package/x264: bump version
PATCH 1/1 package/x264: bump version
--- package/x264/x264.hash | 2 +- package/x264/x264.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/x264/x264.hash +1 -1
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ # Locally computed -sha256 aefebcf4fa547c6a26e1311b5701e6b94030bae23eb9d14df1211dd5bcb7d4d5 x264-df79067c0cf33da712d344b5f8869be7eaf326f3.tar.gz +sha256 986863122b0b3ac2c1fa27c6e3932c3490b84287335fa162bca020aa815aa695 x264-ba24899b0bf23345921da022f7a51e0c57dbe73d.tar.gz
package/x264/x264.mk +1 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -X264_VERSION = df79067c0cf33da712d344b5f8869be7eaf326f3 +X264_VERSION = ba24899b0bf23345921da022f7a51e0c57dbe73d X264_SITE = git://git.videolan.org/x264.git X264_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+ X264_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH 1/1 package/x264: bump version
Hello,
Quoted 5 lines · Bernd Kuhls
Signed-off-by Bernd Kuhls <[email protected]>--- package/x264/x264.hash | 2 +- package/x264/x264.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Bumping from a random Git commit, to another random Git commit, without any explanation.
I've applied. But next time, without an explanation, I won't.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/1 package/x264: bump version
Am Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:49:03 +0200 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni:
Quoted 4 lines
Bumping from a random Git commit, to another random Git commit, without any explanation.
I've applied. But next time, without an explanation, I won't.
Hi Thomas,
upstream does not provide releases with version numbers:
https://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html
I try to bump the package once during each buildroot release cycle. Do you consider this explanation sufficient?
Regards, Bernd
PATCH 1/1 package/x264: bump version
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Bernd" == Bernd Kuhls <[email protected]> writes:
Am Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:49:03 +0200 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni:
Quoted 4 lines
Bumping from a random Git commit, to another random Git commit, without any explanation.
I've applied. But next time, without an explanation, I won't.
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Thomas,
upstream does not provide releases with version numbers:
https://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.htmlI try to bump the package once during each buildroot release cycle. Do you consider this explanation sufficient?
Still, it would be good if there would be some more background information about why this new version is an improvement (E.G. a short summary of the new features or bugfixes) or doesn't introduce any big regressions (E.G. information about how you have tested it).
This kind of information is useful to understand how risky it is (E.G. we are getting close to rc1 time) or if it should also be backported to 2017.08.x / 2017.02.x
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard