apparent big-endian bugs in dwc-xlgmac
RFC PATCH 1/1 apparent big-endian bugs in dwc-xlgmac
In xlgmac_dev_xmit():
/* Mark it as a CONTEXT descriptor */
dma_desc->desc3 = XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE(
dma_desc->desc3,
TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_CTXT_POS,
TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_CTXT_LEN,
1);Looking at XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE() we see this:
#define XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE(var, pos, len, val) ({ \
typeof(var) _var = (var); \
typeof(pos) _pos = (pos); \
typeof(len) _len = (len); \
typeof(val) _val = (val); \
_val = (_val << _pos) & GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos); \
_var = (_var & ~GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos)) | _val; \
cpu_to_le32(_var); \})
That thing assumes var to be host-endian and has a little-endian result. Unfortunately, we feed it a little-endian and store the result back into the same place. That might work if the original values *was* host-endian and we wanted to end up with little-endian. However, that is immediately followed by
/* Indicate this descriptor contains the MSS */
dma_desc->desc3 = XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE(
dma_desc->desc3,
TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_TCMSSV_POS,
TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_TCMSSV_LEN,
1);where we operate on the now definitely little-endian value. That really can't be right. I don't have the hardware in question, so I can't test that, but it smells like this needs something like diff below, making XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE take le32 and return le32. GET side of things is le32 -> u32; definition looks correct, but slightly misannotated.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +3 -3
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@#define XLGMAC_GET_REG_BITS_LE (var, pos, len) ({ \ typeof(pos) _pos = (pos); \ typeof(len) _len = (len); \ - typeof(var) _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \ + u32 _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \ ((_var) & GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos)) >> (_pos); \ })
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@typeof (len) _len = (len); \typeof (val) _val = (val); \ _val = (_val << _pos) &GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos); \ - _var = (_var & ~GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos)) | _val; \ -cpu_to_le32 (_var); \ + (_var & ~cpu_to_le32 (GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos))) | \ +cpu_to_le32 (_val); \ })struct xlgmac_pdata ;
Hi AI Viro,
Quoted 56 lines · Al Viro
In
xlgmac_dev_xmit():/* Mark it as a CONTEXT descriptor */ dma_desc->desc3 = XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE( dma_desc->desc3, TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_CTXT_POS, TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_CTXT_LEN, 1);Looking at
XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE()we see this:#define XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE(var, pos, len, val) ({ \ typeof(var) _var = (var); \ typeof(pos) _pos = (pos); \ typeof(len) _len = (len); \ typeof(val) _val = (val); \ _val = (_val << _pos) & GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos); \ _var = (_var & ~GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos)) | _val; \ cpu_to_le32(_var); \})
That thing assumes var to be host-endian and has a little-endian result. Unfortunately, we feed it a little-endian and store the result back into the same place. That might work if the original values *was* host-endian and we wanted to end up with little-endian. However, that is immediately followed by
/* Indicate this descriptor contains the MSS */ dma_desc->desc3 = XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LE( dma_desc->desc3, TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_TCMSSV_POS, TX_CONTEXT_DESC3_TCMSSV_LEN, 1);where we operate on the now definitely little-endian value. That really can't be right. I don't have the hardware in question, so I can't test that, but it smells like this needs something like diff below, making
XLGMAC_SET_REG_BITS_LEtake le32 and return le32. GET side of things is le32 -> u32; definition looks correct, but slightly misannotated.Signed-off-by Al Viro <[email protected]>---
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +1
-1@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@#define XLGMAC_GET_REG_BITS_LE (var, pos, len) ({ \ typeof(pos) _pos = (pos); \ typeof(len) _len = (len); \ - typeof(var) _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \ + u32 _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \ ((_var) & GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos)) >> (_pos); \ })
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h line 132
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +2
-2@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@typeof (len) _len = (len); \typeof (val) _val = (val); \ _val = (_val << _pos) &GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos); \ - _var = (_var & ~GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos)) | _val; \ -cpu_to_le32 (_var); \ + (_var & ~cpu_to_le32 (GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos))) | \ +cpu_to_le32 (_val); \ })struct xlgmac_pdata ;
Make sense. But I think what you want is fix as follows. Right ?
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@
typeof(len) _len = (len); \
- typeof(val) _val = (val); \
+ u32 _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \
_val = (_val << _pos) & GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos); \- _var = (_var & ~GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos)) | _val; \
- cpu_to_le32(_var); \
+ (cpu_to_le32(_var) & ~cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos))) | \
+ cpu_to_le32(_val); \
})
Quoted 16 lines · Jie Deng
Hi AI Viro,
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h line 132
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +2
-2@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@typeof (len) _len = (len); \typeof (val) _val = (val); \ _val = (_val << _pos) &GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos); \ - _var = (_var & ~GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos)) | _val; \ -cpu_to_le32 (_var); \ + (_var & ~cpu_to_le32 (GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos))) | \ +cpu_to_le32 (_val); \ })struct xlgmac_pdata ;Make sense. But I think what you want is fix as follows. Right ?
