Skip to contentSkip to conversation

udftools: new package

PATCH New Steve Kenton 3 participants 5 messages Jan 22, 2018 – Feb 8, 2018

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 udftools: new package

---
Try 2: fix stupid copy paste error in Config.in
Try 3: remove duplicate/misplaced addition to master Config.in
I wish I could see these issues when I first look the patch over - sigh
Try 4: Fixes for feedback from Thomas
I computed the hash below for the license file but I did not see any others under the package directory so I think I must be misunderstanding where it should go from my reading of the on-line manual # Locally computed
sha256 dcc100d4161cc0b7177545ab6e47216f84857cda3843847c792a25289852dcaa COPYING
I ran ./utils/check-package package/udftools/* and fixed up all the white space errors But I'm not sure what to do with ./utils/test-pkg, do I need to build all 47 tools chains? I tried ./utils/test-pkg -p udftools -c udftools.snippet (contents below) but just got errors BR2_PACKAGE_UDFTOOLS=y

How do I proceed from there?

 DEVELOPERS                     |  1 +
 package/Config.in              |  1 +
 package/udftools/Config.in     | 12 ++++++++++++
 package/udftools/udftools.hash |  2 ++
 package/udftools/udftools.mk   | 12 ++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 package/udftools/Config.in
 create mode 100644 package/udftools/udftools.hash
 create mode 100644 package/udftools/udftools.mk
DEVELOPERS +1 -0
index 73c0231..1c5ed16 100644
@@ -1681,6 +1681,7 @@ F:	package/dvdrw-tools/
 F:	package/memtest86/
 F:	package/mjpegtools/
 F:	package/tovid/
+F:	package/udftools/
 F:	package/xorriso/
 
 N:	Steve Thomas <[email protected]>
package/Config.in +1 -0
index 00451f5..7b3531c 100644
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ menu "Filesystem and flash utilities"
 	source "package/squashfs/Config.in"
 	source "package/sshfs/Config.in"
 	source "package/sunxi-tools/Config.in"
+	source "package/udftools/Config.in"
 	source "package/unionfs/Config.in"
 	source "package/xfsprogs/Config.in"
 endmenu
package/udftools/Config.in new file +12 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bbccd60
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+config BR2_PACKAGE_UDFTOOLS
+	bool "udftools"
+	depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR
+	select BR2_PACKAGE_READLINE
+	help
+	  Tools for creating UDF filesystems
+	  Maintained fork of the 2004 Sourcforge package
+
+	  https://github.com/pali/udftools
+
+comment "udftools needs a toolchain w/ wchar"
+	depends on !BR2_USE_WCHAR
package/udftools/udftools.hash new file +2 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b297edf
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# Locally computed
+sha256	67fe428d452901215cfad8049d250540c97114b1a20dd63277b91c2c4fae8292	udftools-2.0.tar.gz
package/udftools/udftools.mk new file +12 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..708fef9
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+################################################################################
+#
+# udftools
+#
+################################################################################
+
+UDFTOOLS_VERSION = 2.0
+UDFTOOLS_SITE = https://github.com/pali/udftools/releases/download/$(UDFTOOLS_VERSION)
+UDFTOOLS_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+
+UDFTOOLS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
+
+$(eval $(autotools-package))
Signature · 1 line
2.9.0.137.gcf4c2cf
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 udftools: new package

Hi Steve,

Quoted 3 lines · Steve Kenton

I computed the hash below for the license file but I did not see any others under the package directory so I think I must be misunderstanding where it should go from my reading of the on-line manual

?

package/udftools/udftools.hash line 1

Quoted 13 lines

# Locally computed
sha256 dcc100d4161cc0b7177545ab6e47216f84857cda3843847c792a25289852dcaa COPYING
I ran ./utils/check-package package/udftools/* and fixed up all the white space errors But I'm not sure what to do with ./utils/test-pkg, do I need to build all 47 tools chains? I tried ./utils/test-pkg -p udftools -c udftools.snippet (contents below) but just got errors BR2_PACKAGE_UDFTOOLS=y

package/udftools/udftools.hash new file +1 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b297edf
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# Locally computed

