i2c: update i2c-dev.h warning in documentation
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 i2c: update i2c-dev.h warning in documentation
dev-interface document gives examples for accessing i2c from userspace.
There's a note warning developers about the different i2c-dev.h header files which were shipped with the kernel and i2c-tools separately.
However, these commits in i2c-tools repository suggests that the header files are now identical (in functionality) and i2c_* functions are now defined in a separate header called i2c/smbus.h, which is distributed with i2c-tools:
commit 652619121974 ("Minimize differences with kernel flavor") commit 93caf007f4cb ("Move SMBus helper functions to include/i2c/smbus.h")
Thus, I've converted the warning paragraph into a historical note and updated the suggested header files.
---
Sorry for duplicate mails. My email client hard-wrapped previous patch.
Thanks.
Documentation/i2c/dev-interface | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Documentation/i2c/dev-interface +16 -13
@@ -9,21 +9,24 @@ i2c adapters present on your system at a given time. i2cdetect is part of the i2c-tools package. I2C device files are character device files with major device number 89 -and a minor device number corresponding to the number assigned as -explained above. They should be called "i2c-%d" (i2c-0, i2c-1, ..., +and a minor device number corresponding to the number assigned as +explained above. They should be called "i2c-%d" (i2c-0, i2c-1, ..., i2c-10, ...). All 256 minor device numbers are reserved for i2c. C example ========= -So let's say you want to access an i2c adapter from a C program. The -first thing to do is "#include <linux/i2c-dev.h>". Please note that -there are two files named "i2c-dev.h" out there, one is distributed -with the Linux kernel and is meant to be included from kernel -driver code, the other one is distributed with i2c-tools and is -meant to be included from user-space programs. You obviously want -the second one here. +So let's say you want to access an i2c adapter from a C program. First, you +need to include these two headers: + + #include <linux/i2c-dev.h> + #include <i2c/smbus.h> + +(Please note that there are two files named "i2c-dev.h" out there. One is +distributed with the Linux kernel and the other one is included in the +source tree of i2c-tools. They used to be different in content but since 2012 +they're identical. You should use "linux/i2c-dev.h"). Now, you have to decide which adapter you want to access. You should inspect /sys/class/i2c-dev/ or run "i2cdetect -l" to decide this.
@@ -35,7 +38,7 @@ Next thing, open the device file, as follows: int file; int adapter_nr = 2; /* probably dynamically determined */ char filename[20]; - + snprintf(filename, 19, "/dev/i2c-%d", adapter_nr); file = open(filename, O_RDWR); if (file < 0) {
@@ -69,7 +72,7 @@ the device supports them. Both are illustrated below. /* res contains the read word */ } - /* Using I2C Write, equivalent of + /* Using I2C Write, equivalent of i2c_smbus_write_word_data(file, reg, 0x6543) */ buf[0] = reg; buf[1] = 0x43;
@@ -144,7 +147,7 @@ You can do plain i2c transactions by using read(2) and write(2) calls. You do not need to pass the address byte; instead, set it through ioctl I2C_SLAVE before you try to access the device. -You can do SMBus level transactions (see documentation file smbus-protocol +You can do SMBus level transactions (see documentation file smbus-protocol for details) through the following functions: __s32 i2c_smbus_write_quick(int file, __u8 value); __s32 i2c_smbus_read_byte(int file);
@@ -155,7 +158,7 @@ for details) through the following functions: __s32 i2c_smbus_write_word_data(int file, __u8 command, __u16 value); __s32 i2c_smbus_process_call(int file, __u8 command, __u16 value); __s32 i2c_smbus_read_block_data(int file, __u8 command, __u8 *values); - __s32 i2c_smbus_write_block_data(int file, __u8 command, __u8 length, + __s32 i2c_smbus_write_block_data(int file, __u8 command, __u8 length, __u8 *values); All these transactions return -1 on failure; you can read errno to see what happened. The 'write' transactions return 0 on success; the
Signature · 6 lines
2.15.1 -- Cengiz Can
Quoted 11 lines · On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 23:10:58 +0300 Cengiz Can <[email protected]> wrote:
dev-interfacedocument gives examples for accessing i2c from userspace.There's a note warning developers about the different
i2c-dev.hheader files which were shipped with the kernel and i2c-tools separately.However, these commits in i2c-tools repository suggests that the header files are now identical (in functionality) and
i2c_*functions are now defined in a separate header calledi2c/smbus.h, which is distributed with i2c-tools:
Quoted 7 lines
commit 652619121974 ("Minimize differences with kernel flavor") commit
93caf007f4cb("Move SMBus helper functions toinclude/i2c/smbus.h")Thus, I've converted the warning paragraph into a historical note and updated the suggested header files.
