Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm: drop hotplug lock from lru_add_drain_all

PATCH Applied Michal Hocko 1 participant 1 message Nov 16, 2017

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mm: drop hotplug lock from lru_add_drain_all

From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

Pulling cpu hotplug locks inside the mm core function like lru_add_drain_all just asks for problems and the recent lockdep splat
[1] just proves this. While the usage in that particular case might be wrong we should prevent from locking as lru_add_drain_all is used at many places. It seems that this is not all that hard to achieve actually.

We have done the same thing for drain_all_pages which is analogous by a459eeb7b852 ("mm, page_alloc: do not depend on cpu hotplug locks inside the allocator"). All we have to care about is to handle
- the work item might be executed on a different cpu in worker from unbound pool so it doesn't run on pinned on the cpu

- we have to make sure that we do not race with page_alloc_cpu_dead calling lru_add_drain_cpu

the first part is already handled because the worker calls lru_add_drain which disables preemption when calling lru_add_drain_cpu on the local cpu it is draining. The later is true because page_alloc_cpu_dead is called on the controlling CPU after the hotplugged CPU vanished completely.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

[add a cpu hotplug locking interaction as per tglx]
---
 include/linux/swap.h |  1 -
 mm/memory_hotplug.c  |  2 +-
 mm/swap.c            | 16 ++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
include/linux/swap.h +0 -1
index 84255b3da7c1..cfc200673e13 100644
@@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ extern void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
 extern void lru_add_drain(void);
 extern void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu);
 extern void lru_add_drain_all(void);
-extern void lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked(void);
 extern void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page);
 extern void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page);
 extern void mark_page_lazyfree(struct page *page);
mm/memory_hotplug.c +1 -1
index 832a042134f8..c9f6b418be79 100644
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
 		goto failed_removal;
 
 	cond_resched();
-	lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked();
+	lru_add_drain_all();
 	drain_all_pages(zone);
 
 	pfn = scan_movable_pages(start_pfn, end_pfn);
mm/swap.c +8 -8
index 381e0fe9efbf..1ab8122d2d0c 100644
@@ -688,7 +688,14 @@ static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
 
-void lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked(void)
+/*
+ * Doesn't need any cpu hotplug locking because we do rely on per-cpu
+ * kworkers being shut down before our page_alloc_cpu_dead callback is
+ * executed on the offlined cpu.
+ * Calling this function with cpu hotplug locks held can actually lead
+ * to obscure indirect dependencies via WQ context.
+ */
+void lru_add_drain_all(void)
 {
 	static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
 	static struct cpumask has_work;
@@ -724,13 +731,6 @@ void lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked(void)
 	mutex_unlock(&lock);
 }
 
-void lru_add_drain_all(void)
-{
-	get_online_cpus();
-	lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked();
-	put_online_cpus();
-}
-
 /**
  * release_pages - batched put_page()
  * @pages: array of pages to release
Signature · 7 lines
2.15.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>