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h line 130
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +3
-3@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@typeof (len) _len = (len); \ -typeof (val) _val = (val); \ + u32 _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \ _val = (_val << _pos) &GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos); \ - _var = (_var & ~GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos)) | _val; \ -cpu_to_le32 (_var); \ + (cpu_to_le32 (_var) & ~cpu_to_le32 (GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos))) | \ +cpu_to_le32 (_val); \ })
What for? Sure, this variant will work, but why bother with
a = le32_to_cpu(b); (cpu_to_le32(a) & ....) | .... and how is that better than (b & ...) | ...
IDGI... Mind you, I'm not sure if there is any point keeping _var in that thing, seeing that we use var only once - might be better off with
((var) & ~cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos))) | \ cpu_to_le32(_val); \
Quoted 10 lines · Al Viro
What for? Sure, this variant will work, but why bother with
a = le32_to_cpu(b); (cpu_to_le32(a) & ....) | .... and how is that better than (b & ...) | ...IDGI... Mind you, I'm not sure if there is any point keeping
_varin that thing, seeing that we use var only once - might be better off with((var) & ~cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos))) | \ cpu_to_le32(_val); \
FWIW, seeing how many drivers end up open-coding that, I'm rather tempted to add to linux/bitops.h or linux/byteorder/generic.h the following:
static inline __le16 le16_replace_bits(__le16 old, u16 v, int bit, int size)
{
__le16 mask = cpu_to_le16(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit));
return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_le16(v << bit) & mask);
}static inline __le32 le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, int bit, int size)
{
__le32 mask = cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit));
return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_le32(v << bit) & mask);
}static inline __le64 le64_replace_bits(__le64 old, u64 v, int bit, int size)
{
__le64 mask = cpu_to_le64(GENMASK_ULL(bit + size - 1, bit));
return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_le64(v << bit) & mask);
}static inline __be16 be16_replace_bits(__be16 old, u16 v, int bit, int size)
{
__be16 mask = cpu_to_be16(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit));
return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_be16(v << bit) & mask);
}static inline __be32 be32_replace_bits(__be32 old, u32 v, int bit, int size)
{
__be32 mask = cpu_to_be32(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit));
return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_be32(v << bit) & mask);
}static inline __be64 be64_replace_bits(__be64 old, u64 v, int bit, int size)
{
__be64 mask = cpu_to_be64(GENMASK_ULL(bit + size - 1, bit));
return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_be64(v << bit) & mask);
}static inline u16 le16_get_bits(__le16 v, int bit, int size)
{
return (le16_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1);
}static inline u32 le32_get_bits(__le32 v, int bit, int size)
{
return (le32_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1);
}static inline u64 le64_get_bits(__le64 v, int bit, int size)
{
return (le64_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1);
}static inline u16 be16_get_bits(__be16 v, int bit, int size)
{
return (be16_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1);
}static inline u32 be32_get_bits(__be32 v, int bit, int size)
{
return (be32_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1);
}static inline u64 be64_get_bits(__be64 v, int bit, int size)
{
return (be64_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1);
}and let drivers use those...
Quoted 76 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 10 lines · Al Viro
What for? Sure, this variant will work, but why bother with
a = le32_to_cpu(b); (cpu_to_le32(a) & ....) | .... and how is that better than (b & ...) | ...IDGI... Mind you, I'm not sure if there is any point keeping
_varin that thing, seeing that we use var only once - might be better off with((var) & ~cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos))) | \ cpu_to_le32(_val); \FWIW, seeing how many drivers end up open-coding that, I'm rather tempted to add to
linux/bitops.horlinux/byteorder/generic.hthe following:static inline
__le16le16_replace_bits(__le16 old, u16 v, int bit, int size){ __le16 mask = cpu_to_le16(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit)); return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_le16(v << bit) & mask); }static inline
__le32le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, int bit, int size){ __le32 mask = cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit)); return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_le32(v << bit) & mask); }static inline
__le64le64_replace_bits(__le64 old, u64 v, int bit, int size){ __le64 mask = cpu_to_le64(GENMASK_ULL(bit + size - 1, bit)); return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_le64(v << bit) & mask); }static inline
__be16be16_replace_bits(__be16 old, u16 v, int bit, int size){ __be16 mask = cpu_to_be16(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit)); return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_be16(v << bit) & mask); }static inline
__be32be32_replace_bits(__be32 old, u32 v, int bit, int size){ __be32 mask = cpu_to_be32(GENMASK(bit + size - 1, bit)); return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_be32(v << bit) & mask); }static inline
__be64be64_replace_bits(__be64 old, u64 v, int bit, int size){ __be64 mask = cpu_to_be64(GENMASK_ULL(bit + size - 1, bit)); return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_be64(v << bit) & mask); }static inline u16
le16_get_bits(__le16 v, int bit, int size){ return (le16_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1); }static inline u32
le32_get_bits(__le32 v, int bit, int size){ return (le32_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1); }static inline u64
le64_get_bits(__le64 v, int bit, int size){ return (le64_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1); }static inline u16
be16_get_bits(__be16 v, int bit, int size){ return (be16_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1); }static inline u32
be32_get_bits(__be32 v, int bit, int size){ return (be32_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT(size) - 1); }
Quoted 6 lines
static inline u64
be64_get_bits(__be64 v, int bit, int size){ return (be64_to_cpu(v) >> bit) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1); }and let drivers use those...
Sounds good. As a driver developer, I'm happy to see this.
RFC PATCH 1/1 new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
In reply to Al ViroA lot of drivers are open-coding the "replace these bits in __be32 with the following value" kind of primitives. Let's add them to byteorder.h.
Primitives:
{be,le}{16,32,64}_replace_bits(old, v, bit, nbits)
{be,le}{16,32,64}_get_bits(val, bit, nbits)Essentially, it gives helpers for work with bitfields in fixed-endian. Suppose we have e.g. a little-endian 32bit value with fixed layout; expressing that as a bitfield would go like
struct foo {
unsigned foo:4; /* bits 0..3 */
unsigned :2;
unsigned bar:12; /* bits 6..17 */
unsigned baz:14; /* bits 18..31 */
}Even for host-endian it doesn't work all that well - you end up with ifdefs in structure definition and generated code stinks. For fixed-endian it gets really painful, and people tend to use explicit shift-and-mask kind of macros for accessing the fields (and often enough get the endianness conversions wrong, at that). With these primitives
struct foo v <=> __le32 v
v.foo = i ? 1 : 2 <=> v = le32_replace_bits(v, i ? 1 : 2, 0, 4)
f(4 + v.baz) <=> f(4 + le32_get_bits(v, 18, 14))
---
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +22 -0
@@ -187,4 +187,26 @@ static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) dst[i] =be32_to_cpu (src[i]); } +#define ____MASK (bit, nbits) ((((1ULL << ((nbits) - 1)) << 1) - 1) << (bit)) +#define ____MAKE_OP (type,base) \ +static inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, int bit, int nbits) \ +{ \ + __##type mask = cpu_to_##type(____MASK(bit, nbits)); \ + return (old & ~mask) | (cpu_to_##type(val << bit) & mask); \ +} \ +static inline base type##_get_bits(__##type val, int bit, int nbits) \ +{ \ + return (type##_to_cpu(val) >> bit) & ____MASK(0, nbits); \ +} + +____MAKE_OP(le16,u16) +____MAKE_OP(le32,u32) +____MAKE_OP(le64,u64) +____MAKE_OP(be16,u16) +____MAKE_OP(be32,u32) +____MAKE_OP(be64,u64) +#undef ____MAKE_OP +#undef ____MASK +#endif /* _LINUX_BYTEORDER_GENERIC_H */
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 15 lines · Al Viro
Essentially, it gives helpers for work with bitfields in fixed-endian. Suppose we have e.g. a little-endian 32bit value with fixed layout; expressing that as a bitfield would go like
struct foo { unsigned foo:4; /* bits 0..3 */ unsigned :2; unsigned bar:12; /* bits 6..17 */ unsigned baz:14; /* bits 18..31 */ }Even for host-endian it doesn't work all that well - you end up with ifdefs in structure definition and generated code stinks. For fixed-endian it gets really painful, and people tend to use explicit shift-and-mask kind of macros for accessing the fields (and often enough get the endianness conversions wrong, at that). With these primitives
Quoted 3 lines
struct foo v <=>
__le32v
v.foo = i ? 1 : 2 <=> v =le32_replace_bits(v, i ? 1 : 2, 0, 4)
f(4 + v.baz) <=>f(4 + le32_get_bits(v, 18, 14))
Looks very useful. The [start bit, size] pair may not land itself too nicely to creating defines, though. Which is why in include/linux/bitfield.h we tried to use a shifted mask and work backwards from that single value what the start and size are. commit 3e9b3112ec74 ("add basic register-field manipulation macros") has the description. Could a similar trick perhaps be applicable here?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 20 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 15 lines · Al Viro
Essentially, it gives helpers for work with bitfields in fixed-endian. Suppose we have e.g. a little-endian 32bit value with fixed layout; expressing that as a bitfield would go like
struct foo { unsigned foo:4; /* bits 0..3 */ unsigned :2; unsigned bar:12; /* bits 6..17 */ unsigned baz:14; /* bits 18..31 */ }Even for host-endian it doesn't work all that well - you end up with ifdefs in structure definition and generated code stinks. For fixed-endian it gets really painful, and people tend to use explicit shift-and-mask kind of macros for accessing the fields (and often enough get the endianness conversions wrong, at that). With these primitives
Quoted 3 lines
struct foo v <=>
__le32v
v.foo = i ? 1 : 2 <=> v =le32_replace_bits(v, i ? 1 : 2, 0, 4)
f(4 + v.baz) <=>f(4 + le32_get_bits(v, 18, 14))
Quoted 6 lines
Looks very useful. The [start bit, size] pair may not land itself too nicely to creating defines, though. Which is why in
include/linux/bitfield.hwe tried to use a shifted mask and work backwards from that single value what the start and size are. commit3e9b3112ec74("add basic register-field manipulation macros") has the description. Could a similar trick perhaps be applicable here?
