arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
RFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.
exception__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exit
The mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but probe_kernel_read invoked from slub results in call to __arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to __arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.
---
I have not tested this patch to see if it fixes the problem. Sending it early for comments.
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h +9 -0
@@ -221,7 +221,16 @@ static inline void __switch_mm(struct mm_struct *next)update_saved_ttbr0 (tsk, next); } +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN +static inline void deactivate_mm (struct task_struct *tsk,struct mm_struct *mm) +{ +if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan ()) +task_thread_info (tsk)->ttbr0 =__pa_symbol (empty_zero_page); +} +#else #define deactivate_mm (tsk,mm) do { } while (0) +#endif +#define activate_mm (prev,next) switch_mm(prev, next, current)void verify_cpu_asid_bits (void );
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
RFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Quoted 35 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Vinayak Menon <[email protected]>---
I have not tested this patch to see if it fixes the problem. Sending it early for comments.
I wonder whether it would be better to avoid restoring the user TTBR0 if KERNEL_DS is set. We could do the same thing for PAN. Do we ever access user addresses under KERNEL_DS?
Will
Mark Rutland
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Quoted 12 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 10 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.The mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.
Quoted 3 lines
I wonder whether it would be better to avoid restoring the user TTBR0 if
KERNEL_DSis set. We could do the same thing for PAN. Do we ever access user addresses underKERNEL_DS?
I believe we assume that we don't.
IIUC, with PAN+UAO, when we have KERNEL_DS set, any uaccess to a user address would fault.
Thanks,
Mark.
Mark Rutland
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
In reply to Will DeaconQuoted 36 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 35 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Vinayak Menon <[email protected]>---
I have not tested this patch to see if it fixes the problem. Sending it early for comments.
I wonder whether it would be better to avoid restoring the user TTBR0 if
KERNEL_DSis set.
I think the problem here is that switch_mm() avoids updating the saved ttbr value when the next mm is init_mm.
If we fixed that up to use the empty zero page (as we write to the real ttbr0 in this case), I think that solves the problem. Though I agree we should also avoid restoring the user TTBR for KERNEL_DS uaccess calls.
Example below.
Thanks,
Mark.
---->8----
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h +10 -7
@@ -174,10 +174,15 @@ enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)static inline void update_saved_ttbr0 (struct task_struct *tsk,struct mm_struct *mm) { +u64 ttbr; +if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan ()) { -BUG_ON (mm->pgd == swapper_pg_dir); -task_thread_info (tsk)->ttbr0 = -virt_to_phys (mm->pgd) |ASID (mm) <<48 ; +if (mm == &init_mm) + ttbr =__pa_symbol (empty_zero_page); +else + ttbr =virt_to_phys (mm->pgd) |ASID (mm) <<48 ; + +task_thread_info (tsk)->ttbr0 = ttbr; } }#else
@@ -214,11 +219,9 @@ switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,* Update the saved TTBR0_EL1 of the scheduled-in task as the previous * value may have not been initialised yet (activate_mm caller) or the * ASID has changed since the last run (following the context switch -* of another thread of the same process). Avoid setting the reserved -* TTBR0_EL1 to swapper_pg_dir (init_mm; e.g. via idle_task_exit). +* of another thread of the same process). */ -if (next != &init_mm) -update_saved_ttbr0 (tsk, next); +update_saved_ttbr0 (tsk, next); }#define deactivate_mm (tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
RFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Quoted 40 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 39 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 38 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.Signed-off-by Vinayak Menon <[email protected]>---
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I have not tested this patch to see if it fixes the problem. Sending it early for comments.
I wonder whether it would be better to avoid restoring the user TTBR0 if
KERNEL_DSis set.I think the problem here is that
switch_mm()avoids updating the saved ttbr value when the next mm isinit_mm.
For this switch to happen, the schedule() in do_task_dead at the end of do_exit() need to be called, right ? The issue is happening soon after exit_mm (probably from exit_files).
