Per-package SDK and target directories
cover Per-package SDK and target directories
Hello,
Here is a first iteration of the per-package SDK and target directory implementation. This is definitely not ready for merging, but it already works enough to give it some exposure. I'm sending it early so that:
- Interested people can take the patches, try them on their configurations, and report me the problems that they face.
- Interested people start reviewing the patch series will it is still small and simple, because I'm sure it will grow quite a bit before it gets to a point where it can be merged.
It works well enough to build a complete toolchain and a system with Busybox, Dropbear, a Python interpreter, strace, with the result booting under Qemu.
If you're interested in testing it, you can find the patch series at:
http://git.free-electrons.com/users/thomas-petazzoni/buildroot/log/?h=ppsh
Note: in the following discussion, we use the terminology "SDK" to refer to the combination of HOST_DIR and STAGING_DIR, i.e the cross-compiler and its sysroot with target libraries/headers, and a bunch of other native programs. Since STAGING_DIR is included inside HOST_DIR, the SDK directory is in essence just HOST_DIR.
What is per-package SDK and target?
===================================
Currently, output/host (SDK) and output/target are global directories:
all packages use files installed by other packages in those global directories, and in turn into those global directories.
The idea of per-package SDK and target is that instead of having such global directories, we would have one SDK directory and one target directory per-package, containing just what this package needs (dependencies), and in which the package installs its files.
Why do we want per-package SDK and target?
==========================================
There are two main motivations for per-package SDK and target directories, which are related:
1. Since the SDK directory is global, a package can currently see libraries/headers that it has not explicitly expressed a dependency on. So package A may not have a dependency on package B, but if package B happens to have been installed before, and package A "configure" script automaticatically detects a library installed by package B, it will use it. We have added tons of conditional dependencies in Buildroot to make such situations less problematic, but it is an endless fight, as upstream developers constantly add more optional dependencies to their software.
Using per-package SDK, a given package uses as its SDK a directory that only contains the libraries/headers from packages explicitly listed in its dependencies. So it cannot mistakenly see a library/header installed by another package.
2. Top-level parallel build (building multiple packages in parallel) is currently not enabled because we have global SDK and target directories.
Let's imagine package A configure script auto-detects a library provided by package B, but Buildroot does not encode this dependency in package A's .mk file. Package A and package B are therefore totally independent from a build dependency point of view.
Without top-level parallel build (current situation), you have a guarantee on the build order: either A is always built before B, or B is always built before A. So at least, every build gives the same result: A is built with B's functionality or without it, but it is consistent accross rebuilds.
If you enable top-level parallel build, because A and B are totally independent, you can get A built before B or B built before A depending on the build scheduling. This can change at every build! This means that for a given configuration, A will sometimes be built with B's functionality, sometimes not. Totally unacceptable.
And of course, this extends to case where package B gets installed while package A is being configured. So package A configure script will see some parts of B being installed, other parts not installed, causing all sort of weird and difficult to debug race conditions.
By having per-package SDK directories, we ensure that package A will only see the dependencies its has explicitly expressed, and that no other package gets installed in parallel in the same SDK directory.
How is it implemented?
======================
The basic idea is pretty simple:
- For each package, we have:
output/per-package/<package>/host, which is the specific SDK directory for <package>.
output/per-package/<package>/target, which is the specific target directory for <package>.
- Before <package> is configured, we copy into its specific SDK and target directories the SDK and target directories from its direct dependencies. This basically populates its SDK with the cross-compiler and all libraries that <package> needs. This copy is done using rsync with hard links, so it is very fast and cheap from a storage consumption point of view.
- While <package> is being built, HOST_DIR, STAGING_DIR and TARGET_DIR are tweaked to point to the current <package> specific SDK and target directories. I.e, HOST_DIR no longer points to output/host, but to output/per-package/<package>/host/.
And this is basically enough to get things working!
There are of course a few additional things to do:
- At the end of the build, we still want a global target directory (to generate the filesystem images) and a global SDK. Therefore, in target-finalize, we assemble such global directories by copying the per-package SDK and target directories from all packages listed in the $(PACKAGES) variable.
- We need to fix our pkg-config wrapper script so that it uses relative path instead of absolute paths. This allows the wrapper script to work regardless of which per-package SDK directory it is installed in.
- We need to move away from using absolute RPATH for host binaries, and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH pointing to the current per-package SDK directory.
What remains to be done?
========================
- Completely get rid of the global HOST_DIR, TARGET_DIR and STAGING_DIR definitions, so that nothing uses them, and they really become per-package variables.
- While the toolchain sysroot, pkg-config paths and host RPATHs are properly handled, there are quite certainly a lot of other places that have absolute paths that won't work well with per-package SDK, and that need to be adjusted.
- Perhaps use a temporary per-package SDK and target directory when building a package, and rename it to the final name once the package has finished building. This would allow to detect situations where the per-package SDK directory of package A contains absolute paths referring to the per-package SDK directory of package B. Such absolute paths are wrong, but we currently don't see them because the per-package SDK directory for package B still exists.
- Many other issues that I'm sure people will report.
Comparison with Gustavo's patch series
======================================
Gustavo Zacarias did a previous implementation of this, available in
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/shortlog/refs/heads/pps3-next. Compared to Gustavo's patch series, this patch series:
- Implement per-package SDK and target directories, while Gustavo was only doing per-package staging.
- Gustavo had several patches to pass BR_TOOLCHAIN_SYSROOT to the toolchain wrapper to pass the location of the current sysroot.
This is no longer needed, because 1/ we're doing a full per-package SDK directory rather than per-package staging, which means the sysroot is always at the same relative location compared to the cross-compiler binary and 2/ the toolchain wrapper derives the sysroot location relatively to the wrapper location. Thanks to this, the following patches from Gustavo are (I believe) not needed:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/1ef6e798064649726d396bcb581ddbe4573c2460
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/d15f6c6917b555bbbbbf97c292fad4db9d4007d4
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/95900b65c29a010d85a769c9c6374cf3835f2169
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/7ed53a5437ab09b85bf6d1953f6ff6049dfcc114
- Gustavo had a patch to make our pkg-config wrapper script look at BR_TOOLCHAIN_SYSROOT, in order to find the /usr/{lib,share}/pkgconfig folders of the current sysroot. Just like for the toolchain-wrapper, such a change is no longer needed, and a simple change to our pkg-config script to use relative paths is sufficient.
- I haven't integrated Gustavo patches that move from $(shell ...) to using backticks to delay the evaluation of STAGING_DIR/HOST_DIR/TARGET_DIR:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/0c11c60865f1445830643bb404f92c20d563260c
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/207d2248ec8542293b6201b5c86f971021a3a591
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/7f6a69819fbb176e29a1c3a53b4a76efe87dad15
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/3328a9745eee555f5e5ef7df835afc26612ecd7b
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/45a9d8c2aa6f3c0d2d8ed989d843890025faa3e8
- I haven't looked at Qt specific issues, such as the ones fixed by Gustavo in:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/643e982e635f4386ccefcda9da4b84536af84d04
- I am not doing all the .la files, *-config, *.prl, etc. tweaks that Gustavo is doing in:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/3f7b227b4c8e4514df6e5d54f88fcfb3a3a4bae0
It is part of the "remaining absolute paths that need to be fixed" item that I mentionned above.
Best regards,
Thomas
Thomas Petazzoni (4):
pkgconf: use relative path to STAGING_DIR instead of absolute path
core: change host RPATH handling
toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN
core: implement per-package SDK and target
Makefile | 19 +++++++-- package/Makefile.in | 2 +- package/pkg-generic.mk | 45 ++++++++++++++++++---- package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk | 4 +- support/scripts/fix-rpath | 15 +++++--- .../toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk | 2 +- 6 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
RFC 1/4 pkgconf: use relative path to STAGING_DIR instead of absolute path
The pkg-config wrapper script is currently generated with absolute paths to $(STAGING_DIR). However, this will not work properly with per-package SDK, and each package will be built with a different STAGING_DIR value.
In order to fix this, we adjust how the pkg-config wrapper script is generated, so that it uses a relative path to itself: the sysroot (i.e STAGING_DIR) is always located in $(path of pkg-config)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR).
This change is independent from the per-package SDK work, and could be applied independently from it.
--- package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk +2 -2
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ endef define HOST_PKGCONF_INSTALL_WRAPPER $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -D package/pkgconf/pkg-config.in \ $(HOST_DIR)/bin/pkg-config - $(SED) 's, at PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR@,$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig:$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/share/pkgconfig,' \ - -e 's, at STAGING_DIR@,$(STAGING_DIR),' \ + $(SED) 's, at PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR@,$$(dirname $$0)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig:$$(dirname $$0)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR)/usr/share/pkgconfig,' \ + -e 's, at STAGING_DIR@,$$(dirname $$0)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR),' \ $(HOST_DIR)/bin/pkg-config endef
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
RFC 1/4 pkgconf: use relative path to STAGING_DIR instead of absolute path
Quoted 10 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
The pkg-config wrapper script is currently generated with absolute paths to $(STAGING_DIR). However, this will not work properly with per-package SDK, and each package will be built with a different
STAGING_DIRvalue.In order to fix this, we adjust how the pkg-config wrapper script is generated, so that it uses a relative path to itself: the sysroot (i.e
STAGING_DIR) is always located in $(path of pkg-config)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR).
Quoted 4 lines
This change is independent from the per-package SDK work, and could be applied independently from it.
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
It's OK as it is
However...
Quoted 9 lines
--- package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk +0
-0
package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk endef · line 23
Quoted 7 lines
package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk +2
-2@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ endef define HOST_PKGCONF_INSTALL_WRAPPER $(INSTALL) -m 0755 -D package/pkgconf/pkg-config.in \ $(HOST_DIR)/bin/pkg-config - $(SED) 's, at PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR@,$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig:$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/share/pkgconfig,' \ - -e 's, at STAGING_DIR@,$(STAGING_DIR),' \ + $(SED) 's, at PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR@,$$(dirname $$0)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig:$$(dirname $$0)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR)/usr/share/pkgconfig,' \ + -e 's, at STAGING_DIR@,$$(dirname $$0)/../$(STAGING_SUBDIR),' \
Instead of all this complexity, why not do it directly in pkg-config.in, and
just substitute @STAGING_SUBDIR@ ? Note that the file will have 4 instances of $(dirname $0) so an intermediary variable is called for.
If you do that, you can maybe also do some line splitting there, and add the
missing exec.
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 4 lines
package/pkgconf/pkgconf.mk +0
-0$(HOST_DIR)/bin/pkg-config endef
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniCurrently, our strategy for the RPATH of host binaries is as follows:
- During the build, we force an absolute RPATH to be encoded into binaries, by passing -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR)/lib. This ensures that host binaries will find their libraries.