Umm... What's wrong with
#define FIELD_FOO 0,4
#define FIELD_BAR 6,12
#define FIELD_BAZ 18,14
A macro can bloody well expand to any sequence of tokens - le32_get_bits(v, FIELD_BAZ) will become le32_get_bits(v, 18, 14) just fine. What's the problem with that?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 8 lines · Al Viro
Umm... What's wrong with
#define
FIELD_FOO0,4
#defineFIELD_BAR6,12
#defineFIELD_BAZ18,14A macro can bloody well expand to any sequence of tokens -
le32_get_bits(v, FIELD_BAZ)will becomele32_get_bits(v, 18, 14)just fine. What's the problem with that?
FWIW, if you want to use the mask, __builtin_ffsll() is not the only way to do it - you don't need the shift. Multiplier would do just as well, and that can be had easier. If mask = (2*a + 1)<<n = ((2*a)<<n) ^ (1<<n), then
mask - 1 = ((2*a) << n) + ((1<<n) - 1) = ((2*n) << n) ^ ((1<<n) - 1) mask ^ (mask - 1) = (1<<n) + ((1<<n) - 1) and mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1)) = 1<<n.
IOW, with
static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
{
return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1));
}we could do
static __always_inline __le64 le64_replace_bits(__le64 old, u64 v, u64 mask)
{
__le64 m = cpu_to_le64(mask);
return (old & ~m) | (cpu_to_le64(v * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m);
}static __always_inline u64 le64_get_bits(__le64 v, u64 mask)
{
return (le64_to_cpu(v) & mask) / mask_to_multiplier(mask);
}etc. Compiler will turn those into shifts... I can live with either calling conventions.
Comments?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 35 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 8 lines · Al Viro
Umm... What's wrong with
#define
FIELD_FOO0,4
#defineFIELD_BAR6,12
#defineFIELD_BAZ18,14A macro can bloody well expand to any sequence of tokens -
le32_get_bits(v, FIELD_BAZ)will becomele32_get_bits(v, 18, 14)just fine. What's the problem with that?FWIW, if you want to use the mask,
__builtin_ffsll()is not the only way to do it - you don't need the shift. Multiplier would do just as well, and that can be had easier. If mask = (2*a + 1)<<n = ((2*a)<<n) ^ (1<<n), thenmask - 1 = ((2*a) << n) + ((1<<n) - 1) = ((2*n) << n) ^ ((1<<n) - 1) mask ^ (mask - 1) = (1<<n) + ((1<<n) - 1) and mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1)) = 1<<n.IOW, with
static
__always_inlineu64mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask){ return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1)); }we could do
static
__always_inline__le64le64_replace_bits(__le64 old, u64 v, u64 mask){ __le64 m = cpu_to_le64(mask); return (old & ~m) | (cpu_to_le64(v * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m); }static
__always_inlineu64le64_get_bits(__le64 v, u64 mask)
Quoted 8 lines
{ return (le64_to_cpu(v) & mask) / mask_to_multiplier(mask); }etc. Compiler will turn those into shifts... I can live with either calling conventions.
Comments?
Very nice! The compilation-time check if the value can fit in a field covered by the mask (if they're both known) did help me catch bugs early a few times over the years, so if it could be preserved we can maybe even drop the FIELD_* macros and just use this approach?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 4 lines
static
__always_inlineu64mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask){ return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1)); }
D'oh. Even simpler than that, of course -
static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask) {
return mask & -mask;
}
Quoted 4 lines
Very nice! The compilation-time check if the value can fit in a field covered by the mask (if they're both known) did help me catch bugs early a few times over the years, so if it could be preserved we can maybe even drop the FIELD_* macros and just use this approach?
Umm... Something like this, perhaps? Same bunch, plus u{16,32,64}_... variants for host-endian. Adding sanity check on mask is also not hard, but I don't know how useful it actually is...
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +32 -0
@@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) dst[i] =be32_to_cpu (src[i]); } +extern void __compiletime_error("value doesn't fit into mask") +__field_overflow (void); +static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask) +{ +return mask & -mask; +} + +#define ____MAKE_OP (type,base,to,from) \ +static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base mask) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(mask); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \ + (val & ~(mask/mask_to_multiplier(mask)))) \ + __field_overflow(); \ + return (old & ~m) | \ + (to(val * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m); \ +} \ +static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base mask) \ +{ \ + return (from(v) & mask)/mask_to_multiplier(mask); \ +} +#define __MAKE_OP (size) \ + ____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,) +__MAKE_OP(16) +__MAKE_OP(32) +__MAKE_OP(64) +#undef __MAKE_OP +#undef ____MAKE_OP +#endif /* _LINUX_BYTEORDER_GENERIC_H */
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 14 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 4 lines
static
__always_inlineu64mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask){ return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1)); }D'oh. Even simpler than that, of course -
static
__always_inlineu64mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask){
return mask & -mask;
}
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Very nice! The compilation-time check if the value can fit in a field covered by the mask (if they're both known) did help me catch bugs early a few times over the years, so if it could be preserved we can maybe even drop the FIELD_* macros and just use this approach?
Umm... Something like this, perhaps? Same bunch, plus u{16,32,64}_... variants for host-endian. Adding sanity check on mask is also not hard, but I don't know how useful it actually is...
Sanity checking the mask is not that useful in my experience.
Quoted 11 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +3
-0@@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) dst[i] =be32_to_cpu (src[i]); } +extern void __compiletime_error("value doesn't fit into mask") +__field_overflow (void); +static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) · line 202
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +10
-0+{ +return mask & -mask; +} + +#define ____MAKE_OP (type,base,to,from) \ +static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base mask) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(mask); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \
Is the lack of a __builtin_constant_p(mask) test intentional? Sometimes the bitfield is a packed array and people may have a helper to which only the mask is passed as non-constant and the value is implied by the helper, thus constant.
Quoted 20 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +19
-0+ (val & ~(mask/mask_to_multiplier(mask)))) \ +__field_overflow (); \ +return (old & ~m) | \ + (to (val *mask_to_multiplier (mask)) & m); \ +} \ +static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base mask) \ +{ \ + return (from(v) & mask)/mask_to_multiplier(mask); \ +} +#define __MAKE_OP (size) \ + ____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,) +__MAKE_OP(16) +__MAKE_OP(32) +__MAKE_OP(64) +#undef __MAKE_OP +#undef ____MAKE_OP +#endif /* _LINUX_BYTEORDER_GENERIC_H */
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 10 lines · Jakub Kicinski
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) · line 202
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +5
-0+static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base mask) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(mask); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \Is the lack of a
__builtin_constant_p(mask)test intentional? Sometimes the bitfield is a packed array and people may have a helper to which only the mask is passed as non-constant and the value is implied by the helper, thus constant.
If the mask in non-constant, we probably shouldn't be using that at all; could you show a real-world example where that would be the case?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 12 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 10 lines · Jakub Kicinski
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) · line 202
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +5
-0+static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base mask) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(mask); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \Is the lack of a
__builtin_constant_p(mask)test intentional? Sometimes the bitfield is a packed array and people may have a helper to which only the mask is passed as non-constant and the value is implied by the helper, thus constant.
Quoted 2 lines
If the mask in non-constant, we probably shouldn't be using that at all; could you show a real-world example where that would be the case?
FIELD_* macros explicitly forbid this, since the code would be... suboptimal with the runtime ffsl. Real life examples are the hackish macro NFP_ETH_SET_BIT_CONFIG() in
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_nsp_eth.c
I remember there was also some Renesas code.. maybe this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9881279/
it looks like cpg_z_clk_recalc_rate() and cpg_z2_clk_recalc_rate() only differ in mask.
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 13 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 12 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 10 lines · Jakub Kicinski
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) · line 202
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +5
-0+static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base mask) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(mask); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \Is the lack of a
__builtin_constant_p(mask)test intentional? Sometimes the bitfield is a packed array and people may have a helper to which only the mask is passed as non-constant and the value is implied by the helper, thus constant.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
If the mask in non-constant, we probably shouldn't be using that at all; could you show a real-world example where that would be the case?
FIELD_* macros explicitly forbid this, since the code would be... suboptimal with the runtime ffsl. Real life examples are the hackish macro
NFP_ETH_SET_BIT_CONFIG()in
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_nsp_eth.c
Why not simply make nfp_eth_set_bit_config() static inline and be done with that? It's not that large and there are only few callers, so...
Quoted 6 lines
I remember there was also some Renesas code.. maybe this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9881279/
it looks like
cpg_z_clk_recalc_rate()andcpg_z2_clk_recalc_rate()only differ in mask.
*shrug*
That thing would expand into "reg &= 15" in one case and "reg >>= 8; reg &= 15" in another. Either of which is cheaper than a function call, and definitely cheaper than any kind of dynamic calculation of shift, no matter how implemented.
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 21 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 20 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 12 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 10 lines · Jakub Kicinski
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len) · line 202
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/byteorder/generic.h +5
-0+static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base mask) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(mask); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \Is the lack of a
__builtin_constant_p(mask)test intentional? Sometimes the bitfield is a packed array and people may have a helper to which only the mask is passed as non-constant and the value is implied by the helper, thus constant.Quoted 2 lines
If the mask in non-constant, we probably shouldn't be using that at all; could you show a real-world example where that would be the case?
FIELD_* macros explicitly forbid this, since the code would be... suboptimal with the runtime ffsl. Real life examples are the hackish macro
NFP_ETH_SET_BIT_CONFIG()in
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_nsp_eth.cWhy not simply make
nfp_eth_set_bit_config()static inline and be done with that? It's not that large and there are only few callers, so...
It used to be __always_inline, but apparently LLVM/clang doesn't propagate constants :(
4e59532541c8 ("nfp: don't depend on compiler constant propagation")
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 6 lines
I remember there was also some Renesas code.. maybe this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9881279/
it looks like
cpg_z_clk_recalc_rate()andcpg_z2_clk_recalc_rate()only differ in mask.*shrug*
That thing would expand into "reg &= 15" in one case and "reg >>= 8; reg &= 15" in another. Either of which is cheaper than a function call, and definitely cheaper than any kind of dynamic calculation of shift, no matter how implemented.
