sched: Rework task state printing
Subsystems (4)
Peter Zijlstra
maintainercover sched: Rework task state printing
With wider usage of TASK_IDLE came a few user visible annoyances. Markus reported that TASK_IDLE is reported as TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and some tools like htop mark those highly visible, which is not warranted for TASK_IDLE.
This patch set reworks the task-state printing and introduces explicit handling for TASK_IDLE and TASK_PARKED.
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 1/8 sched: Consistent task-state printing
Currently get_task_state() and task_state_to_char() report different states, create a number of common helpers and unify the reported state space.
--- fs/proc/array.c | 15 ++------------- include/linux/sched.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
fs/proc/array.c +2 -13
@@ -129,19 +129,8 @@ static const char * const task_state_arrstatic inline const char *get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) { -unsigned int state = (tsk->state | tsk->exit_state) &TASK_REPORT ; - -/* -* Parked tasks do not run; they sit in __kthread_parkme(). -* Without this check, we would report them as running, which is -* clearly wrong, so we report them as sleeping instead. -*/ -if (tsk->state ==TASK_PARKED ) - state =TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ; - -BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT ) !=ARRAY_SIZE (task_state_array)-1 ); - -return task_state_array[fls (state)]; +BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT ) !=ARRAY_SIZE (task_state_array) -1 ); +return task_state_array[__get_task_state (tsk)]; }static inline int get_task_umask (struct task_struct *tsk)
include/linux/sched.h +19 -7
@@ -1244,17 +1244,29 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(structreturn task_pgrp_nr_ns (tsk, &init_pid_ns); } -static inline char task_state_to_char (struct task_struct *task) +static inline unsigned int __get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) { -const char stat_nam[] =TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR ; -unsigned long state = task->state; +unsigned int tsk_state =READ_ONCE (tsk->state); +unsigned int state = (tsk_state | tsk->exit_state) &TASK_REPORT ; - state = state ?__ffs (state) +1 :0 ; +if (tsk_state ==TASK_PARKED ) + state =TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ; -/* Make sure the string lines up properly with the number of task states: */ -BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR )-1 !=ilog2 (TASK_STATE_MAX )+1 ); +return fls (state); +} + +static inline char __task_state_to_char (unsigned int state) +{ +static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZ" ; + +BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT ) !=sizeof (state_char) -2 ); -return state <sizeof (stat_nam) -1 ? stat_nam[state] :'?' ; +return state_char[state]; +} + +static inline char task_state_to_char (struct task_struct *tsk) +{ +return __task_state_to_char (__get_task_state (tsk)); }/**
Steven Rostedt
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:07:48 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
include/linux/sched.h +4
-0+static inline char __task_state_to_char (unsigned int state) +{ +static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZ" ; +
include/linux/sched.h static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct · line 1270
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/sched.h +7
-1+BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT ) !=sizeof (state_char) -2 ); -return state <sizeof (stat_nam) -1 ? stat_nam[state] :'?' ; +return state_char[state]; +} + +static inline char task_state_to_char (struct task_struct *tsk) +{ +return __task_state_to_char (__get_task_state (tsk)); }
So far I'm fine with the patch set, but I hate the non descriptive "__" prefix of __task_state_to_char(). Can we make this a bit more descriptive, because every time I see it in other patches, I go back to this patch to see if we are using the right function.
What about something like:
task_state_to_state_char(unsigned int state);
task_to_state_char(struct task_struct *tsk);
?
This way, the "__" wont keep making me think we used the wrong function.
-- Steve
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing
Quoted 24 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:07:48 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
(quoted diff) +4
-0+static inline char __task_state_to_char(unsigned int state) +{ + static const char state_char[] = "RSDTtXZ"; +Review
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +7
-1+ BUILD_BUG_ON(1 + ilog2(TASK_REPORT) != sizeof(state_char) - 2); - return state < sizeof(stat_nam) - 1 ? stat_nam[state] : '?'; + return state_char[state]; +} + +static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + return __task_state_to_char(__get_task_state(tsk)); }So far I'm fine with the patch set, but I hate the non descriptive "__" prefix of
__task_state_to_char(). Can we make this a bit more descriptive, because every time I see it in other patches, I go back to this patch to see if we are using the right function.
