Skip to contentSkip to conversation

x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

PATCH NAK Jason Vas Dias 2 participants 2 messages Mar 12, 2018

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 x86/vdso: on Intel, VDSO should handle CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

Currently the VDSO does not handle
clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, &ts )
on Intel / AMD - it calls
vdso_fallback_gettime()
for this clock, which issues a syscall, having an unacceptably high latency (minimum measurable time or time between measurements) of 300-700ns on 2 2.8-3.9ghz Haswell x86_64 Family'_'Model : 06_3C machines under various versions of Linux.

Sometimes, particularly when correlating elapsed time to performance counter values, code needs to know elapsed time from the perspective of the CPU no matter how "hot" / fast or "cold" / slow it might be running wrt NTP / PTP ; when code needs this, the latencies with a syscall are often unacceptably high.

I reported this as Bug #198161 :

    'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198961'

and in previous posts with subjects matching 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW' .

This patch handles CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW clock_gettime() in the VDSO , by exporting the raw clock calibration, last cycles, last xtime_nsec, and last raw_sec value in the vsyscall_gtod_data during vsyscall_update() .

Now the new do_monotonic_raw() function in the vDSO has a latency of @ 24ns on average, and the test program:
tools/testing/selftest/timers/inconsistency-check.c
succeeds with arguments: '-c 4 -t 120' or any arbitrary -t value.

The patch is against Linus' latest 4.16-rc5 tree, current HEAD of :
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
.

This patch affects only these files:

arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_gtod.c

There are 2 patches in the series - this first
one handles CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in VDSO using
existing rdtsc_ordered() , and the second
uses new rstscp() function which avoids
use of an explicit barrier.

Best Regards,
Jason Vas Dias .

---

arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c renamed from arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c.4.16-rc5 +58 -0
diff -up linux-4.16-rc5.1/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c.4.16-rc5 linux-4.16-rc5.1/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -182,6 +182,18 @@ notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void)
 	return last;
 }
 
+notrace static u64 vread_tsc_raw(void)
+{
+	u64 tsc
+	  , last = gtod->raw_cycle_last;
+
+	tsc	      = rdtsc_ordered();
+	if (likely(tsc >= last))
+		return tsc;
+	asm volatile ("");
+	return last;
+}
+
 notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode)
 {
 	u64 v;
@@ -203,6 +215,27 @@ notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *m
 	return v * gtod->mult;
 }
 
+notrace static inline u64 vgetsns_raw(int *mode)
+{
+	u64 v;
+	cycles_t cycles;
+
+	if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_TSC)
+		cycles = vread_tsc_raw();
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK
+	else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_PVCLOCK)
+		cycles = vread_pvclock(mode);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE
+	else if (gtod->vclock_mode == VCLOCK_HVCLOCK)
+		cycles = vread_hvclock(mode);
+#endif
+	else
+		return 0;
+	v = (cycles - gtod->raw_cycle_last) & gtod->raw_mask;
+	return v * gtod->raw_mult;
+}
+
 /* Code size doesn't matter (vdso is 4k anyway) and this is faster. */
 notrace static int __always_inline do_realtime(struct timespec *ts)
 {
@@ -246,6 +279,27 @@ notrace static int __always_inline do_mo
 	return mode;
 }
 
+notrace static __always_inline int do_monotonic_raw(struct timespec *ts)
+{
+	unsigned long seq;
+	u64 ns;
+	int mode;
+
+	do {
+		seq = gtod_read_begin(gtod);
+		mode = gtod->vclock_mode;
+		ts->tv_sec = gtod->monotonic_time_raw_sec;
+		ns = gtod->monotonic_time_raw_nsec;
+		ns += vgetsns_raw(&mode);
+		ns >>= gtod->raw_shift;
+	} while (unlikely(gtod_read_retry(gtod, seq)));
+
+	ts->tv_sec += __iter_div_u64_rem(ns, NSEC_PER_SEC, &ns);
+	ts->tv_nsec = ns;
+
+	return mode;
+}
+
 notrace static void do_realtime_coarse(struct timespec *ts)
 {
 	unsigned long seq;
@@ -277,6 +331,10 @@ notrace int __vdso_clock_gettime(clockid
 		if (do_monotonic(ts) == VCLOCK_NONE)
 			goto fallback;
 		break;
+	case CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW:
+		if (do_monotonic_raw(ts) == VCLOCK_NONE)
+			goto fallback;
+		break;
 	case CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE:
 		do_realtime_coarse(ts);
 		break;
arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_gtod.c renamed from arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_gtod.c.4.16-rc5 +8 -0
diff -up linux-4.16-rc5.1/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_gtod.c.4.16-rc5 linux-4.16-rc5.1/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_gtod.c
@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *
 	vdata->mult		= tk->tkr_mono.mult;
 	vdata->shift		= tk->tkr_mono.shift;
 
+	vdata->raw_cycle_last	= tk->tkr_raw.cycle_last;
+	vdata->raw_mask		= tk->tkr_raw.mask;
+	vdata->raw_mult		= tk->tkr_raw.mult;
+	vdata->raw_shift	= tk->tkr_raw.shift;
+
 	vdata->wall_time_sec		= tk->xtime_sec;
 	vdata->wall_time_snsec		= tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec;
 
@@ -74,5 +79,8 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *
 		vdata->monotonic_time_coarse_sec++;
 	}
 
+	vdata->monotonic_time_raw_sec  = tk->raw_sec;
+	vdata->monotonic_time_raw_nsec = tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec;
+
 	gtod_write_end(vdata);
 }
arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h renamed from arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h.4.16-rc5 +6 -0
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ struct vsyscall_gtod_data {
 	u64	mask;
 	u32	mult;
 	u32	shift;
+	u64	raw_cycle_last;
+	u64	raw_mask;
+	u32	raw_mult;
+	u32	raw_shift;
 
 	/* open coded 'struct timespec' */
 	u64		wall_time_snsec;
@@ -32,6 +36,8 @@ struct vsyscall_gtod_data {
 	gtod_long_t	wall_time_coarse_nsec;
 	gtod_long_t	monotonic_time_coarse_sec;
 	gtod_long_t	monotonic_time_coarse_nsec;
+	gtod_long_t	monotonic_time_raw_sec;
+	gtod_long_t	monotonic_time_raw_nsec;
 
 	int		tz_minuteswest;
 	int		tz_dsttime;

---

#1 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Jason Vas Dias

Currently the VDSO does not handle

NAK, because you have apparently ignored my mails and have again sent patches in violation of established patch sending procedures outlined in process/submitting-patches.rst.

Thanks,

Ingo