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Kicinski
It used to be
__always_inline, but apparently LLVM/clang doesn't propagate constants :(
4e59532541c8("nfp: don't depend on compiler constant propagation")
Doesn't propagate constants or doesn't have exact same set of rules for __builtin_constant_p()? IOW, if you dropped that BUILD_BUG_ON(), what would be left after optimizations?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 10 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 4 lines · Jakub Kicinski
It used to be
__always_inline, but apparently LLVM/clang doesn't propagate constants :(
4e59532541c8("nfp: don't depend on compiler constant propagation")Doesn't propagate constants or doesn't have exact same set of rules for
__builtin_constant_p()? IOW, if you dropped thatBUILD_BUG_ON(), what would be left after optimizations?
Hm. You're right. It just doesn't recognize the parameter as constant in __builtin_constant_p(). I haven't compiled the actual code, but here is a trivial test:
18:36 ~$ clang --version
clang version 4.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_401/final)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
18:36 ~$ cat /tmp/test.c
#include <stdio.h>
static inline int test_thing(unsigned int a)
{
printf("const: %d\n", __builtin_constant_p(a));
if (a > 10)
return a - 1;
return a;
}int main()
{
printf("const: %d\n", __builtin_constant_p(0));
return test_thing(0);
}18:36 ~$ clang -g /tmp/test.c -O2 -Wall -W -o /tmp/test 18:36 ~$ /tmp/test
const: 1
const: 0
18:36 ~$ objdump -S /tmp/test
...00000000004004e0 <main>:
return a; }
int main()
{
printf("const: %d\n", __builtin_constant_p(0));
4004e0: 50 push %rax
4004e1: bf a0 05 40 00 mov $0x4005a0,%edi
4004e6: be 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%esi
4004eb: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
4004ed: e8 fe fe ff ff callq 4003f0 <printf@plt>
printf("const: %d\n", __builtin_constant_p(a));
4004f2: bf a0 05 40 00 mov $0x4005a0,%edi
4004f7: 31 f6 xor %esi,%esi
4004f9: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
4004fb: e8 f0 fe ff ff callq 4003f0 <printf@plt>
return test_thing(0);
400500: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
400502: 59 pop %rcx
400503: c3 retq 400504: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
40050b: 00 00 00
40050e: 66 90 xchg %ax,%ax
...
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 6 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 5 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 3 lines · Jakub Kicinski
It used to be
__always_inline, but apparently LLVM/clang doesn't propagate constants :(
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
4e59532541c8("nfp: don't depend on compiler constant propagation")Doesn't propagate constants or doesn't have exact same set of rules for
__builtin_constant_p()? IOW, if you dropped thatBUILD_BUG_ON(), what would be left after optimizations?Hm. You're right. It just doesn't recognize the parameter as constant in
__builtin_constant_p().
FWIW, clang does propagate them well enough to detect and optimize multiplication by constant power of two. With the variant I've posted.
The check on field overflow (which works on gcc builds) does nothing on clang - __builtin_constant_p() gives a flat-out false for arguments of inline function there. I can understand their reasoning, even though it's inconvenient in cases like this one - semantics of __builtin_constant_p() is a fucking mess and the less you rely upon its details, the safer you are...
Hell knows - a part of that can be recovered by taking the check into a wrapper; as in
static __always_inline __le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, u32 mask)
{
__le32 m = cpu_to_le32(mask);
return (old & ~m) | cpu_to_le32(v * mask/mask_to_multiplier(mask)));
}#define le32_replace_bits(old, v, mask) ({ \
typeof(v) ____v = (v); \
typeof(mask) ____m = (mask); \
if (__builtin_constant_p(____v)) \
if (v & ~(____m / mask_to_multiplier(____m))) \
__field_overflow(); \
__l32_replace_bits(old, ____v, ____m); \
})That would give that sanity check a better coverage on clang builds, but... does it really buy us enough to bother, especially since all those macros would have to be spelled out; you can have a macro expanding to definition of static inline, but you can't have a macro expanding to anything that would contain a preprocessor directive, including #define. And with that kind of sanity checks, the first build with gcc will catch everything missed by clang builds anyway.
IMO it's not worth the trouble; let's go with the check inside of static inline and accept that on clang builds it'll do nothing.
Next question: where do we put that bunch? I've put it into linux/byteorder/generic.h, so that anything picking fixed-endian primitives would pick those as well; I hadn't thought of linux/bitfield.h at the time. We certainly could put it there instead - it's never pulled by other headers, so adding #include <asm/byteorder.h> into linux/bitfield.h is not going to cause header order problems. Not sure...
Linus, do you have any preferences in that area?
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Quoted 8 lines · Al Viro
Next question: where do we put that bunch? I've put it into
linux/byteorder/generic.h, so that anything picking fixed-endian primitives would pick those as well; I hadn't thought oflinux/bitfield.hat the time. We certainly could put it there instead - it's never pulled by other headers, so adding #include <asm/byteorder.h> intolinux/bitfield.his not going to cause header order problems. Not sure...Linus, do you have any preferences in that area?
After looking at some of the callers of bitfield.h stuff: it might be useful to add
static inline void le64p_replace_bits(__le64 *p, u64 v, u64 mask)
{
__le64 m = cpu_to_le64(mask);
*p = (*p & ~m) | (cpu_to_le64(v * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m);
}and similar for other types. Not sure what would be a good name for host-endian variants - u64p_replace_bits() sounds a bit clumsy. Suggestions?