Quoted 7 lines
What about something like:
task_state_to_state_char(unsigned int state);
task_to_state_char(struct task_struct *tsk);?
Hurmph.. naming.
How about something like so?
fs/proc/array.c +1 -1
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static const char * const task_state_arrstatic inline const char *get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) {BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ) !=ARRAY_SIZE (task_state_array)); -return task_state_array[__get_task_state (tsk)]; +return task_state_array[task_state_index (tsk)]; }static inline int get_task_umask (struct task_struct *tsk)
include/linux/sched.h +3 -3
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct#define TASK_REPORT_IDLE (TASK_REPORT + 1)#define TASK_REPORT_MAX (TASK_REPORT_IDLE << 1) -static inline unsigned int __get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) +static inline unsigned int task_state_index (struct task_struct *tsk) {unsigned int tsk_state =READ_ONCE (tsk->state);unsigned int state = (tsk_state | tsk->exit_state) &TASK_REPORT ;
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __get_task_streturn fls (state); } -static inline char __task_state_to_char (unsigned int state) +static inline char task_index_to_char (unsigned int state) {static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZPI" ;
@@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ static inline char __task_state_to_char(static inline char task_state_to_char (struct task_struct *tsk) { -return __task_state_to_char (__get_task_state (tsk)); +return task_index_to_char (task_state_index (tsk)); }/**
include/trace/events/sched.h +1 -1
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline long __trace_sched_switch_if (preempt)return TASK_STATE_MAX ; - return __get_task_state(p); + return task_state_index(p); }#endif /* CREATE_TRACE_POINTS */
kernel/trace/trace_output.c +6 -6
@@ -921,8 +921,8 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_ctxwake_ptrace_assign_type (field, iter->ent); -T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); -S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =task_index_to_char (field->next_state); +S =task_index_to_char (field->prev_state);trace_find_cmdline (field->next_pid, comm); trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, " %5d:%3d:%c %s [%03d] %5d:%3d:%c %s\n",
@@ -957,8 +957,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_raw(struct tractrace_assign_type (field, iter->ent);if (!S ) -S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); -T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); +S =task_index_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =task_index_to_char (field->next_state); trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "%d %d %c %d %d %d %c\n", field->prev_pid, field->prev_prio,
@@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_hex(struct tractrace_assign_type (field, iter->ent);if (!S ) -S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); -T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); +S =task_index_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =task_index_to_char (field->next_state);SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD (s, field->prev_pid);SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD (s, field->prev_prio);
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c +4 -4
@@ -397,10 +397,10 @@ tracing_sched_switch_trace(struct trace_ entry =ring_buffer_event_data (event); entry->prev_pid = prev->pid; entry->prev_prio = prev->prio; - entry->prev_state =__get_task_state (prev); + entry->prev_state =task_state_index (prev); entry->next_pid = next->pid; entry->next_prio = next->prio; - entry->next_state =__get_task_state (next); + entry->next_state =task_state_index (next); entry->next_cpu =task_cpu (next);if (!call_filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))
@@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_ entry =ring_buffer_event_data (event); entry->prev_pid = curr->pid; entry->prev_prio = curr->prio; - entry->prev_state =__get_task_state (curr); + entry->prev_state =task_state_index (curr); entry->next_pid = wakee->pid; entry->next_prio = wakee->prio; - entry->next_state =__get_task_state (wakee); + entry->next_state =task_state_index (wakee); entry->next_cpu =task_cpu (wakee);if (!call_filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))
Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: Consistent task-state printing
Quoted 29 lines · On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:50:16 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 28 lines · Steven Rostedt
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:07:48 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
(quoted diff) +4
-0+static inline char __task_state_to_char(unsigned int state) +{ + static const char state_char[] = "RSDTtXZ"; +Review
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +7
-1+ BUILD_BUG_ON(1 + ilog2(TASK_REPORT) != sizeof(state_char) - 2); - return state < sizeof(stat_nam) - 1 ? stat_nam[state] : '?'; + return state_char[state]; +} + +static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + return __task_state_to_char(__get_task_state(tsk)); }So far I'm fine with the patch set, but I hate the non descriptive "__" prefix of
__task_state_to_char(). Can we make this a bit more descriptive, because every time I see it in other patches, I go back to this patch to see if we are using the right function.What about something like:
task_state_to_state_char(unsigned int state);
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
task_to_state_char(struct task_struct *tsk);?