- In the "make sdk" target, when preparing the SDK to be relocatable, we use patchelf to replace those absolute RPATHs by relative RPATHs that use $ORIGIN.
Unfortunately, the use of absolute RPATH during the build is not compatible with the move to per-package SDK, where a different host directory is used for the build of each package. Therefore, we need to move to a different strategy for RPATH handling.
The new strategy is as follows:
- During the build, we do not encode any RPATH into the host binaries. Instead, we specify LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment to point to the current HOST_DIR/lib directory (for the package being currently built).
- At the end of the build, in order to make sure that binaries are usable without LD_LIBRARY_PATH, we fixup the host binaries to use $ORIGIN/../lib. This is more-or-less what was done previously in the "make sdk" target, except that instead of turning absolute paths into relative paths in the RPATH, we are simply setting the RPATH to $ORIGIN/../lib.
In order to implement this, the fix-rpath script logic is adjusted for the "host" case.
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
This change is independent from the per-package SDK functionality, and could be applied separately.
--- Makefile | 4 +++- package/Makefile.in | 2 +- package/pkg-generic.mk | 8 -------- support/scripts/fix-rpath | 15 ++++++++++----- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Makefile +3 -1
@@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ LEGAL_MANIFEST_CSV_HOST = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/host-manifest.csv LEGAL_WARNINGS = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/.warnings LEGAL_REPORT = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/README +export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$(HOST_DIR)/lib) + ################################################################################ # # staging and target directories do NOT list these as
@@ -558,7 +560,6 @@ world: target-post-image .PHONY: sdk sdk: world @$(call MESSAGE,"Rendering the SDK relocatable") - $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath staging $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(TOPDIR)/support/misc/relocate-sdk.sh $(HOST_DIR)/relocate-sdk.sh echo $(HOST_DIR) > $(HOST_DIR)/share/buildroot/sdk-location
@@ -679,6 +680,7 @@ $(TARGETS_ROOTFS): target-finalize .PHONY: target-finalize target-finalize: $(PACKAGES) @$(call MESSAGE,"Finalizing target directory") + $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host $(foreach hook,$(TARGET_FINALIZE_HOOKS),$($(hook))$(sep)) rm -rf $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/include $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/aclocal \ $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/pkgconfig \
package/Makefile.in +1 -1
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ HOST_CPPFLAGS = -I$(HOST_DIR)/include HOST_CFLAGS ?= -O2 HOST_CFLAGS += $(HOST_CPPFLAGS) HOST_CXXFLAGS += $(HOST_CFLAGS) -HOST_LDFLAGS += -L$(HOST_DIR)/lib -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR)/lib +HOST_LDFLAGS += -L$(HOST_DIR)/lib # The macros below are taken from linux 4.11 and adapted slightly. # Copy more when needed.
package/pkg-generic.mk +0 -8
@@ -105,14 +105,6 @@ endef GLOBAL_INSTRUMENTATION_HOOKS += check_bin_arch -# This hook checks that host packages that need libraries that we build -# have a proper DT_RPATH or DT_RUNPATH tag -define check_host_rpath - $(if $(filter install-host,$(2)),\ - $(if $(filter end,$(1)),support/scripts/check-host-rpath $(3) $(HOST_DIR))) -endef -GLOBAL_INSTRUMENTATION_HOOKS += check_host_rpath - define step_check_build_dir_one if [ -d $(2) ]; then \ printf "%s: installs files in %s\n" $(1) $(2) >&2; \
support/scripts/fix-rpath +10 -5
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ main() { local rootdir local tree="${1}" local find_args=( ) - local sanitize_extra_args=( ) + local sanitize_args=( ) if ! "${PATCHELF}" --version > /dev/null 2>&1; then echo "Error: can't execute patchelf utility '${PATCHELF}'"
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ main() { cp "${PATCHELF}" "${PATCHELF}.__to_be_patched" # we always want $ORIGIN-based rpaths to make it relocatable. - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--relative-to-file" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--set-rpath" ) + sanitize_args+=( "\$ORIGIN/../lib" ) ;; staging)
@@ -101,14 +102,18 @@ main() { done # should be like for the target tree below - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--make-rpath-relative" ) + sanitize_args+=( "${rootdir}" ) ;; target) rootdir="${TARGET_DIR}" # we don't want $ORIGIN-based rpaths but absolute paths without rootdir. # we also want to remove rpaths pointing to /lib or /usr/lib. - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--make-rpath-relative" ) + sanitize_args+=( "${rootdir}" ) ;; *)
@@ -125,7 +130,7 @@ main() { # make files writable if necessary changed=$(chmod -c u+w "${file}") # call patchelf to sanitize the rpath - ${PATCHELF} --make-rpath-relative "${rootdir}" ${sanitize_extra_args[@]} "${file}" + ${PATCHELF} ${sanitize_args[@]} "${file}" # restore the original permission test "${changed}" != "" && chmod u-w "${file}" fi
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Thomas, All,
Here is a summary of our discussion on IRC...
On 2017-11-03 17:06 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
Quoted 15 lines
Currently, our strategy for the RPATH of host binaries is as follows:
- During the build, we force an absolute RPATH to be encoded into binaries, by passing -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR)/lib. This ensures that host binaries will find their libraries.
- In the "make sdk" target, when preparing the SDK to be relocatable, we use patchelf to replace those absolute RPATHs by relative RPATHs that use $ORIGIN.
Unfortunately, the use of absolute RPATH during the build is not compatible with the move to per-package SDK, where a different host directory is used for the build of each package. Therefore, we need to move to a different strategy for RPATH handling.
Quoted 6 lines
The new strategy is as follows:
- During the build, we do not encode any RPATH into the host binaries. Instead, we specify
LD_LIBRARY_PATHenvironment to point to the current HOST_DIR/lib directory (for the package being currently built).
In the past, we explicitly got rid of LD_LIBRARY_PATH because it does not work. See 34d081674a (core/pkg-infrastructures: remove LD_LIBRARY_PATH from the environment).
Briefly, it does not work when we build a library that is also present on the distro, which is used by a tool from the distro, and we build it in an incompatibl way.
So, we'll have to come up with another solution, like your suggested alternative.
Quoted 7 lines
- At the end of the build, in order to make sure that binaries are usable without
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, we fixup the host binaries to use $ORIGIN/../lib. This is more-or-less what was done previously in the "make sdk" target, except that instead of turning absolute paths into relative paths in the RPATH, we are simply setting the RPATH to $ORIGIN/../lib.
Quoted 8 lines
In order to implement this, the fix-rpath script logic is adjusted for the "host" case.
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
I wonder how expensive that would be. It would be nice to time this.
Also note that, even if the overhead is noticeable, this would be compensated by the mere fact that we are now doing a parallel build, so we would end up winning.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 128 lines
This change is independent from the per-package SDK functionality, and could be applied separately.
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>--- Makefile | 4 +++- package/Makefile.in | 2 +- package/pkg-generic.mk | 8 -------- support/scripts/fix-rpath | 15 ++++++++++----- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)Makefile +3
-1@@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ LEGAL_MANIFEST_CSV_HOST = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/host-manifest.csv LEGAL_WARNINGS = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/.warnings LEGAL_REPORT = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/README +export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$(HOST_DIR)/lib) + ################################################################################ # # staging and target directories do NOT list these as@@ -558,7 +560,6 @@ world: target-post-image .PHONY: sdk sdk: world @$(call MESSAGE,"Rendering the SDK relocatable") - $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath staging $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(TOPDIR)/support/misc/relocate-sdk.sh $(HOST_DIR)/relocate-sdk.sh echo $(HOST_DIR) > $(HOST_DIR)/share/buildroot/sdk-location@@ -679,6 +680,7 @@ $(TARGETS_ROOTFS): target-finalize .PHONY: target-finalize target-finalize: $(PACKAGES) @$(call MESSAGE,"Finalizing target directory") + $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host $(foreach hook,$(TARGET_FINALIZE_HOOKS),$($(hook))$(sep)) rm -rf $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/include $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/aclocal \ $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/pkgconfig \package/Makefile.in +1
-1@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ HOST_CPPFLAGS = -I$(HOST_DIR)/include HOST_CFLAGS ?= -O2 HOST_CFLAGS += $(HOST_CPPFLAGS) HOST_CXXFLAGS += $(HOST_CFLAGS) -HOST_LDFLAGS += -L$(HOST_DIR)/lib -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR)/lib +HOST_LDFLAGS += -L$(HOST_DIR)/lib # The macros below are taken from linux 4.11 and adapted slightly. # Copy more when needed.package/pkg-generic.mk +0
-8@@ -105,14 +105,6 @@ endef GLOBAL_INSTRUMENTATION_HOOKS += check_bin_arch -# This hook checks that host packages that need libraries that we build -# have a proper DT_RPATH or DT_RUNPATH tag -define check_host_rpath - $(if $(filter install-host,$(2)),\ - $(if $(filter end,$(1)),support/scripts/check-host-rpath $(3) $(HOST_DIR))) -endef -GLOBAL_INSTRUMENTATION_HOOKS += check_host_rpath - define step_check_build_dir_one if [ -d $(2) ]; then \ printf "%s: installs files in %s\n" $(1) $(2) >&2; \support/scripts/fix-rpath +10
-5@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ main() { local rootdir local tree="${1}" local find_args=( ) - local sanitize_extra_args=( ) + local sanitize_args=( ) if ! "${PATCHELF}" --version > /dev/null 2>&1; then echo "Error: can't execute patchelf utility '${PATCHELF}'"@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ main() { cp "${PATCHELF}" "${PATCHELF}.__to_be_patched" # we always want $ORIGIN-based rpaths to make it relocatable. - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--relative-to-file" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--set-rpath" ) + sanitize_args+=( "\$ORIGIN/../lib" ) ;; staging)@@ -101,14 +102,18 @@ main() { done # should be like for the target tree below - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--make-rpath-relative" ) + sanitize_args+=( "${rootdir}" ) ;; target) rootdir="${TARGET_DIR}" # we don't want $ORIGIN-based rpaths but absolute paths without rootdir. # we also want to remove rpaths pointing to /lib or /usr/lib. - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--no-standard-lib-dirs" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--make-rpath-relative" ) + sanitize_args+=( "${rootdir}" ) ;; *)@@ -125,7 +130,7 @@ main() { # make files writable if necessary changed=$(chmod -c u+w "${file}") # call patchelf to sanitize the rpath - ${PATCHELF} --make-rpath-relative "${rootdir}" ${sanitize_extra_args[@]} "${file}" + ${PATCHELF} ${sanitize_args[@]} "${file}" # restore the original permission test "${changed}" != "" && chmod u-w "${file}" fiSignature · 1 line
2.13.6
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Hello,
Quoted 27 lines · Yann E. MORIN
In the past, we explicitly got rid of
LD_LIBRARY_PATHbecause it does not work. See34d081674a(core/pkg-infrastructures: removeLD_LIBRARY_PATHfrom the environment).Briefly, it does not work when we build a library that is also present on the distro, which is used by a tool from the distro, and we build it in an incompatibl way.
