char: report errors from qio_channel_{read, write}v_full
PATCH 1/1 char: report errors from qio_channel_{read, write}v_full
Two callers of qio_channel_{read,write}v_full were not passing in an Error pointer, missing any error messages from the channel class io_{read,write}v methods.
--- chardev/char-io.c | 7 ++++++- chardev/char-socket.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
chardev/char-io.c +6 -1
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@* THE SOFTWARE. */ #include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include "qapi/error.h" #include "chardev/char-io.h" typedef struct IOWatchPoll {
@@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ int io_channel_send_full(QIOChannel *ioc, int *fds, size_t nfds) {size_t offset =0 ; +Error *local_err =NULL ;while (offset < len) {ssize_t ret =0 ;
@@ -160,7 +162,10 @@ int io_channel_send_full(QIOChannel *ioc, ret =qio_channel_writev_full ( ioc, &iov,1 , - fds, nfds,NULL ); + fds, nfds, &local_err); +if (local_err) { +error_report_err (local_err); + }if (ret ==QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK ) {if (offset) {return offset;
chardev/char-socket.c +6 -2
@@ -272,15 +272,19 @@ static ssize_t tcp_chr_recv(Chardev *chr, char *buf, size_t len)size_t i;int *msgfds =NULL ;size_t msgfds_num =0 ; +Error *local_err =NULL ;if (qio_channel_has_feature (s->ioc,QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_FD_PASS )) { ret =qio_channel_readv_full (s->ioc, &iov,1 , &msgfds, &msgfds_num, -NULL ); + &local_err); }else { ret =qio_channel_readv_full (s->ioc, &iov,1 ,NULL ,NULL , -NULL ); + &local_err); + } +if (local_err) { +error_report_err (local_err); }if (ret ==QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK ) {
Signature · 1 line
2.13.5
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Edwards
Two callers of qio_channel_{read,write}v_full were not passing in an Error pointer, missing any error messages from the channel class io_{read,write}v methods.
Signed-off-by Greg Edwards <[email protected]>
This is on purpose in order to avoid "spamming" the logs. In particular, for sockets it can be a normal thing for the other side to disconnect.
Paolo
Quoted 64 lines
--- chardev/char-io.c | 7 ++++++- chardev/char-socket.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)chardev/char-io.c +6
-1@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@* THE SOFTWARE. */ #include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include "qapi/error.h" #include "chardev/char-io.h" typedef struct IOWatchPoll {@@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ int io_channel_send_full(QIOChannel *ioc, int *fds, size_t nfds) {size_t offset =0 ; +Error *local_err =NULL ;while (offset < len) {ssize_t ret =0 ;@@ -160,7 +162,10 @@ int io_channel_send_full(QIOChannel *ioc, ret =qio_channel_writev_full ( ioc, &iov,1 , - fds, nfds,NULL ); + fds, nfds, &local_err); +if (local_err) { +error_report_err (local_err); + }if (ret ==QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK ) {if (offset) {return offset;chardev/char-socket.c +6
-2@@ -272,15 +272,19 @@ static ssize_t tcp_chr_recv(Chardev *chr, char *buf, size_t len)size_t i;int *msgfds =NULL ;size_t msgfds_num =0 ; +Error *local_err =NULL ;if (qio_channel_has_feature (s->ioc,QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_FD_PASS )) { ret =qio_channel_readv_full (s->ioc, &iov,1 , &msgfds, &msgfds_num, -NULL ); + &local_err); }else { ret =qio_channel_readv_full (s->ioc, &iov,1 ,NULL ,NULL , -NULL ); + &local_err); + } +if (local_err) { +error_report_err (local_err); }if (ret ==QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK ) {
Quoted 8 lines · Paolo Bonzini
Quoted 3 lines · Greg Edwards
Two callers of qio_channel_{read,write}v_full were not passing in an Error pointer, missing any error messages from the channel class io_{read,write}v methods.
This is on purpose in order to avoid "spamming" the logs. In particular, for sockets it can be a normal thing for the other side to disconnect.
Thanks for the background, Paolo.
We had encountered a vhost-user-scsi initialization failure, and were looking for the errno from the recvmsg failure from VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES:
qemu-system-x86_64: -device vhost-user-scsi-pci,chardev=vus0,bootindex=2: Failed to read msg header. Read -1 instead of 12. Original request 1.
qemu-system-x86_64: -device vhost-user-scsi-pci,chardev=vus0,bootindex=2: vhost-user-scsi: vhost initialization failed: Operation not permitted
In this case, the strerror in vhost_user_scsi_realize is just reporting on the -1 returned from the vhost_user_read failure, not the errno of original offender. That's what started me down this path.
Greg