Hurmph.. naming.
How about something like so?
I'm not picky, I just hate beginning underscores, and wish we can start removing all functions that use them.
-- Steve
tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
merge bot[tip:sched/core] sched/debug: Rename task-state printing helpers
In reply to Peter Zijlstrasched/debug: Rename task-state printing helpers
Commit-ID: 1d48b080bcce0a5e7d7aa2dbcdb35deefc188c3f Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/1d48b080bcce0a5e7d7aa2dbcdb35deefc188c3f Author: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:50:16 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:43:29 +0200
sched/debug: Rename task-state printing helpers
Steve requested better names for the new task-state helper functions.
So introduce the concept of task-state index for the printing and rename __get_task_state() to task_state_index() and __task_state_to_char() to task_index_to_char().
--- fs/proc/array.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched.h | 6 +++--- include/trace/events/sched.h | 2 +- kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 12 ++++++------ kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 8 ++++---- 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
fs/proc/array.c +1 -1
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static const char * const task_state_array[] = {static inline const char *get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) {BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ) !=ARRAY_SIZE (task_state_array)); -return task_state_array[__get_task_state (tsk)]; +return task_state_array[task_state_index (tsk)]; }static inline int get_task_umask (struct task_struct *tsk)
include/linux/sched.h +3 -3
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct task_struct *tsk)#define TASK_REPORT_IDLE (TASK_REPORT + 1)#define TASK_REPORT_MAX (TASK_REPORT_IDLE << 1) -static inline unsigned int __get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) +static inline unsigned int task_state_index (struct task_struct *tsk) {unsigned int tsk_state =READ_ONCE (tsk->state);unsigned int state = (tsk_state | tsk->exit_state) &TASK_REPORT ;
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __get_task_state(struct task_struct *tsk)return fls (state); } -static inline char __task_state_to_char (unsigned int state) +static inline char task_index_to_char (unsigned int state) {static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZPI" ;
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ static inline char __task_state_to_char(unsigned int state)static inline char task_state_to_char (struct task_struct *tsk) { -return __task_state_to_char (__get_task_state (tsk)); +return task_index_to_char (task_state_index (tsk)); }/**
include/trace/events/sched.h +1 -1
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(bool preempt, struct task_struct *if (preempt)return TASK_STATE_MAX ; - return __get_task_state(p); + return task_state_index(p); }#endif /* CREATE_TRACE_POINTS */
kernel/trace/trace_output.c +6 -6
@@ -921,8 +921,8 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_ctxwake_print(struct trace_iterator *iter,trace_assign_type (field, iter->ent); -T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); -S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =task_index_to_char (field->next_state); +S =task_index_to_char (field->prev_state);trace_find_cmdline (field->next_pid, comm); trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, " %5d:%3d:%c %s [%03d] %5d:%3d:%c %s\n",
@@ -957,8 +957,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, char S)trace_assign_type (field, iter->ent);if (!S ) -S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); -T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); +S =task_index_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =task_index_to_char (field->next_state); trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "%d %d %c %d %d %d %c\n", field->prev_pid, field->prev_prio,
@@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_hex(struct trace_iterator *iter, char S)trace_assign_type (field, iter->ent);if (!S ) -S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); -T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); +S =task_index_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =task_index_to_char (field->next_state);SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD (s, field->prev_pid);SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD (s, field->prev_prio);
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c +4 -4
@@ -397,10 +397,10 @@ tracing_sched_switch_trace(struct trace_array *tr, entry =ring_buffer_event_data (event); entry->prev_pid = prev->pid; entry->prev_prio = prev->prio; - entry->prev_state =__get_task_state (prev); + entry->prev_state =task_state_index (prev); entry->next_pid = next->pid; entry->next_prio = next->prio; - entry->next_state =__get_task_state (next); + entry->next_state =task_state_index (next); entry->next_cpu =task_cpu (next);if (!call_filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))
@@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_array *tr, entry =ring_buffer_event_data (event); entry->prev_pid = curr->pid; entry->prev_prio = curr->prio; - entry->prev_state =__get_task_state (curr); + entry->prev_state =task_state_index (curr); entry->next_pid = wakee->pid; entry->next_prio = wakee->prio; - entry->next_state =__get_task_state (wakee); + entry->next_state =task_state_index (wakee); entry->next_cpu =task_cpu (wakee);if (!call_filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 2/8 sched: Convert TASK_state to hex
In reply to Peter ZijlstraBit patterns are easier in hex.
