Skip to contentSkip to conversation

highbank: validate register offset before access

PATCH In review P J P 2 participants 3 messages Nov 9, 2017 – Nov 11, 2017

lore
Share & tools
lore

P J P

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 highbank: validate register offset before access

From: Prasad J Pandit <[email protected]>

An 'offset' parameter sent to highbank register r/w functions could be greater than number(NUM_REGS=0x200) of hb registers, leading to an OOB access issue. Add check to avoid it.

---
 hw/arm/highbank.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
hw/arm/highbank.c +7 -0
index 354c6b25a8..94df151454 100644
@@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ static void hb_regs_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
         }
     }
 
+    if (offset / 4 >= NUM_REGS) {
+        return;
+    }
     regs[offset/4] = value;
 }
 
@@ -124,6 +127,10 @@ static uint64_t hb_regs_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
                              unsigned size)
 {
     uint32_t *regs = opaque;
+
+    if (offset / 4 >= NUM_REGS) {
+        return 0;
+    }
     uint32_t value = regs[offset/4];
 
     if ((offset == 0x100) || (offset == 0x108) || (offset == 0x10C)) {
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
#1 lore raw

Hi Prasad, Moguofang.

Quoted 17 lines · P J P

From: Prasad J Pandit <[email protected]>

An 'offset' parameter sent to highbank register r/w functions could be greater than number(NUM_REGS=0x200) of hb registers, leading to an OOB access issue. Add check to avoid it.

---
 hw/arm/highbank.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
hw/arm/highbank.c +0 -0
index 354c6b25a8..94df151454 100644

hw/arm/highbank.c static void hb_regs_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, · line 120

Quoted 4 lines
hw/arm/highbank.c +1 -0
@@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ static void hb_regs_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
         }
     }
 
+    if (offset / 4 >= NUM_REGS) {

I'd report that:

           qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, ...

Cc'ing Shawn & Rob since this might also be a LOG_GUEST_ERROR.

hw/arm/highbank.c static uint64_t hb_regs_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, · line 131

Quoted 11 lines
hw/arm/highbank.c +4 -0
+        return;
+    }
     regs[offset/4] = value;
 }
 
@@ -124,6 +127,10 @@ static uint64_t hb_regs_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
                              unsigned size)
 {
     uint32_t *regs = opaque;
+
+    if (offset / 4 >= NUM_REGS) {

Ditto.

hw/arm/highbank.c static uint64_t hb_regs_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, · line 133

Quoted 2 lines
hw/arm/highbank.c +2 -0
+        return 0;
+    }

From CODING_STYLE:

Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the beginning of blocks.

hw/arm/highbank.c static uint64_t hb_regs_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, · line 136

Quoted 3 lines
hw/arm/highbank.c +0 -0
     uint32_t value = regs[offset/4];
 
     if ((offset == 0x100) || (offset == 0x108) || (offset == 0x10C)) {

Regards,

Phil.

author
#2 lore raw

Hello Philippe,

+-- On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote --+
| I'd report that:
| 
|            qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, ...
| 
| Cc'ing Shawn & Rob since this might also be a LOG_GUEST_ERROR.
| 
| Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within
| blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the
| beginning of blocks.

Done. Sent a revised patch v1.

Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F