Fix const confusion in intel-mid x86 platform drivers

From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

const must be marked __initconst, not __initdata

Signed-off-by Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c +1 -1

index dc036e511f48..2b5d86ce24c2 100644
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int __init tng_bt_sfi_setup(struct bt_sfi_data *ddata)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct bt_sfi_data tng_bt_sfi_data __initdata = {
+static const struct bt_sfi_data tng_bt_sfi_data __initconst = {
 	.setup	= tng_bt_sfi_setup,
 };
 

Signature · 1 line

2.15.0

Quoted 4 lines · Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

const must be marked __initconst, not __initdata

Thanks Andi,

This file should go through the x86 maintainers per the current MAINTAINERS file. So to avoid risk of duplication, added Thomas et al. to Cc.

Thomas, we discussed moving more of arch/x86/platform to drivers/platform/x86. We have migrated pmc_atom already, but a lot remains. Do you want to pull patches like this in the interim, or should we move arch/x86/platform under our entry in MAINTAINERS now?

Reviewed-by Darren Hart (VMware) <[email protected]>