--- include/linux/sched.h | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
include/linux/sched.h +14 -14
@@ -65,23 +65,23 @@ struct task_group;*/ /* Used in tsk->state: */ -#define TASK_RUNNING 0 -#define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 1 -#define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 2 -#define __TASK_STOPPED 4 -#define __TASK_TRACED 8 +#define TASK_RUNNING 0x0000 +#define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 0x0001 +#define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 0x0002 +#define __TASK_STOPPED 0x0004 +#define __TASK_TRACED 0x0008/* Used in tsk->exit_state: */ -#define EXIT_DEAD 16 -#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 32 +#define EXIT_DEAD 0x0010 +#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 0x0020#define EXIT_TRACE (EXIT_ZOMBIE | EXIT_DEAD)/* Used in tsk->state again: */ -#define TASK_DEAD 64 -#define TASK_WAKEKILL 128 -#define TASK_WAKING 256 -#define TASK_PARKED 512 -#define TASK_NOLOAD 1024 -#define TASK_NEW 2048 -#define TASK_STATE_MAX 4096 +#define TASK_DEAD 0x0040 +#define TASK_WAKEKILL 0x0080 +#define TASK_WAKING 0x0100 +#define TASK_PARKED 0x0200 +#define TASK_NOLOAD 0x0400 +#define TASK_NEW 0x0800 +#define TASK_STATE_MAX 0x1000#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtXZxKWPNn"
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 3/8 sched/debug: Remove unused variable
In reply to Peter Zijlstra--- kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/debug.c +0 -2
@@ -461,8 +461,6 @@ static char *task_group_path(struct task }#endif -static const char stat_nam[] =TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR ; -static void print_task (struct seq_file *m,struct rq *rq,struct task_struct *p) {
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 4/8 sched/trace: Fix trace_sched_switch task-state printing
In reply to Peter ZijlstraConvert trace_sched_switch to use the common task-state helpers and fix the "X" and "Z" order, possibly they ended up in the wrong order because TASK_REPORT has them in the wrong order too.
--- include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- include/trace/events/sched.h | 18 +++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
include/linux/sched.h +1 -1
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct task_group;/* get_task_state(): */ #define TASK_REPORT (TASK_RUNNING | TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | \ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | __TASK_STOPPED | \ - __TASK_TRACED | EXIT_ZOMBIE | EXIT_DEAD) + __TASK_TRACED | EXIT_DEAD | EXIT_ZOMBIE)#define task_is_traced (task) ((task->state & __TASK_TRACED) != 0)
include/trace/events/sched.h +11 -7
@@ -114,7 +114,10 @@ static inline long __trace_sched_switch_* Preemption ignores task state, therefore preempted tasks are always * RUNNING (we will not have dequeued if state != RUNNING). */ - return preempt ? TASK_RUNNING | TASK_STATE_MAX : p->state; +if (preempt) +return TASK_STATE_MAX ; + + return __get_task_state(p); }#endif /* CREATE_TRACE_POINTS */
@@ -152,12 +155,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,TP_printk ("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d" , __entry->prev_comm, __entry->prev_pid, __entry->prev_prio, - __entry->prev_state & (TASK_STATE_MAX -1 ) ? -__print_flags (__entry->prev_state & (TASK_STATE_MAX -1 ),"|" , - { 1, "S"} , { 2, "D" }, { 4, "T" }, { 8, "t" }, - { 16, "Z" }, { 32, "X" }, { 64, "x" }, - { 128, "K" }, { 256, "W" }, { 512, "P" }, - { 1024, "N" }) : "R", + + (__entry->prev_state &TASK_REPORT ) ? +__print_flags (__entry->prev_state &TASK_REPORT ,"|" , + { 0x01, "S" }, { 0x02, "D" }, { 0x04, "T" }, + { 0x08, "t" }, { 0x10, "X" }, { 0x20, "Z" }) : +"R" , + __entry->prev_state &TASK_STATE_MAX ?"+" :"" , __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio) );
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 5/8 sched/trace: Use common task-state helpers
In reply to Peter ZijlstraRemove yet another task-state char instance.
--- include/linux/sched.h | 2 -- kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 21 ++++++--------------- kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 12 ++++++------ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
include/linux/sched.h +0 -2
@@ -86,8 +86,6 @@ struct task_group;#define TASK_NEW 0x0800#define TASK_STATE_MAX 0x1000 -#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtXZxKWPNn" -/* Convenience macros for the sake of set_current_state: */ #define TASK_KILLABLE (TASK_WAKEKILL | TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)#define TASK_STOPPED (TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_STOPPED)
kernel/trace/trace_output.c +6 -15
@@ -656,15 +656,6 @@ int trace_print_lat_context(struct tracereturn !trace_seq_has_overflowed (s); } -static const char state_to_char[] =TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR ; - -static int task_state_char (unsigned long state) -{ -int bit = state ?__ffs (state) +1 :0 ; - -return bit <sizeof (state_to_char) -1 ? state_to_char[bit] :'?' ; -} -/** * ftrace_find_event - find a registered event * @type: the type of event to look for
@@ -930,8 +921,8 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_ctxwake_ptrace_assign_type (field, iter->ent); -T =task_state_char (field->next_state); -S =task_state_char (field->prev_state); +T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); +S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state);trace_find_cmdline (field->next_pid, comm); trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, " %5d:%3d:%c %s [%03d] %5d:%3d:%c %s\n",
@@ -966,8 +957,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_raw(struct tractrace_assign_type (field, iter->ent);if (!S ) -S =task_state_char (field->prev_state); -T =task_state_char (field->next_state); +S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state); trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "%d %d %c %d %d %d %c\n", field->prev_pid, field->prev_prio,
@@ -1002,8 +993,8 @@ static int trace_ctxwake_hex(struct tractrace_assign_type (field, iter->ent);if (!S ) -S =task_state_char (field->prev_state); -T =task_state_char (field->next_state); +S =__task_state_to_char (field->prev_state); +T =__task_state_to_char (field->next_state);SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD (s, field->prev_pid);SEQ_PUT_HEX_FIELD (s, field->prev_prio);
kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c +6 -6
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ probe_wakeup_migrate_task(void *ignore, }static void -tracing_sched_switch_trace (struct trace_array *tr, +tracing_sched_switch_trace (bool preempt,struct trace_array *tr,struct task_struct *prev,struct task_struct *next,unsigned long flags,int pc)
@@ -397,10 +397,10 @@ tracing_sched_switch_trace(struct trace_ entry =ring_buffer_event_data (event); entry->prev_pid = prev->pid; entry->prev_prio = prev->prio; - entry->prev_state = prev->state; + entry->prev_state =__trace_sched_switch_state (preempt, prev); entry->next_pid = next->pid; entry->next_prio = next->prio; - entry->next_state = next->state; + entry->next_state =__get_task_state (next); entry->next_cpu =task_cpu (next);if (!call_filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))
@@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ tracing_sched_wakeup_trace(struct trace_ entry =ring_buffer_event_data (event); entry->prev_pid = curr->pid; entry->prev_prio = curr->prio; - entry->prev_state = curr->state; + entry->prev_state =__get_task_state (curr); entry->next_pid = wakee->pid; entry->next_prio = wakee->prio; - entry->next_state = wakee->state; + entry->next_state =__get_task_state (wakee); entry->next_cpu =task_cpu (wakee);if (!call_filter_check_discard (call, entry, buffer, event))
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ probe_wakeup_sched_switch(void *ignore, data =per_cpu_ptr (wakeup_trace->trace_buffer.data, wakeup_cpu);__trace_function (wakeup_trace,CALLER_ADDR0 ,CALLER_ADDR1 , flags, pc); -tracing_sched_switch_trace (wakeup_trace, prev, next, flags, pc); +tracing_sched_switch_trace (preempt, wakeup_trace, prev, next, flags, pc);T0 = data->preempt_timestamp;T1 =ftrace_now (cpu);
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 6/8 sched: Add explicit TASK_IDLE printing
In reply to Peter ZijlstraMarkus reported that kthreads that idle using TASK_IDLE instead of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE are reported in as TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and things like htop mark those red.