RFC PATCH 1/1 Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian.
The following primitives are defined in linux/bitfield.h:
* u32 le32_get_bits(__le32 val, u32 field) extracts the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit value @val and converts it to host-endian.
* void le32p_replace_bits(__le32 *p, u32 v, u32 field) replaces the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit object pointet to by *p with the value of @v. New value is given in host-endian and stored as little-endian.
* __le32 le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, u32 field) is equivalent to ({__le32 tmp = old; le32p_replace_bits(&old, v, field); tmp;}) In other words, instead of modifying an object in memory, it takes the initial value and returns the modified one.
Such set of helpers is defined for each of little-, big- and host-endian types; e.g. u64_get_bits(val, field) will return the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in host-endian 64bit value @val, etc. Of course, for host-endian no conversion is involved.
Fields to access are specified as GENMASK() values - an N-bit field starting at bit #M is encoded as GENMASK(M + N - 1, N). Note that bit numbers refer to endianness of the object we are working with - e.g. GENMASK(11, 0) in __be16 refers to the second byte and the lower 4 bits of the first byte. In __le16 it would refer to the first byte and the lower 4 bits of the second byte, etc.
Field specification must be a constant; __builtin_constant_p() doesn't have to be true for it, but compiler must be able to evaluate it at build time. If it cannot or if the value does not encode any bitfield, the build will fail.
If the value being stored in ..._replace_bits() is a constant that does not fit into bitfield, a warning will be generated at compile time.
include/linux/bitfield.h +47 -0
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@#define _LINUX_BITFIELD_H#include <linux/build_bug.h> +#include <asm/byteorder.h> /* * Bitfield access macros
@@ -103,4 +104,50 @@ (typeof (_mask))(((_reg) & (_mask)) >>__bf_shf (_mask)); \ }) +extern void __compiletime_warning("value doesn't fit into mask") +__field_overflow (void); +extern void __compiletime_error("bad bitfield mask") +__bad_mask (void); +static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask) +{ +if ((mask | (mask -1 )) & ((mask | (mask -1 )) +1 )) +__bad_mask (); +return mask & -mask; +} + +#define ____MAKE_OP (type,base,to,from) \ +static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base field) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(field); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \ + (val & ~(field/mask_to_multiplier(field)))) \ + __field_overflow(); \ + return (old & ~m) | \ + (to(val * mask_to_multiplier(field)) & m); \ +} \ +static __always_inline void type##p_replace_bits(__##type *p, \ + base val, base field) \ +{ \ + __##type m = to(field); \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \ + (val & ~(field/mask_to_multiplier(field)))) \ + __field_overflow(); \ + *p = (*p & ~m) | \ + (to(val * mask_to_multiplier(field)) & m); \ +} \ +static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base field) \ +{ \ + return (from(v) & field)/mask_to_multiplier(field); \ +} +#define __MAKE_OP (size) \ + ____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,) +__MAKE_OP(16) +__MAKE_OP(32) +__MAKE_OP(64) +#undef __MAKE_OP +#undef ____MAKE_OP +#endif
Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian.
Looks great to me!
Quoted 11 lines · Al Viro
The following primitives are defined in
linux/bitfield.h:* u32
le32_get_bits(__le32 val, u32 field)extracts the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit value @val and converts it to host-endian.* void
le32p_replace_bits(__le32 *p, u32 v, u32 field)replaces the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit object pointet to by *p with the value of @v. New value is given in host-endian and stored as little-endian.
Quoted 4 lines
*
__le32le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, u32 field)is equivalent to ({__le32tmp = old;le32p_replace_bits(&old, v, field); tmp;}) In other words, instead of modifying an object in memory, it takes the initial value and returns the modified one.
the current macros take filed/mask as first param, not sure if it's worth maintaining the order
Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian.
Quoted 14 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Looks great to me!
Quoted 11 lines · Al Viro
The following primitives are defined in
linux/bitfield.h:* u32
le32_get_bits(__le32 val, u32 field)extracts the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit value @val and converts it to host-endian.* void
le32p_replace_bits(__le32 *p, u32 v, u32 field)replaces the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit object pointet to by *p with the value of @v. New value is given in host-endian and stored as little-endian.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
*
__le32le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, u32 field)is equivalent to ({__le32tmp = old;le32p_replace_bits(&old, v, field); tmp;}) In other words, instead of modifying an object in memory, it takes the initial value and returns the modified one.the current macros take filed/mask as first param, not sure if it's worth maintaining the order
Umm... For something like Haskell that would be more natural (as in replace_foo = replace_field foo), but it's C - no partially applied functions here...
While we are at it, to cover the FIELD_PREP users it might make sense to add
__le32 le32_encode_bits(u32 v, u32 field)
{
if (__builtin_constant_p(v) &&
(v & ~(field/mask_to_multiplier(field))))
__field_overflow();
return cpu_to_le32((v * mask_to_multiplier(field)) & field);
}turning the body of le32_replace_bits into
return (old & ~cpu_to_le32(field)) | le32_encode_bits(v, field);
RFC PATCH v2 1/1 Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian.