Sorry, I don't understand your comments. The computed hash should go here

package/udftools/udftools.hash line 2

Quoted 1 line
package/udftools/udftools.hash new file +1 -0
+sha256	67fe428d452901215cfad8049d250540c97114b1a20dd63277b91c2c4fae8292	udftools-2.0.tar.gz

sha256 dcc100d4161cc0b7177545ab6e47216f84857cda3843847c792a25289852dcaa COPYING

Quoted 6 lines
package/udftools/udftools.mk new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..708fef9

package/udftools/udftools.mk line 9

Quoted 9 lines
package/udftools/udftools.mk new file +9 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+################################################################################
+#
+# udftools
+#
+################################################################################
+
+UDFTOOLS_VERSION = 2.0
+UDFTOOLS_SITE = https://github.com/pali/udftools/releases/download/$(UDFTOOLS_VERSION)
+UDFTOOLS_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+

The license is "GPL-2.0".

Quoted 10 lines
package/udftools/udftools.mk new file +3 -0
+UDFTOOLS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING
+
+$(eval $(autotools-package))
Signature · 6 lines
2.9.0.137.gcf4c2cf

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Best regards
Marcus Folkesson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20180131/2c2695f6/attachment.asc>

#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 udftools: new package

In reply to Steve Kenton

Hello,

Quoted 14 lines · Steve Kenton

---
Try 2: fix stupid copy paste error in Config.in
Try 3: remove duplicate/misplaced addition to master Config.in
I wish I could see these issues when I first look the patch over - sigh
Try 4: Fixes for feedback from Thomas
I computed the hash below for the license file but I did not see any others under the package directory so I think I must be misunderstanding where it should go from my reading of the on-line manual # Locally computed
sha256 dcc100d4161cc0b7177545ab6e47216f84857cda3843847c792a25289852dcaa COPYING
I ran ./utils/check-package package/udftools/* and fixed up all the white space errors But I'm not sure what to do with ./utils/test-pkg, do I need to build all 47 tools chains? I tried ./utils/test-pkg -p udftools -c udftools.snippet (contents below) but just got errors BR2_PACKAGE_UDFTOOLS=y

I've added a hash for the license file, and applied to next. Thanks!

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 udftools: new package

Thomas,

Quoted 18 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Hello,

Quoted 14 lines · Steve Kenton

---
Try 2: fix stupid copy paste error in Config.in
Try 3: remove duplicate/misplaced addition to master Config.in
I wish I could see these issues when I first look the patch over - sigh
Try 4: Fixes for feedback from Thomas
I computed the hash below for the license file but I did not see any others under the package directory so I think I must be misunderstanding where it should go from my reading of the on-line manual # Locally computed
sha256 dcc100d4161cc0b7177545ab6e47216f84857cda3843847c792a25289852dcaa COPYING
I ran ./utils/check-package package/udftools/* and fixed up all the white space errors But I'm not sure what to do with ./utils/test-pkg, do I need to build all 47 tools chains? I tried ./utils/test-pkg -p udftools -c udftools.snippet (contents below) but just got errors BR2_PACKAGE_UDFTOOLS=y

Quoted 1 line

I've added a hash for the license file, and applied to next. Thanks!

I think the license should be "GPL-2.0" ?

Quoted 10 lines

Thomas

Signature · 7 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Best regards
Marcus Folkesson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20180208/878c4a78/attachment.asc>

#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 udftools: new package

Hello,

Quoted 3 lines · Marcus Folkesson
Quoted 1 line

I've added a hash for the license file, and applied to next. Thanks!

I think the license should be "GPL-2.0" ?

All the source files that have a license header have the mention:

* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.

So the license is GPL-2.0+.

Best regards,

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com