So, we'll have to come up with another solution, like your suggested alternative.
Quoted 7 lines
- At the end of the build, in order to make sure that binaries are usable without
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, we fixup the host binaries to use $ORIGIN/../lib. This is more-or-less what was done previously in the "make sdk" target, except that instead of turning absolute paths into relative paths in the RPATH, we are simply setting the RPATH to $ORIGIN/../lib.Quoted 8 lines
In order to implement this, the fix-rpath script logic is adjusted for the "host" case.
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
Quoted 5 lines
I wonder how expensive that would be. It would be nice to time this.
Also note that, even if the overhead is noticeable, this would be compensated by the mere fact that we are now doing a parallel build, so we would end up winning.
Thanks for the feedback. We already discussed this on IRC, and I agree. I'll have a look at implementing the solution of doing the patchelf adding $ORIGIN/../lib as an RPATH directly after the installation of each package.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Quoted 33 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Quoted 29 lines · Yann E. MORIN
In the past, we explicitly got rid of
LD_LIBRARY_PATHbecause it does not work. See34d081674a(core/pkg-infrastructures: removeLD_LIBRARY_PATHfrom the environment).Briefly, it does not work when we build a library that is also present on the distro, which is used by a tool from the distro, and we build it in an incompatibl way.
So, we'll have to come up with another solution, like your suggested alternative.
Quoted 7 lines
- At the end of the build, in order to make sure that binaries are usable without
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, we fixup the host binaries to use $ORIGIN/../lib. This is more-or-less what was done previously in the "make sdk" target, except that instead of turning absolute paths into relative paths in the RPATH, we are simply setting the RPATH to $ORIGIN/../lib.Quoted 8 lines
In order to implement this, the fix-rpath script logic is adjusted for the "host" case.
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
I wonder how expensive that would be. It would be nice to time this.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Also note that, even if the overhead is noticeable, this would be compensated by the mere fact that we are now doing a parallel build, so we would end up winning.
Thanks for the feedback. We already discussed this on IRC, and I agree. I'll have a look at implementing the solution of doing the patchelf adding $ORIGIN/../lib as an RPATH directly after the installation of each package.
Note that according to Wolfgang's measurements (if I remember correctly), doing
fix-rpath on the host dir didn't take too long, but doing it in staging does. There aren't that many host files.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
In reply to Yann E. MORINHello,
Quoted 7 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 5 lines
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
I wonder how expensive that would be. It would be nice to time this.
OK, to time this, I did a quick hacky shell script
(http://code.bulix.org/uboevd-223829). What it does is:
- Generate a mix of ELF files and random data files (half of the files are ELF files, half are random data files). This is the "generate" target of the script.
- Fixup rpath to $ORIGIN/../lib if not already fixed. We don't want to fixup files repeatedly, as we don't want to duplicate files over and over by breaking hard links. So we really want to set the RPATH only once per binary.
Results are as follows:
$ ./rpath-evaluation.sh generate 0 500 ... generate 250 random data files, 250 ELF programs with a crappy rpath ...
$ time ./rpath-evaluation.sh fixup
real 0m0.976s
user 0m0.546s
sys 0m0.457s
$ time ./rpath-evaluation.sh fixup
real 0m0.610s
user 0m0.393s
sys 0m0.234s
So the first fixup pass, which actually fixes the RPATH of 250 binaries takes about one second. The next fixup pass doesn't do anything, except checking that all binaries already have a fixed RPATH.
So we see that it will take ~600ms to scan 500 files, provided half of them are ELF files, verify that they already have the correct RPATH.
To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Quoted 41 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Quoted 7 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 5 lines
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
I wonder how expensive that would be. It would be nice to time this.
OK, to time this, I did a quick hacky shell script
(http://code.bulix.org/uboevd-223829). What it does is:- Generate a mix of ELF files and random data files (half of the files are ELF files, half are random data files). This is the "generate" target of the script.
- Fixup rpath to $ORIGIN/../lib if not already fixed. We don't want to fixup files repeatedly, as we don't want to duplicate files over and over by breaking hard links. So we really want to set the RPATH only once per binary.
Results are as follows:
$ ./rpath-evaluation.sh generate 0 500 ... generate 250 random data files, 250 ELF programs with a crappy rpath ...$ time ./rpath-evaluation.sh fixupreal 0m0.976s
user 0m0.546s
sys 0m0.457s$ time ./rpath-evaluation.sh fixupreal 0m0.610s
user 0m0.393s
sys 0m0.234s
Quoted 8 lines
So the first fixup pass, which actually fixes the RPATH of 250 binaries takes about one second. The next fixup pass doesn't do anything, except checking that all binaries already have a fixed RPATH.
So we see that it will take ~600ms to scan 500 files, provided half of them are ELF files, verify that they already have the correct RPATH.
To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?
500 files is not a lot if you include staging as well, so I've repeated the
experiment with 50000 files and on a HDD. First pass takes 3m34, second pass 3m43. Hm, perhaps I should have left my computer alone for a while during this experiment :-).
Anyway, I think the bottom line is that the fixup script should avoid going
over staging. But $(HOST_DIR)/{bin,sbin,lib} should be enough anyway.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Hello,
Quoted 3 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 1 line
To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?
500 files is not a lot if you include staging as well
Why would I include staging? I don't see at all why fixing up RPATH in staging after each package build would be necessary.
Quoted 3 lines
so I've repeated the experiment with 50000 files and on a HDD. First pass takes 3m34, second pass 3m43. Hm, perhaps I should have left my computer alone for a while during this experiment :-).
It's not very logical that the second pass is longer than the first pass, since the first pass does do patchelf invocations per file, while the second pass does only one patchelf invocation per file.
Quoted 2 lines
Anyway, I think the bottom line is that the fixup script should
avoid going over staging.
Why would it need to go over staging?
Quoted 1 line
But $(HOST_DIR)/{bin,sbin,lib} should be enough anyway.
Yes, that was my intent. If needed, we could optimize it by only doing the fixup at the end of a host package installation. But since we have a few target packages installing host stuff (toolchain, qt, etc.), it would require them to explicitly state that they need host rpath fixups. Perhaps it's easiest for now to just do the rpath fixup after every package installation.
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Quoted 10 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Quoted 3 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 1 line
To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?
500 files is not a lot if you include staging as well
Why would I include staging? I don't see at all why fixing up RPATH in staging after each package build would be necessary.
The simplest way would be to do find $(HOST_DIR) -type f but that includes staging.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines
so I've repeated the experiment with 50000 files and on a HDD. First pass takes 3m34, second pass 3m43. Hm, perhaps I should have left my computer alone for a while during this experiment :-).
Quoted 10 lines
It's not very logical that the second pass is longer than the first pass, since the first pass does do patchelf invocations per file, while the second pass does only one patchelf invocation per file.
Quoted 2 lines
Anyway, I think the bottom line is that the fixup script should
avoid going over staging.Why would it need to go over staging?
Quoted 1 line
But $(HOST_DIR)/{bin,sbin,lib} should be enough anyway.
So this is not true, we also need $(HOST_DIR)/$(GNU_TARGET_NAME)/{bin,lib}.
So then it's perhaps easier to just -prune staging.
Quoted 6 lines
Yes, that was my intent. If needed, we could optimize it by only doing the fixup at the end of a host package installation. But since we have a few target packages installing host stuff (toolchain, qt, etc.), it would require them to explicitly state that they need host rpath fixups. Perhaps it's easiest for now to just do the rpath fixup after every package installation.
After every package installation would be better, yes.
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 5 lines
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Hello,
Quoted 8 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?
500 files is not a lot if you include staging as well
Why would I include staging? I don't see at all why fixing up RPATH in staging after each package build would be necessary.
The simplest way would be to do find $(HOST_DIR) -type f but that includes staging.
Hum, you didn't reply to my question, which was: "Why would we need to fixup RPATHs in STAGING_DIR" ?
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
But $(HOST_DIR)/{bin,sbin,lib} should be enough anyway.
So this is not true, we also need $(HOST_DIR)/$(GNU_TARGET_NAME)/{bin,lib}.
So then it's perhaps easier to just -prune staging.
Absolutely.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Yes, that was my intent. If needed, we could optimize it by only doing the fixup at the end of a host package installation. But since we have a few target packages installing host stuff (toolchain, qt, etc.), it would require them to explicitly state that they need host rpath fixups. Perhaps it's easiest for now to just do the rpath fixup after every package installation.
After every package installation would be better, yes.
ACK.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Quoted 4 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
To me, this sounds very reasonable. What do you think?
500 files is not a lot if you include staging as well
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why would I include staging? I don't see at all why fixing up RPATH in staging after each package build would be necessary.
The simplest way would be to do find $(HOST_DIR) -type f but that includes staging.
Hum, you didn't reply to my question, which was: "Why would we need to fixup RPATHs in
STAGING_DIR" ?
We don't, obviously. However, if we naively go through HOST_DIR we will includeSTAGING_DIR. I thought that was obvious :-)
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
But $(HOST_DIR)/{bin,sbin,lib} should be enough anyway.
So this is not true, we also need $(HOST_DIR)/$(GNU_TARGET_NAME)/{bin,lib}.
So then it's perhaps easier to just -prune staging.Absolutely.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Yes, that was my intent. If needed, we could optimize it by only doing the fixup at the end of a host package installation. But since we have a few target packages installing host stuff (toolchain, qt, etc.), it would require them to explicitly state that they need host rpath fixups. Perhaps it's easiest for now to just do the rpath fixup after every package installation.
After every package installation would be better, yes.
ACK.
Thomas
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniQuoted 29 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Currently, our strategy for the RPATH of host binaries is as follows:
- During the build, we force an absolute RPATH to be encoded into binaries, by passing -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR)/lib. This ensures that host binaries will find their libraries.
- In the "make sdk" target, when preparing the SDK to be relocatable, we use patchelf to replace those absolute RPATHs by relative RPATHs that use $ORIGIN.
Unfortunately, the use of absolute RPATH during the build is not compatible with the move to per-package SDK, where a different host directory is used for the build of each package. Therefore, we need to move to a different strategy for RPATH handling.
The new strategy is as follows:
- During the build, we do not encode any RPATH into the host binaries. Instead, we specify
LD_LIBRARY_PATHenvironment to point to the current HOST_DIR/lib directory (for the package being currently built).- At the end of the build, in order to make sure that binaries are usable without
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, we fixup the host binaries to use $ORIGIN/../lib. This is more-or-less what was done previously in the "make sdk" target, except that instead of turning absolute paths into relative paths in the RPATH, we are simply setting the RPATH to $ORIGIN/../lib.