This is undesirable, so add an explicit state for TASK_IDLE.
--- fs/proc/array.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++-- include/trace/events/sched.h | 7 ++++--- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
fs/proc/array.c +13 -8
@@ -118,18 +118,23 @@ static inline void task_name(struct seq_* simple bit tests. */ static const char *const task_state_array[] = { -"R (running)" ,/* 0 */ -"S (sleeping)" ,/* 1 */ -"D (disk sleep)" ,/* 2 */ -"T (stopped)" ,/* 4 */ -"t (tracing stop)" ,/* 8 */ -"X (dead)" ,/* 16 */ -"Z (zombie)" ,/* 32 */ + +/* states in TASK_REPORT: */ +"R (running)" ,/* 0x00 */ +"S (sleeping)" ,/* 0x01 */ +"D (disk sleep)" ,/* 0x02 */ +"T (stopped)" ,/* 0x04 */ +"t (tracing stop)" ,/* 0x08 */ +"X (dead)" ,/* 0x10 */ +"Z (zombie)" ,/* 0x20 */ + +/* states beyond TASK_REPORT: */ +"I (idle)" ,/* 0x40 */ };static inline const char *get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) { -BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT ) !=ARRAY_SIZE (task_state_array) -1 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ) !=ARRAY_SIZE (task_state_array));return task_state_array[__get_task_state (tsk)]; }
include/linux/sched.h +10 -2
@@ -1242,22 +1242,30 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(structreturn task_pgrp_nr_ns (tsk, &init_pid_ns); } +#define TASK_REPORT_IDLE (TASK_REPORT + 1) +#define TASK_REPORT_MAX (TASK_REPORT_IDLE << 1) +static inline unsigned int __get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk) {unsigned int tsk_state =READ_ONCE (tsk->state);unsigned int state = (tsk_state | tsk->exit_state) &TASK_REPORT ; +BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ); +if (tsk_state ==TASK_PARKED ) state =TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ; +if (tsk_state ==TASK_IDLE ) + state =TASK_REPORT_IDLE ; +return fls (state); }static inline char __task_state_to_char (unsigned int state) { -static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZ" ; +static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZI" ; -BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT ) !=sizeof (state_char) -2 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ) !=sizeof (state_char) -1 );return state_char[state]; }
include/trace/events/sched.h +4 -3
@@ -156,10 +156,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch, TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d", __entry->prev_comm, __entry->prev_pid, __entry->prev_prio, - (__entry->prev_state & TASK_REPORT) ? - __print_flags(__entry->prev_state & TASK_REPORT, "|", + (__entry->prev_state & (TASK_REPORT_MAX - 1)) ? + __print_flags(__entry->prev_state & (TASK_REPORT_MAX - 1), "|", { 0x01, "S" }, { 0x02, "D" }, { 0x04, "T" }, - { 0x08, "t" }, { 0x10, "X" }, { 0x20, "Z" }) : + { 0x08, "t" }, { 0x10, "X" }, { 0x20, "Z" }, + { 0x40, "I" }) : "R", __entry->prev_state & TASK_STATE_MAX ? "+" : "",
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 7/8 sched: Ignore TASK_IDLE for SysRq-W
In reply to Peter ZijlstraMarkus reported that tasks in TASK_IDLE state are reported by SysRq-W, which results in undesirable clutter.
