Skip to contentSkip to conversation

exec-binfmt_misc-dont-nullify-node-dentry-in-kill_node.patch removed from -mm tree

merged [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Oct 4, 2017

lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author tree notice Applied
#0 lore raw

The patch titled

     Subject: exec: binfmt_misc: don't nullify Node->dentry in kill_node()

has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
exec-binfmt_misc-dont-nullify-node-dentry-in-kill_node.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Subject: exec: binfmt_misc: don't nullify Node->dentry in kill_node()

kill_node() nullifies/checks Node->dentry to avoid double free. This complicates the next changes and this is very confusing:

- we do not need to check dentry != NULL under entries_lock, kill_node() is always called under inode_lock(d_inode(root)) and we rely on this inode_lock() anyway, without this lock the MISC_FMT_OPEN_FILE cleanup could race with itself.

- if kill_inode() was already called and ->dentry == NULL we should not even try to close e->interp_file.

We can change bm_entry_write() to simply check !list_empty(list) before kill_node. Again, we rely on inode_lock(), in particular it saves us from the race with bm_status_write(), another caller of kill_node().

---

 fs/binfmt_misc.c |   22 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
fs/binfmt_misc.c renamed from fs/binfmt_misc.c~exec-binfmt_misc-dont-nullify-node-dentry-in-kill_node +9 -13
diff -puN fs/binfmt_misc.c~exec-binfmt_misc-dont-nullify-node-dentry-in-kill_node fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -603,11 +603,7 @@ static void kill_node(Node *e)
 	struct dentry *dentry;
 
 	write_lock(&entries_lock);
-	dentry = e->dentry;
-	if (dentry) {
-		list_del_init(&e->list);
-		e->dentry = NULL;
-	}
+	list_del_init(&e->list);
 	write_unlock(&entries_lock);
 
 	if ((e->flags & MISC_FMT_OPEN_FILE) && e->interp_file) {
@@ -615,12 +611,11 @@ static void kill_node(Node *e)
 		e->interp_file = NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (dentry) {
-		drop_nlink(d_inode(dentry));
-		d_drop(dentry);
-		dput(dentry);
-		simple_release_fs(&bm_mnt, &entry_count);
-	}
+	dentry = e->dentry;
+	drop_nlink(d_inode(dentry));
+	d_drop(dentry);
+	dput(dentry);
+	simple_release_fs(&bm_mnt, &entry_count);
 }
 
 /* /<entry> */
@@ -665,7 +660,8 @@ static ssize_t bm_entry_write(struct fil
 		root = file_inode(file)->i_sb->s_root;
 		inode_lock(d_inode(root));
 
-		kill_node(e);
+		if (!list_empty(&e->list))
+			kill_node(e);
 
 		inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
 		break;
@@ -794,7 +790,7 @@ static ssize_t bm_status_write(struct fi
 		inode_lock(d_inode(root));
 
 		while (!list_empty(&entries))
-			kill_node(list_entry(entries.next, Node, list));
+			kill_node(list_first_entry(&entries, Node, list));
 
 		inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
 		break;

_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are