Quoted 8 lines
In order to implement this, the fix-rpath script logic is adjusted for the "host" case.
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
As discussed, this would be the preferred approach after all.
Quoted 3 lines
This change is independent from the per-package SDK functionality, and could be applied separately.
Shouldn't this type of comment be below the --- ?
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>---
[snip]
support/scripts/fix-rpath main() { · line 93
Quoted 7 lines
support/scripts/fix-rpath +2
-1@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ main() { cp "${PATCHELF}" "${PATCHELF}.__to_be_patched" # we always want $ORIGIN-based rpaths to make it relocatable. - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--relative-to-file" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--set-rpath" ) + sanitize_args+=( "\$ORIGIN/../lib" )
One advantage of --make-rpath-relative over --set-rpath is that the former will
also remove rpaths that are not needed (which I guess is often the case for host tools). OTOH for host tools this is not really important. And it doesn't even save size, patchelf doesn't shift sections to the left (IIRC). But it does save a tiny amount of startup time - for gcc, this could have an impact on overall build time.
Regards,
Arnout
[snip]
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Hello,
Quoted 7 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 5 lines
An alternative strategy would have been to keep the -Wl,-rpath,$(HOST_DIR) flag, and therefore the absolute RPATH in the host binaries, and fix such RPATH at the end of the build of every package. However, that would require calling fix-rpath after the installation of every package, which is a bit expensive.
As discussed, this would be the preferred approach after all.
Yes, agreed.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
This change is independent from the per-package SDK functionality, and could be applied separately.
Shouldn't this type of comment be below the --- ?
Well, it's not really that I expected the v1 of the patches to be merged :-)
Quoted 11 lines
support/scripts/fix-rpath main() { · line 93
Quoted 7 lines
support/scripts/fix-rpath +2
-1@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ main() { cp "${PATCHELF}" "${PATCHELF}.__to_be_patched" # we always want $ORIGIN-based rpaths to make it relocatable. - sanitize_extra_args+=( "--relative-to-file" ) + sanitize_args+=( "--set-rpath" ) + sanitize_args+=( "\$ORIGIN/../lib" )One advantage of --make-rpath-relative over --set-rpath is that the former will
also remove rpaths that are not needed (which I guess is often the case for host tools).
Well, --set-rpath sets the RPATH, so I believe it entirely removes any existing RPATH and replaces them all by just $ORIGIN/../lib. So I don't see how it could be more "efficient", since we're down to a single RPATH, which is the only rpath that is needed.
Perhaps the only problem that I can think of is if some host binaries do have libraries installed in non-standard locations, and really need a custom absolute RPATH such
as /home/foo/buildroot/output/per-package/host/lib/baz/ to be turned into $ORIGIN/../lib/baz/. However, I don't think we have such non-standard library locations for host packages, so I simply ignored this possible problem for now. It is a problem that can be fixed later on if needed by adjusting the host rpath mangling logic.
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 2/4 core: change host RPATH handling
Quoted 3 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:15:38 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
One advantage of --make-rpath-relative over --set-rpath is that the former will
also remove rpaths that are not needed (which I guess is often the case for host tools).Well, --set-rpath sets the RPATH, so I believe it entirely removes any existing RPATH and replaces them all by just $ORIGIN/../lib. So I don't see how it could be more "efficient", since we're down to a single RPATH, which is the only rpath that is needed.
In many cases, no rpath is needed because it doesn't link with any
Buildroot-built libraries. In that case, no rpath is slightly more efficient for application startup.
Quoted 9 lines
Perhaps the only problem that I can think of is if some host binaries do have libraries installed in non-standard locations, and really need a custom absolute RPATH such
as/home/foo/buildroot/output/per-package/host/lib/baz/to be turned into $ORIGIN/../lib/baz/. However, I don't think we have such non-standard library locations for host packages, so I simply ignored this possible problem for now. It is a problem that can be fixed later on if needed by adjusting the host rpath mangling logic.
I've taken a quick look at what I have in my build dirs, and there is no .so
file in another location except for dlopen()'d stuff.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 3/4 toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniThe upcoming per-package SDK functionality is heavily based on the fact that HOST_DIR, STAGING_DIR and TARGET_DIR are evaluated during the configure/build/install steps of the packages. Therefore, any evaluation-during-assignment using := is going to cause problems, and need to be turned into evaluation-during-use using =.
This patch fix up one such instance in the external toolchain code.
This change is independent from the per-package SDK functionality, and could be applied separately.
--- toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk +1 -1
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(dir $(shell which $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX)-gcc)) endif else -TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/bin +TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN = $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/bin endif # If this is a buildroot toolchain, it already has a wrapper which we want to
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
RFC 3/4 toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN
Quoted 7 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
The upcoming per-package SDK functionality is heavily based on the fact that
HOST_DIR,STAGING_DIRandTARGET_DIRare evaluated during the configure/build/install steps of the packages. Therefore, any evaluation-during-assignment using := is going to cause problems, and need to be turned into evaluation-during-use using =.This patch fix up one such instance in the external toolchain code.
fixes
Quoted 14 lines
This change is independent from the per-package SDK functionality, and could be applied separately.
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>--- toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk +0
-0
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) · line 80
Quoted 5 lines
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk +1
-1@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(dir $(shell which $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX)-gcc)) endif else -TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/bin +TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN = $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/bin
It gives me the shivers to see the same variable sometimes defined recursive
and sometimes defined immediate... But I can't find an elegant solution (other than introducing an artificial extra variable, which is also ugly), so
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 4 lines
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk +0
-0endif # If this is a buildroot toolchain, it already has a wrapper which we want to
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 3/4 toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN
Hello,
Quoted 15 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) · line 80
Quoted 10 lines
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk +1
-1@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(dir $(shell which $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX)-gcc)) endif else -TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/bin +TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN = $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/binIt gives me the shivers to see the same variable sometimes defined recursive
and sometimes defined immediate... But I can't find an elegant solution (other than introducing an artificial extra variable, which is also ugly), so
Quoted 1 line
I also saw the other TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN assignment using := above, and didn't change it for now because that was not the case I was interested in testing/fixing. But my plan was to get back to this := assignment at some point. However, it seems like you have concluded that we have to keep := here. Could you explain why?
Note: I think keeping the := is OK, because TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX doesn't reference anything like HOST_DIR/STAGING_DIR/TARGET_DIR, so it's fine to have evaluation at the time of assignment for this case.
Perhaps a comment above would help clarify that it's intentional?
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 3/4 toolchain: post-pone evaluation of TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN
Quoted 19 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Quoted 15 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) · line 80
Quoted 10 lines
toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk +1
-1@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ifneq ($(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX),) TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(dir $(shell which $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIX)-gcc)) endif else -TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN := $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/bin +TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BIN = $(TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_INSTALL_DIR)/binIt gives me the shivers to see the same variable sometimes defined recursive
and sometimes defined immediate... But I can't find an elegant solution (other than introducing an artificial extra variable, which is also ugly), so
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
I also saw the other
TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BINassignment using := above, and didn't change it for now because that was not the case I was interested in testing/fixing. But my plan was to get back to this := assignment at some point. However, it seems like you have concluded that we have to keep := here. Could you explain why?
It's using $(shell which ...). That variable ends up in $(TARGET_CC), so it is
re-evaluated hundreds of times. I don't know if it really makes much of a difference, but the rule of thumb is: think twice about using recursively-expanded if it's used in many places and it contains $(shell ...) constructs.
Quoted 6 lines
Note: I think keeping the := is OK, because
TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PREFIXdoesn't reference anything like HOST_DIR/STAGING_DIR/TARGET_DIR, so it's fine to have evaluation at the time of assignment for this case.Perhaps a comment above would help clarify that it's intentional?
Not really needed, the code speaks for itself. The $(shell) makes it quite easy
to see why immediate expansion is chosen there.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniThis commit implemnts the core of the move to per-package SDK and target directories. The main idea is that instead of having a global output/host and output/target in which all packages install files, we switch to per-package host and target folders, that only contain their explicit dependencies.
There are two main benefits:
- Packages will no longer discover dependencies that they do not explicitly indicate in their <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES variable.
- We can support top-level parallel build properly, because a package only "sees" its own host directory and target directory, isolated from the build of other packages that can happen in parallel.
It works as follows:
- A new output/per-package/ folder is created, which will contain one sub-folder per package, and inside it, a "host" folder and a "target" folder:
output/per-package/busybox/target
output/per-package/busybox/host
output/per-package/host-fakeroot/target
output/per-package/host-fakeroot/host
This output/per-package/ folder is PER_PACKAGE_DIR, and each package defines <pkg>_TARGET_DIR, <pkg>_HOST_DIR and <pkg>_STAGING_DIR pointing to its own target, host and staging directories.
- The <pkg>_TARGET_DIR, <pkg>_HOST_DIR and <pkg>_STAGING_DIR variable are passed as TARGET_DIR, HOST_DIR and STAGING_DIR to the various make targets used for the different build steps of the packages. Effectively this means that when a package references $(HOST_DIR), the value is in fact $(<pkg>_HOST_DIR).
- Of course, packages have dependencies, so those dependencies must be installed in the per-package host and target folders before configuring the package. To do so, we simply rsync (using hard links to save space and time) the host and target folders of the direct dependencies of the package to the current package host and target folders. We only need to take care of direct dependencies (and not recursively all dependencies), because we accumulate into those per-package host and target folders the files installed by the dependencies.
- We fix LD_LIBRARY_PATH to make it point to the current package host directory.
This is basically enough to make per-package SDK and target work. The only gotcha is that at the end of the build, output/target and output/host are empty, which means that:
- The filesystem image creation code cannot work.
- We don't have a SDK to build code outside of Buildroot.
In order to fix this, this commit extends the target-finalize step so that it starts by populating output/target and output/host by rsync-ing into them the target and host directories of all packages listed in the $(PACKAGES) variable.
[Note: in fact, output/host is not completely empty, even though they should be. It contains the following files:
output/host/
output/host/lib64
output/host/usr
output/host/share
output/host/share/buildroot output/host/share/buildroot/Platform output/host/share/buildroot/Platform/Buildroot.cmake output/host/share/buildroot/toolchainfile.cmake output/host/lib
Perhaps those files should be installed by some package instead, perhaps the 'toolchain' package.]