--- kernel/sched/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/sched/core.c +23 -1
@@ -5164,6 +5164,28 @@ void sched_show_task(struct task_structput_task_stack (p); } +static inline bool +state_filter_match (unsigned long state_filter,struct task_struct *p) +{ +/* no filter, everything matches */ +if (!state_filter) +return true; + +/* filter, but doesn't match */ +if (!(p->state & state_filter)) +return false; + +/* +* When looking for TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE skip TASK_IDLE (allows +* TASK_KILLABLE). +*/ +if (state_filter ==TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE && p->state ==TASK_IDLE ) +return false; + +return true; +} + +void show_state_filter (unsigned long state_filter) {struct task_struct *g, *p;
@@ -5186,7 +5208,7 @@ void show_state_filter(unsigned long sta*/ touch_nmi_watchdog ();touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs (); -if (!state_filter || (p->state & state_filter)) +if (state_filter_match (state_filter, p))sched_show_task (p); }
Peter Zijlstra
maintainerPATCH 8/8 sched: Add explicit TASK_PARKED printing
In reply to Peter ZijlstraCurrently TASK_PARKED is masqueraded as TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, give it its own print state because it will not in fact get woken by regular wakeups and is a long-term state.
This requires moving TASK_PARKED into the TASK_REPORT mask, and since that latter needs to be a contiguous bitmask, we need to shuffle the bits around a bit.
--- fs/proc/array.c | 3 ++- include/linux/sched.h | 16 +++++++--------- include/trace/events/sched.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
fs/proc/array.c +2 -1
@@ -127,9 +127,10 @@ static const char * const task_state_arr"t (tracing stop)" ,/* 0x08 */ "X (dead)" ,/* 0x10 */ "Z (zombie)" ,/* 0x20 */ +"P (parked)" ,/* 0x40 */ /* states beyond TASK_REPORT: */ - "I (idle)", /* 0x40 */ + "I (idle)", /* 0x80 */ };static inline const char *get_task_state (struct task_struct *tsk)
include/linux/sched.h +7 -9
@@ -75,10 +75,10 @@ struct task_group;#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 0x0020#define EXIT_TRACE (EXIT_ZOMBIE | EXIT_DEAD)/* Used in tsk->state again: */ -#define TASK_DEAD 0x0040 -#define TASK_WAKEKILL 0x0080 -#define TASK_WAKING 0x0100 -#define TASK_PARKED 0x0200 +#define TASK_PARKED 0x0040 +#define TASK_DEAD 0x0080 +#define TASK_WAKEKILL 0x0100 +#define TASK_WAKING 0x0200#define TASK_NOLOAD 0x0400#define TASK_NEW 0x0800#define TASK_STATE_MAX 0x1000
@@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ struct task_group;/* get_task_state(): */ #define TASK_REPORT (TASK_RUNNING | TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | \ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | __TASK_STOPPED | \ - __TASK_TRACED | EXIT_DEAD | EXIT_ZOMBIE) + __TASK_TRACED | EXIT_DEAD | EXIT_ZOMBIE | \ + TASK_PARKED)#define task_is_traced (task) ((task->state & __TASK_TRACED) != 0)
@@ -1252,9 +1253,6 @@ static inline unsigned int __get_task_stBUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ); -if (tsk_state ==TASK_PARKED ) - state =TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ; -if (tsk_state ==TASK_IDLE ) state =TASK_REPORT_IDLE ;
@@ -1263,7 +1261,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __get_task_ststatic inline char __task_state_to_char (unsigned int state) { -static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZI" ; +static const char state_char[] ="RSDTtXZPI" ;BUILD_BUG_ON (1 +ilog2 (TASK_REPORT_MAX ) !=sizeof (state_char) -1 );
include/trace/events/sched.h +1 -1
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,__print_flags (__entry->prev_state & (TASK_REPORT_MAX -1 ),"|" , { 0x01, "S" }, { 0x02, "D" }, { 0x04, "T" }, { 0x08, "t" }, { 0x10, "X" }, { 0x20, "Z" }, - { 0x40, "I" }) : + { 0x40, "P" }, { 0x80, "I" }) : "R", __entry->prev_state & TASK_STATE_MAX ? "+" : "",
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Zijlstra
With wider usage of
TASK_IDLEcame a few user visible annoyances. Markus reported thatTASK_IDLEis reported asTASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLEand some tools like htop mark those highly visible, which is not warranted forTASK_IDLE.This patch set reworks the task-state printing and introduces explicit handling for
TASK_IDLEandTASK_PARKED.
Thanks for cleaning that up. I went through the lot and did not find anything to bitch about.