Quoted 48 lines
If we fixed that up to use the empty zero page (as we write to the real ttbr0 in this case), I think that solves the problem. Though I agree we should also avoid restoring the user TTBR for
KERNEL_DSuaccess calls.Example below.
Thanks,
Mark.---->8----
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h +10
-7@@ -174,10 +174,15 @@ enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)static inline void update_saved_ttbr0 (struct task_struct *tsk,struct mm_struct *mm) { +u64 ttbr; +if (system_uses_ttbr0_pan ()) { -BUG_ON (mm->pgd == swapper_pg_dir); -task_thread_info (tsk)->ttbr0 = -virt_to_phys (mm->pgd) |ASID (mm) <<48 ; +if (mm == &init_mm) + ttbr =__pa_symbol (empty_zero_page); +else + ttbr =virt_to_phys (mm->pgd) |ASID (mm) <<48 ; + +task_thread_info (tsk)->ttbr0 = ttbr; } }#else @@ -214,11 +219,9 @@ switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,* Update the saved TTBR0_EL1 of the scheduled-in task as the previous * value may have not been initialised yet (activate_mm caller) or the * ASID has changed since the last run (following the context switch -* of another thread of the same process). Avoid setting the reserved -* TTBR0_EL1 to swapper_pg_dir (init_mm; e.g. via idle_task_exit). +* of another thread of the same process). */ -if (next != &init_mm) -update_saved_ttbr0 (tsk, next); +update_saved_ttbr0 (tsk, next); }#define deactivate_mm (tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
Mark Rutland
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Quoted 38 lines · Vinayak Menon
Quoted 36 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 35 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 34 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I think the problem here is that
switch_mm()avoids updating the saved ttbr value when the next mm isinit_mm.For this switch to happen, the
schedule()indo_task_deadat the end ofdo_exit()need to be called, right ? The issue is happening soon afterexit_mm(probably fromexit_files).
I'd assumed that we'd switch_mm() away from the task's mm prior to the final mmput(). Otherwise, I can't see why we don't have issues in the non SW PAN case (as that would leave the HW TTBR0 stale).
However, I can't see exactly where we do that, so I'll go diggging. Something doesn't seem quite right.
Do you have a reproducer for the issue?
Thanks,
Mark.
RFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Quoted 46 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 38 lines · Vinayak Menon
Quoted 36 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 35 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 34 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I think the problem here is that
switch_mm()avoids updating the saved ttbr value when the next mm isinit_mm.For this switch to happen, the
schedule()indo_task_deadat the end ofdo_exit()need to be called, right ? The issue is happening soon afterexit_mm(probably fromexit_files).
Quoted 8 lines
I'd assumed that we'd
switch_mm()away from the task's mm prior to the finalmmput(). Otherwise, I can't see why we don't have issues in the non SW PAN case (as that would leave the HW TTBR0 stale).However, I can't see exactly where we do that, so I'll go diggging. Something doesn't seem quite right.
Do you have a reproducer for the issue?
I'd be very interested in that, or just more details about how this was observed. What was the workload? Kernel version? Hardware? .config? Do you know for sure that it was a page table walk that triggered the abort?
In the report above, Vinayak claims that "The mm has been released and the pgd is freed" but that really shouldn't happen in the do_exit path. We free the other levels of page table in free_pgtables, but deliberately keep the mm and the pgd around until we've switched away in finish_task_switch.
I'm quite prepared to believe that the ttbr0 stashing by the SW PAN code isn't bulletproof, but I'm struggling to see how the backtrace above can happen.
Will
RFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Quoted 56 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 43 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 37 lines · Vinayak Menon
Quoted 36 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 35 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 34 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I think the problem here is that
switch_mm()avoids updating the saved ttbr value when the next mm isinit_mm.For this switch to happen, the
schedule()indo_task_deadat the end ofdo_exit()need to be called, right ? The issue is happening soon afterexit_mm(probably fromexit_files).Quoted 8 lines
I'd assumed that we'd
switch_mm()away from the task's mm prior to the finalmmput(). Otherwise, I can't see why we don't have issues in the non SW PAN case (as that would leave the HW TTBR0 stale).However, I can't see exactly where we do that, so I'll go diggging. Something doesn't seem quite right.
Do you have a reproducer for the issue?
I'd be very interested in that, or just more details about how this was observed. What was the workload? Kernel version? Hardware? .config? Do you know for sure that it was a page table walk that triggered the abort?
Quoted 8 lines
In the report above, Vinayak claims that "The mm has been released and the pgd is freed" but that really shouldn't happen in the
do_exitpath. We free the other levels of page table infree_pgtables, but deliberately keep the mm and the pgd around until we've switched away infinish_task_switch.I'm quite prepared to believe that the ttbr0 stashing by the SW PAN code isn't bulletproof, but I'm struggling to see how the backtrace above can happen.
The issue was reported on 3.18 kernel. The hardware configuration is A53 octa core. The test which reproduces this is a reboot test, which just boots up android and then reboots, and this is done in a loop. It may be reproducing this problem? as reboot causes the tasks to be killed (do_exit). Its not very easy to reproduce the problem. "The issue is not reproducible when CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN is disabled". What I have looked at is the coredumps collected when the problem happens. The issue is that one of the cores tries to access a physical address which is invalid. Interestingly there is no mapping for this physical address in page tables. And every time the issue happens, the core which issues the wrong address is found to be in the path above, few instructions after the TTBR0 write inside uaccess_ttbr0_enable (and rest of the callstack is also consistent, debug_object_init->kmem_cache_alloc->probe_kernel_read). We are not sure it is a page table walk that resulted in this, that was just a guess, that a speculative access would have caused a table walk with an invalid TTBR0. As per the coredumps, tsk->mm is made NULL. Rest was assumption, that mm is released and pgd is freed. I assumed do_exit->exit_mmap->mmput->__mmdrop will do that. But let me go and check if I can figure out from the dumps if that has really happened. I remember doing it but let me confirm. Let me know if you want me to collect any other info from the dumps.
Thanks,
Vinayak
Mark Rutland
reviewerRFC PATCH 1/1 arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
In reply to Mark RutlandQuoted 46 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 38 lines · Vinayak Menon
Quoted 36 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 35 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 34 lines · Vinayak Menon
A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read, resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is set to the saved ttbr by
uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always seen to happen in the exit path of the task.exception
__arch_copy_from_user__copy_from_userprobe_kernel_readget_freepointer_safeslab_alloc_nodeslab_allockmem_cache_allockmem_cache_zallocfill_pool__debug_object_initdebug_object_initrcuhead_fixup_activatedebug_object_fixupdebug_object_activatedebug_rcu_head_queue__call_rcuep_removeeventpoll_release_file__fput____fputtask_work_rundo_exitThe mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but
probe_kernel_readinvoked from slub results in call to__arch_copy_from_user. At the entry to__arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards is resulting in invalid physical address access.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I think the problem here is that
switch_mm()avoids updating the saved ttbr value when the next mm isinit_mm.For this switch to happen, the
schedule()indo_task_deadat the end ofdo_exit()need to be called, right ? The issue is happening soon afterexit_mm(probably fromexit_files).
Quoted 6 lines
I'd assumed that we'd
switch_mm()away from the task's mm prior to the finalmmput(). Otherwise, I can't see why we don't have issues in the non SW PAN case (as that would leave the HW TTBR0 stale).However, I can't see exactly where we do that, so I'll go diggging. Something doesn't seem quite right.
AFAICT, we rely on finish_task_switch() to do the final drop of the mm, after* we've switched away from the task. So while the task is installed, the mm (and associated pgd) should still be live, and not freed.
So my patch shouldn't be necessary.
I'm afraid I don't have any other theory as to what's going on here.
Thanks,
Mark.