--- Makefile | 17 ++++++++++++++--- package/pkg-generic.mk | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Makefile +14 -3
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ BR_GRAPH_OUT := $(or $(BR2_GRAPH_OUT),pdf) BUILD_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/build BINARIES_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/images TARGET_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/target +PER_PACKAGE_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/per-package + # initial definition so that 'make clean' works for most users, even without # .config. HOST_DIR will be overwritten later when .config is included. HOST_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/host
@@ -231,7 +233,7 @@ LEGAL_MANIFEST_CSV_HOST = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/host-manifest.csv LEGAL_WARNINGS = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/.warnings LEGAL_REPORT = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/README -export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$(HOST_DIR)/lib) +export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$($(PKG)_HOST_DIR)/lib) ################################################################################ #
@@ -239,7 +241,7 @@ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$(HOST_DIR)/lib) # dependencies anywhere else # ################################################################################ -$(BUILD_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) $(BINARIES_DIR) $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_TARGET) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_HOST): +$(BUILD_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) $(BINARIES_DIR) $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_TARGET) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_HOST) $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR): @mkdir -p $@ BR2_CONFIG = $(CONFIG_DIR)/.config
@@ -675,10 +677,19 @@ endef TARGET_FINALIZE_HOOKS += PURGE_LOCALES endif +ALL_PACKAGES_TARGET_DIRS = $(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),$($(call UPPERCASE,$(pkg))_TARGET_DIR)) +ALL_PACKAGES_HOST_DIRS = $(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),$($(call UPPERCASE,$(pkg))_HOST_DIR)) + $(TARGETS_ROOTFS): target-finalize .PHONY: target-finalize target-finalize: $(PACKAGES) + @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global target directory") + $(foreach dir,$(ALL_PACKAGES_TARGET_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep)) + @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global host directory") + $(foreach dir,$(ALL_PACKAGES_HOST_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(HOST_DIR)$(sep)) @$(call MESSAGE,"Finalizing target directory") $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host $(foreach hook,$(TARGET_FINALIZE_HOOKS),$($(hook))$(sep))
@@ -972,7 +983,7 @@ printvars: clean: rm -rf $(TARGET_DIR) $(BINARIES_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) \ $(BUILD_DIR) $(BASE_DIR)/staging \ - $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(GRAPHS_DIR) + $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(GRAPHS_DIR) $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR) .PHONY: distclean distclean: clean
package/pkg-generic.mk +37 -0
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_extracted: @$(call step_start,extract) @$(call MESSAGE,"Extracting") + @mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(STAGING_DIR) $(foreach hook,$($(PKG)_PRE_EXTRACT_HOOKS),$(call $(hook))$(sep)) $(Q)mkdir -p $(@D) $($(PKG)_EXTRACT_CMDS)
@@ -215,6 +216,10 @@ $(foreach dir,$(call qstrip,$(BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR)),\ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_configured: @$(call step_start,configure) @$(call MESSAGE,"Configuring") + $(foreach dir,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_HOST_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(HOST_DIR)$(sep)) + $(foreach dir,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_TARGET_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep)) $(foreach hook,$($(PKG)_PRE_CONFIGURE_HOOKS),$(call $(hook))$(sep)) $($(PKG)_CONFIGURE_CMDS) $(foreach hook,$($(PKG)_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS),$(call $(hook))$(sep))
@@ -409,6 +414,10 @@ $(2)_NAME = $(1) $(2)_RAWNAME = $$(patsubst host-%,%,$(1)) $(2)_PKGDIR = $(pkgdir) +$(2)_TARGET_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/target/ +$(2)_HOST_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/ +$(2)_STAGING_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/$(STAGING_SUBDIR) + # Keep the package version that may contain forward slashes in the _DL_VERSION # variable, then replace all forward slashes ('/') by underscores ('_') to # sanitize the package version that is used in paths, directory and file names.
@@ -561,6 +570,13 @@ $(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_DEPENDENCIES)) $(2)_FINAL_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES)) $(2)_FINAL_ALL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES) $$($(2)_FINAL_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES)) +$(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_HOST_DIRS = \ + $$(foreach dep,$$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ + $$($$(call UPPERCASE,$$(dep))_HOST_DIR)) +$(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_TARGET_DIRS = \ + $$(foreach dep,$$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ + $$($$(call UPPERCASE,$$(dep))_TARGET_DIR)) + $(2)_INSTALL_STAGING ?= NO $(2)_INSTALL_IMAGES ?= NO $(2)_INSTALL_TARGET ?= YES
@@ -789,17 +805,38 @@ $(1)-reconfigure: $(1)-clean-for-reconfigure $(1) # define the PKG variable for all targets, containing the # uppercase package variable prefix $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_RSYNC): SRCDIR=$$($(2)_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_RSYNC): PKG=$(2) $$($(2)_TARGET_PATCH): PKG=$(2) $$($(2)_TARGET_PATCH): RAWNAME=$$(patsubst host-%,%,$(1)) $$($(2)_TARGET_PATCH): PKGDIR=$(pkgdir) $$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE): PKG=$(2) $$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE): PKGDIR=$(pkgdir) $$($(2)_TARGET_ACTUAL_SOURCE): PKG=$(2)
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Quoted 54 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
This commit implemnts the core of the move to per-package SDK and target directories. The main idea is that instead of having a global output/host and output/target in which all packages install files, we switch to per-package host and target folders, that only contain their explicit dependencies.
There are two main benefits:
- Packages will no longer discover dependencies that they do not explicitly indicate in their <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES variable.
- We can support top-level parallel build properly, because a package only "sees" its own host directory and target directory, isolated from the build of other packages that can happen in parallel.
It works as follows:
- A new output/per-package/ folder is created, which will contain one sub-folder per package, and inside it, a "host" folder and a "target" folder:
output/per-package/busybox/target
output/per-package/busybox/host
output/per-package/host-fakeroot/target
output/per-package/host-fakeroot/hostThis output/per-package/ folder is
PER_PACKAGE_DIR, and each package defines <pkg>_TARGET_DIR, <pkg>_HOST_DIR and <pkg>_STAGING_DIR pointing to its own target, host and staging directories.- The <pkg>_TARGET_DIR, <pkg>_HOST_DIR and <pkg>_STAGING_DIR variable are passed as
TARGET_DIR,HOST_DIRandSTAGING_DIRto the various make targets used for the different build steps of the packages. Effectively this means that when a package references $(HOST_DIR), the value is in fact $(<pkg>_HOST_DIR).- Of course, packages have dependencies, so those dependencies must be installed in the per-package host and target folders before configuring the package. To do so, we simply rsync (using hard links to save space and time) the host and target folders of the direct dependencies of the package to the current package host and target folders. We only need to take care of direct dependencies (and not recursively all dependencies), because we accumulate into those per-package host and target folders the files installed by the dependencies.
- We fix
LD_LIBRARY_PATHto make it point to the current package host directory.This is basically enough to make per-package SDK and target work. The only gotcha is that at the end of the build, output/target and output/host are empty, which means that:
Quoted 8 lines
- The filesystem image creation code cannot work.
- We don't have a SDK to build code outside of Buildroot.
In order to fix this, this commit extends the target-finalize step so that it starts by populating output/target and output/host by rsync-ing into them the target and host directories of all packages listed in the $(PACKAGES) variable.
It would have been good to mention somewhere in the commit log the problem of 2
packages writing the same file...
Also, is there a good reason not to do the rsync at the end of package
installation? I don't know how robust rsync is against race conditions in directory or hardlink creation... OK, so I did a test and it races pretty badly :-) So, could you add this to the commit log? Like:
It is necessary to do this sequentially in the target-finalize step and not in each package. Doing it in package installation means that it can be done in parallel. In that case, there is a chance that two rsyncs are creating the same hardlink or directory at the same time, which makes one of them fail.
Quoted 14 lines
[Note: in fact, output/host is not completely empty, even though they should be. It contains the following files:
output/host/
output/host/lib64
output/host/usr
output/host/share
output/host/share/buildroot output/host/share/buildroot/Platform output/host/share/buildroot/Platform/Buildroot.cmake output/host/share/buildroot/toolchainfile.cmake output/host/lib
Perhaps those files should be installed by some package instead, perhaps the 'toolchain' package.]
If we go that way: perhaps the .cmake files should be installed by some package
like 'host-cmake-infra' that is added to the dependencies from cmake-package.
Quoted 42 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>--- Makefile | 17 ++++++++++++++--- package/pkg-generic.mk | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Makefile +4
-2@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ BR_GRAPH_OUT := $(or $(BR2_GRAPH_OUT),pdf) BUILD_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/build BINARIES_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/images TARGET_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/target +PER_PACKAGE_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/per-package + # initial definition so that 'make clean' works for most users, even without # .config. HOST_DIR will be overwritten later when .config is included. HOST_DIR := $(BASE_DIR)/host@@ -231,7 +233,7 @@ LEGAL_MANIFEST_CSV_HOST = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/host-manifest.csv LEGAL_WARNINGS = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/.warnings LEGAL_REPORT = $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)/README -export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$(HOST_DIR)/lib) +export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$($(PKG)_HOST_DIR)/lib) ################################################################################ #@@ -239,7 +241,7 @@ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = $(if $(PKG),$(HOST_DIR)/lib) # dependencies anywhere else # ################################################################################ -$(BUILD_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) $(BINARIES_DIR) $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_TARGET) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_HOST): +$(BUILD_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) $(BINARIES_DIR) $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_TARGET) $(REDIST_SOURCES_DIR_HOST) $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR): @mkdir -p $@ BR2_CONFIG = $(CONFIG_DIR)/.config@@ -675,10 +677,19 @@ endef TARGET_FINALIZE_HOOKS += PURGE_LOCALES endif
Makefile endef · line 689
Quoted 10 lines
Makefile +6
-0+ALL_PACKAGES_TARGET_DIRS = $(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),$($(call UPPERCASE,$(pkg))_TARGET_DIR)) +ALL_PACKAGES_HOST_DIRS = $(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),$($(call UPPERCASE,$(pkg))_HOST_DIR)) + $(TARGETS_ROOTFS): target-finalize .PHONY: target-finalize target-finalize: $(PACKAGES) + @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global target directory") + $(foreach dir,$(ALL_PACKAGES_TARGET_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep))
Why -u? Since we're not actually copying anything, there is no reason to not
overwrite files that already exist, right?
Also, shouldn't there be a / behind $(dir)? Otherwise, if TARGET_DIR exists
already, rsync will create $(dir) as a subdirectory of $(TARGET_DIR), no?
Quoted 20 lines
Makefile +4
-1+ @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global host directory") + $(foreach dir,$(ALL_PACKAGES_HOST_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(HOST_DIR)$(sep)) @$(call MESSAGE,"Finalizing target directory") $(TOPDIR)/support/scripts/fix-rpath host $(foreach hook,$(TARGET_FINALIZE_HOOKS),$($(hook))$(sep))@@ -972,7 +983,7 @@ printvars: clean: rm -rf $(TARGET_DIR) $(BINARIES_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) \ $(BUILD_DIR) $(BASE_DIR)/staging \ - $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(GRAPHS_DIR) + $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR) $(GRAPHS_DIR) $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR) .PHONY: distclean distclean: cleanpackage/pkg-generic.mk +0
-0
package/pkg-generic.mk $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: · line 161
Quoted 4 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +1
-0@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_extracted: @$(call step_start,extract) @$(call MESSAGE,"Extracting") + @mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(STAGING_DIR)
Why do you create them here? It would make more sense to do it just before the
rsync, no?
