtable code and make the *_fast operations even cheaper for VFIO when it starts using them.
So,
Joerg, do you reckon it's worth merging this as-is, or should we also hook up add_flush before implementing this?
Will
Joerg Roedel
maintainerPATCH 1/2 iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync
Hi Will, Robin,
Quoted 2 lines · Will Deacon
Joerg, do you reckon it's worth merging this as-is, or should we also hook up
add_flushbefore implementing this?
The patches implement .iotlb_sync() so that it is okay to not have a .iotlb_range_add() call-back for now. But the patches lack a .flush_iotlb_range() call-back, which is strictly necessary for correctness because it is defined to be synchronous and doesn't require a sync-call afterwards.
Regards,
Joerg
Robin Murphy
reviewerPATCH 1/2 iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync
Quoted 11 lines · Joerg Roedel
Hi Will, Robin,
Quoted 2 lines · Will Deacon
Joerg, do you reckon it's worth merging this as-is, or should we also hook up
add_flushbefore implementing this?The patches implement .iotlb_sync() so that it is okay to not have a .iotlb_range_add() call-back for now. But the patches lack a .flush_iotlb_range() call-back, which is strictly necessary for correctness because it is defined to be synchronous and doesn't require a sync-call afterwards.
Good point - even with the flush still implicit in the unmap, an iommu_unmap_fast()/iommu_flush_iotlb_all() sequence would indeed be missing a sync at the end. I'll fix that up and post a new version shortly.
Thanks,
Robin.