[Folks, please review and comment; if no objections show up, into -next it goes]
The following primitives are defined in linux/bitfield.h:
* u32 le32_get_bits(__le32 val, u32 field) extracts the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit object @val and converts it to host-endian.
* void le32p_replace_bits(__le32 *p, u32 v, u32 field) replaces the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in little-endian 32bit object pointed to by @p with the value of @v. New value is given in host-endian and stored as little-endian.
* __le32 le32_replace_bits(__le32 old, u32 v, u32 field) is equivalent to ({__le32 tmp = old; le32p_replace_bits(&tmp, v, field); tmp;}) In other words, instead of modifying an object in memory, it takes the initial value and returns the modified one.
* __le32 le32_encode_bits(u32 v, u32 field) is equivalent to le32_replace_bits(0, v, field). In other words, it returns a little-endian 32bit object with the bitfield specified by @field containing the value of @v and all bits outside that bitfield being zero.
Such set of helpers is defined for each of little-, big- and host-endian types; e.g. u64_get_bits(val, field) will return the contents of the bitfield specified by @field in host-endian 64bit object @val, etc. Of course, for host-endian no conversion is involved.
Fields to access are specified as GENMASK() values - an N-bit field starting at bit #M is encoded as GENMASK(M + N - 1, M). Note that bit numbers refer to endianness of the object we are working with - e.g. GENMASK(11, 0) in __be16 refers to the second byte and the lower 4 bits of the first byte. In __le16 it would refer to the first byte and the lower 4 bits of the second byte, etc.
Field specification must be a constant; __builtin_constant_p() doesn't have to be true for it, but compiler must be able to evaluate it at build time. If it cannot or if the value does not encode any bitfield, the build will fail.
If the value being stored in a bitfield is a constant that does not fit into that bitfield, a warning will be generated at compile time.
include/linux/bitfield.h +46 -0
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@#define _LINUX_BITFIELD_H#include <linux/build_bug.h> +#include <asm/byteorder.h> /* * Bitfield access macros
@@ -103,4 +104,49 @@ (typeof (_mask))(((_reg) & (_mask)) >>__bf_shf (_mask)); \ }) +extern void __compiletime_warning("value doesn't fit into mask") +__field_overflow (void); +extern void __compiletime_error("bad bitfield mask") +__bad_mask (void); +static __always_inline u64 field_multiplier(u64 field) +{ +if ((field | (field -1 )) & ((field | (field -1 )) +1 )) +__bad_mask (); +return field & -field; +} +static __always_inline u64 field_mask(u64 field) +{ +return field /field_multiplier (field); +} +#define ____MAKE_OP (type,base,to,from) \ +static __always_inline __##type type##_encode_bits(base v, base field) \ +{ \ + if (__builtin_constant_p(v) && (v & ~field_multiplier(field))) \ + __field_overflow(); \ + return to((v & field_mask(field)) * field_multiplier(field)); \ +} \ +static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \ + base val, base field) \ +{ \ + return (old & ~to(field)) | type##_encode_bits(val, field); \ +} \ +static __always_inline void type##p_replace_bits(__##type *p, \ + base val, base field) \ +{ \ + *p = (*p & ~to(field)) | type##_encode_bits(val, field); \ +} \ +static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base field) \ +{ \ + return (from(v) & field)/field_multiplier(field); \ +} +#define __MAKE_OP (size) \ + ____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu) \ + ____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,) +__MAKE_OP(16) +__MAKE_OP(32) +__MAKE_OP(64) +#undef __MAKE_OP +#undef ____MAKE_OP +#endif
Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
In reply to Al ViroQuoted 2 lines · Al Viro
IMO it's not worth the trouble; let's go with the check inside of static inline and accept that on clang builds it'll do nothing.
Ack, thanks for investigating!
Quoted 31 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 15 lines · Jie Deng
Hi AI Viro,
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h line 132
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +2
-2@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@typeof (len) _len = (len); \typeof (val) _val = (val); \ _val = (_val << _pos) &GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos); \ - _var = (_var & ~GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos)) | _val; \ -cpu_to_le32 (_var); \ + (_var & ~cpu_to_le32 (GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos))) | \ +cpu_to_le32 (_val); \ })struct xlgmac_pdata ;Make sense. But I think what you want is fix as follows. Right ?
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h line 130
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac.h +3
-3@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@typeof (len) _len = (len); \ -typeof (val) _val = (val); \ + u32 _var = le32_to_cpu((var)); \ _val = (_val << _pos) &GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos); \ - _var = (_var & ~GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos)) | _val; \ -cpu_to_le32 (_var); \ + (cpu_to_le32 (_var) & ~cpu_to_le32 (GENMASK (_pos + _len -1 , _pos))) | \ +cpu_to_le32 (_val); \ })What for? Sure, this variant will work, but why bother with
a = le32_to_cpu(b); (cpu_to_le32(a) & ....) | .... and how is that better than (b & ...) | ...
Quoted 4 lines
IDGI... Mind you, I'm not sure if there is any point keeping
_varin that thing, seeing that we use var only once - might be better off with((var) & ~cpu_to_le32(GENMASK(_pos + _len - 1, _pos))) | \ cpu_to_le32(_val); \
I agree. Could you please send the patch with this better fix ?