Given the possible host-tar and host-lzip dependencies, the rsync should be
done here already, not in the configure step. Ouch, that's not good, because the dependencies are only evaluated for the configure step... There are PATCH_DEPENDENCIES, but those are only before patch. Well, I guess that's a reason to keep host-tar and host-lzip as DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ :-)
package/pkg-generic.mk $(foreach dir,$(call qstrip,$(BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR)),\ · line 220
Quoted 9 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +2
-0$(foreach hook,$($(PKG)_PRE_EXTRACT_HOOKS),$(call $(hook))$(sep)) $(Q)mkdir -p $(@D) $($(PKG)_EXTRACT_CMDS)@@ -215,6 +216,10 @@ $(foreach dir,$(call qstrip,$(BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR)),\ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_configured: @$(call step_start,configure) @$(call MESSAGE,"Configuring") + $(foreach dir,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_HOST_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(HOST_DIR)$(sep))
Shouldn't there be a $Q somewhere?
package/pkg-generic.mk $(2)_NAME = $(1) · line 417
Quoted 10 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +3
-0+ $(foreach dir,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_TARGET_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep)) $(foreach hook,$($(PKG)_PRE_CONFIGURE_HOOKS),$(call $(hook))$(sep)) $($(PKG)_CONFIGURE_CMDS) $(foreach hook,$($(PKG)_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS),$(call $(hook))$(sep))@@ -409,6 +414,10 @@ $(2)_NAME = $(1) $(2)_RAWNAME = $$(patsubst host-%,%,$(1)) $(2)_PKGDIR = $(pkgdir) +$(2)_TARGET_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/target/
Ah, here is the trailing slash, that explains why it worked. I don't really
like it when you have to rely on a trailing slash in the variable definition...
package/pkg-generic.mk $(2)_NAME = $(1) · line 419
Quoted 2 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +2
-0+$(2)_HOST_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/ +$(2)_STAGING_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/$(STAGING_SUBDIR)
I hate adding more per-package variables. Can't you use the expanded values,
substituting $($(PKG)_NAME) for $(1)? Or maybe even better, change the definition of TARGET_DIR etc:
TARGET_DIR = $(if $(PKG),$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$($(PKG)_RAWNAME)/target,$(BASE_DIR)/target)
That way you also don't need to pass those variables to each individual stamp rule.
Quoted 5 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +1
-0+ # Keep the package version that may contain forward slashes in the _DL_VERSION # variable, then replace all forward slashes ('/') by underscores ('_') to # sanitize the package version that is used in paths, directory and file names.
package/pkg-generic.mk $(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_DEPENDENCIES)) · line 578
Quoted 9 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +6
-0@@ -561,6 +570,13 @@ $(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_DEPENDENCIES)) $(2)_FINAL_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES)) $(2)_FINAL_ALL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES) $$($(2)_FINAL_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES)) +$(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_HOST_DIRS = \ + $$(foreach dep,$$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ + $$($$(call UPPERCASE,$$(dep))_HOST_DIR)) +$(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_TARGET_DIRS = \ + $$(foreach dep,$$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ + $$($$(call UPPERCASE,$$(dep))_TARGET_DIR))
I may be overengineering things, but perhaps things can be simplified as
follows (with the definition of TARGET_DIR etc as above):
define RSYNC_HOST_DIRS
$(foreach pkg,$(1),\ $(Q)dir=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host;\ rsync -au --link-dest=$$dir $$dir/ $(HOST_DIR)$(sep))
endef
define RSYNC_TARGET_DIRS
$(foreach pkg,$(1),\ $(Q)dir=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target;\ rsync -au --link-dest=$$dir $$dir/ $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep))
endef
(as always, completely untested). These macros can be used both in the config stamp rule and in the finalize rule. I even considered leaving out the argument and instead defaulting $(1) to
$(if $(PKG),$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),$(PACKAGES))
but that probably just makes things harder to understand.
Otherwise looks good to me :-P
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 44 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +22
-0+ $(2)_INSTALL_STAGING ?= NO $(2)_INSTALL_IMAGES ?= NO $(2)_INSTALL_TARGET ?= YES@@ -789,17 +805,38 @@ $(1)-reconfigure: $(1)-clean-for-reconfigure $(1) # define the PKG variable for all targets, containing the # uppercase package variable prefix $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_TARGET): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_STAGING): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_IMAGES): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_INSTALL_HOST): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_BUILD): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_CONFIGURE): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_RSYNC): SRCDIR=$$($(2)_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_RSYNC): PKG=$(2) $$($(2)_TARGET_PATCH): PKG=$(2) $$($(2)_TARGET_PATCH): RAWNAME=$$(patsubst host-%,%,$(1)) $$($(2)_TARGET_PATCH): PKGDIR=$(pkgdir) $$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): PKG=$(2) +$$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): HOST_DIR=$$($(2)_HOST_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): STAGING_DIR=$$($(2)_STAGING_DIR) +$$($(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT): TARGET_DIR=$$($(2)_TARGET_DIR) $$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE): PKG=$(2) $$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE): PKGDIR=$(pkgdir) $$($(2)_TARGET_ACTUAL_SOURCE): PKG=$(2)
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, I'll take them into account for the next version. Just a few comments/questions below.
Quoted 7 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 4 lines
In order to fix this, this commit extends the target-finalize step so that it starts by populating output/target and output/host by rsync-ing into them the target and host directories of all packages listed in the $(PACKAGES) variable.
It would have been good to mention somewhere in the commit log the problem of 2
packages writing the same file...
True. I believe the work Yann has done to detect packages overwriting files installed by other packages is definitely a pre-requisite for this work, so I was kind of assuming that the "packages don't overwrite each other" would already be a rule by the time my per-package SDK patches get merged. But I should make this explicit in the cover letter at least.
Quoted 9 lines
Also, is there a good reason not to do the rsync at the end of package
installation? I don't know how robust rsync is against race conditions in directory or hardlink creation... OK, so I did a test and it races pretty badly :-) So, could you add this to the commit log? Like:It is necessary to do this sequentially in the target-finalize step and not in each package. Doing it in package installation means that it can be done in parallel. In that case, there is a chance that two rsyncs are creating the same hardlink or directory at the same time, which makes one of them fail.
I didn't think at all about doing this in parallel. To me, the creation of the final/common HOST_DIR/TARGET_DIR/STAGING_DIR is not at all something that needs to be done while the build is on-going. And I could go even further: unless you call "make sdk", we technically don't really need to create the final/common HOST_DIR/STAGING_DIR. Only a TARGET_DIR is needed, and perhaps even we could avoid a global one, and instead have a per-filesystem image one, in order to avoid the parallel filesystem image creation problem.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 5 lines
[Note: in fact, output/host is not completely empty, even though they should be. It contains the following files:
output/host/
output/host/lib64
output/host/usrQuoted 8 lines
output/host/share
output/host/share/buildroot output/host/share/buildroot/Platform output/host/share/buildroot/Platform/Buildroot.cmake output/host/share/buildroot/toolchainfile.cmake output/host/lib
Perhaps those files should be installed by some package instead, perhaps the 'toolchain' package.]
Quoted 2 lines
If we go that way: perhaps the .cmake files should be installed by some package
like 'host-cmake-infra' that is added to the dependencies from cmake-package.
That was my thinking: perhaps those files should all be installed by packages.
Quoted 8 lines
Makefile endef · line 689
Quoted 5 lines
.PHONY: target-finalize
target-finalize: $(PACKAGES)Makefile +3
-0+ @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global target directory") + $(foreach dir,$(ALL_PACKAGES_TARGET_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep))Why -u? Since we're not actually copying anything, there is no reason to not
overwrite files that already exist, right?
I just borrowed parts of Gustavo patches, including those rsync invocations. Indeed -u is not needed.
Quoted 2 lines
Also, shouldn't there be a / behind $(dir)? Otherwise, if
TARGET_DIRexists
already, rsync will create $(dir) as a subdirectory of $(TARGET_DIR), no?
I'll fix.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +0
-0
Quoted 8 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: · line 161
Quoted 5 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +1
-0@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_extracted: @$(call step_start,extract) @$(call MESSAGE,"Extracting") + @mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(STAGING_DIR)Why do you create them here? It would make more sense to do it just before the
rsync, no?
I don't remember, I'll have to check again. I don't immediately see a reason why they would be needed before the rsync.
Quoted 5 lines
Given the possible host-tar and host-lzip dependencies, the rsync should be
done here already, not in the configure step. Ouch, that's not good, because the dependencies are only evaluated for the configure step... There arePATCH_DEPENDENCIES, but those are only before patch. Well, I guess that's a reason to keep host-tar and host-lzip asDEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ:-)
These are all topics that I haven't looked at yet. So thanks for pointing them out. I should probably collect a TODO list on per-package SDK to not forget about all the things people have mentioned as things to look at.
Quoted 4 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk $(foreach dir,$(call qstrip,$(BR2_GLOBAL_PATCH_DIR)),\ · line 220
Quoted 2 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +2
-0+ $(foreach dir,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_HOST_DIRS),\ + rsync -au --link-dest=$(dir) $(dir) $(HOST_DIR)$(sep))Shouldn't there be a $Q somewhere?
Yes. Seeing the rsync commands was useful for debugging, as you can imagine :)
Quoted 4 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk $(2)_NAME = $(1) · line 417
Quoted 1 line
package/pkg-generic.mk +1
-0+$(2)_TARGET_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/target/Ah, here is the trailing slash, that explains why it worked. I don't really
like it when you have to rely on a trailing slash in the variable definition...
OK.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines
+$(2)_HOST_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/
+$(2)_STAGING_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/$(STAGING_SUBDIR)
Quoted 8 lines
I hate adding more per-package variables. Can't you use the expanded values,
substituting $($(PKG)_NAME) for $(1)? Or maybe even better, change the definition ofTARGET_DIRetc:
TARGET_DIR= $(if $(PKG),$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$($(PKG)_RAWNAME)/target,$(BASE_DIR)/target)That way you also don't need to pass those variables to each individual stamp rule.
I didn't think about this, sounds like a good idea, I'll try that.
However, I'm actually planning to drop entirely having TARGET_DIR defined outside of package rules. What I want to have ultimately is:
- TARGET_DIR points to the current package per-package target directory. If we're outside of a package rule, TARGET_DIR has no value (or possibly a bogus value such as /this/is/a/bogus/thing/). Indeed, we really don't want things to directly install/mess with the global/common target directory.
