x86/hvm: Fix altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify error handling
PATCH v2 1/1 x86/hvm: Fix altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify error handling
The altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify subop handler might skip calling rcu_unlock_domain() after rcu_lock_current_domain(). Albeit since both rcu functions are no-ops when run on the current domain, this doesn't really have repercussions.
The second change is adding a missing break that would have potentially enabled #VE for the current domain even if it had intended to enable it for another one (not a supported functionality).
---
changes in v2:
- reword the commit message
--- xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +7 -1
@@ -4534,12 +4534,18 @@ static int do_altp2m_op(if ( a.u.enable_notify.pad || a.domain !=DOMID_SELF || a.u.enable_notify.vcpu_id != curr->vcpu_id ) + { rc = -EINVAL ; +break ; + }if ( !gfn_eq (vcpu_altp2m (curr).veinfo_gfn,INVALID_GFN ) ||mfn_eq (get_gfn_query_unlocked (curr->domain, a.u.enable_notify.gfn, &p2mt),INVALID_MFN ) ) -return -EINVAL ; + { + rc = -EINVAL ; +break ; + }vcpu_altp2m (curr).veinfo_gfn =_gfn (a.u.enable_notify.gfn);altp2m_vcpu_update_vmfunc_ve (curr);
Signature · 7 lines
2.15.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 15.11.17 at 14:47, <[email protected]> wrote:
The
altp2m_vcpu_enable_notifysubop handler might skip callingrcu_unlock_domain()afterrcu_lock_current_domain(). Albeit since both rcu functions are no-ops when run on the current domain, this doesn't really have repercussions.The second change is adding a missing break that would have potentially enabled #VE for the current domain even if it had intended to enable it for another one (not a supported functionality).
Thanks, much better.
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Adrian Pop <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Quoted 6 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 15.11.17 at 14:47, <[email protected]> wrote:
The
altp2m_vcpu_enable_notifysubop handler might skip callingrcu_unlock_domain()afterrcu_lock_current_domain(). Albeit since both rcu functions are no-ops when run on the current domain, this doesn't really have repercussions.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The second change is adding a missing break that would have potentially enabled #VE for the current domain even if it had intended to enable it for another one (not a supported functionality).
Thanks, much better.
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Adrian Pop <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
FOAD, Requesting a release ack for this change.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Hi,
Quoted 10 lines · Andrew Cooper
Quoted 9 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · On 15.11.17 at 14:47, <[email protected]> wrote:
The
altp2m_vcpu_enable_notifysubop handler might skip callingrcu_unlock_domain()afterrcu_lock_current_domain(). Albeit since both rcu functions are no-ops when run on the current domain, this doesn't really have repercussions.The second change is adding a missing break that would have potentially enabled #VE for the current domain even if it had intended to enable it for another one (not a supported functionality).
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks, much better.
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Adrian Pop <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Jan Beulich <[email protected]>FOAD, Requesting a release ack for this change.
Cheers,
Signature · 6 lines
Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel