eeprom: at24: coding style fixes
Subsystems (2)
v3 cover eeprom: at24: coding style fixes
Just two patches fixing minor coding style issues. The first one contains fixes for problems reported by checkpatch. The second adds a common prefix to all symbols in at24.c.
v1 -> v2:
- don't break the user space: use module_param_named() for module parameters
v2 -> v3:
- s/at24_tool_until/at24_loop_until/g
- tweaked the commit message in patch 2/2
Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
eeprom: at24: use a common prefix for all symbols in at24.c
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
PATCH v3 1/2 eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
Fix issues reported by checkpatch for at24.c.
--- drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +11 -11
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ struct at24_data {*/ struct mutex lock; -unsigned write_max; -unsigned num_addresses; +unsigned int write_max; +unsigned int num_addresses;unsigned int offset_adj;struct nvmem_config nvmem_config;
@@ -93,16 +93,16 @@ struct at24_data {* * This value is forced to be a power of two so that writes align on pages. */ -static unsigned io_limit =128 ; -module_param (io_limit, uint,0 ); +static unsigned int io_limit =128 ; +module_param (io_limit, uint,0000 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (io_limit,"Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)" );/* * Specs often allow 5 msec for a page write, sometimes 20 msec; * it's important to recover from write timeouts. */ -static unsigned write_timeout =25 ; -module_param (write_timeout, uint,0 ); +static unsigned int write_timeout =25 ; +module_param (write_timeout, uint,0000 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (write_timeout,"Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)" );#define AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN 5
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)");#define AT24_BITMASK (x) (BIT(x) - 1)/* create non-zero magic value for given eeprom parameters */ -#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC (_len, _flags) \ - ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \ +#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC (_len, _flags) \ + ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \ << AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN | ilog2(_len))/*
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, at24_acpi_ids);static struct at24_client *at24_translate_offset (struct at24_data *at24,unsigned int *offset) { -unsigned i; +unsigned int i;if (at24->chip.flags &AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 ) { i = *offset >>16 ;
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_regmap_read(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,static size_t at24_adjust_write_count (struct at24_data *at24,unsigned int offset,size_t count) { -unsigned next_page; +unsigned int next_page;/* write_max is at most a page */ if (count > at24->write_max)
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)bool writable;struct at24_data *at24;int err; -unsigned i, num_addresses; +unsigned int i, num_addresses;const struct regmap_config *config;u8 test_byte;
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)"); · line 116
Quoted 5 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +2
-2-#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC (_len, _flags) \ - ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \ +#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC (_len, _flags) \ + ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \ << AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN | ilog2(_len))
Looks like there's been a whitespace accident on that first added line. (Backslash has one more tab in front of it than it should have)
--
Regards,
Christoph
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
2017-12-10 2:31 GMT+01:00 Christoph Böhmwalder <[email protected]>:
Quoted 10 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)"); · line 116
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +2
-2-#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC (_len, _flags) \ - ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \ +#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC (_len, _flags) \ + ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \ << AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN | ilog2(_len))Looks like there's been a whitespace accident on that first added line. (Backslash has one more tab in front of it than it should have)
Quoted 3 lines
--
Regards,
Christoph
It's only the way diff prints the patch. The file looks correct.
Thanks,
Bartosz
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
In reply to Bartosz Golaszewskidrivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c struct at24_data { · line 105
Quoted 5 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
Fix issues reported by checkpatch for
at24.c.drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +2
-0+module_param (io_limit, uint,0000 ); +module_param (write_timeout, uint,0000 );
0 is a pretty much octal number as 0000.
So, I would prefer not to blindly follow the stupid advise from checkpatch, better to teach checkpatch about 0.
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
2017-12-10 13:57 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>:
Quoted 13 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c struct at24_data { · line 105
Quoted 5 lines
Fix issues reported by checkpatch for
at24.c.drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +2
-0+module_param (io_limit, uint,0000 ); +module_param (write_timeout, uint,0000 );0 is a pretty much octal number as 0000.
So, I would prefer not to blindly follow the stupid advise from checkpatch, better to teach checkpatch about 0.
I submitted a patch for that - let's see what checkpatch maintainers say.
Thanks,
Bartosz
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] eeprom: at24: fix coding style issues
Quoted 13 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-12-10 13:57 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>:
Quoted 11 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c struct at24_data { · line 105
Quoted 3 lines
Fix issues reported by checkpatch for
at24.c.drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +2
-0+module_param (io_limit, uint,0000 ); +module_param (write_timeout, uint,0000 );0 is a pretty much octal number as 0000.
So, I would prefer not to blindly follow the stupid advise from checkpatch, better to teach checkpatch about 0.
Quoted 1 line
I submitted a patch for that - let's see what checkpatch maintainers say.
Personally, I prefer 4 digit octal in most cases as it shows the coder knows that the argument is a permissions use and not just some generic 0.
There are not many uses of 0 for permissions outside of module_param*.
I suppose all the variants of module_param calls, as a 0 there is specifically a "not to appear in sysfs" flag, could or should be excluded from that octal test.
PATCH v3 2/2 eeprom: at24: use a common prefix for all symbols in at24.c
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiThere are a couple symbols defined in the driver source file which are missing the at24_ prefix. This patch fixes that.
For module params: use module_param_named() in order to not break userspace.
--- drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +18 -16
@@ -93,17 +93,17 @@ struct at24_data {* * This value is forced to be a power of two so that writes align on pages. */ -static unsigned int io_limit =128 ; -module_param (io_limit, uint,0000 ); -MODULE_PARM_DESC (io_limit,"Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)" ); +static unsigned int at24_io_limit =128 ; +module_param_named (io_limit, at24_io_limit, uint,0000 ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (at24_io_limit,"Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)" );/* * Specs often allow 5 msec for a page write, sometimes 20 msec; * it's important to recover from write timeouts. */ -static unsigned int write_timeout =25 ; -module_param (write_timeout, uint,0000 ); -MODULE_PARM_DESC (write_timeout,"Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)" ); +static unsigned int at24_write_timeout =25 ; +module_param_named (write_timeout, at24_write_timeout, uint,0000 ); +MODULE_PARM_DESC (at24_write_timeout,"Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)" );#define AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN 5#define AT24_SIZE_FLAGS 8
@@ -126,8 +126,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)");* iteration of processing the request. Both should be unsigned integers * holding at least 32 bits. */ -#define loop_until_timeout (tout, op_time) \ - for (tout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout), op_time = 0; \ +#define at24_loop_until_timeout (tout, op_time) \ + for (tout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(at24_write_timeout), \ + op_time = 0; \ op_time ? time_before(op_time, tout) : true; \ usleep_range(1000, 1500), op_time = jiffies)
@@ -290,13 +291,13 @@ static ssize_t at24_regmap_read(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf, regmap = at24_client->regmap; client = at24_client->client; -if (count > io_limit) - count = io_limit; +if (count > at24_io_limit) + count = at24_io_limit;/* adjust offset for mac and serial read ops */ offset += at24->offset_adj; - loop_until_timeout(timeout, read_time) { + at24_loop_until_timeout(timeout, read_time) { ret =regmap_bulk_read (regmap, offset, buf, count);dev_dbg (&client->dev,"read %zu@%d --> %d (%ld)\n" , count, offset, ret, jiffies);
@@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_regmap_write(struct at24_data *at24, const char *buf, client = at24_client->client; count =at24_adjust_write_count (at24, offset, count); - loop_until_timeout(timeout, write_time) { + at24_loop_until_timeout(timeout, write_time) { ret =regmap_bulk_write (regmap, offset, buf, count);dev_dbg (&client->dev,"write %zu@%d --> %d (%ld)\n" , count, offset, ret, jiffies);
@@ -613,7 +614,8 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) writable = !(chip.flags &AT24_FLAG_READONLY );if (writable) { - at24->write_max = min_t(unsigned int, chip.page_size, io_limit); + at24->write_max = min_t(unsigned int, + chip.page_size, at24_io_limit);if (!i2c_check_functionality (client->adapter,I2C_FUNC_I2C ) && at24->write_max >I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX ) at24->write_max =I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX ;
@@ -728,12 +730,12 @@ static struct i2c_driver at24_driver = {static int __init at24_init (void ) { -if (!io_limit) { -pr_err ("at24: io_limit must not be 0!\n" ); +if (!at24_io_limit) { +pr_err ("at24: at24_io_limit must not be 0!\n" );return -EINVAL ; } - io_limit =rounddown_pow_of_two (io_limit); + at24_io_limit =rounddown_pow_of_two (at24_io_limit);return i2c_add_driver (&at24_driver); }module_init (at24_init);
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1