Signed-off-by Cengiz Can <[email protected]>
So this seems like a worthwhile change, but the patch contains a number of unrelated changes, mostly white-space stuff it seems. Can you clean that up and resend?
Thanks,
jon
PATCH v2 1/1 i2c: update i2c-dev.h warning in documentation
Documentation/i2c/dev-interface gives examples for accessing i2c from userspace.
There's a note that warns developers about the two i2c-dev.h header files which were shipped with the kernel and i2c-tools separately.
However, following i2c-tools commits suggest that the header files are now identical (in functionality) and i2c_* helper functions are now defined in a separate header called i2c/smbus.h, which is distributed with i2c-tools:
commit 652619121974 ("Minimize differences with kernel flavor") commit 93caf007f4cb ("Move SMBus helper functions to include/i2c/smbus.h")
Thus, I've converted the warning paragraph into a historical note and updated the suggested header files.
---
Hello Jonathan,
Thank you for the quick feedback.
I've removed unnecessary modifications and fixed some grammar in the commit message.
Documentation/i2c/dev-interface | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Documentation/i2c/dev-interface +0 -0
@@ -17,13 +17,16 @@ i2c-10, ...). All 256 minor device numbers are
reserved for i2c.
C example
=========
-So let's say you want to access an i2c adapter from a C program. The -first thing to do is "#include <linux/i2c-dev.h>". Please note that -there are two files named "i2c-dev.h" out there, one is distributed -with the Linux kernel and is meant to be included from kernel -driver code, the other one is distributed with i2c-tools and is -meant to be included from user-space programs. You obviously want -the second one here.
+So let's say you want to access an i2c adapter from a C program. +First, you need to include these two headers:
+
+ #include <linux/i2c-dev.h>
+ #include <i2c/smbus.h>
+
+(Please note that there are two files named "i2c-dev.h" out there. One is +distributed with the Linux kernel and the other one is included in the +source tree of i2c-tools. They used to be different in content but since 2012 +they're identical. You should use "linux/i2c-dev.h").
Now, you have to decide which adapter you want to access. You should inspect /sys/class/i2c-dev/ or run "i2cdetect -l" to decide this.
Signature · 1 line
2.15.1
Jonathan Corbet
AppliedQuoted 11 lines · On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:43:09 +0300 "Cengiz C." <[email protected]> wrote:
Documentation/i2c/dev-interfacegives examples for accessing i2c from userspace.There's a note that warns developers about the two
i2c-dev.hheader files which were shipped with the kernel and i2c-tools separately.However, following i2c-tools commits suggest that the header files are now identical (in functionality) and
i2c_*helper functions are now defined in a separate header calledi2c/smbus.h, which is distributed with i2c-tools:
Quoted 7 lines
commit 652619121974 ("Minimize differences with kernel flavor") commit
93caf007f4cb("Move SMBus helper functions toinclude/i2c/smbus.h")Thus, I've converted the warning paragraph into a historical note and updated the suggested header files.
Signed-off-by Cengiz Can <[email protected]>
Applied to the docs tree, thanks. Note that the patch was wrapped by your mailer and I had to fix it up; that would be nice to avoid in the future.
Thanks,
jon
Quoted 2 lines
Applied to the docs tree, thanks. Note that the patch was wrapped by your mailer and I had to fix it up; that would be nice to avoid in the future.
Thank you!
I've ditched claws-mail and will use git send-mail instead.
Signature · 1 line
Cengiz Can
Quoted 1 line · On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:49:16 +0300 Cengiz Can <[email protected]> wrote:
I've ditched claws-mail and will use git send-mail instead.
FWIW, I use claws for patch mailing and more. It can be made to work, you just need to tweak the options a bit. The trick is to send patches to yourself and keep at it until what you receive still applies.
jon