sunrpc: sort groups on unix_gid_parse
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 sunrpc: sort groups on unix_gid_parse
In cases were mountd is managing the group membership for nfsd, if a user has several groups, multiple nfsd threads may call sort_groups for the same freshly created unix_gid_cache entry simultaneously, causing entries to be overwritten and the cache entry to get corrupted. This eventually leads to the server replying to the client with a bogus EPERM error if the group overwritten is the group that would allow access.
This is a very hard bug to analyze, as a very slight change in timing leads to proper sorting behavior. It was first noticed and reproduced in kernel 3.10.0, which uses shell sort to sort groups. Nothing indicates that heapsort, which is used upstream, is thread safe.
This patch solves this issue by sorting the cache entry before inserting it into the cache, and thus next entries will not have to sort it again, avoiding the issue altogether.
--- kernel/groups.c | 4 +++- net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/groups.c +3 -1
@@ -86,11 +86,13 @@ static int gid_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)return gid_gt (a, b) -gid_lt (a, b); } -static void groups_sort (struct group_info *group_info) +void groups_sort (struct group_info *group_info) {sort (group_info->gid, group_info->ngroups,sizeof (*group_info->gid), gid_cmp,NULL ); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL (groups_sort); +/* a simple bsearch */ int groups_search (const struct group_info *group_info,kgid_t grp)
net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c +7 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include "netns.h" +void groups_sort (struct group_info *group_info);/* * AUTHUNIX and AUTHNULL credentials are both handled here.
@@ -520,6 +521,12 @@ static int unix_gid_parse(struct cache_detail *cd, ug.gi->gid[i] = kgid; } +/* Sort the groups before inserting this entry +* into the cache to avoid future corrutpions +* by multiple simultaneous attempts to sort this +* entry. +*/ +groups_sort (ug.gi); ugp =unix_gid_lookup (cd, uid);if (ugp) {struct cache_head *ch;
Signature · 1 line
2.9.5
Thanks for the patch:
Quoted 5 lines · Thiago Rafael Becker
In cases were mountd is managing the group membership for nfsd, if a user has several groups, multiple nfsd threads may call
sort_groupsfor the same freshly createdunix_gid_cacheentry simultaneously, causing entries to be overwritten and the cache entry to get corrupted.
The groups_sort call is in set_groups, called from fs/nfsd/auth.c:nfsd_setuser():
set_groups(new, gi);
where "gi" is usually (in the absence of id squashing) a pointer to rqstp->rq_cred.cr_group_info, which can be in use by other threads.
To me it's pretty unintuitive that set_groups() would modify the group info passed in the second argument. While we're here, I wonder if we should make that the caller's responsibility? There are basically only three callers outside this one.
But I'm OK with this patch. I probably need an OK from a vfs person to take it through the nfsd tree?
--b.
Quoted 66 lines
This eventually leads to the server
replying to the client with a bogus EPERM error if the group overwritten is the group that would allow access.This is a very hard bug to analyze, as a very slight change in timing leads to proper sorting behavior. It was first noticed and reproduced in kernel 3.10.0, which uses shell sort to sort groups. Nothing indicates that heapsort, which is used upstream, is thread safe.
This patch solves this issue by sorting the cache entry before inserting it into the cache, and thus next entries will not have to sort it again, avoiding the issue altogether.
Signed-off-by Thiago Rafael Becker <[email protected]>--- kernel/groups.c | 4 +++- net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)kernel/groups.c +3
-1@@ -86,11 +86,13 @@ static int gid_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)return gid_gt (a, b) -gid_lt (a, b); } -static void groups_sort (struct group_info *group_info) +void groups_sort (struct group_info *group_info) {sort (group_info->gid, group_info->ngroups,sizeof (*group_info->gid), gid_cmp,NULL ); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL (groups_sort); +/* a simple bsearch */ int groups_search (const struct group_info *group_info,kgid_t grp)net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c +7
-0@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include "netns.h" +void groups_sort (struct group_info *group_info);/* * AUTHUNIX and AUTHNULL credentials are both handled here. @@ -520,6 +521,12 @@ static int unix_gid_parse(struct cache_detail *cd, ug.gi->gid[i] = kgid; } +/* Sort the groups before inserting this entry +* into the cache to avoid future corrutpions +* by multiple simultaneous attempts to sort this +* entry. +*/ +groups_sort (ug.gi); ugp =unix_gid_lookup (cd, uid);if (ugp) {struct cache_head *ch;Signature · 1 line
2.9.5
Quoted 22 lines · J. Bruce Fields
Thanks for the patch:
Quoted 5 lines · Thiago Rafael Becker
In cases were mountd is managing the group membership for nfsd, if a user has several groups, multiple nfsd threads may call
sort_groupsfor the same freshly createdunix_gid_cacheentry simultaneously, causing entries to be overwritten and the cache entry to get corrupted.The
groups_sortcall is inset_groups, called from fs/nfsd/auth.c:nfsd_setuser():set_groups(new, gi);where "gi" is usually (in the absence of id squashing) a pointer to
rqstp->rq_cred.cr_group_info, which can be in use by other threads.To me it's pretty unintuitive that
set_groups()would modify the group info passed in the second argument. While we're here, I wonder if we should make that the caller's responsibility? There are basically only three callers outside this one.
Quoted 4 lines
But I'm OK with this patch. I probably need an OK from a vfs person to take it through the nfsd tree?
--b.
I tend to agree. I have an updated version of the patches that I'll be sending to a broader audience to see if they have any inputs.