- Have something like COMMON_TARGET_DIR that points to $(BASE_DIR)/target, and we carefully change the places that should access the COMMON_TARGET_DIR (i.e mainly target-finalize and some filesystem generation stuff).
Quoted 27 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk $(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_DEPENDENCIES)) · line 578
Quoted 13 lines
# Keep the package version that may contain forward slashes in the
_DL_VERSION# variable, then replace all forward slashes ('/') by underscores ('_') to# sanitize the package version that is used in paths, directory and file names.package/pkg-generic.mk +6
-0@@ -561,6 +570,13 @@ $(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_DEPENDENCIES)) $(2)_FINAL_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES)) $(2)_FINAL_ALL_DEPENDENCIES = $$(sort $$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES) $$($(2)_FINAL_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES)) +$(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_HOST_DIRS = \ + $$(foreach dep,$$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ + $$($$(call UPPERCASE,$$(dep))_HOST_DIR)) +$(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES_TARGET_DIRS = \ + $$(foreach dep,$$($(2)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ + $$($$(call UPPERCASE,$$(dep))_TARGET_DIR))I may be overengineering things, but perhaps things can be simplified as
follows (with the definition ofTARGET_DIRetc as above):define
RSYNC_HOST_DIRS$(foreach pkg,$(1),\ $(Q)dir=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host;\ rsync -au --link-dest=$$dir $$dir/ $(HOST_DIR)$(sep))endef
define
RSYNC_TARGET_DIRS$(foreach pkg,$(1),\ $(Q)dir=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target;\ rsync -au --link-dest=$$dir $$dir/ $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep))
Quoted 7 lines
endef
(as always, completely untested). These macros can be used both in the config stamp rule and in the finalize rule. I even considered leaving out the argument and instead defaulting $(1) to
$(if $(PKG),$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),$(PACKAGES))
but that probably just makes things harder to understand.
I'll think about this suggestion.
Thanks again for the detailed review.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Quoted 6 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, I'll take them into account for the next version. Just a few comments/questions below.
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:50:52 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Also, is there a good reason not to do the rsync at the end of package
installation? I don't know how robust rsync is against race conditions in directory or hardlink creation... OK, so I did a test and it races pretty badly :-) So, could you add this to the commit log? Like:It is necessary to do this sequentially in the target-finalize step and not in each package. Doing it in package installation means that it can be done in parallel. In that case, there is a chance that two rsyncs are creating the same hardlink or directory at the same time, which makes one of them fail.
I didn't think at all about doing this in parallel.
The point is not that you may want to do it in parallel. The point is that it
is natural to do something that needs to be done for each package at the time you build that package. Doing stuff in finalize is always a bit weird.
Quoted 5 lines
To me, the creation
of the final/common HOST_DIR/TARGET_DIR/STAGING_DIR is not at all something that needs to be done while the build is on-going. And I could go even further: unless you call "make sdk", we technically don't really need to create the final/common HOST_DIR/STAGING_DIR.
Absolutely true, it would make sense to do that in 'make sdk'.
Quoted 4 lines
Only a
TARGET_DIRis needed, and perhaps even we could avoid a global one, and instead have a per-filesystem image one, in order to avoid the parallel filesystem image creation problem.
That's a great idea!
[snip]
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +0
-0Quoted 8 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: · line 161
Quoted 5 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +1
-0@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_extracted: @$(call step_start,extract) @$(call MESSAGE,"Extracting") + @mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(STAGING_DIR)Why do you create them here? It would make more sense to do it just before the
rsync, no?
Quoted 2 lines
I don't remember, I'll have to check again. I don't immediately see a reason why they would be needed before the rsync.
A package without any dependencies will not do the rsync, and I do think you
want the directories to exist. Or maybe not, I'm not sure... Actually, shouldn't a skeleton be installed there as well?
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Given the possible host-tar and host-lzip dependencies, the rsync should be
done here already, not in the configure step. Ouch, that's not good, because the dependencies are only evaluated for the configure step... There arePATCH_DEPENDENCIES, but those are only before patch. Well, I guess that's a reason to keep host-tar and host-lzip asDEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ:-)These are all topics that I haven't looked at yet. So thanks for pointing them out. I should probably collect a TODO list on per-package SDK to not forget about all the things people have mentioned as things to look at.
Yeah, a skeleton HOST_DIR that every package depends on would simplify that,
perhaps.
[snip]
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
I hate adding more per-package variables. Can't you use the expanded values,
substituting $($(PKG)_NAME) for $(1)? Or maybe even better, change the definition ofTARGET_DIRetc:
TARGET_DIR= $(if $(PKG),$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$($(PKG)_RAWNAME)/target,$(BASE_DIR)/target)That way you also don't need to pass those variables to each individual stamp rule.
I didn't think about this, sounds like a good idea, I'll try that.
Quoted 8 lines
However, I'm actually planning to drop entirely having
TARGET_DIRdefined outside of package rules. What I want to have ultimately is:-
TARGET_DIRpoints to the current package per-package target directory. If we're outside of a package rule,TARGET_DIRhas no value (or possibly a bogus value such as /this/is/a/bogus/thing/). Indeed, we really don't want things to directly install/mess with the global/common target directory.
bogus thing, good plan!
Quoted 5 lines
- Have something like
COMMON_TARGET_DIRthat points to $(BASE_DIR)/target, and we carefully change the places that should access theCOMMON_TARGET_DIR(i.e mainly target-finalize and some filesystem generation stuff).
Ack yes, sounds good.
Regards,
Arnout
[snip]
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Hello,
Quoted 6 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 5 lines
To me, the creation
of the final/common HOST_DIR/TARGET_DIR/STAGING_DIR is not at all something that needs to be done while the build is on-going. And I could go even further: unless you call "make sdk", we technically don't really need to create the final/common HOST_DIR/STAGING_DIR.
Quoted 8 lines
Absolutely true, it would make sense to do that in 'make sdk'.
Quoted 4 lines
Only a
TARGET_DIRis needed, and perhaps even we could avoid a global one, and instead have a per-filesystem image one, in order to avoid the parallel filesystem image creation problem.That's a great idea!
For those two things, I believe there is one reason to keep creating the global HOST_DIR and TARGET_DIR in target-finalize: backward compatibility with user habits. It is going to be really weird for a lot of our users if output/host and output/target are empty at the end of the build.
There is already something really weird going on with my changes: if you run "make foobar" but BR2_PACKAGE_FOOBAR is not enabled, then foobar is built, installed in its per-package directory, but because it is not enabled at the Kconfig level, this package is not in PACKAGES, so it is not copied to the global TARGET_DIR. So you don't have foobar installed in output/target, nor in your final root filesystem image!
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 12 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: · line 161
Quoted 9 lines
package/pkg-generic.mk +1
-0@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_actual_downloaded: $(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_extracted: @$(call step_start,extract) @$(call MESSAGE,"Extracting") + @mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR) $(STAGING_DIR)Why do you create them here? It would make more sense to do it just before the
rsync, no?
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I don't remember, I'll have to check again. I don't immediately see a reason why they would be needed before the rsync.
Following my proposal in my previous e-mail to have EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES rsync'ed into the per-package host/target at extract time, it makes sense to create those folders at the extract step :)
Quoted 4 lines
A package without any dependencies will not do the rsync, and I do think you
want the directories to exist. Or maybe not, I'm not sure... Actually, shouldn't a skeleton be installed there as well?
For the target directory, there is no problem: all target packages depend on the skeleton package, so there is always a skeleton in the per-package target directory.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Given the possible host-tar and host-lzip dependencies, the rsync should be
done here already, not in the configure step. Ouch, that's not good, because the dependencies are only evaluated for the configure step... There arePATCH_DEPENDENCIES, but those are only before patch. Well, I guess that's a reason to keep host-tar and host-lzip asDEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ:-)
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
These are all topics that I haven't looked at yet. So thanks for pointing them out. I should probably collect a TODO list on per-package SDK to not forget about all the things people have mentioned as things to look at.
Yeah, a skeleton
HOST_DIRthat every package depends on would simplify that,
perhaps.
The skeleton HOST_DIR is just:
$(HOST_DIR)/usr: $(HOST_DIR)
@ln -snf . $@
$(HOST_DIR)/lib: $(HOST_DIR)
@mkdir -p $@
@case $(HOSTARCH) in \
(*64) ln -snf lib $(@D)/lib64;; \
(*) ln -snf lib $(@D)/lib32;; \
esacBut yes, perhaps that could be clarified as a host-skeleton package ?
I'll have to double check how this works with my current proposed implementation.
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
In reply to Arnout VandecappelleHello,
A few more answers/topics I wanted to discuss.
Quoted 6 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Given the possible host-tar and host-lzip dependencies, the rsync
should be done here already, not in the configure step. Ouch, that's not good, because the dependencies are only evaluated for the configure step... There arePATCH_DEPENDENCIES, but those are only before patch. Well, I guess that's a reason to keep host-tar and host-lzip asDEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ:-)
Here is how I'm thinking of solving the problem:
- Next to <pkg>_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES, introduce the concept of <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES.
- If there is no suitable tar in the system, then host-tar would be added to <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES of all packages, except host-tar itself.
- If the package needs lzip and there is no lzip available on the system, host-lzip is added to <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES.
- If ccache support is enabled, host-ccache is added to <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES of all packages, except host-tar, which is built with HOSTCC_NOCCACHE.
- At the beginning of the extract step of a package, we rsync to its per-package target/host directories the per-package target/host dirs of the packages listed in its <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES variable.
- At the beginning of the patch step of a package, we rsync to its per-package target/host directories the per-package target/host dirs of the packages listed in its <pkg>_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES variable.
Thoughts?
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 2 lines
+$(2)_HOST_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/
+$(2)_STAGING_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/$(STAGING_SUBDIR)I hate adding more per-package variables. Can't you use the expanded values,
substituting $($(PKG)_NAME) for $(1)? Or maybe even better, change the definition ofTARGET_DIRetc:
TARGET_DIR= $(if $(PKG),$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$($(PKG)_RAWNAME)/target,$(BASE_DIR)/target)That way you also don't need to pass those variables to each individual stamp rule.
I've changed this in my new iteration. The only drawback is that since we no longer have those shortcut variables, the foreach loops building the per-package directories, and building the final global directories are a bit less readable:
Per-package host/target creation:
$(foreach pkg,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(HOST_DIR)$(sep)) $(foreach pkg,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep))
Global host/target creation in target-finalize:
$(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep)) @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global host directory") $(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(HOST_DIR)$(sep))
But I guess that's OK. If we find that too weird, I can always introduce some some make helpers:
per-package-target-dir = $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/target per-package-host-dir = $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host
But:
$(call per-package-target-dir,$(pkg))
is not really shorter than
$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/target
It is actually longer :-)
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Quoted 13 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
A few more answers/topics I wanted to discuss.
Quoted 6 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Given the possible host-tar and host-lzip dependencies, the rsync
should be done here already, not in the configure step. Ouch, that's not good, because the dependencies are only evaluated for the configure step... There arePATCH_DEPENDENCIES, but those are only before patch. Well, I guess that's a reason to keep host-tar and host-lzip asDEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ:-)
Quoted 4 lines
Here is how I'm thinking of solving the problem:
- Next to <pkg>_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES, introduce the concept of <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES.
_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES is different: it introduces a dependency between foo-patch
and bar-patch. Here you want a dependency between foo-extract and tar.
Quoted 4 lines
- If there is no suitable tar in the system, then host-tar would be added to <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES of all packages, except host-tar itself.
So you need an additional NO_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES or something to exclude it
for tar...
Quoted 7 lines
- If the package needs lzip and there is no lzip available on the system, host-lzip is added to <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES.
- If ccache support is enabled, host-ccache is added to <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES of all packages, except host-tar, which is built with
HOSTCC_NOCCACHE.
Quoted 7 lines
- At the beginning of the extract step of a package, we rsync to its per-package target/host directories the per-package target/host dirs of the packages listed in its <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES variable.
- At the beginning of the patch step of a package, we rsync to its per-package target/host directories the per-package target/host dirs of the packages listed in its <pkg>_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES variable.
So this bit doesn't make sense: _PATCH_DEPENDENCIES are not (necessarily) built
before foo-patch. So to be reproducible, it should *not* be rsynced yet.
Quoted 2 lines
Thoughts?
I'm not at all happy with this approach. It adds generic-package stuff that is
used for only one package, and it spreads the logic out over different places.
I'd rather make the logic explicit in dependencies.mk. Something like
ifneq ($(filter host-tar,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),) $(filter-out host-tar,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)): host-tar endif
ifneq ($(filter host-ccache,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),) $(filter-out host-tar host-ccache,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)): host-ccache endif
etc. You'll probably want to introduce a variable to collect the filter-out things, though.
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 59 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines
+$(2)_HOST_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/
+$(2)_STAGING_DIR = $$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host/$(STAGING_SUBDIR)Quoted 8 lines
I hate adding more per-package variables. Can't you use the expanded values,
substituting $($(PKG)_NAME) for $(1)? Or maybe even better, change the definition ofTARGET_DIRetc:
TARGET_DIR= $(if $(PKG),$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$($(PKG)_RAWNAME)/target,$(BASE_DIR)/target)That way you also don't need to pass those variables to each individual stamp rule.
I've changed this in my new iteration. The only drawback is that since we no longer have those shortcut variables, the foreach loops building the per-package directories, and building the final global directories are a bit less readable:
Per-package host/target creation:
$(foreach pkg,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(HOST_DIR)$(sep)) $(foreach pkg,$($(PKG)_FINAL_DEPENDENCIES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep))Global host/target creation in target-finalize:
$(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/target/ \ $(TARGET_DIR)$(sep)) @$(call MESSAGE,"Creating global host directory") $(foreach pkg,$(PACKAGES),\ rsync -a --link-dest=$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(pkg)/host/ \ $(HOST_DIR)$(sep))But I guess that's OK. If we find that too weird, I can always introduce some some make helpers:
per-package-target-dir = $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/target per-package-host-dir = $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/host
But:
$(call per-package-target-dir,$(pkg))is not really shorter than
$(PER_PACKAGE_DIR)/$(1)/targetIt is actually longer :-)
Thomas
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Hello,
Quoted 7 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 4 lines
Here is how I'm thinking of solving the problem:
- Next to <pkg>_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES, introduce the concept of <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES.
_PATCH_DEPENDENCIESis different: it introduces a dependency between foo-patch
and bar-patch. Here you want a dependency between foo-extract and tar.
True.
Quoted 11 lines
So this bit doesn't make sense:
_PATCH_DEPENDENCIESare not (necessarily) built
before foo-patch. So to be reproducible, it should *not* be rsynced yet.Quoted 2 lines
Thoughts?
I'm not at all happy with this approach. It adds generic-package stuff that is
used for only one package, and it spreads the logic out over different places.I'd rather make the logic explicit in dependencies.mk. Something like
Quoted 7 lines
ifneq ($(filter host-tar,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),) $(filter-out host-tar,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)): host-tar endif
ifneq ($(filter host-ccache,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),) $(filter-out host-tar host-ccache,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)): host-ccache endif
I don't understand how this can work.
The big thing to remember is that when I'm building a package, it only sees in its per-package host/staging directory the dependencies explicitly listed in this package <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES variable.
With your approach, neither host-tar nor host-ccache are listed in any package <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES variable, so the per-package host directory of host-ccache and host-tar will never be rsync'ed into the per-package host directories of other packages.
Due to this, the package infrastructure _will_ have to know about the fact that all packages depend on host-tar/host-ccache, for the simple reason that we need to know that we have to rsync host-tar/host-ccache when populating the per-package host directory in the configure step.
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
RFC 4/4 core: implement per-package SDK and target
Thomas, Arnout, All,
On 2017-11-25 21:01 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
Quoted 9 lines · Arnout Vandecappelle
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Here is how I'm thinking of solving the problem:
- Next to <pkg>_PATCH_DEPENDENCIES, introduce the concept of <pkg>_EXTRACT_DEPENDENCIES.
_PATCH_DEPENDENCIESis different: it introduces a dependency between foo-patch
and bar-patch. Here you want a dependency between foo-extract and tar.
And I think this is a sane approach. We already have such requirements for tar, lzip and xz.
So we already have three cases where we might want to add an extract dependency, which is imho sufficient to justify support in the infra.
Besides, having the dependencies managed from the infra will guarantee the build ordering and the fact that they are built only when required.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
So this bit doesn't make sense:
_PATCH_DEPENDENCIESare not (necessarily) built
before foo-patch. So to be reproducible, it should *not* be rsynced yet.Quoted 2 lines
Thoughts?
I'm not at all happy with this approach. It adds generic-package stuff that is
used for only one package, and it spreads the logic out over different places.
Quite the opposite: it is used for at least three packages, and it gathers all the dependencies under the aegis of the package infra.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 9 lines
I'd rather make the logic explicit in dependencies.mk. Something like
ifneq ($(filter host-tar,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),) $(filter-out host-tar,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)): host-tar endif
ifneq ($(filter host-ccache,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)),) $(filter-out host-tar host-ccache,$(DEPENDENCIES_HOST_PREREQ)): host-ccache endif
I don't understand how this can work.
TBH, I have a bit of an issue following it as well... :-/
Quoted 9 lines
The big thing to remember is that when I'm building a package, it only sees in its per-package host/staging directory the dependencies explicitly listed in this package <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES variable.
With your approach, neither host-tar nor host-ccache are listed in any package <pkg>_DEPENDENCIES variable, so the per-package host directory of host-ccache and host-tar will never be rsync'ed into the per-package host directories of other packages.
Quoted 4 lines
Due to this, the package infrastructure _will_ have to know about the fact that all packages depend on host-tar/host-ccache, for the simple reason that we need to know that we have to rsync host-tar/host-ccache when populating the per-package host directory in the configure step.
I think we should strive at moving as much as possible to packages and the package infra.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 8 lines
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
cover Per-package SDK and target directories
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniOn 03-11-17 17:06, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 6 lines
What remains to be done?
========================- Completely get rid of the global
HOST_DIR,TARGET_DIRandSTAGING_DIRdefinitions, so that nothing uses them, and they really become per-package variables.
I don't think that that's needed.
Quoted 5 lines
- While the toolchain sysroot, pkg-config paths and host RPATHs are properly handled, there are quite certainly a lot of other places that have absolute paths that won't work well with per-package SDK, and that need to be adjusted.
Quoted 8 lines
- Perhaps use a temporary per-package SDK and target directory when building a package, and rename it to the final name once the package has finished building. This would allow to detect situations where the per-package SDK directory of package A contains absolute paths referring to the per-package SDK directory of package B. Such absolute paths are wrong, but we currently don't see them because the per-package SDK directory for package B still exists.
Add an instrumentation hook:
! grep -r $(PER_PACKAGE_DIR) $(HOST_DIR) $(TARGET_DIR)
That will immediately point to the culprit package. Maybe you want to avoid grepping through gigabytes of data over and over again so perhaps use the same approach as check-bin-arch.
But actually,
Quoted 10 lines
- Many other issues that I'm sure people will report.
Comparison with Gustavo's patch series
======================================Gustavo Zacarias did a previous implementation of this, available in
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/shortlog/refs/heads/pps3-next. Compared to Gustavo's patch series, this patch series:
[snip]
Quoted 9 lines
- I haven't integrated Gustavo patches that move from $(shell ...) to using backticks to delay the evaluation of STAGING_DIR/HOST_DIR/TARGET_DIR:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/0c11c60865f1445830643bb404f92c20d563260c http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/207d2248ec8542293b6201b5c86f971021a3a591 http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/7f6a69819fbb176e29a1c3a53b4a76efe87dad15 http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/3328a9745eee555f5e5ef7df835afc26612ecd7b http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/45a9d8c2aa6f3c0d2d8ed989d843890025faa3e8
Independently of the PPS feature, these are useful patches I think. Can you
submit them?
Quoted 4 lines
- I haven't looked at Qt specific issues, such as the ones fixed by Gustavo in:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/643e982e635f4386ccefcda9da4b84536af84d04
Yeah, and something similar for CMake as well...
I'm a bit worried about python and friends. They may embed paths in all kinds
of weird places. Like sysconfigdata has paths to compilers and stuff.
But now I think about it a little more: is there really a problem if e.g. a .la
file refers to a library in one of the other per-package dirs? The library does exist there after all... The only thing we need to avoid is that a package installs something in a different package's per-package dir. You may of course end up with references to indirect dependencies, but they are still dependencies that are tracked by Buildroot so they're OK.
So how about this: at the end of the package build, we make the per-package dir
readonly. An evil package can of course still make it readwrite again before installing something, but it's not very likely.
Cleaning up all references to other per-package dirs is only really needed if
we want to make a tarball of the directory to save as a seed for a later build. But we're not there yet by a long shot, so let's just ignore that use case.
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 8 lines
- I am not doing all the .la files, *-config, *.prl, etc. tweaks that Gustavo is doing in:
http://repo.or.cz/buildroot-gz.git/commitdiff/3f7b227b4c8e4514df6e5d54f88fcfb3a3a4bae0
It is part of the "remaining absolute paths that need to be fixed" item that I mentionned above.
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF