QMP: out-of-band (OOB) execution support
v8 cover QMP: out-of-band (OOB) execution support
Based-on: <[email protected]>
The series is based on the following series:
[PATCH v2 0/9] chardev: qio related non-default context support (actually patch 9 is based on version 2.1, Dan's version)
This version only contains some trivial changes, most of the work is posted separately in either the QIO or CHARDEV series.
Four days until soft freeze. Hmm...
Please review. Thanks,
v8:
- fix up doc patch as suggested [Eric]
- rename functions in form of X_get_Y() or X_bh() [Stefan]
- English fixes [Stefan]
- make sure to kick iothread after suspend count update [Stefan]
- remove the hack to remove fd in monitor_init(), since now we have the QIO/CHARDEV series to solve the root problem.
v7:
- add some r-bs, and remove some.
- remove the chardev fix since already queued by Paolo
- use local var in qemu_chr_fe_add_watch [Stefan]
- move doc patch to front, mention it in some patches [Eric]
- Quite a few of English fixes [Eric]
- fix unlock missing in handle_qmp_command [Stefan]
- squash some patches according to the review comments
- don't break gdbserver usage on HMP non-interactive mode by fixing up the suspend/resume logic [Fam, Stefan]
- move the qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() call in monitor_init() into a bottom half to avoid race between the call itself and iothread. [Stefan]
- spent quite a lot of time debugging another assertion failure in io_watch_poll_finalize() after above change is made (ouch! I really hoped we always have the latest glib): when QEMU inits chardevs in chardev_init_func() it's possible that QEMU registers the chardev handlers there, even before CharBackend is connected to that chardev in monitor_init(). Then, when we reach monitor_init() we must make sure we unregister that old one first, or there can have one orphan GSource still in default gcontext (note that this can really happen when we start to use QEMUBH to setup chardev frontends, which is above change).
v6:
- add r-bs
- s/negociate/negotiate/ [Dave]
- let mon_global be anonymous struct [Stefan]
- in monitor_init(): call qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() later than init parser, then it's safe [Stefan]
- drop patch "qjson: add "opaque" field to JSONMessageParser", re-write the following one to use container_of(). [Stefan]
- keep get_qmp_greeting() the old way, add cap list [Stefan, Fam]
- fix the iothread_stop() comment since that's not really related to the glib bug [Stefan]
- when do qmp greeting, don't expose oob capability if iothread not used [Stefan, Fam]
- squash "qmp: introduce some capability helpers" into patch "monitor:
separate QMP parser and dispatcher" [Fam]
- tune comments for monitor_qmp_respond(). [Stefan]
- use atomic_mb_{read|set}() where proper instead of no-mb ones [Stefan]
- add patch to let monitor suspend/resume really support QMP. Notify iothread when needed, in both suspend/resume. [Stefan]
- add comment for qmp_queue_lock on lock taking ordering. [Stefan]
- refactor monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher() to not loop, instead queue itself after each request. [Stefan]
- rename "request" into "command" in the new qmp event [Stefan]
- in handle_qmp_command() protect the queue length fetch with qmp_queue_lock [Stefan]
- one more s/2.11/2.12/. [Fam]
- when isolating response queue, not only flush the queue, but also flush the monitor out buffer [Stefan]
- document rewrite [Stefan]
- some other touch-ups that I forgot to mention and some tiny new patches... anyway, rbs will be gone if any of the patch is touched up. Please have a look!
v5
- rename "monitor_iothread" to "mon_iothread" [Dave]
- add comment in monitor_cleanup(), note that when the hacks can be removed. [Dan]
- add a note section in qmp-spec.txt, mentioning about how to migrate existing QMP command to oob-capable command. [Dave]
- drop patch "qmp: let migrate-incoming allow out-of-band". All migration related changes will all be put into postcopy-recovery series.
v4:
- drop first patch to fix IOWatchPool [Stefan, Dan]
- add s-o-b where missing, and newly got r-bs
- fix English error in commit msg [Fam]
- some tunes on request-dropped event: [Stefan]
- firstly let 'id' be any type, meanwhile make sure "id" is there as long as OOB is enabled for the monitor.
- some comments fix
- add new command "x-oob-test" for testing oob commands [Stefan]
- simplify the test codes to use new x-oob-test
- flush response queue before cleanup monitors
This series was born from this one:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg04310.html
The idea comes from Markus Armbruster and the discussion we had in the thread. It's not a super ideal solution (I believe Markus had been thinking hard to keep everything in order meanwhile trying to satisfy the migration requirement), but AFAIU it's currently the best.
What is OOB?
============
It's the shortcut of Out-Of-Band execution, its name is given by Markus. It's a way to quickly execute a QMP request. Say, originally QMP is going throw these steps:
JSON Parser --> QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ (2) (3) |
(1) | \|/ (4)
+--------- main thread --------+The requests are executed by the so-called QMP-dispatcher after the JSON is parsed. If OOB is on, we run the command directly in the parser and quickly returns.
This series changed the QMP handling logic by moving the command parsing and responding phases into IOThreads, so to be more accurate, after the series the above graph would change into this:
queue/kick queue/kick
JSON Parser ======> QMP Dispatcher =====> Responder
/|\ | (3) /|\ | (4) | /|\
(1) | | (2) | | | |
| | | \|/ (6)| |(5)
| | main thread | |
| | | |
| +--------> monitor IO thread <-------+ |
+-----------/ \----------+New Interfaces
==============
QMP Introspection Changes
-------------------------
When do query-qmp-schema, we were getting something like:
{"name": "migrate-incoming", "ret-type": "17",
"meta-type": "command", "arg-type": "89"}
Now we will get a new key named "allow-oob":
{"name": "migrate-incoming", "ret-type": "17", "allow-oob": true,
"meta-type": "command", "arg-type": "89"}
Which shows whether a command supports OOB.
QMP Negociation Changes
-----------------------
We were running "qmp_capabilities" always without parameters like:
{"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
Now we can enable capabilities (we don't have any capability before this series) like OOB using:
{"execute": "qmp_capabilities", "arguments": {"enable": ["oob"]}}
Only after we explicitly enable OOB capability can we send requests in OOB manner. Otherwise we'll have exactly the same QMP session as before, just like when OOB is not there.
When OOB is enabled, it's possible that OOB reply reaches faster than previous command, so clients should be prepared.
Trigger OOB execution
---------------------
Let's take migrate-incoming as example. The old command looks like:
{"execute": "migrate-incoming", "arguments" : {"uri": "xxxxxx"}}
To execute a command with OOB execution, we need to specify it in the QMP request in the extra "control" key:
{"execute": "migrate-incoming", "arguments" : {"uri": "xxxxxx"},
"control" { "run-oob": true } }
Then the command will be run in parser, and it can preempt other commands.
Others
=================
The last patch of OOB test may need some attention. I used dump-guest-memory as a time-consuming command to test whether OOB is working, and the only command I can test now is "migrate-incoming". I hope that is a "okay" solution for unit tests. Any other suggestions on that would be welcomed.
Please review. Thanks.
Peter Xu (23):
docs: update QMP documents for OOB commands
qobject: introduce qstring_get_try_str()
qobject: introduce qobject_get_try_str()
qobject: let object_property_get_str() use new API
monitor: move skip_flush into monitor_data_init
monitor: move the cur_mon hack deeper for QMP
monitor: unify global init
monitor: let mon_list be tail queue
monitor: allow using IO thread for parsing
qmp: introduce QMPCapability
monitor: introduce monitor_qmp_respond()
monitor: let suspend_cnt be thread safe
monitor: let suspend/resume work even with QMPs
monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
qmp: add new event "command-dropped"
monitor: send event when command queue full
qapi: introduce new cmd option "allow-oob"
qmp: support out-of-band (oob) execution
qmp: isolate responses into io thread
monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
qmp: add command "x-oob-test"
tests: qmp-test: verify command batching
tests: qmp-test: add oob test
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt | 65 +++- docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt | 30 +- include/monitor/monitor.h | 2 +- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 7 +- include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h | 2 + monitor.c | 695 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- qapi/introspect.json | 6 +- qapi/misc.json | 87 +++++- qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 33 +- qmp.c | 16 + qobject/qstring.c | 21 ++ qom/object.c | 9 +- scripts/qapi/commands.py | 18 +- scripts/qapi/common.py | 15 +- scripts/qapi/doc.py | 2 +- scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 10 +- tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 2 +- tests/qmp-test.c | 97 +++++- trace-events | 3 + vl.c | 7 +- 20 files changed, 1010 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 1/23 docs: update QMP documents for OOB commands
Update both the developer and spec for the new QMP OOB (Out-Of-Band) command.
--- docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt | 30 +++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +60 -5
@@ -554,9 +554,12 @@ following example objects: === Commands === +--- General Command Layout --- + Usage: { 'command': STRING, '*data': COMPLEX-TYPE-NAME-OR-DICT, '*returns': TYPE-NAME, '*boxed': true, - '*gen': false, '*success-response': false } + '*gen': false, '*success-response': false, + '*allow-oob': true } Commands are defined by using a dictionary containing several members, where three members are most common. The 'command' member is a
@@ -636,6 +639,56 @@ possible, the command expression should include the optional key 'success-response' with boolean value false. So far, only QGA makes use of this member. +A command can be declared to support Out-Of-Band (OOB) execution. By +default, commands do not support OOB. To declare a command that +supports it, we need an extra 'allow-oob' field. For example: + + { 'command': 'migrate_recover', + 'data': { 'uri': 'str' }, 'allow-oob': true } + +To execute a command in Out-Of-Band way, we need to specify the +"control" field in the request, with "run-oob" set to true. Example: + + => { "execute": "command-support-oob", + "arguments": { ... }, + "control": { "run-oob": true } } + <= { "return": { } } + +Without it, even the commands that support out-of-band execution will +still be run In-Band. + +--- About Out-Of-Band (OOB) Command Execution --- + +Out-Of-Band does not mean a special kind of command. Instead, it's a +special way to execute the command. One normal command can be +declared to support Out-Of-Band execution when 'allow-oob' field is +set to true when defining the command. With that, it can be run in an +Out-Of-Band way if 'run-oob' is specified in 'control' field of +command request. + +Under normal QMP command execution, the following apply to each +command: + +- They are executed in order, +- They run only in main thread of QEMU, +- They have the BQL taken during execution. + +When a command is executed with OOB, the following changes occur: + +- They can be completed before a pending in-band command, +- They run in a monitor dedicated thread, +- They do not take the BQL during execution. + +OOB command handlers must satisfy the following conditions: + +- It executes extremely fast, +- It does not take any lock, or, it can take very small locks if all + critical regions also follow the rules for OOB command handler code, +- It does not invoke system calls that may block, +- It does not access guest RAM that may block when userfaultfd is + enabled for postcopy live migration. + +If in doubt, do not implement OOB execution support. === Events ===
@@ -739,10 +792,12 @@ references by name. QAPI schema definitions not reachable that way are omitted. The SchemaInfo for a command has meta-type "command", and variant -members "arg-type" and "ret-type". On the wire, the "arguments" -member of a client's "execute" command must conform to the object type -named by "arg-type". The "return" member that the server passes in a -success response conforms to the type named by "ret-type". +members "arg-type", "ret-type" and "allow-oob". On the wire, the +"arguments" member of a client's "execute" command must conform to the +object type named by "arg-type". The "return" member that the server +passes in a success response conforms to the type named by +"ret-type". When "allow-oob" is set, it means the command supports +out-of-band execution. If the command takes no arguments, "arg-type" names an object type without members. Likewise, if the command returns nothing, "ret-type"
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +26 -4
@@ -83,16 +83,27 @@ The greeting message format is: 2.2.1 Capabilities ------------------ -As of the date this document was last revised, no server or client -capability strings have been defined. +Currently supported capabilities are: +- "oob": it means the QMP server supports "Out-Of-Band" command + execution. For more details, please see "run-oob" parameter in + "Issuing Commands" section below. Not all commands allow this "oob" + execution. The "query-qmp-schema" command can be used to inspect + which commands support "oob" execution. + +QMP clients can get a list of supported QMP capabilities of the QMP +server in the greeting message mentioned above. By default, all the +capabilities are off. To enable any QMP capabilities, the QMP client +needs to send the "qmp_capabilities" command with an extra parameter +for the requested capabilities. 2.3 Issuing Commands -------------------- The format for command execution is: -{ "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value } +{ "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value, + "control": json-dict } Where,
@@ -102,10 +113,16 @@ The format for command execution is: required. Each command documents what contents will be considered valid when handling the json-argument - The "id" member is a transaction identification associated with the - command execution, it is optional and will be part of the response if + command execution. It is required if OOB is enabled, and optional + if not. The same "id" field will be part of the response if provided. The "id" member can be any json-value, although most clients merely use a json-number incremented for each successive command +- The "control" member is optional, and currently only used for + "out-of-band" execution ("oob" as shortcut). The handling or + response of an "oob" command can overtake prior in-band commands. + To enable "oob" handling of a particular command, just provide a + control field with: { "control": { "run-oob": true } } 2.4 Commands Responses ----------------------
@@ -113,6 +130,11 @@ The format for command execution is: There are two possible responses which the Server will issue as the result of a command execution: success or error. +As long as the commands were issued with a proper "id" field, then the +same "id" field will be attached in the corresponding response message +so that requests and responses can match. Clients should drop all the +responses that are with unknown "id" field. + 2.4.1 success -------------
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 01/23] docs: update QMP documents for OOB commands
Quoted 8 lines · Peter Xu
Update both the developer and spec for the new QMP OOB (Out-Of-Band) command.
Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt | 30 +++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
If all goes well, I'm planning on taking this series through my QAPI tree, with a pull request either late today or early Monday in order to make the soft freeze deadline. We'll see what my review turns up, but hopefully at this point it's either clean or minor enough tweaks that I can polish it without a v9.
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt possible, the command expression should include the optional key · line 649
Quoted 5 lines
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +5
-0+ + { 'command': 'migrate_recover', + 'data': { 'uri': 'str' }, 'allow-oob': true } + +To execute a command in Out-Of-Band way, we need to specify the
Either 'execute a command in an Out-Of-Band way,' or 'execute a command in Out-Of-Band order,'.
Quoted 4 lines
+"control" field in the request, with "run-oob" set to true. Example:
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +3
-0+ + => { "execute": "command-support-oob", + "arguments": { ... },
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt possible, the command expression should include the optional key · line 663
Quoted 10 lines
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +10
-0+ "control": { "run-oob": true } } + <= { "return": { } } + +Without it, even the commands that support out-of-band execution will +still be run In-Band. + +--- About Out-Of-Band (OOB) Command Execution --- + +Out-Of-Band does not mean a special kind of command. Instead, it's a +special way to execute the command. One normal command can be
Perhaps s/One normal command can be/A normal command is/
Quoted 1 line
+declared to support Out-Of-Band execution when 'allow-oob' field is
s/when/when the/
Quoted 1 line
+set to true when defining the command. With that, it can be run in an
s/when defining the command/in the command definition/
Quoted 4 lines
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +4
-0+Out-Of-Band way if 'run-oob' is specified in 'control' field of +command request. + +Under normal QMP command execution, the following apply to each
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt possible, the command expression should include the optional key · line 679
Quoted 10 lines
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +10
-0+command: + +- They are executed in order, +- They run only in main thread of QEMU, +- They have the BQL taken during execution. + +When a command is executed with OOB, the following changes occur: + +- They can be completed before a pending in-band command, +- They run in a monitor dedicated thread,
s/monitor dedicated/dedicated monitor/
Quoted 19 lines
+- They do not take the BQL during execution.
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +11
-0+ +OOB command handlers must satisfy the following conditions: + +- It executes extremely fast, +- It does not take any lock, or, it can take very small locks if all + critical regions also follow the rules for OOB command handler code, +- It does not invoke system calls that may block, +- It does not access guest RAM that may block when userfaultfd is + enabled for postcopy live migration. + +If in doubt, do not implement OOB execution support. === Events ===@@ -739,10 +792,12 @@ references by name. QAPI schema definitions not reachable that way are omitted. The SchemaInfo for a command has meta-type "command", and variant
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt references by name. · line 800
Quoted 10 lines
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +6
-4-members "arg-type" and "ret-type". On the wire, the "arguments" -member of a client's "execute" command must conform to the object type -named by "arg-type". The "return" member that the server passes in a -success response conforms to the type named by "ret-type". +members "arg-type", "ret-type" and "allow-oob". On the wire, the +"arguments" member of a client's "execute" command must conform to the +object type named by "arg-type". The "return" member that the server +passes in a success response conforms to the type named by +"ret-type". When "allow-oob" is set, it means the command supports +out-of-band execution.
We're inconsistent on whether it is capitalized 'Out-Of-Band'. I'm probably okay with the first mention being capitalized (next to the first use of the OOB acronym), and all subsequent uses being lower case.
Quoted 8 lines
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt +0
-0If the command takes no arguments, "arg-type" names an object type without members. Likewise, if the command returns nothing, "ret-type"docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +0
-0
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The greeting message format is: · line 88
Quoted 8 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +2
-2@@ -83,16 +83,27 @@ The greeting message format is: 2.2.1 Capabilities ------------------ -As of the date this document was last revised, no server or client -capability strings have been defined. +Currently supported capabilities are: +- "oob": it means the QMP server supports "Out-Of-Band" command
s/it means //
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The greeting message format is: · line 89
Quoted 1 line
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +1
-0+ execution. For more details, please see "run-oob" parameter in
s/see/see the/
Quoted 8 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +8
-0+ "Issuing Commands" section below. Not all commands allow this "oob" + execution. The "query-qmp-schema" command can be used to inspect + which commands support "oob" execution. + +QMP clients can get a list of supported QMP capabilities of the QMP +server in the greeting message mentioned above. By default, all the +capabilities are off. To enable any QMP capabilities, the QMP client +needs to send the "qmp_capabilities" command with an extra parameter
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The greeting message format is: · line 106
Quoted 10 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +3
-1+for the requested capabilities. 2.3 Issuing Commands -------------------- The format for command execution is: -{ "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value } +{ "execute": json-string, "arguments": json-object, "id": json-value, + "control": json-dict }
s/json-dict/json-object/
(The JSON term is Object, even though dictionary is a common term for the typical data representation of an object)
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The format for command execution is: · line 117
Quoted 10 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +2
-1Where,@@ -102,10 +113,16 @@ The format for command execution is: required. Each command documents what contents will be considered valid when handling the json-argument - The "id" member is a transaction identification associated with the - command execution, it is optional and will be part of the response if + command execution. It is required if OOB is enabled, and optional + if not. The same "id" field will be part of the response if
Ambiguous on whether this is the per-command 'run-oob', or whether this is the generic QMP capability requested during qmp_capabilities. I think the intent is that if you enabled the QMP capability up front, ALL commands must have an "id", even if they are run in-band without 'run-oob', because the 'id' in the response is what will distinguish whether a later OOB request overtook a pending in-band reply.
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The format for command execution is: · line 122
Quoted 5 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +2
-0provided. The "id" member can be any json-value, although most clients merely use a json-number incremented for each successive command +- The "control" member is optional, and currently only used for + "out-of-band" execution ("oob" as shortcut). The handling or
A bit late to be introducing "oob" as shortcut, given that you've already used the abbreviation oob earlier in the document.
Quoted 7 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +3
-0+ response of an "oob" command can overtake prior in-band commands. + To enable "oob" handling of a particular command, just provide a + control field with: { "control": { "run-oob": true } } 2.4 Commands Responses ----------------------
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The format for command execution is: · line 136
Quoted 7 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +4
-0@@ -113,6 +130,11 @@ The format for command execution is: There are two possible responses which the Server will issue as the result of a command execution: success or error. +As long as the commands were issued with a proper "id" field, then the +same "id" field will be attached in the corresponding response message +so that requests and responses can match. Clients should drop all the +responses that are with unknown "id" field.
s/are with/have an/
I've got quite a few wording tweaks, but the general concept is good. If you need to respin for other reasons, feel free to make those improvements, but I also don't mind making tweaks myself as part of queuing for a pull request, so:
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 01/23] docs: update QMP documents for OOB commands
Quoted 10 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 8 lines · Peter Xu
Update both the developer and spec for the new QMP OOB (Out-Of-Band) command.
Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt | 30 +++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Quoted 5 lines
If all goes well, I'm planning on taking this series through my QAPI tree, with a pull request either late today or early Monday in order to make the soft freeze deadline. We'll see what my review turns up, but hopefully at this point it's either clean or minor enough tweaks that I can polish it without a v9.
That'll be great. Thanks Eric!
[...]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +1
-1@@ -102,10 +113,16 @@ The format for command execution is: required. Each command documents what contents will be considered valid when handling the json-argument - The "id" member is a transaction identification associated with the - command execution, it is optional and will be part of the response if + command execution. It is required if OOB is enabled, and optional
Quoted 8 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The format for command execution is: · line 117
Quoted 1 line
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +1
-0+ if not. The same "id" field will be part of the response ifAmbiguous on whether this is the per-command 'run-oob', or whether this is the generic QMP capability requested during
qmp_capabilities. I think the intent is that if you enabled the QMP capability up front, ALL commands must have an "id", even if they are run in-band without 'run-oob', because the 'id' in the response is what will distinguish whether a later OOB request overtook a pending in-band reply.
Yes, maybe I should use "OOB capability" to be explicit - exactly as you explained.
Quoted 25 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The format for command execution is: · line 122
Quoted 6 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +2
-0provided. The "id" member can be any json-value, although most clients merely use a json-number incremented for each successive command +- The "control" member is optional, and currently only used for + "out-of-band" execution ("oob" as shortcut). The handling orA bit late to be introducing "oob" as shortcut, given that you've already used the abbreviation oob earlier in the document.
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt The format for command execution is: · line 135
Quoted 12 lines
docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt +7
-0+ response of an "oob" command can overtake prior in-band commands. + To enable "oob" handling of a particular command, just provide a + control field with: { "control": { "run-oob": true } } 2.4 Commands Responses ----------------------@@ -113,6 +130,11 @@ The format for command execution is: There are two possible responses which the Server will issue as the result of a command execution: success or error. +As long as the commands were issued with a proper "id" field, then the +same "id" field will be attached in the corresponding response message +so that requests and responses can match. Clients should drop all the +responses that are with unknown "id" field.s/are with/have an/
Quoted 6 lines
I've got quite a few wording tweaks, but the general concept is good. If you need to respin for other reasons, feel free to make those improvements, but I also don't mind making tweaks myself as part of queuing for a pull request, so:
Reviewed-by Eric Blake <[email protected]>
(I agree on all the rest of the review comments too)
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
PATCH v8 2/23 qobject: introduce qstring_get_try_str()
In reply to Peter XuThe only difference from qstring_get_str() is that it allows the qstring to be NULL. If so, NULL is returned.
--- include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h | 1 + qobject/qstring.c | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h +1 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ QString *qstring_from_str(const char *str);QString *qstring_from_substr (const char *str,int start,int end);size_t qstring_get_length (const QString *qstring);const char *qstring_get_str (const QString *qstring); +const char *qstring_get_try_str (const QString *qstring);void qstring_append_int (QString *qstring,int64_t value);void qstring_append (QString *qstring,const char *str);void qstring_append_chr (QString *qstring,int c);
qobject/qstring.c +10 -0
@@ -127,6 +127,16 @@ const char *qstring_get_str(const QString *qstring)return qstring->string; } +/** +* qstring_get_try_str(): Return a pointer to the stored string +* +* NOTE: will return NULL if qstring is not provided. +*/ +const char *qstring_get_try_str (const QString *qstring) +{ +return qstring ?qstring_get_str (qstring) :NULL ; +} +/** * qstring_is_equal(): Test whether the two QStrings are equal */
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 3/23 qobject: introduce qobject_get_try_str()
In reply to Peter XuA quick way to fetch string from qobject when it's a QString.
--- include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h | 1 + qobject/qstring.c | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h +1 -0
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ QString *qstring_from_substr(const char *str, int start, int end);size_t qstring_get_length (const QString *qstring);const char *qstring_get_str (const QString *qstring);const char *qstring_get_try_str (const QString *qstring); +const char *qobject_get_try_str (const QObject *qstring);void qstring_append_int (QString *qstring,int64_t value);void qstring_append (QString *qstring,const char *str);void qstring_append_chr (QString *qstring,int c);
qobject/qstring.c +11 -0
@@ -137,6 +137,17 @@ const char *qstring_get_try_str(const QString *qstring)return qstring ?qstring_get_str (qstring) :NULL ; } +/** +* qobject_get_try_str(): Return a pointer to the corresponding string +* +* NOTE: the string will only be returned if the object is valid, and +* its type is QString, otherwise NULL is returned. +*/ +const char *qobject_get_try_str (const QObject *qstring) +{ +return qstring_get_try_str (qobject_to_qstring (qstring)); +} +/** * qstring_is_equal(): Test whether the two QStrings are equal */
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 03/23] qobject: introduce qobject_get_try_str()
Quoted 15 lines · Peter Xu
A quick way to fetch string from qobject when it's a QString.
Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- include/qapi/qmp/qstring.h | 1 + qobject/qstring.c | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)+++
b/qobject/qstring.cqobject/qstring.c +0
-0@@ -137,6 +137,17 @@ const char *qstring_get_try_str(const QString *qstring)return qstring ?qstring_get_str (qstring) :NULL ; }
qobject/qstring.c const char *qstring_get_try_str(const QString *qstring) · line 148
Quoted 10 lines
qobject/qstring.c +9
-0+/** +* qobject_get_try_str(): Return a pointer to the corresponding string +* +* NOTE: the string will only be returned if the object is valid, and +* its type is QString, otherwise NULL is returned. +*/ +const char *qobject_get_try_str (const QObject *qstring) +{ +return qstring_get_try_str (qobject_to_qstring (qstring));
Conflicts with Max's refactoring to a qobject_to() macro.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-02/msg06230.html
Whoever lands first gets to watch the other (or the maintainer) rebase ;)
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 4/23 qobject: let object_property_get_str() use new API
In reply to Peter XuWe can simplify object_property_get_str() using the new qobject_get_try_str().
--- qom/object.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
qom/object.c +3 -6
@@ -1123,18 +1123,15 @@ char *object_property_get_str(Object *obj, const char *name, Error **errp) {QObject *ret =object_property_get_qobject (obj, name, errp); -QString *qstring;char *retval;if (!ret) {return NULL ; } - qstring =qobject_to_qstring (ret); -if (!qstring) { + + retval =g_strdup (qobject_get_try_str (ret)); +if (!retval) {error_setg (errp,QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_TYPE , name,"string" ); - retval =NULL ; - }else { - retval =g_strdup (qstring_get_str (qstring)); }qobject_decref (ret);
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 5/23 monitor: move skip_flush into monitor_data_init
In reply to Peter XuIt's part of the data init. Collect it.
--- monitor.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
monitor.c +4 -4
@@ -570,13 +570,14 @@ static void monitor_qapi_event_init(void)static void handle_hmp_command (Monitor *mon,const char *cmdline); -static void monitor_data_init (Monitor *mon) +static void monitor_data_init (Monitor *mon,bool skip_flush) {memset (mon,0 ,sizeof (Monitor));qemu_mutex_init (&mon->out_lock); mon->outbuf =qstring_new ();/* Use *mon_cmds by default. */ mon->cmd_table = mon_cmds; + mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)
@@ -597,8 +598,7 @@ char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,char *output =NULL ;Monitor *old_mon, hmp; -monitor_data_init (&hmp); - hmp.skip_flush = true; +monitor_data_init (&hmp, true); old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = &hmp;
@@ -4039,7 +4039,7 @@ void monitor_init(Chardev *chr, int flags) } mon =g_malloc (sizeof (*mon)); -monitor_data_init (mon); +monitor_data_init (mon, false);qemu_chr_fe_init (&mon->chr, chr, &error_abort); mon->flags = flags;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 6/23 monitor: move the cur_mon hack deeper for QMP
In reply to Peter XuIn monitor_qmp_read(), we have the hack to temporarily replace the cur_mon pointer. Now we move this hack deeper inside the QMP dispatcher routine since the Monitor pointer can be actually obtained using container_of() upon the parser object, just like most of the other JSON parser users do.
This does not make much sense as a single patch. However, this will be a big step for the next patch, when the QMP dispatcher routine will be split from the QMP parser.
--- monitor.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
monitor.c +10 -7
@@ -3762,7 +3762,9 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) {QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -Monitor *mon = cur_mon; +MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); +Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); +Error *err =NULL ; req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err);
@@ -3787,8 +3789,13 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)QDECREF (req_json); } + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + rsp =qmp_dispatch (cur_mon->qmp.commands, req); + cur_mon = old_mon; +if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to_qdict (rsp),"error" ); if (qdict
@@ -3825,13 +3832,9 @@ err_out:static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size) { -Monitor *old_mon = cur_mon; - - cur_mon = opaque; - -json_message_parser_feed (&cur_mon->qmp.parser, (const char *) buf, size); +Monitor *mon = opaque; - cur_mon = old_mon; +json_message_parser_feed (&mon->qmp.parser, (const char *) buf, size); }static void monitor_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size)
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 06/23] monitor: move the cur_mon hack deeper for QMP
Quoted 19 lines · Peter Xu
In
monitor_qmp_read(), we have the hack to temporarily replace thecur_monpointer. Now we move this hack deeper inside the QMP dispatcher routine since the Monitor pointer can be actually obtained usingcontainer_of()upon the parser object, just like most of the other JSON parser users do.This does not make much sense as a single patch. However, this will be a big step for the next patch, when the QMP dispatcher routine will be split from the QMP parser.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Eric Blake <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3800
Quoted 4 lines
monitor.c +2
-0+ cur_mon = old_mon; +if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to_qdict (rsp),"error" );
More conflict fun with the qobject_to() series. Sadly, 'git am -3' had a tough time, even though the conflict was only in the context, but I managed to get it all sorted out.
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 7/23 monitor: unify global init
In reply to Peter XuThere are many places where the monitor initializes its globals:
- monitor_init_qmp_commands() at the very beginning
- single function to init monitor_lock
- in the first entry of monitor_init() using "is_first_init"
Unify them a bit.
monitor_lock is not used before monitor_init() (as confirmed by code analysis and gdb watchpoints); so we are safe delaying what was a constructor-time initialization of the mutex into the later first call to monitor_init().
--- include/monitor/monitor.h | 2 +- monitor.c | 25 ++++++++++--------------- vl.c | 7 ++++++- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
include/monitor/monitor.h +1 -1
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ extern Monitor *cur_mon;bool monitor_cur_is_qmp (void ); -void monitor_init_qmp_commands (void ); +void monitor_init_globals (void );void monitor_init (Chardev *chr,int flags);void monitor_cleanup (void );
monitor.c +10 -15
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ static void qmp_unregister_commands_hack(void)#endif } -void monitor_init_qmp_commands (void ) +static void monitor_init_qmp_commands (void ) {/* * Two command lists:
@@ -3985,6 +3985,14 @@ static void sortcmdlist(void)qsort ((void *)info_cmds, array_num, elem_size, compare_mon_cmd); } +void monitor_init_globals (void ) +{ +monitor_init_qmp_commands (); +monitor_qapi_event_init (); +sortcmdlist (); +qemu_mutex_init (&monitor_lock); +} +/* These functions just adapt the readline interface in a typesafe way. We * could cast function pointers but that discards compiler checks. */
@@ -4025,23 +4033,10 @@ void error_vprintf_unless_qmp(const char *fmt, va_list ap) } } -static void __attribute__((constructor))monitor_lock_init (void ) -{ -qemu_mutex_init (&monitor_lock); -} -void monitor_init (Chardev *chr,int flags) { -static int is_first_init =1 ; -Monitor *mon; - -if (is_first_init) { -monitor_qapi_event_init (); -sortcmdlist (); - is_first_init =0 ; - } +Monitor *mon =g_malloc (sizeof (*mon)); - mon =g_malloc (sizeof (*mon));monitor_data_init (mon, false);qemu_chr_fe_init (&mon->chr, chr, &error_abort);
vl.c +6 -1
@@ -3065,7 +3065,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)qemu_init_exec_dir (argv[0 ]);module_call_init (MODULE_INIT_QOM ); -monitor_init_qmp_commands ();qemu_add_opts (&qemu_drive_opts);qemu_add_drive_opts (&qemu_legacy_drive_opts);
@@ -4535,6 +4534,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)default_drive (default_floppy, snapshot,IF_FLOPPY ,0 ,FD_OPTS );default_drive (default_sdcard, snapshot,IF_SD ,0 ,SD_OPTS ); +/* +* Note: qtest_enabled() (which is used in monitor_qapi_event_init()) +* depends on configure_accelerator() above. +*/ +monitor_init_globals (); +if (qemu_opts_foreach (qemu_find_opts ("mon" ), mon_init_func,NULL ,NULL )) {exit (1 );
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 8/23 monitor: let mon_list be tail queue
In reply to Peter XuIt was QLIST. I want to use this list to do monitor priority job later, which need tail insertion ability. So switching to a tail queue.
--- monitor.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
monitor.c +6 -6
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct Monitor {void *password_opaque;mon_cmd_t *cmd_table; QLIST_HEAD(,mon_fd_t) fds; -QLIST_ENTRY (Monitor) entry; +QTAILQ_ENTRY (Monitor) entry; };/* QMP checker flags */
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ struct Monitor {/* Protects mon_list, monitor_event_state. */ static QemuMutex monitor_lock; -static QLIST_HEAD(mon_list, Monitor) mon_list; +static QTAILQ_HEAD(mon_list, Monitor) mon_list; static QLIST_HEAD(mon_fdsets, MonFdset) mon_fdsets;static int mon_refcount;
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static void monitor_qapi_event_emit(QAPIEvent event, QDict *qdict)Monitor *mon;trace_monitor_protocol_event_emit (event, qdict); - QLIST_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) {if (monitor_is_qmp (mon) && mon->qmp.commands != &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) {monitor_json_emitter (mon,QOBJECT (qdict));
@@ -4060,7 +4060,7 @@ void monitor_init(Chardev *chr, int flags) }qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); -QLIST_INSERT_HEAD (&mon_list, mon, entry); +QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD (&mon_list, mon, entry);qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); }
@@ -4069,8 +4069,8 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void)Monitor *mon, *next;qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); - QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) { -QLIST_REMOVE (mon, entry); + QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) { +QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry);monitor_data_destroy (mon);g_free (mon); }
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 9/23 monitor: allow using IO thread for parsing
In reply to Peter XuFor each Monitor, add one field "use_io_thr" to show whether it will be using the dedicated monitor IO thread to handle input/output. When set, monitor IO parsing work will be offloaded to the dedicated monitor IO thread, rather than the original main loop thread.
This only works for QMP. HMP will always be run on the main loop thread.
Currently we're still keeping use_io_thr off always. Will turn it on later at some point.
One thing to mention is that we cannot set use_io_thr for every QMP monitor. The problem is that MUXed typed chardevs may not work well with it now. When MUX is used, frontend of chardev can be the monitor plus something else. The only thing we know would be safe to be run outside main thread so far is the monitor frontend. All the rest of the frontends should still be run in main thread only.
--- monitor.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
monitor.c +90 -8
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@#include "net/net.h" #include "net/slirp.h" #include "chardev/char-fe.h" +#include "chardev/char-io.h" #include "ui/qemu-spice.h" #include "sysemu/numa.h" #include "monitor/monitor.h"
@@ -79,6 +80,7 @@#include "qapi/qapi-introspect.h" #include "sysemu/qtest.h" #include "sysemu/cpus.h" +#include "sysemu/iothread.h" #include "qemu/cutils.h" #if defined(TARGET_S390X )
@@ -192,6 +194,7 @@ struct Monitor {int flags;int suspend_cnt;bool skip_flush; +bool use_io_thr;QemuMutex out_lock;QString *outbuf;
@@ -210,6 +213,11 @@ struct Monitor {QTAILQ_ENTRY (Monitor) entry; }; +/* Let's add monitor global variables to this struct. */ +static struct { +IOThread *mon_iothread; +} mon_global; +/* QMP checker flags */ #define QMP_ACCEPT_UNKNOWNS 1
@@ -570,7 +578,8 @@ static void monitor_qapi_event_init(void)static void handle_hmp_command (Monitor *mon,const char *cmdline); -static void monitor_data_init (Monitor *mon,bool skip_flush) +static void monitor_data_init (Monitor *mon,bool skip_flush, +bool use_io_thr) {memset (mon,0 ,sizeof (Monitor));qemu_mutex_init (&mon->out_lock);
@@ -578,6 +587,7 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush)/* Use *mon_cmds by default. */ mon->cmd_table = mon_cmds; mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; + mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)
@@ -598,7 +608,7 @@ char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,char *output =NULL ;Monitor *old_mon, hmp; -monitor_data_init (&hmp, true); +monitor_data_init (&hmp, true, false); old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = &hmp;
@@ -3985,12 +3995,29 @@ static void sortcmdlist(void)qsort ((void *)info_cmds, array_num, elem_size, compare_mon_cmd); } +static GMainContext *monitor_get_io_context (void ) +{ +return iothread_get_g_main_context (mon_global.mon_iothread); +} + +static AioContext *monitor_get_aio_context (void ) +{ +return iothread_get_aio_context (mon_global.mon_iothread); +} + +static void monitor_iothread_init (void ) +{ + mon_global.mon_iothread =iothread_create ("mon_iothread" , + &error_abort); +} +void monitor_init_globals (void ) {monitor_init_qmp_commands ();monitor_qapi_event_init ();sortcmdlist ();qemu_mutex_init (&monitor_lock); +monitor_iothread_init (); }/* These functions just adapt the readline interface in a typesafe way. We
@@ -4033,11 +4060,41 @@ void error_vprintf_unless_qmp(const char *fmt, va_list ap) } } +static void monitor_list_append (Monitor *mon) +{ +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); +QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD (&mon_list, mon, entry); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +} + +static void monitor_qmp_setup_handlers_bh (void *opaque) +{ +Monitor *mon = opaque; +GMainContext *context; + +if (mon->use_io_thr) { +/* +* When use_io_thr is set, we use the global shared dedicated +* IO thread for this monitor to handle input/output. +*/ + context =monitor_get_io_context (); +/* We should have inited globals before reaching here. */ +assert (context); + }else { +/* The default main loop, which is the main thread */ + context =NULL ; + } + +qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers (&mon->chr, monitor_can_read, monitor_qmp_read, + monitor_qmp_event,NULL , mon, context, true); +monitor_list_append (mon); +} +void monitor_init (Chardev *chr,int flags) {Monitor *mon =g_malloc (sizeof (*mon)); -monitor_data_init (mon, false); +monitor_data_init (mon, false, false);qemu_chr_fe_init (&mon->chr, chr, &error_abort); mon->flags = flags;
@@ -4050,24 +4107,46 @@ void monitor_init(Chardev *chr, int flags) }if (monitor_is_qmp (mon)) { -qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers (&mon->chr, monitor_can_read, monitor_qmp_read, - monitor_qmp_event,NULL , mon,NULL , true);qemu_chr_fe_set_echo (&mon->chr, true);json_message_parser_init (&mon->qmp.parser, handle_qmp_command); +if (mon->use_io_thr) { +/* +* We can't call qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() directly here +* since during the procedure the chardev will be active +* and running in monitor iothread, while we'll still do +* something before returning from it, which is a possible +* race too. To avoid that, we just create a BH to setup +* the handlers. +*/ +aio_bh_schedule_oneshot (monitor_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_setup_handlers_bh, mon); +/* We'll add this to mon_list in the BH when setup done */ +return ; + }else { +qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers (&mon->chr, monitor_can_read, + monitor_qmp_read, monitor_qmp_event, +NULL , mon,NULL , true); + } }else {qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers (&mon->chr, monitor_can_read, monitor_read, monitor_event,NULL , mon,NULL , true); } -qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); -QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD (&mon_list, mon, entry); -qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +monitor_list_append (mon); }void monitor_cleanup (void ) {Monitor *mon, *next; +/* +* We need to explicitly stop the iothread (but not destroy it), +* cleanup the monitor resources, then destroy the iothread since +* we need to unregister from chardev below in +* monitor_data_destroy(), and chardev is not thread-safe yet +*/ +iothread_stop (mon_global.mon_iothread); +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) {QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry);
@@ -4075,6 +4154,9 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void)g_free (mon); }qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); + +iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); + mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ; }QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts = {
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 09/23] monitor: allow using IO thread for parsing
Quoted 25 lines · Peter Xu
For each Monitor, add one field "
use_io_thr" to show whether it will be using the dedicated monitor IO thread to handle input/output. When set, monitor IO parsing work will be offloaded to the dedicated monitor IO thread, rather than the original main loop thread.This only works for QMP. HMP will always be run on the main loop thread.
Currently we're still keeping
use_io_throff always. Will turn it on later at some point.One thing to mention is that we cannot set
use_io_thrfor every QMP monitor. The problem is that MUXed typed chardevs may not work well with it now. When MUX is used, frontend of chardev can be the monitor plus something else. The only thing we know would be safe to be run outside main thread so far is the monitor frontend. All the rest of the frontends should still be run in main thread only.Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
monitor.c struct Monitor { · line 219
Quoted 7 lines
monitor.c +4
-0@@ -210,6 +213,11 @@ struct Monitor {QTAILQ_ENTRY (Monitor) entry; }; +/* Let's add monitor global variables to this struct. */ +static struct { +IOThread *mon_iothread; +} mon_global;
Anonymous struct type, but not the first time someone has done this, so it's okay.
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 10/23 qmp: introduce QMPCapability
In reply to Peter XuThere were no QMP capabilities defined. Define the first "oob" as capability to allow out-of-band messages.
After this patch, we will allow QMP clients to enable QMP capabilities when sending the first "qmp_capabilities" command. Originally we are starting QMP session with no arguments like:
{ "execute": "qmp_capabilities" }
Now we can enable some QMP capabilities using (take OOB as example, which is the only one capability that we support):
{ "execute": "qmp_capabilities",
"argument": { "enable": [ "oob" ] } }When the "argument" key is not provided, no capability is enabled.
For capability "oob", the monitor needs to be run on dedicated IO thread, otherwise the command will fail. For example, trying to enable OOB on a MUXed typed QMP monitor will fail.
One thing to mention is that, QMP capabilities are per-monitor, and also when the connection is closed due to some reason, the capabilities will be reset.
Also, touch up qmp-test.c to test the new bits.
--- monitor.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- qapi/misc.json | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++--- tests/qmp-test.c | 10 +++++++- 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
monitor.c +72 -5
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@#include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h" #include "qapi/qmp/json-streamer.h" #include "qapi/qmp/json-parser.h" +#include "qapi/qmp/qlist.h" #include "qom/object_interfaces.h" #include "trace-root.h" #include "trace/control.h"
@@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ typedef struct {* mode. */ QmpCommandList *commands; +bool qmp_caps[QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ]; } MonitorQMP;/*
@@ -1039,8 +1041,42 @@ static void monitor_init_qmp_commands(void) qmp_marshal_qmp_capabilities, QCO_NO_OPTIONS); } -void qmp_qmp_capabilities (Error **errp) +static void qmp_caps_check (Monitor *mon,QMPCapabilityList *list, +Error **errp) +{ +for (; list; list = list->next) { +assert (list->value <QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ); +switch (list->value) { +case QMP_CAPABILITY_OOB : +if (!mon->use_io_thr) { +/* +* Out-Of-Band only works with monitors that are +* running on dedicated IOThread. +*/ +error_setg (errp,"This monitor does not support " +"Out-Of-Band (OOB)" ); +return ; + } +break ; +default : +break ; + } + } +} + +/* This function should only be called after capabilities are checked. */ +static void qmp_caps_apply (Monitor *mon,QMPCapabilityList *list) { +for (; list; list = list->next) { + mon->qmp.qmp_caps[list->value] = true; + } +} + +void qmp_qmp_capabilities (bool has_enable,QMPCapabilityList *enable, +Error **errp) +{ +Error *local_err =NULL ; +if (cur_mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_commands) {error_set (errp,ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND , "Capabilities negotiation is already complete, command "
@@ -1048,6 +1084,21 @@ void qmp_qmp_capabilities(Error **errp)return ; } +/* Enable QMP capabilities provided by the client if applicable. */ +if (has_enable) { +qmp_caps_check (cur_mon, enable, &local_err); +if (local_err) { +/* +* Failed check on any of the capabilities will fail the +* entire command (and thus not apply any of the other +* capabilities that were also requested). +*/ +error_propagate (errp, local_err); +return ; + } +qmp_caps_apply (cur_mon, enable); + } + cur_mon->qmp.commands = &qmp_commands; }
@@ -3893,14 +3944,29 @@ void monitor_resume(Monitor *mon)readline_show_prompt (mon->rs); } -static QObject *get_qmp_greeting (void ) +static QObject *get_qmp_greeting (Monitor *mon) { +QList *cap_list =qlist_new ();QObject *ver =NULL ; +QMPCapability cap;qmp_marshal_query_version (NULL , &ver,NULL ); -return qobject_from_jsonf ("{'QMP': {'version': %p, 'capabilities': []}}" , - ver); +for (cap =0 ; cap <QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ; cap++) { +if (!mon->use_io_thr && cap ==QMP_CAPABILITY_OOB ) { +/* Monitors that are not using IOThread won't support OOB */ +continue ; + } +qlist_append (cap_list,qstring_from_str (QMPCapability_str (cap))); + } + +return qobject_from_jsonf ("{'QMP': {'version': %p, 'capabilities': %p}}" , + ver, cap_list); +} + +static void monitor_qmp_caps_reset (Monitor *mon) +{ +memset (mon->qmp.qmp_caps,0 ,sizeof (mon->qmp.qmp_caps)); }static void monitor_qmp_event (void *opaque,int event)
@@ -3911,7 +3977,8 @@ static void monitor_qmp_event(void *opaque, int event)switch (event) {case CHR_EVENT_OPENED : mon->qmp.commands = &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands; - data =get_qmp_greeting (); +monitor_qmp_caps_reset (mon); + data =get_qmp_greeting (mon);monitor_json_emitter (mon, data);qobject_decref (data); mon_refcount++;
qapi/misc.json +29 -3
@@ -10,21 +10,47 @@ # # Enable QMP capabilities. # -# Arguments: None. +# Arguments: +# +# @enable: An optional list of QMPCapability values to enable. The +# client must not enable any capability that is not +# mentioned in the QMP greeting message. If the field is not +# provided, it means no QMP capabilities will be enabled. +# (since 2.12) # # Example: # -# -> { "execute": "qmp_capabilities" } +# -> { "execute": "qmp_capabilities", +# "arguments": { "enable": [ "oob" ] } } # <- { "return": {} } # # Notes: This command is valid exactly when first connecting: it must be # issued before any other command will be accepted, and will fail once the # monitor is accepting other commands. (see qemu docs/interop/qmp-spec.txt) # +# The QMP client needs to explicitly enable QMP capabilities, otherwise +# all the QMP capabilities will be turned off by default. +# # Since: 0.13 # ## -{ 'command': 'qmp_capabilities' } +{ 'command': 'qmp_capabilities', + 'data': { '*enable': [ 'QMPCapability' ] } } + +## +# @QMPCapability: +# +# Enumeration of capabilities to be advertised during initial client +# connection, used for agreeing on particular QMP extension behaviors. +# +# @oob: QMP ability to support Out-Of-Band requests. +# (Please refer to qmp-spec.txt for more information on OOB) +# +# Since: 2.12 +# +## +{ 'enum': 'QMPCapability', + 'data': [ 'oob' ] } ## # @VersionTriple:
tests/qmp-test.c +9 -1
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@#include "qapi/qobject-input-visitor.h" #include "qapi/util.h" #include "qapi/visitor.h" +#include "qapi/qmp/qstring.h" const char common_args[] ="-nodefaults -machine none" ;
@@ -79,6 +80,8 @@ static void test_qmp_protocol(void)QDict *resp, *q, *ret;QList *capabilities;QTestState *qts; +const QListEntry *entry; +QString *qstr; qts =qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake (common_args);
@@ -88,7 +91,12 @@ static void test_qmp_protocol(void)g_assert (q);test_version (qdict_get (q,"version" )); capabilities =qdict_get_qlist (q,"capabilities" ); -g_assert (capabilities &&qlist_empty (capabilities)); +g_assert (capabilities); + entry =qlist_first (capabilities); +g_assert (entry); + qstr =qobject_to_qstring (entry->value); +g_assert (qstr); + g_assert_cmpstr(qstring_get_str(qstr), ==, "oob");QDECREF (resp);/* Test valid command before handshake */
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 10/23] qmp: introduce QMPCapability
Quoted 2 lines · Peter Xu
There were no QMP capabilities defined. Define the first "oob" as capability to allow out-of-band messages.
Reads better as "Define the first capability, "oob", to allow..."
Quoted 5 lines
After this patch, we will allow QMP clients to enable QMP capabilities when sending the first "
qmp_capabilities" command. Originally we are starting QMP session with no arguments like:
Quoted 7 lines
{ "execute": "qmp_capabilities" }Now we can enable some QMP capabilities using (take OOB as example, which is the only one capability that we support):
{ "execute": "
qmp_capabilities","argument": { "enable": [ "oob" ] } }
s/argument/arguments/
Quoted 2 lines
When the "argument" key is not provided, no capability is enabled.
again. Also when "arguments":{} is provided with an empty dict, or even with "arguments":{"enable":[]} an empty enable array. But no need to mention them here.
Quoted 2 lines
For capability "oob", the monitor needs to be run on dedicated IO
s/on/on a/
Quoted 4 lines
thread, otherwise the command will fail. For example, trying to enable OOB on a MUXed typed QMP monitor will fail.
One thing to mention is that, QMP capabilities are per-monitor, and also
s/that,/that/
Quoted 12 lines
when the connection is closed due to some reason, the capabilities will be reset.
Also, touch up
qmp-test.cto test the new bits.Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- qapi/misc.json | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++--- tests/qmp-test.c | 10 +++++++- 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 11/23 monitor: introduce monitor_qmp_respond()
In reply to Peter XuA tiny refactoring, preparing to split the QMP dispatcher away.
--- monitor.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
monitor.c +33 -17
@@ -3819,6 +3819,38 @@ static int monitor_can_read(void *opaque)return (mon->suspend_cnt ==0 ) ?1 :0 ; } +/* +* 1. This function takes ownership of rsp, err, and id. +* 2. rsp, err, and id may be NULL. +* 3. If err != NULL then rsp must be NULL. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_respond (Monitor *mon,QObject *rsp, +Error *err,QObject *id) +{ +QDict *qdict =NULL ; + +if (err) { +assert (!rsp); + qdict =qdict_new (); +qdict_put_obj (qdict,"error" ,qmp_build_error_object (err)); +error_free (err); + rsp =QOBJECT (qdict); + } + +if (rsp) { +if (id) { +/* This is for the qdict below. */ +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_put_obj (qobject_to_qdict (rsp),"id" , id); + } + +monitor_json_emitter (mon, rsp); + } + +qobject_decref (id); +qobject_decref (rsp); +} +static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) {QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ;
@@ -3870,24 +3902,8 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) } err_out: -if (err) { - qdict =qdict_new (); -qdict_put_obj (qdict,"error" ,qmp_build_error_object (err)); -error_free (err); - rsp =QOBJECT (qdict); - } +monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp, err, id); -if (rsp) { -if (id) { -qdict_put_obj (qobject_to_qdict (rsp),"id" , id); - id =NULL ; - } - -monitor_json_emitter (mon, rsp); - } - -qobject_decref (id); -qobject_decref (rsp);qobject_decref (req); }
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 11/23] monitor: introduce monitor_qmp_respond()
Quoted 10 lines · Peter Xu
A tiny refactoring, preparing to split the QMP dispatcher away.
Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
monitor.c static int monitor_can_read(void *opaque) · line 3844
Quoted 5 lines
monitor.c +5
-0+if (rsp) { +if (id) { +/* This is for the qdict below. */ +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_put_obj (qobject_to_qdict (rsp),"id" , id);
Another victim of qobject_to() refactoring.
Fixing that is minor, so
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 12/23 monitor: let suspend_cnt be thread safe
In reply to Peter XuMonitor code now can be run in more than one thread. Let it be thread safe when accessing suspend_cnt counter.
--- monitor.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
monitor.c +8 -7
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ struct Monitor {CharBackend chr;int reset_seen;int flags; -int suspend_cnt; +int suspend_cnt;/* Needs to be accessed atomically */ bool skip_flush;bool use_io_thr;
@@ -3816,7 +3816,7 @@ static int monitor_can_read(void *opaque) {Monitor *mon = opaque; -return (mon->suspend_cnt ==0 ) ?1 :0 ; +return !atomic_mb_read (&mon->suspend_cnt); }/*
@@ -3948,7 +3948,7 @@ int monitor_suspend(Monitor *mon) {if (!mon->rs)return -ENOTTY ; - mon->suspend_cnt++; +atomic_inc (&mon->suspend_cnt);return 0 ; }
@@ -3956,8 +3956,9 @@ void monitor_resume(Monitor *mon) {if (!mon->rs)return ; -if (--mon->suspend_cnt ==0 ) +if (atomic_dec_fetch (&mon->suspend_cnt) ==0 ) {readline_show_prompt (mon->rs); + } }static QObject *get_qmp_greeting (Monitor *mon)
@@ -4022,19 +4023,19 @@ static void monitor_event(void *opaque, int event)monitor_resume (mon);monitor_flush (mon); }else { - mon->suspend_cnt =0 ; +atomic_mb_set (&mon->suspend_cnt,0 ); }break ;case CHR_EVENT_MUX_OUT :if (mon->reset_seen) { -if (mon->suspend_cnt ==0 ) { +if (atomic_mb_read (&mon->suspend_cnt) ==0 ) {monitor_printf (mon,"\n" ); }monitor_flush (mon);monitor_suspend (mon); }else { - mon->suspend_cnt++; +atomic_inc (&mon->suspend_cnt); }qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->out_lock); mon->mux_out =1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
PATCH v8 13/23 monitor: let suspend/resume work even with QMPs
In reply to Peter XuThis patches allows QMP monitors to be suspended/resumed.
One thing to mention is that for QMPs that are using IOThreads, we need an explicit kick for the IOThread in case it is sleeping.
Meanwhile, we need to take special care on non-interactive HMPs. Currently only gdbserver is using that. For these monitors, we still don't allow suspend/resume operations.
Since at it, add traces for the operations.
--- monitor.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- trace-events | 1 + 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
monitor.c +44 -3
@@ -250,6 +250,21 @@ static inline bool monitor_is_qmp(const Monitor *mon)return (mon->flags &MONITOR_USE_CONTROL ); } +/** +* Whether @mon is using readline? Note: not all HMP monitors use +* readline, e.g., gdbserver has a non-interactive HMP monitor, so +* readline is not used there. +*/ +static inline bool monitor_uses_readline (const Monitor *mon) +{ +return mon->flags &MONITOR_USE_READLINE ; +} + +static inline bool monitor_is_hmp_non_interactive (const Monitor *mon) +{ +return !monitor_is_qmp (mon) && !monitor_uses_readline (mon); +} +/** * Is the current monitor, if any, a QMP monitor? */
@@ -3946,19 +3961,45 @@ static void monitor_command_cb(void *opaque, const char *cmdline,int monitor_suspend (Monitor *mon) { -if (!mon->rs) +if (monitor_is_hmp_non_interactive (mon)) {return -ENOTTY ; + } +atomic_inc (&mon->suspend_cnt); + +if (monitor_is_qmp (mon)) { +/* +* Kick iothread to make sure this takes effect. It'll be +* evaluated again in prepare() of the watch object. +*/ +aio_notify (iothread_get_aio_context (mon_global.mon_iothread)); + } + +trace_monitor_suspend (mon,1 );return 0 ; }void monitor_resume (Monitor *mon) { -if (!mon->rs) +if (monitor_is_hmp_non_interactive (mon)) {return ; + } +if (atomic_dec_fetch (&mon->suspend_cnt) ==0 ) { -readline_show_prompt (mon->rs); +if (monitor_is_qmp (mon)) { +/* +* For QMP monitors that are running in IOThread, let's +* kick the thread in case it's sleeping. +*/ +if (mon->use_io_thr) { +aio_notify (iothread_get_aio_context (mon_global.mon_iothread)); + } + }else { +assert (mon->rs); +readline_show_prompt (mon->rs); + } } +trace_monitor_suspend (mon,-1 ); }static QObject *get_qmp_greeting (Monitor *mon)
trace-events +1 -0
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ monitor_protocol_event_emit(uint32_t event, void *data) "event=%d data=%p" monitor_protocol_event_queue(uint32_t event, void *qdict, uint64_t rate) "event=%d data=%p rate=%" PRId64 handle_hmp_command(void *mon, const char *cmdline) "mon %p cmdline: %s" handle_qmp_command(void *mon, const char *req) "mon %p req: %s" +monitor_suspend(void *ptr, int cnt) "mon %p: %d" # dma-helpers.c dma_blk_io(void *dbs, void *bs, int64_t offset, bool to_dev) "dbs=%p bs=%p offset=%" PRId64 " to_dev=%d"
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 13/23] monitor: let suspend/resume work even with QMPs
Quoted 9 lines · Peter Xu
This patches allows QMP monitors to be suspended/resumed.
One thing to mention is that for QMPs that are using IOThreads, we need an explicit kick for the IOThread in case it is sleeping.
Meanwhile, we need to take special care on non-interactive HMPs. Currently only gdbserver is using that. For these monitors, we still don't allow suspend/resume operations.
Quoted 8 lines
Since at it, add traces for the operations.
Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- trace-events | 1 + 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 14/23 monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
In reply to Peter XuOriginally QMP goes through these steps:
JSON Parser --> QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ (2) (3) |
(1) | \|/ (4)
+--------- main thread --------+This patch does this:
JSON Parser QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ | /|\ (4) |
| | (2) | (3) | (5)
(1) | +-----> | \|/
+--------- main thread <-------+So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
--- monitor.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
monitor.c +178 -23
@@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ typedef struct {*/ QmpCommandList *commands;bool qmp_caps[QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ]; +/* +* Protects qmp request/response queue. Please take monitor_lock +* first when used together. +*/ +QemuMutex qmp_queue_lock; +/* Input queue that holds all the parsed QMP requests */ +GQueue *qmp_requests; } MonitorQMP;/*
@@ -218,6 +225,8 @@ struct Monitor {/* Let's add monitor global variables to this struct. */ static struct {IOThread *mon_iothread; +/* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from IO thread */ +QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh; } mon_global;/* QMP checker flags */
@@ -600,11 +609,13 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush, {memset (mon,0 ,sizeof (Monitor));qemu_mutex_init (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_init (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); mon->outbuf =qstring_new ();/* Use *mon_cmds by default. */ mon->cmd_table = mon_cmds; mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; + mon->qmp.qmp_requests =g_queue_new (); }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)
@@ -617,6 +628,8 @@ static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)readline_free (mon->rs);QDECREF (mon->outbuf);qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); } char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,
@@ -1056,6 +1069,16 @@ static void monitor_init_qmp_commands(void) qmp_marshal_qmp_capabilities, QCO_NO_OPTIONS); } +static bool qmp_cap_enabled (Monitor *mon,QMPCapability cap) +{ +return mon->qmp.qmp_caps[cap]; +} + +static bool qmp_oob_enabled (Monitor *mon) +{ +return qmp_cap_enabled (mon,QMP_CAPABILITY_OOB ); +} +static void qmp_caps_check (Monitor *mon,QMPCapabilityList *list,Error **errp) {
@@ -3866,30 +3889,39 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon, QObject *rsp,qobject_decref (rsp); } -static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +struct QMPRequest { +/* Owner of the request */ +Monitor *mon; +/* "id" field of the request */ +QObject *id; +/* Request object to be handled */ +QObject *req; +/* +* Whether we need to resume the monitor afterward. This flag is +* used to emulate the old QMP server behavior that the current +* command must be completed before execution of the next one. +*/ +bool need_resume; +}; +typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest ; + +/* +* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj +* and objects inside it before return. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) { -QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ; +Monitor *mon, *old_mon; +QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); -Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - -Error *err =NULL ; +bool need_resume; - req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); -if (!req && !err) { -/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ -error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); - } -if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +g_free (req_obj);if (trace_event_get_state_backends (TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND )) {QString *req_json =qobject_to_json (req);
@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon; - rsp =qmp_dispatch (cur_mon->qmp.commands, req); + rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); cur_mon = old_mon;
@@ -3916,12 +3948,122 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) } } -err_out: -monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp, err, id); +/* Respond if necessary */ +monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp,NULL , id); + +/* This pairs with the monitor_suspend() in handle_qmp_command(). */ +if (need_resume) { +monitor_resume (mon); + }qobject_decref (req); } +/* +* Pop one QMP request from monitor queues, return NULL if not found. +* We are using round-robin fashion to pop the request, to avoid +* processing command only on a very busy monitor. To achieve that, +* when we processed one request on specific monitor, we put that +* monitor to the end of mon_list queue. +*/ +static QMPRequest *monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (void ) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =NULL ; +Monitor *mon; + +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + req_obj =g_queue_pop_head (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +if (req_obj) { +break ; + } + } + +if (req_obj) { +/* +* We found one request on the monitor. Degrade this monitor's +* priority to lowest by re-inserting it to end of queue. +*/ +QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry); +QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL (&mon_list, mon, entry); + } + +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); + +return req_obj; +} + +static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher (void *data) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (); + +if (req_obj) { +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + } +} + +static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +{ +QObject *req, *id =NULL ; +QDict *qdict =NULL ; +MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); +Monitor *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); +Error *err =NULL ; +QMPRequest *req_obj; + + req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); +if (!req && !err) { +/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ +error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); + } +if (err) { +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); +return ; + } + + qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); +if (qdict) { + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); + }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + + req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); + req_obj->mon = mon; + req_obj->id = id; + req_obj->req = req; + req_obj->need_resume = false; + +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is +* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } + +/* +* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, +* etc. will be delivered to the handler side. +*/ +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_requests, req_obj); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + +/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +} +static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size) {Monitor *mon = opaque;
@@ -4134,6 +4276,15 @@ static void monitor_iothread_init(void) { mon_global.mon_iothread =iothread_create ("mon_iothread" , &error_abort); + +/* +* This MUST be on main loop thread since we have commands that +* have assumption to be run on main loop thread. It would be +* nice that one day we can remove this assumption in the future. +*/ + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =aio_bh_new (qemu_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher, +NULL ); }void monitor_init_globals (void )
@@ -4280,6 +4431,10 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void) }qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +/* QEMUBHs needs to be deleted before destroying the IOThread. */ +qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =NULL ; +iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 9 lines · Peter Xu
Originally QMP goes through these steps:
JSON Parser --> QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ (2) (3) | (1) | \|/ (4) +--------- main thread --------+This patch does this:
Quoted 8 lines
JSON Parser QMP Dispatcher --> Respond /|\ | /|\ (4) | | | (2) | (3) | (5) (1) | +-----> | \|/ +--------- main thread <-------+So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
s/following/follow/
Quoted 6 lines
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
--- monitor.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);
More context conflicts.
Quoted 4 lines
+/*
+ * Pop one QMP request from monitor queues, return NULL if not found.
+ * We are using round-robin fashion to pop the request, to avoid
+ * processing command only on a very busy monitor. To achieve that,
s/command/commands/
Quoted 1 line
+ * when we processed one request on specific monitor, we put that
s/processed/process/
s/on/on a/
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4045
Quoted 7 lines
+ * monitor to the end of
mon_listqueue.
+ */monitor.c +5
-0+static QMPRequest *monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (void ) + +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until
s/current/the current/g
Quoted 1 line
+ * it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is
/is responded/has responded/
Review
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-0+ * not enabled, the server will never drop any command. + */
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
In reply to Peter XuHi
Quoted 265 lines · Peter Xu
Originally QMP goes through these steps:
JSON Parser --> QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ (2) (3) | (1) | \|/ (4) +--------- main thread --------+This patch does this:
JSON Parser QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ | /|\ (4) | | | (2) | (3) | (5) (1) | +-----> | \|/ +--------- main thread <-------+So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)monitor.c +145
-23@@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ typedef struct {*/ QmpCommandList *commands;bool qmp_caps[QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ]; +/* +* Protects qmp request/response queue. Please take monitor_lock +* first when used together. +*/ +QemuMutex qmp_queue_lock; +/* Input queue that holds all the parsed QMP requests */ +GQueue *qmp_requests; } MonitorQMP;/* @@ -218,6 +225,8 @@ struct Monitor {/* Let's add monitor global variables to this struct. */ static struct {IOThread *mon_iothread; +/* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from IO thread */ +QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh; } mon_global;/* QMP checker flags */ @@ -600,11 +609,13 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush, {memset (mon,0 ,sizeof (Monitor));qemu_mutex_init (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_init (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); mon->outbuf =qstring_new ();/* Use *mon_cmds by default. */ mon->cmd_table = mon_cmds; mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; + mon->qmp.qmp_requests =g_queue_new (); }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)@@ -617,6 +628,8 @@ static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)readline_free (mon->rs);QDECREF (mon->outbuf);qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); } char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,@@ -1056,6 +1069,16 @@ static void monitor_init_qmp_commands(void) qmp_marshal_qmp_capabilities, QCO_NO_OPTIONS); } +static bool qmp_cap_enabled (Monitor *mon,QMPCapability cap) +{ +return mon->qmp.qmp_caps[cap]; +} + +static bool qmp_oob_enabled (Monitor *mon) +{ +return qmp_cap_enabled (mon,QMP_CAPABILITY_OOB ); +} +static void qmp_caps_check (Monitor *mon,QMPCapabilityList *list,Error **errp) {@@ -3866,30 +3889,39 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon, QObject *rsp,qobject_decref (rsp); } -static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +struct QMPRequest { +/* Owner of the request */ +Monitor *mon; +/* "id" field of the request */ +QObject *id; +/* Request object to be handled */ +QObject *req; +/* +* Whether we need to resume the monitor afterward. This flag is +* used to emulate the old QMP server behavior that the current +* command must be completed before execution of the next one. +*/ +bool need_resume; +}; +typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest ; + +/* +* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj +* and objects inside it before return. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) { -QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ; +Monitor *mon, *old_mon; +QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); -Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - -Error *err =NULL ; +bool need_resume; - req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); -if (!req && !err) { -/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ -error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); - } -if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +g_free (req_obj);if (trace_event_get_state_backends (TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND )) {QString *req_json =qobject_to_json (req);@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon; - rsp =qmp_dispatch (cur_mon->qmp.commands, req); + rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); cur_mon = old_mon;@@ -3916,12 +3948,122 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) } } -err_out: -monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp, err, id); +/* Respond if necessary */ +monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp,NULL , id); + +/* This pairs with the monitor_suspend() in handle_qmp_command(). */ +if (need_resume) { +monitor_resume (mon); + }qobject_decref (req); } +/* +* Pop one QMP request from monitor queues, return NULL if not found. +* We are using round-robin fashion to pop the request, to avoid +* processing command only on a very busy monitor. To achieve that, +* when we processed one request on specific monitor, we put that +* monitor to the end of mon_list queue. +*/ +static QMPRequest *monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (void ) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =NULL ; +Monitor *mon; + +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + req_obj =g_queue_pop_head (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +if (req_obj) { +break ; + } + } + +if (req_obj) { +/* +* We found one request on the monitor. Degrade this monitor's +* priority to lowest by re-inserting it to end of queue. +*/ +QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry); +QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL (&mon_list, mon, entry); + } + +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); + +return req_obj; +} + +static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher (void *data) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (); + +if (req_obj) { +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + } +} + +static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +{ +QObject *req, *id =NULL ; +QDict *qdict =NULL ; +MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); +Monitor *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); +Error *err =NULL ; +QMPRequest *req_obj; + + req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); +if (!req && !err) { +/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ +error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); + } +if (err) { +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); +return ; + } + + qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); +if (qdict) { + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); + }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + + req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); + req_obj->mon = mon; + req_obj->id = id; + req_obj->req = req; + req_obj->need_resume = false; + +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4056
Quoted 10 lines
monitor.c +10
-0+* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } + +/* +* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id,
I think the order is not respected if subsequent messages have errors (in either json parsing, dispatch_check_obj, oob_check). So if I enable oob, and queue a few command, then send a bad command/message, I won't be able to tell for which command.
Quoted 44 lines
monitor.c +23
-1+* etc. will be delivered to the handler side. +*/ +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_requests, req_obj); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + +/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +} +static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size) {Monitor *mon = opaque;@@ -4134,6 +4276,15 @@ static void monitor_iothread_init(void) { mon_global.mon_iothread =iothread_create ("mon_iothread" , &error_abort); + +/* +* This MUST be on main loop thread since we have commands that +* have assumption to be run on main loop thread. It would be +* nice that one day we can remove this assumption in the future. +*/ + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =aio_bh_new (qemu_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher, +NULL ); }void monitor_init_globals (void )@@ -4280,6 +4431,10 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void) }qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +/* QEMUBHs needs to be deleted before destroying the IOThread. */ +qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =NULL ; +iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ; } --2.14.3
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 275 lines · * Marc-André Lureau ([email protected]) wrote:
Hi
Quoted 272 lines · Peter Xu
Originally QMP goes through these steps:
JSON Parser --> QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ (2) (3) | (1) | \|/ (4) +--------- main thread --------+This patch does this:
JSON Parser QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ | /|\ (4) | | | (2) | (3) | (5) (1) | +-----> | \|/ +--------- main thread <-------+So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)monitor.c +152
-23@@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ typedef struct {*/ QmpCommandList *commands;bool qmp_caps[QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ]; +/* +* Protects qmp request/response queue. Please take monitor_lock +* first when used together. +*/ +QemuMutex qmp_queue_lock; +/* Input queue that holds all the parsed QMP requests */ +GQueue *qmp_requests; } MonitorQMP;/* @@ -218,6 +225,8 @@ struct Monitor {/* Let's add monitor global variables to this struct. */ static struct {IOThread *mon_iothread; +/* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from IO thread */ +QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh; } mon_global;/* QMP checker flags */ @@ -600,11 +609,13 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush, {memset (mon,0 ,sizeof (Monitor));qemu_mutex_init (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_init (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); mon->outbuf =qstring_new ();/* Use *mon_cmds by default. */ mon->cmd_table = mon_cmds; mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; + mon->qmp.qmp_requests =g_queue_new (); }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)@@ -617,6 +628,8 @@ static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)readline_free (mon->rs);QDECREF (mon->outbuf);qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); } char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,@@ -1056,6 +1069,16 @@ static void monitor_init_qmp_commands(void) qmp_marshal_qmp_capabilities, QCO_NO_OPTIONS); } +static bool qmp_cap_enabled (Monitor *mon,QMPCapability cap) +{ +return mon->qmp.qmp_caps[cap]; +} + +static bool qmp_oob_enabled (Monitor *mon) +{ +return qmp_cap_enabled (mon,QMP_CAPABILITY_OOB ); +} +static void qmp_caps_check (Monitor *mon,QMPCapabilityList *list,Error **errp) {@@ -3866,30 +3889,39 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon, QObject *rsp,qobject_decref (rsp); } -static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +struct QMPRequest { +/* Owner of the request */ +Monitor *mon; +/* "id" field of the request */ +QObject *id; +/* Request object to be handled */ +QObject *req; +/* +* Whether we need to resume the monitor afterward. This flag is +* used to emulate the old QMP server behavior that the current +* command must be completed before execution of the next one. +*/ +bool need_resume; +}; +typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest ; + +/* +* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj +* and objects inside it before return. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) { -QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ; +Monitor *mon, *old_mon; +QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); -Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - -Error *err =NULL ; +bool need_resume; - req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); -if (!req && !err) { -/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ -error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); - } -if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +g_free (req_obj);if (trace_event_get_state_backends (TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND )) {QString *req_json =qobject_to_json (req);@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon; - rsp =qmp_dispatch (cur_mon->qmp.commands, req); + rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); cur_mon = old_mon;@@ -3916,12 +3948,122 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) } } -err_out: -monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp, err, id); +/* Respond if necessary */ +monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp,NULL , id); + +/* This pairs with the monitor_suspend() in handle_qmp_command(). */ +if (need_resume) { +monitor_resume (mon); + }qobject_decref (req); } +/* +* Pop one QMP request from monitor queues, return NULL if not found. +* We are using round-robin fashion to pop the request, to avoid +* processing command only on a very busy monitor. To achieve that, +* when we processed one request on specific monitor, we put that +* monitor to the end of mon_list queue. +*/ +static QMPRequest *monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (void ) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =NULL ; +Monitor *mon; + +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + req_obj =g_queue_pop_head (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +if (req_obj) { +break ; + } + } + +if (req_obj) { +/* +* We found one request on the monitor. Degrade this monitor's +* priority to lowest by re-inserting it to end of queue. +*/ +QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry); +QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL (&mon_list, mon, entry); + } + +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); + +return req_obj; +} + +static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher (void *data) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (); + +if (req_obj) { +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + } +} + +static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +{ +QObject *req, *id =NULL ; +QDict *qdict =NULL ; +MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); +Monitor *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); +Error *err =NULL ; +QMPRequest *req_obj; + + req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); +if (!req && !err) { +/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ +error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); + } +if (err) { +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); +return ; + } + + qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); +if (qdict) { + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); + }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + + req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); + req_obj->mon = mon; + req_obj->id = id; + req_obj->req = req; + req_obj->need_resume = false; + +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is +* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } +
Quoted 8 lines
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4056
Quoted 3 lines
monitor.c +3
-0+/* +* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, I think the order is not respected if subsequent messages have errors (in either json parsing,
dispatch_check_obj,oob_check). So if I enable oob, and queue a few command, then send a bad command/message, I won't be able to tell for which command.
Doesn't OOB insist on having an ID field with the command?
Dave
Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 33 lines
monitor.c +19
-0+* etc. will be delivered to the handler side. +*/ +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_requests, req_obj); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + +/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +} +static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size) {Monitor *mon = opaque;@@ -4134,6 +4276,15 @@ static void monitor_iothread_init(void) { mon_global.mon_iothread =iothread_create ("mon_iothread" , &error_abort); + +/* +* This MUST be on main loop thread since we have commands that +* have assumption to be run on main loop thread. It would be +* nice that one day we can remove this assumption in the future. +*/ + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =aio_bh_new (qemu_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher, +NULL ); }void monitor_init_globals (void )@@ -4280,6 +4431,10 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void) }qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock);
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 11 lines
monitor.c +4
-1+/* QEMUBHs needs to be deleted before destroying the IOThread. */ +qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =NULL ; +iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ; } --2.14.3
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 29 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 20 lines
So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
monitor.c +12
-0+ +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is +* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } +Quoted 8 lines
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4056
Quoted 3 lines
monitor.c +3
-0+/* +* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, I think the order is not respected if subsequent messages have errors (in either json parsing,
dispatch_check_obj,oob_check). So if I enable oob, and queue a few command, then send a bad command/message, I won't be able to tell for which command.
Quoted 1 line
Doesn't OOB insist on having an ID field with the command?
OOB insists on an id field - but there is the situation that SOME errors occur even before the id field has been encountered (for example, if you send non-JSON, the parser gets all confused - it has to emit SOME error, but that error can't refer to an id because it wasn't able to parse one yet). A well-formed client will never do this, but we MUST be robust even in the face of a malicious client (or even a well-intentioned client but a noisy communication medium that manages to corrupt bytes). I'm not sure if the testsuite adequately covers what happens in this scenario. Peter?
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Hi
Quoted 36 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 31 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 21 lines
So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
monitor.c +13
-0+ +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is +* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } + +/* Quoted 8 lines
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4056
Quoted 2 lines
monitor.c +2
-0+* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, I think the order is not respected if subsequent messages have errors (in either json parsing,
dispatch_check_obj,oob_check). So if I enable oob, and queue a few command, then send a bad command/message, I won't be able to tell for which command.Quoted 1 line
Doesn't OOB insist on having an ID field with the command?
Quoted 8 lines
OOB insists on an id field - but there is the situation that SOME errors occur even before the id field has been encountered (for example, if you send non-JSON, the parser gets all confused - it has to emit SOME error, but that error can't refer to an id because it wasn't able to parse one yet). A well-formed client will never do this, but we MUST be robust even in the face of a malicious client (or even a well-intentioned client but a noisy communication medium that manages to corrupt bytes). I'm not sure if the testsuite adequately covers what happens in this scenario. Peter?
I think a solution would be to queue the error reply (the reply only) instead of replying directly.
Another problem I see with the current solution is that pending commands are not discarded when a new client connects. So I suppose a new client can receive replies for commands it didn't make, with id namespace that may conflict with its own. breaking ordering etc. A possible solution is to mark the pending request to not send the reply somehow?
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 48 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 36 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 31 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 21 lines
So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
monitor.c +13
-0+ +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is +* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } + +/* Quoted 8 lines
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4056
Quoted 2 lines
monitor.c +2
-0+* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, I think the order is not respected if subsequent messages have errors (in either json parsing,
dispatch_check_obj,oob_check). So if I enable oob, and queue a few command, then send a bad command/message, I won't be able to tell for which command.Quoted 1 line
Doesn't OOB insist on having an ID field with the command?
Quoted 8 lines
OOB insists on an id field - but there is the situation that SOME errors occur even before the id field has been encountered (for example, if you send non-JSON, the parser gets all confused - it has to emit SOME error, but that error can't refer to an id because it wasn't able to parse one yet). A well-formed client will never do this, but we MUST be robust even in the face of a malicious client (or even a well-intentioned client but a noisy communication medium that manages to corrupt bytes). I'm not sure if the testsuite adequately covers what happens in this scenario. Peter?
Quoted 2 lines
I think a solution would be to queue the error reply (the reply only) instead of replying directly.
IMHO this should be fine.
Note that to be compatible with existing QMP we'll suspend the monitor if OOB is not enabled in the session on receiving the first command. It means even if another faulty command is sent after the good one, it'll not be read by QMP parser until the first one is fully complete.
Since I'm working on some test patches after all, I'll try to add a test case for this to see whether Eric would like them too.
Quoted 7 lines
Another problem I see with the current solution is that pending commands are not discarded when a new client connects. So I suppose a new client can receive replies for commands it didn't make, with id namespace that may conflict with its own. breaking ordering etc. A possible solution is to mark the pending request to not send the reply somehow?
Yeah, to be simpler - maybe we can even drop the commands that have not yet been dispatched?
I'll treat a command as "complete" only until the client receives a response, otherwise if a client disconnects before receiving a reply then I think it's fine the behavior is undefined - IMHO it's fine either the QMP server executes the command or not (and no matter what, we drop the responses). Would that work?
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 12 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 1 line
Doesn't OOB insist on having an ID field with the command?
OOB insists on an id field - but there is the situation that SOME errors occur even before the id field has been encountered (for example, if you send non-JSON, the parser gets all confused - it has to emit SOME error, but that error can't refer to an id because it wasn't able to parse one yet). A well-formed client will never do this, but we MUST be robust even in the face of a malicious client (or even a well-intentioned client but a noisy communication medium that manages to corrupt bytes). I'm not sure if the testsuite adequately covers what happens in this scenario. Peter?
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I think a solution would be to queue the error reply (the reply only) instead of replying directly.
IMHO this should be fine.
Seems reasonable - conceptually, the error reply comes no sooner than pre-patch (the client wouldn't see a parse error message until after all earlier successful parsed messages completed), making a parse error a sort of synchronization barrier (if the client gets one, then all outstanding message prior to the parse error have finished sending replies to the client, and nothing after the parse error has been processed at the time the error message was sent).
Quoted 8 lines
Note that to be compatible with existing QMP we'll suspend the monitor if OOB is not enabled in the session on receiving the first command. It means even if another faulty command is sent after the good one, it'll not be read by QMP parser until the first one is fully complete.
Since I'm working on some test patches after all, I'll try to add a test case for this to see whether Eric would like them too.
Yes, these are the sorts of bug fixes and test suite coverage that we want to include during freeze, for better robustness.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Another problem I see with the current solution is that pending commands are not discarded when a new client connects. So I suppose a new client can receive replies for commands it didn't make, with id namespace that may conflict with its own. breaking ordering etc. A possible solution is to mark the pending request to not send the reply somehow?
Quoted 8 lines
Yeah, to be simpler - maybe we can even drop the commands that have not yet been dispatched?
I'll treat a command as "complete" only until the client receives a response, otherwise if a client disconnects before receiving a reply then I think it's fine the behavior is undefined - IMHO it's fine either the QMP server executes the command or not (and no matter what, we drop the responses). Would that work?
If a client disconnects before receiving a reply, I'm fine with either approach (the command gets discarded from the queue and never run - which matches if the client disconnect raced with the server actually getting the command, or the command ran but the response is dropped - which matches pre-patch behavior), while agreeing that sending the response to the next client is probably not a good idea (clients are supposed to ignore unknown id's, but we can't guarantee an 'id' collision will not confuse the client).
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
In reply to Peter XuQuoted 155 lines · Peter Xu
Originally QMP goes through these steps:
JSON Parser --> QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ (2) (3) | (1) | \|/ (4) +--------- main thread --------+This patch does this:
JSON Parser QMP Dispatcher --> Respond
/|\ | /|\ (4) | | | (2) | (3) | (5) (1) | +-----> | \|/ +--------- main thread <-------+So the parsing job and the dispatching job is isolated now. It gives us a chance in following up patches to totally move the parser outside.
The isolation is done using one QEMUBH. Only one dispatcher QEMUBH is used for all the monitors.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 178 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)monitor.c +52
-20@@ -172,6 +172,13 @@ typedef struct {*/ QmpCommandList *commands;bool qmp_caps[QMP_CAPABILITY__MAX ]; +/* +* Protects qmp request/response queue. Please take monitor_lock +* first when used together. +*/ +QemuMutex qmp_queue_lock; +/* Input queue that holds all the parsed QMP requests */ +GQueue *qmp_requests; } MonitorQMP;/* @@ -218,6 +225,8 @@ struct Monitor {/* Let's add monitor global variables to this struct. */ static struct {IOThread *mon_iothread; +/* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from IO thread */ +QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh; } mon_global;/* QMP checker flags */ @@ -600,11 +609,13 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush, {memset (mon,0 ,sizeof (Monitor));qemu_mutex_init (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_init (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); mon->outbuf =qstring_new ();/* Use *mon_cmds by default. */ mon->cmd_table = mon_cmds; mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; + mon->qmp.qmp_requests =g_queue_new (); }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)@@ -617,6 +628,8 @@ static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)readline_free (mon->rs);QDECREF (mon->outbuf);qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->out_lock); +qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); } char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,@@ -1056,6 +1069,16 @@ static void monitor_init_qmp_commands(void) qmp_marshal_qmp_capabilities, QCO_NO_OPTIONS); } +static bool qmp_cap_enabled (Monitor *mon,QMPCapability cap) +{ +return mon->qmp.qmp_caps[cap]; +} + +static bool qmp_oob_enabled (Monitor *mon) +{ +return qmp_cap_enabled (mon,QMP_CAPABILITY_OOB ); +} +static void qmp_caps_check (Monitor *mon,QMPCapabilityList *list,Error **errp) {@@ -3866,30 +3889,39 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon, QObject *rsp,qobject_decref (rsp); } -static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +struct QMPRequest { +/* Owner of the request */ +Monitor *mon; +/* "id" field of the request */ +QObject *id; +/* Request object to be handled */ +QObject *req; +/* +* Whether we need to resume the monitor afterward. This flag is +* used to emulate the old QMP server behavior that the current +* command must be completed before execution of the next one. +*/ +bool need_resume; +}; +typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest ; + +/* +* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj +* and objects inside it before return. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) { -QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ; +Monitor *mon, *old_mon; +QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); -Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - -Error *err =NULL ; +bool need_resume; - req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); -if (!req && !err) { -/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ -error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); - } -if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +g_free (req_obj);if (trace_event_get_state_backends (TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND )) {QString *req_json =qobject_to_json (req);
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 2 lines
monitor.c +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;
There is another issue with this series, since cur_mon is global (and not protected), an oob command may change the cur_mon while another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid of cur_mon (my preference, but much harder)
Quoted 162 lines
monitor.c +126
-4- rsp =qmp_dispatch (cur_mon->qmp.commands, req); + rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); cur_mon = old_mon;@@ -3916,12 +3948,122 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) } } -err_out: -monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp, err, id); +/* Respond if necessary */ +monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp,NULL , id); + +/* This pairs with the monitor_suspend() in handle_qmp_command(). */ +if (need_resume) { +monitor_resume (mon); + }qobject_decref (req); } +/* +* Pop one QMP request from monitor queues, return NULL if not found. +* We are using round-robin fashion to pop the request, to avoid +* processing command only on a very busy monitor. To achieve that, +* when we processed one request on specific monitor, we put that +* monitor to the end of mon_list queue. +*/ +static QMPRequest *monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (void ) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =NULL ; +Monitor *mon; + +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + req_obj =g_queue_pop_head (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +if (req_obj) { +break ; + } + } + +if (req_obj) { +/* +* We found one request on the monitor. Degrade this monitor's +* priority to lowest by re-inserting it to end of queue. +*/ +QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry); +QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL (&mon_list, mon, entry); + } + +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); + +return req_obj; +} + +static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher (void *data) +{ +QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one (); + +if (req_obj) { +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + } +} + +static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) +{ +QObject *req, *id =NULL ; +QDict *qdict =NULL ; +MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); +Monitor *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); +Error *err =NULL ; +QMPRequest *req_obj; + + req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); +if (!req && !err) { +/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ +error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); + } +if (err) { +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); +return ; + } + + qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); +if (qdict) { + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); + }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + + req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); + req_obj->mon = mon; + req_obj->id = id; + req_obj->req = req; + req_obj->need_resume = false; + +/* +* If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old +* behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until +* it is responded. This helps make sure that as long as OOB is +* not enabled, the server will never drop any command. +*/ +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +monitor_suspend (mon); + req_obj->need_resume = true; + } + +/* +* Put the request to the end of queue so that requests will be +* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, +* etc. will be delivered to the handler side. +*/ +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_requests, req_obj); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + +/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +} +static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size) {Monitor *mon = opaque;@@ -4134,6 +4276,15 @@ static void monitor_iothread_init(void) { mon_global.mon_iothread =iothread_create ("mon_iothread" , &error_abort); + +/* +* This MUST be on main loop thread since we have commands that +* have assumption to be run on main loop thread. It would be +* nice that one day we can remove this assumption in the future. +*/ + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =aio_bh_new (qemu_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher, +NULL ); }void monitor_init_globals (void )@@ -4280,6 +4431,10 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void) }qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +/* QEMUBHs needs to be deleted before destroying the IOThread. */ +qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); + mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =NULL ; +iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ; } --2.14.3
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
monitor.c +13
-19+/* +* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj +* and objects inside it before return. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) { -QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ; +Monitor *mon, *old_mon; +QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); -Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - -Error *err =NULL ; +bool need_resume; - req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); -if (!req && !err) { -/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ -error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); - } -if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +g_free (req_obj);
Quoted 12 lines
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);monitor.c +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)
IMHO it is fine too.
Note that this cur_mon operation is in monitor_qmp_dispatch_one() now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all the cur_mon references are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.
I would be far more than glad to see cur_mon go away one day.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Hi
Quoted 54 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
monitor.c +13
-19+/* +* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj +* and objects inside it before return. +*/ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) { -QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id =NULL ; +Monitor *mon, *old_mon; +QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;QDict *qdict =NULL ; -MonitorQMP *mon_qmp =container_of (parser, MonitorQMP, parser); -Monitor *old_mon, *mon =container_of (mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - -Error *err =NULL ; +bool need_resume; - req =json_parser_parse_err (tokens,NULL , &err); -if (!req && !err) { -/* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ -error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); - } -if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +g_free (req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);monitor.c +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)
Quoted 6 lines
IMHO it is fine too.
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.
But monitor_qmp_dispatch_one() is called from iothread if the command is oob, so cur_mon may be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?
Quoted 7 lines
I would be far more than glad to see
cur_mongo away one day.Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?
You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10 -6
@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;
@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );
@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }
@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }
Then we forbit touching that evil cur_mon in OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,
That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decision
- file & socket lookup (fd: & /dev/fdset etc)
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands, cpu_path, capabilities..
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 127 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decision
IMO this should not be a problem, since any QMP handler (including OOB-capable ones) will be with an Error** there, so logically speaking people should never call things like error_report() in that.
Quoted 1 line
- file & socket lookup (fd: &
/dev/fdsetetc)
I suppose only very rare commands will use it? It'll be a big problem to solve when we want to completely remove cur_mon though.
Quoted 1 line
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands,
cpu_path, capabilities..
This is very rare to be used too? Most commands should not use them AFAIU.
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Anyway I think yes this is still a good option (though the cur_mon logic will be a bit more complicated).
Do you plan to post some patch about this, or do you want me to do this? I suppose we'll change the qemu_thread_create() a bit to pass the cur_mon inside, and I suppose this might be better material after 2.12 release if OOB is off now.
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Hi Peter
Quoted 151 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 127 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decisionIMO this should not be a problem, since any QMP handler (including OOB-capable ones) will be with an Error** there, so logically speaking people should never call things like
error_report()in that.Quoted 1 line
- file & socket lookup (fd: &
/dev/fdsetetc)I suppose only very rare commands will use it? It'll be a big problem to solve when we want to completely remove
cur_monthough.Quoted 1 line
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands,
cpu_path, capabilities..This is very rare to be used too? Most commands should not use them AFAIU.
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Quoted 7 lines
Anyway I think yes this is still a good option (though the
cur_monlogic will be a bit more complicated).Do you plan to post some patch about this, or do you want me to do this? I suppose we'll change the
qemu_thread_create()a bit to pass thecur_moninside, and I suppose this might be better material after 2.12 release if OOB is off now.
Have you looked at making cur_mon per-thread?
thanks
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 157 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi Peter
Quoted 154 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 127 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decisionIMO this should not be a problem, since any QMP handler (including OOB-capable ones) will be with an Error** there, so logically speaking people should never call things like
error_report()in that.Quoted 1 line
- file & socket lookup (fd: &
/dev/fdsetetc)I suppose only very rare commands will use it? It'll be a big problem to solve when we want to completely remove
cur_monthough.Quoted 1 line
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands,
cpu_path, capabilities..This is very rare to be used too? Most commands should not use them AFAIU.
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Anyway I think yes this is still a good option (though the
cur_monlogic will be a bit more complicated).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Do you plan to post some patch about this, or do you want me to do this? I suppose we'll change the
qemu_thread_create()a bit to pass thecur_moninside, and I suppose this might be better material after 2.12 release if OOB is off now.Have you looked at making
cur_monper-thread?
Above was my idea, nothing else has been done.
Please feel free to post a patch for this, or I'll do this after 2.12 release.
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Hi
Quoted 163 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 162 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi Peter
Quoted 158 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 127 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decisionIMO this should not be a problem, since any QMP handler (including OOB-capable ones) will be with an Error** there, so logically speaking people should never call things like
error_report()in that.Quoted 1 line
- file & socket lookup (fd: &
/dev/fdsetetc)I suppose only very rare commands will use it? It'll be a big problem to solve when we want to completely remove
cur_monthough.Quoted 1 line
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands,
cpu_path, capabilities..This is very rare to be used too? Most commands should not use them AFAIU.
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Anyway I think yes this is still a good option (though the
cur_monlogic will be a bit more complicated).Do you plan to post some patch about this, or do you want me to do this? I suppose we'll change the
qemu_thread_create()a bit to pass thecur_moninside, and I suppose this might be better material after 2.12 release if OOB is off now.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Have you looked at making
cur_monper-thread?Above was my idea, nothing else has been done.
Please feel free to post a patch for this, or I'll do this after 2.12 release.
If it's fixed after 2.12, I think we should document the race as a known issue.
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 166 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 163 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 162 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi Peter
Quoted 158 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 127 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decisionIMO this should not be a problem, since any QMP handler (including OOB-capable ones) will be with an Error** there, so logically speaking people should never call things like
error_report()in that.Quoted 1 line
- file & socket lookup (fd: &
/dev/fdsetetc)I suppose only very rare commands will use it? It'll be a big problem to solve when we want to completely remove
cur_monthough.Quoted 1 line
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands,
cpu_path, capabilities..This is very rare to be used too? Most commands should not use them AFAIU.
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Anyway I think yes this is still a good option (though the
cur_monlogic will be a bit more complicated).Do you plan to post some patch about this, or do you want me to do this? I suppose we'll change the
qemu_thread_create()a bit to pass thecur_moninside, and I suppose this might be better material after 2.12 release if OOB is off now.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Have you looked at making
cur_monper-thread?Above was my idea, nothing else has been done.
Please feel free to post a patch for this, or I'll do this after 2.12 release.
If it's fixed after 2.12, I think we should document the race as a known issue.
Do you mean this page?
https://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.12
To be simpler, I'll see whether I can post the patches soon, and whether that can be accepted as 2.12 material.
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 14/23] monitor: separate QMP parser and dispatcher
Quoted 174 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 173 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 169 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 157 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi Peter
Quoted 154 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 127 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 124 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 59 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 56 lines · Peter Xu
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 37 lines
(quoted diff) +13
-19+/* + * Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj + * and objects inside it before return. + */ +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj) { - QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id = NULL; + Monitor *mon, *old_mon; + QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id; QDict *qdict = NULL; - MonitorQMP *mon_qmp = container_of(parser, MonitorQMP, parser); - Monitor *old_mon, *mon = container_of(mon_qmp, Monitor, qmp); - - Error *err = NULL; + bool need_resume; - req = json_parser_parse_err(tokens, NULL, &err); - if (!req && !err) { - /* json_parser_parse_err() sucks: can fail without setting @err */ - error_setg(&err, QERR_JSON_PARSING); - } - if (err) { - goto err_out; - } + req = req_obj->req; + mon = req_obj->mon; + id = req_obj->id; + need_resume = req_obj->need_resume; - qdict = qobject_to_qdict(req); - if (qdict) { - id = qdict_get(qdict, "id"); - qobject_incref(id); - qdict_del(qdict, "id"); - } /* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ + g_free(req_obj);Quoted 12 lines
Review static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 3933
Quoted 5 lines
if (trace_event_get_state_backends(TRACE_HANDLE_QMP_COMMAND)) { QString *req_json = qobject_to_json(req);(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -3900,7 +3932,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) old_mon = cur_mon; cur_mon = mon;There is another issue with this series, since
cur_monis global (and not protected), an oob command may change thecur_monwhile another command is running in the main thread with unexpected consequences. I don't have a clear idea what is the best way to solve it. Making the variable per-thread, or going all the way to get rid ofcur_mon(my preference, but much harder)IMHO it is fine too.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this
cur_monoperation is inmonitor_qmp_dispatch_one()now, which is still running in main thread. So AFAICT all thecur_monreferences are in main thread, and monitor IOThread does not modify that variable at all. Then we should probably be safe.But
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()is called from iothread if the command is oob, socur_monmay be updated while another command is running in main thread, or am I wrong?You are right. I missed that, sorry...
Would this be a simple workaround (but hopefully efficient) solution?
monitor.c +10
-6@@ -4023,7 +4023,7 @@ typedef struct QMPRequest QMPRequest;* Dispatch one single QMP request. The function will free the req_obj * and objects inside it before return. */ -static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj) +static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (QMPRequest *req_obj,bool hack_curmon) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id;@@ -4043,12 +4043,16 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj)QDECREF (req_json); } - old_mon = cur_mon; - cur_mon = mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + old_mon = cur_mon; + cur_mon = mon; + } rsp =qmp_dispatch (mon->qmp.commands, req); - cur_mon = old_mon; +if (hack_curmon) { + cur_mon = old_mon; + }if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" );@@ -4116,7 +4120,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)if (req_obj) {trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, true);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); }@@ -4175,7 +4179,7 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" ); -monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj, false);return ; }Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Then we forbit touching that evil
cur_monin OOB-capable command handlers. Thanks,That's not easy to enforce though, afaict it is being used for:
- error reporting decisionIMO this should not be a problem, since any QMP handler (including OOB-capable ones) will be with an Error** there, so logically speaking people should never call things like
error_report()in that.Quoted 1 line
- file & socket lookup (fd: &
/dev/fdsetetc)I suppose only very rare commands will use it? It'll be a big problem to solve when we want to completely remove
cur_monthough.Quoted 1 line
- the current state of the monitor / list of commands,
cpu_path, capabilities..This is very rare to be used too? Most commands should not use them AFAIU.
Quoted 3 lines
Wouldn't it be simpler to make it per-thread? I think it could also use helpers to push/pop the current monitor.
Anyway I think yes this is still a good option (though the
cur_monlogic will be a bit more complicated).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Do you plan to post some patch about this, or do you want me to do this? I suppose we'll change the
qemu_thread_create()a bit to pass thecur_moninside, and I suppose this might be better material after 2.12 release if OOB is off now.Have you looked at making
cur_monper-thread?Above was my idea, nothing else has been done.
Please feel free to post a patch for this, or I'll do this after 2.12 release.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
If it's fixed after 2.12, I think we should document the race as a known issue.
Do you mean this page?
https://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.12
To be simpler, I'll see whether I can post the patches soon, and whether that can be accepted as 2.12 material.
Btw I think it's not a 2.12 "known issue" - IMHO now it's not an issue at all. Because we don't have any real command support OOB (let's ignore the x-oob-test command since it never touches cur_mon). So cur_mon will still only be accessed by the main thread but never anything else.
I'll post the patch as usual in case further OOB commands will touch cur_mon, but I suppose that'll be for after the release.
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
PATCH v8 15/23 qmp: add new event "command-dropped"
In reply to Peter XuThis event will be emitted if one QMP command is dropped. Along, declare an enum for the reasons.
--- qapi/misc.json | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
qapi/misc.json +37 -0
@@ -3227,3 +3227,40 @@ # Since: 2.9 ## { 'command': 'query-vm-generation-id', 'returns': 'GuidInfo' } + +## +# @CommandDropReason: +# +# Reasons that caused one command to be dropped. +# +# @queue-full: the command queue is full. This can only occur when +# the client sends a new non-oob command before the +# response to the previous non-oob command has been +# received. +# +# Since: 2.12 +## +{ 'enum': 'CommandDropReason', + 'data': [ 'queue-full' ] } + +## +# @COMMAND_DROPPED: +# +# Emitted when a command is dropped due to some reason. Commands can +# only be dropped when the oob capability is enabled. +# +# @id: The dropped command's "id" field. +# +# @reason: The reason why the command is dropped. +# +# Since: 2.12 +# +# Example: +# +# { "event": "COMMAND_DROPPED", +# "data": {"result": {"id": "libvirt-102", +# "reason": "queue-full" } } } +# +## +{ 'event': 'COMMAND_DROPPED' , + 'data': { 'id': 'any', 'reason': 'CommandDropReason' } }
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 15/23] qmp: add new event "command-dropped"
Quoted 1 line · Peter Xu
This event will be emitted if one QMP command is dropped. Along,
s/Along,/Also,/
Quoted 8 lines
declare an enum for the reasons.
Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- qapi/misc.json | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
Quoted 5 lines
qapi/misc.json +0
-0
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 16/23 monitor: send event when command queue full
In reply to Peter XuSet maximum QMP command queue length to 8. If queue full, instead of queue the command, we directly return a "command-dropped" event, telling client that specific command is dropped.
Note that this flow control mechanism is only valid if OOB is enabled. If it's not, the effective queue length will always be 1, which strictly follows original behavior of QMP command handling (which never drop messages).
--- monitor.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
monitor.c +17 -1
@@ -4007,6 +4007,8 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data) } } +#define QMP_REQ_QUEUE_LEN_MAX (8) +static void handle_qmp_command (JSONMessageParser *parser,GQueue *tokens) {QObject *req, *id =NULL ;
@@ -4040,6 +4042,9 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) req_obj->req = req; req_obj->need_resume = false; +/* Protect qmp_requests and fetching its length. */ +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +/* * If OOB is not enabled on current monitor, we'll emulate the old * behavior that we won't process current monitor any more until
@@ -4049,6 +4054,18 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) {monitor_suspend (mon); req_obj->need_resume = true; + }else { +/* Drop the request if queue is full. */ +if (mon->qmp.qmp_requests->length >=QMP_REQ_QUEUE_LEN_MAX ) { +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +qapi_event_send_command_dropped (id, +COMMAND_DROP_REASON_QUEUE_FULL , +NULL ); +qobject_decref (id); +qobject_decref (req); +g_free (req_obj); +return ; + } }/*
@@ -4056,7 +4073,6 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)* handled in time order. Ownership for req_obj, req, id, * etc. will be delivered to the handler side. */ -qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_requests, req_obj);qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 16/23] monitor: send event when command queue full
Quoted 1 line · Peter Xu
Set maximum QMP command queue length to 8. If queue full, instead of
If the queue is full
Quoted 1 line
queue the command, we directly return a "command-dropped" event, telling
s/queue/queuing/
Quoted 1 line
client that specific command is dropped.
s/client that/the client that a/
Quoted 4 lines
Note that this flow control mechanism is only valid if OOB is enabled. If it's not, the effective queue length will always be 1, which strictly follows original behavior of QMP command handling (which never drop
s/drop/drops/
Quoted 14 lines
messages).
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)monitor.c +0
-0
monitor.c static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data) · line 4010
Quoted 4 lines
monitor.c +1
-0@@ -4007,6 +4007,8 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data) } } +#define QMP_REQ_QUEUE_LEN_MAX (8)
Parens are redundant on a single int, but it doesn't hurt to leave them in a macro definition.
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4063
Quoted 11 lines
monitor.c +7
-0@@ -4049,6 +4054,18 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) {monitor_suspend (mon); req_obj->need_resume = true; + }else { +/* Drop the request if queue is full. */ +if (mon->qmp.qmp_requests->length >=QMP_REQ_QUEUE_LEN_MAX ) { +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +qapi_event_send_command_dropped (id, +COMMAND_DROP_REASON_QUEUE_FULL , +NULL );
Most qapi_event_send_* callers pass &error_abort (migration/ram.c being the only exception I could find); why not this one? I'm changing it for consistency; we can revert back to NULL if testing finds a problem with it.
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 17/23 qapi: introduce new cmd option "allow-oob"
In reply to Peter XuHere "oob" stands for "Out-Of-Band". When "allow-oob" is set, it means the command allows out-of-band execution.
The "oob" idea is proposed by Markus Armbruster in following thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg02057.html
This new "allow-oob" boolean will be exposed by "query-qmp-schema" as well for command entries, so that QMP clients can know which command can be used as out-of-band calls. For example the command "migrate" originally looks like:
{"name": "migrate", "ret-type": "17", "meta-type": "command",
"arg-type": "86"}
And it'll be changed into:
{"name": "migrate", "ret-type": "17", "allow-oob": false,
"meta-type": "command", "arg-type": "86"}
This patch only provides the QMP interface level changes. It does not contains the real out-of-band execution implementation yet.
--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 5 +++-- qapi/introspect.json | 6 +++++- scripts/qapi/commands.py | 18 +++++++++++++----- scripts/qapi/common.py | 15 ++++++++++----- scripts/qapi/doc.py | 2 +- scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 10 ++++++++-- tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 2 +- 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h +3 -2
@@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ typedef void (QmpCommandFunc)(QDict *, QObject **, Error **);typedef enum QmpCommandOptions { -QCO_NO_OPTIONS =0x0 , -QCO_NO_SUCCESS_RESP =0x1 , +QCO_NO_OPTIONS =0x0 , +QCO_NO_SUCCESS_RESP = (1U <<0 ), +QCO_ALLOW_OOB = (1U <<1 ), }QmpCommandOptions ; typedef struct QmpCommand
qapi/introspect.json +5 -1
@@ -259,12 +259,16 @@ # # @ret-type: the name of the command's result type. # +# @allow-oob: whether the command allows out-of-band execution. +# (Since: 2.12) +# # TODO: @success-response (currently irrelevant, because it's QGA, not QMP) # # Since: 2.5 ## { 'struct': 'SchemaInfoCommand', - 'data': { 'arg-type': 'str', 'ret-type': 'str' } } + 'data': { 'arg-type': 'str', 'ret-type': 'str', + 'allow-oob': 'bool' } } ## # @SchemaInfoEvent:
scripts/qapi/commands.py +13 -5
@@ -193,10 +193,18 @@ out: return ret -def gen_register_command(name, success_response): - options = 'QCO_NO_OPTIONS' +def gen_register_command(name, success_response, allow_oob): + options = [] + if not success_response: - options = 'QCO_NO_SUCCESS_RESP' + options += ['QCO_NO_SUCCESS_RESP'] + if allow_oob: + options += ['QCO_ALLOW_OOB'] + + if not options: + options = ['QCO_NO_OPTIONS'] + + options = " | ".join(options) ret = mcgen(''' qmp_register_command(cmds, "%(name)s",
@@ -268,7 +276,7 @@ void %(c_prefix)sqmp_init_marshal(QmpCommandList *cmds); genc.add(gen_registry(self._regy, self._prefix)) def visit_command(self, name, info, arg_type, ret_type, - gen, success_response, boxed): + gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob): if not gen: return self._genh.add(gen_command_decl(name, arg_type, boxed, ret_type))
@@ -277,7 +285,7 @@ void %(c_prefix)sqmp_init_marshal(QmpCommandList *cmds); self._genc.add(gen_marshal_output(ret_type)) self._genh.add(gen_marshal_decl(name)) self._genc.add(gen_marshal(name, arg_type, boxed, ret_type)) - self._regy += gen_register_command(name, success_response) + self._regy += gen_register_command(name, success_response, allow_oob) def gen_commands(schema, output_dir, prefix):
scripts/qapi/common.py +10 -5
@@ -921,7 +921,8 @@ def check_exprs(exprs): elif 'command' in expr: meta = 'command' check_keys(expr_elem, 'command', [], - ['data', 'returns', 'gen', 'success-response', 'boxed']) + ['data', 'returns', 'gen', 'success-response', + 'boxed', 'allow-oob']) elif 'event' in expr: meta = 'event' check_keys(expr_elem, 'event', [], ['data', 'boxed'])
@@ -1044,7 +1045,7 @@ class QAPISchemaVisitor(object): pass def visit_command(self, name, info, arg_type, ret_type, - gen, success_response, boxed): + gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob): pass def visit_event(self, name, info, arg_type, boxed):
@@ -1421,7 +1422,7 @@ class QAPISchemaAlternateType(QAPISchemaType): class QAPISchemaCommand(QAPISchemaEntity): def __init__(self, name, info, doc, arg_type, ret_type, - gen, success_response, boxed): + gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob): QAPISchemaEntity.__init__(self, name, info, doc) assert not arg_type or isinstance(arg_type, str) assert not ret_type or isinstance(ret_type, str)
@@ -1432,6 +1433,7 @@ class QAPISchemaCommand(QAPISchemaEntity): self.gen = gen self.success_response = success_response self.boxed = boxed + self.allow_oob = allow_oob def check(self, schema): if self._arg_type_name:
@@ -1455,7 +1457,8 @@ class QAPISchemaCommand(QAPISchemaEntity): def visit(self, visitor): visitor.visit_command(self.name, self.info, self.arg_type, self.ret_type, - self.gen, self.success_response, self.boxed) + self.gen, self.success_response, + self.boxed, self.allow_oob) class QAPISchemaEvent(QAPISchemaEntity):
@@ -1674,6 +1677,7 @@ class QAPISchema(object): gen = expr.get('gen', True) success_response = expr.get('success-response', True) boxed = expr.get('boxed', False) + allow_oob = expr.get('allow-oob', False) if isinstance(data, OrderedDict): data = self._make_implicit_object_type( name, info, doc, 'arg', self._make_members(data, info))
@@ -1681,7 +1685,8 @@ class QAPISchema(object): assert len(rets) == 1 rets = self._make_array_type(rets[0], info) self._def_entity(QAPISchemaCommand(name, info, doc, data, rets, - gen, success_response, boxed)) + gen, success_response, + boxed, allow_oob)) def _def_event(self, expr, info, doc): name = expr['event']
scripts/qapi/doc.py +1 -1
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ class QAPISchemaGenDocVisitor(qapi.common.QAPISchemaVisitor): body=texi_entity(doc, 'Members'))) def visit_command(self, name, info, arg_type, ret_type, - gen, success_response, boxed): + gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob): doc = self.cur_doc if boxed: body = texi_body(doc)
scripts/qapi/introspect.py +8 -2
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ def to_json(obj, level=0): to_json(obj[key], level + 1)) for key in sorted(obj.keys())] ret = '{' + ', '.join(elts) + '}' + elif isinstance(obj, bool): + if obj: + ret = 'true' + else: + ret = 'false' else: assert False # not implemented if level == 1:
@@ -160,12 +165,13 @@ const char %(c_name)s[] = %(c_string)s; for m in variants.variants]}) def visit_command(self, name, info, arg_type, ret_type, - gen, success_response, boxed): + gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob): arg_type = arg_type or self._schema.the_empty_object_type ret_type = ret_type or self._schema.the_empty_object_type self._gen_json(name, 'command', {'arg-type': self._use_type(arg_type), - 'ret-type': self._use_type(ret_type)}) + 'ret-type': self._use_type(ret_type), + 'allow-oob': allow_oob}) def visit_event(self, name, info, arg_type, boxed): arg_type = arg_type or self._schema.the_empty_object_type
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py +1 -1
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ class QAPISchemaTestVisitor(QAPISchemaVisitor): self._print_variants(variants) def visit_command(self, name, info, arg_type, ret_type, - gen, success_response, boxed): + gen, success_response, boxed, allow_oob): print('command %s %s -> %s' % \ (name, arg_type and arg_type.name, ret_type and ret_type.name)) print(' gen=%s success_response=%s boxed=%s' % \
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 17/23] qapi: introduce new cmd option "allow-oob"
Quoted 9 lines · Peter Xu
Here "oob" stands for "Out-Of-Band". When "allow-oob" is set, it means the command allows out-of-band execution.
The "oob" idea is proposed by Markus Armbruster in following thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg02057.htmlThis new "allow-oob" boolean will be exposed by "query-qmp-schema" as well for command entries, so that QMP clients can know which command can
s/command can/commands/can/
Quoted 6 lines
be used as out-of-band calls. For example the command "migrate" originally looks like:
{"name": "migrate", "ret-type": "17", "meta-type": "command", "arg-type": "86"}
Quoted 7 lines
And it'll be changed into:
{"name": "migrate", "ret-type": "17", "allow-oob": false, "meta-type": "command", "arg-type": "86"}This patch only provides the QMP interface level changes. It does not contains the real out-of-band execution implementation yet.
s/contains/contain/
Quoted 5 lines
Suggested-by Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>
Quoted 9 lines
--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 5 +++-- qapi/introspect.json | 6 +++++- scripts/qapi/commands.py | 18 +++++++++++++----- scripts/qapi/common.py | 15 ++++++++++----- scripts/qapi/doc.py | 2 +- scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 10 ++++++++-- tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 2 +- 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
I'm a bit disappointed that tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json doesn't have any "allow-oob":true commands at any point in the series. I consider that to be a bug, so it can be fixed by followup patch even after soft freeze; but won't make the lack of good testing hold up this series from making the release.
scripts/qapi/introspect.py def to_json(obj, level=0): · line 36
Quoted 10 lines
+++
b/scripts/qapi/introspect.pyscripts/qapi/introspect.py +5
-0@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ def to_json(obj, level=0): to_json(obj[key], level + 1)) for key in sorted(obj.keys())] ret = '{' + ', '.join(elts) + '}' + elif isinstance(obj, bool): + if obj: + ret = 'true' + else: + ret = 'false'
Conflicts with Marc-Andre's work to perform introspection by QLIT_*; but it's easy enough to adjust:
+ elif isinstance(obj, bool):
+ ret += 'QLIT_QBOOL(%s)' % ('true' if obj else 'false')
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 17/23] qapi: introduce new cmd option "allow-oob"
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 08:27:22PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
I'm a bit disappointed that
tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.jsondoesn't have any "allow-oob":true commands at any point in the series. I consider that to be a bug, so it can be fixed by followup patch even after soft freeze; but won't make the lack of good testing hold up this series from making the release.
Sorry, obviously I missed that one.
If this series will reach master soon, I'll post separate patch for that before release as bugfix.
If this series can't make it due to any reason, I'll append a patch to the series when repost.
Quoted 18 lines
scripts/qapi/introspect.py def to_json(obj, level=0): · line 36
Quoted 11 lines
+++
b/scripts/qapi/introspect.pyscripts/qapi/introspect.py +5
-0@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ def to_json(obj, level=0): to_json(obj[key], level + 1)) for key in sorted(obj.keys())] ret = '{' + ', '.join(elts) + '}' + elif isinstance(obj, bool): + if obj: + ret = 'true' + else: + ret = 'false'Conflicts with Marc-Andre's work to perform introspection by QLIT_*; but it's easy enough to adjust:
(quoted diff) +2
-0+ elif isinstance(obj, bool): + ret += 'QLIT_QBOOL(%s)' % ('true' if obj else 'false')
Quoted 1 line
Reviewed-by Eric Blake <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
PATCH v8 18/23 qmp: support out-of-band (oob) execution
In reply to Peter XuHaving "allow-oob" to true for a command does not mean that this command will always be run in out-of-band mode. The out-of-band quick path will only be executed if we specify the extra "run-oob" flag when sending the QMP request:
{ "execute": "command-that-allows-oob",
"arguments": { ... },
"control": { "run-oob": true } }The "control" key is introduced to store this extra flag. "control" field is used to store arguments that are shared by all the commands, rather than command specific arguments. Let "run-oob" be the first.
Note that in the patch I exported qmp_dispatch_check_obj() to be used to check the request earlier, and at the same time allowed "id" field to be there since actually we always allow that.
--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 2 ++ monitor.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++- trace-events | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h +2 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ bool qmp_command_is_enabled(const QmpCommand *cmd);const char *qmp_command_name (const QmpCommand *cmd);bool qmp_has_success_response (const QmpCommand *cmd);QObject *qmp_build_error_object (Error *err); +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp); +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict);typedef void (*qmp_cmd_callback_fn )(QmpCommand *cmd,void *opaque);
monitor.c +75 -9
116 lines not on this page · raw message
qapi/qmp-dispatch.c +32 -1
@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@#include "qapi/qmp/json-parser.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h" +#include "qapi/qmp/qbool.h" -static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) {const QDictEntry *ent;const char *arg_name;
@@ -50,6 +51,14 @@ static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj(const QObject *request, Error **errp) "QMP input member 'arguments' must be an object");return NULL ; } + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"id" )) { +continue ; + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"control" )) { +if (qobject_type (arg_obj) !=QTYPE_QDICT ) { +error_setg (errp, +"QMP input member 'control' must be a dict" ); +return NULL ; + } }else {error_setg (errp,"QMP input member '%s' is unexpected" , arg_name);
@@ -120,6 +129,28 @@ QObject *qmp_build_error_object(Error *err) error_get_pretty(err)); } +/* +* Detect whether a request should be run out-of-band, by quickly +* peeking at whether we have: { "control": { "run-oob": True } }. By +* default commands are run in-band. +*/ +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict) +{ +QBool *bool_obj; + + dict =qdict_get_qdict (dict,"control" ); +if (!dict) { +return false; + } + + bool_obj =qobject_to_qbool (qdict_get (dict,"run-oob" )); +if (!bool_obj) { +return false; + } + +return qbool_get_bool (bool_obj); +} +QObject *qmp_dispatch (QmpCommandList *cmds,QObject *request) {Error *err =NULL ;
trace-events +2 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ monitor_protocol_event_queue(uint32_t event, void *qdict, uint64_t rate) "event= handle_hmp_command(void *mon, const char *cmdline) "mon %p cmdline: %s" handle_qmp_command(void *mon, const char *req) "mon %p req: %s" monitor_suspend(void *ptr, int cnt) "mon %p: %d" +monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band(const char *id) "%s" +monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band(const char *id) "%s" # dma-helpers.c dma_blk_io(void *dbs, void *bs, int64_t offset, bool to_dev) "dbs=%p bs=%p offset=%" PRId64 " to_dev=%d"
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/23] qmp: support out-of-band (oob) execution
Quoted 1 line · Peter Xu
Having "allow-oob" to true for a command does not mean that this command
s/to/:/
Quoted 26 lines
will always be run in out-of-band mode. The out-of-band quick path will only be executed if we specify the extra "run-oob" flag when sending the QMP request:
{ "execute": "command-that-allows-oob", "arguments": { ... }, "control": { "run-oob": true } }The "control" key is introduced to store this extra flag. "control" field is used to store arguments that are shared by all the commands, rather than command specific arguments. Let "run-oob" be the first.
Note that in the patch I exported
qmp_dispatch_check_obj()to be used to check the request earlier, and at the same time allowed "id" field to be there since actually we always allow that.Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 2 ++ monitor.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++- trace-events | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
monitor.c static void qmp_caps_apply(Monitor *mon, QMPCapabilityList *list) · line 1138
Quoted 5 lines
monitor.c +5
-0+ +if (qmp_is_oob (req)) { +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +error_setg (errp,"Please enable Out-Of-Band first " +"for the session during capabilities negociation" );
s/negociation/negotiation/
qapi/qmp-dispatch.c QObject *qmp_build_error_object(Error *err) · line 20
Quoted 6 lines
+++
b/qapi/qmp-dispatch.cqapi/qmp-dispatch.c +3
-0@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ +/* +* Detect whether a request should be run out-of-band, by quickly +* peeking at whether we have: { "control": { "run-oob": True } }. By
s/True/true/
qapi/qmp-dispatch.c QObject *qmp_build_error_object(Error *err) · line 146
Quoted 12 lines
qapi/qmp-dispatch.c +12
-0+* default commands are run in-band. +*/ +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict) +{ +QBool *bool_obj; + + dict =qdict_get_qdict (dict,"control" ); +if (!dict) { +return false; + } + + bool_obj =qobject_to_qbool (qdict_get (dict,"run-oob" ));
Another qobject_to() rebase victim.
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/23] qmp: support out-of-band (oob) execution
In reply to Peter XuHi
Quoted 112 lines · Peter Xu
Having "allow-oob" to true for a command does not mean that this command will always be run in out-of-band mode. The out-of-band quick path will only be executed if we specify the extra "run-oob" flag when sending the QMP request:
{ "execute": "command-that-allows-oob", "arguments": { ... }, "control": { "run-oob": true } }The "control" key is introduced to store this extra flag. "control" field is used to store arguments that are shared by all the commands, rather than command specific arguments. Let "run-oob" be the first.
Note that in the patch I exported
qmp_dispatch_check_obj()to be used to check the request earlier, and at the same time allowed "id" field to be there since actually we always allow that.Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 2 ++ monitor.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++- trace-events | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h +2
-0@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ bool qmp_command_is_enabled(const QmpCommand *cmd);const char *qmp_command_name (const QmpCommand *cmd);bool qmp_has_success_response (const QmpCommand *cmd);QObject *qmp_build_error_object (Error *err); +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp); +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict);typedef void (*qmp_cmd_callback_fn )(QmpCommand *cmd,void *opaque);monitor.c +46
-3@@ -1110,6 +1110,44 @@ static void qmp_caps_apply(Monitor *mon, QMPCapabilityList *list) } } +/* +* Return true if check successful, or false otherwise. When false is +* returned, detailed error will be in errp if provided. +*/ +static bool qmp_cmd_oob_check (Monitor *mon,QDict *req,Error **errp) +{ +const char *command; +QmpCommand *cmd; + + command =qdict_get_try_str (req,"execute" ); +if (!command) { +error_setg (errp,"Command field 'execute' missing" ); +return false; + } + + cmd =qmp_find_command (mon->qmp.commands, command); +if (!cmd) { +error_set (errp,ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND , +"The command %s has not been found" , command); +return false; + } + +if (qmp_is_oob (req)) { +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +error_setg (errp,"Please enable Out-Of-Band first " +"for the session during capabilities negociation" ); +return false; + } +if (!(cmd->options &QCO_ALLOW_OOB )) { +error_setg (errp,"The command %s does not support OOB" , + command); +return false; + } + } + +return true; +} +void qmp_qmp_capabilities (bool has_enable,QMPCapabilityList *enable,Error **errp) {@@ -4001,6 +4039,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one ();if (req_obj) { +trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" );monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh);@@ -4024,17 +4063,31 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); }if (err) { -monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); -qobject_decref (req); -return ; + goto err; + } + +/* Check against the request in general layout */ + qdict =qmp_dispatch_check_obj (req, &err); +if (!qdict) { + goto err; }
monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4078
Quoted 10 lines
monitor.c +4
-6- qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +/* Check against OOB specific */ +if (!qmp_cmd_oob_check (mon, qdict, &err)) { + goto err; + }
This check happens before monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(), where there is now dead code for COMMAND_NOT_FOUND error handling (changing the error description), since it will error here.
A solution is to move the error manipulation code to monitor_qmp_respond():
monitor.c +0 -0
@@ -3997,6 +3997,18 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon,
QObject *rsp,
qdict_put_obj(qobject_to(QDict, rsp), "id", id);
}+ if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) {
+ qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qobject_to(QDict, rsp), "error");
+ if (qdict
+ && !g_strcmp0(qdict_get_try_str(qdict, "class"),
+ QapiErrorClass_str(ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND))) {
+ /* Provide a more useful error message */ + qdict_del(qdict, "desc"); + qdict_put_str(qdict, "desc", "Expecting capabilities
negotiation"
+ " with 'qmp_capabilities'");
+ }
+ }
+
monitor_json_emitter(mon, rsp);
}@@ -4022,7 +4034,6 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj, bool oob_cmd)
{
Monitor *mon, *old_mon;
QObject *req, *rsp = NULL, *id;
- QDict *qdict = NULL;
bool need_resume;
req = req_obj->req;@@ -4045,18 +4056,6 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj, bool oob_cmd)
cur_mon = old_mon;
- if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) {
- qdict = qdict_get_qdict(qobject_to(QDict, rsp), "error");
- if (qdict
- && !g_strcmp0(qdict_get_try_str(qdict, "class"),
- QapiErrorClass_str(ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND))) {
- /* Provide a more useful error message */ - qdict_del(qdict, "desc"); - qdict_put_str(qdict, "desc", "Expecting capabilities negotiation"
- " with 'qmp_capabilities'");
- }
- }
-
/* Respond if necessary */
monitor_qmp_respond(mon, rsp, NULL, id);Quoted 118 lines
monitor.c +25
-0+ + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); + +/* When OOB is enabled, the "id" field is mandatory. */ +if (qmp_oob_enabled (mon) && !id) { +error_setg (&err,"Out-Of-Band capability requires that " +"every command contains an 'id' field" ); + goto err; + } + +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); req_obj->mon = mon;@@ -4042,6 +4095,14 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) req_obj->req = req; req_obj->need_resume = false; +if (qmp_is_oob (qdict)) { +/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ +trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) + ?:"" ); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +return ; + } +/* Protect qmp_requests and fetching its length. */ qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);@@ -4078,6 +4139,11 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +return ; + +err: +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); }static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size)qapi/qmp-dispatch.c +32
-1@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@#include "qapi/qmp/json-parser.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h" +#include "qapi/qmp/qbool.h" -static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) {const QDictEntry *ent;const char *arg_name;@@ -50,6 +51,14 @@ static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj(const QObject *request, Error **errp) "QMP input member 'arguments' must be an object");return NULL ; } + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"id" )) { +continue ; + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"control" )) { +if (qobject_type (arg_obj) !=QTYPE_QDICT ) { +error_setg (errp, +"QMP input member 'control' must be a dict" ); +return NULL ; + } }else {error_setg (errp,"QMP input member '%s' is unexpected" , arg_name);@@ -120,6 +129,28 @@ QObject *qmp_build_error_object(Error *err) error_get_pretty(err)); } +/* +* Detect whether a request should be run out-of-band, by quickly +* peeking at whether we have: { "control": { "run-oob": True } }. By +* default commands are run in-band. +*/ +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict) +{ +QBool *bool_obj; + + dict =qdict_get_qdict (dict,"control" ); +if (!dict) { +return false; + } + + bool_obj =qobject_to_qbool (qdict_get (dict,"run-oob" )); +if (!bool_obj) { +return false; + } + +return qbool_get_bool (bool_obj); +} +QObject *qmp_dispatch (QmpCommandList *cmds,QObject *request) {Error *err =NULL ;trace-events +2
-1@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ monitor_protocol_event_queue(uint32_t event, void *qdict, uint64_t rate) "event= handle_hmp_command(void *mon, const char *cmdline) "mon %p cmdline: %s" handle_qmp_command(void *mon, const char *req) "mon %p req: %s" monitor_suspend(void *ptr, int cnt) "mon %p: %d" +monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band(const char *id) "%s" +monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band(const char *id) "%s" # dma-helpers.c dma_blk_io(void *dbs, void *bs, int64_t offset, bool to_dev) "dbs=%p bs=%p offset=%" PRId64 " to_dev=%d" --2.14.3
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/23] qmp: support out-of-band (oob) execution
Quoted 130 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 112 lines · Peter Xu
Having "allow-oob" to true for a command does not mean that this command will always be run in out-of-band mode. The out-of-band quick path will only be executed if we specify the extra "run-oob" flag when sending the QMP request:
{ "execute": "command-that-allows-oob", "arguments": { ... }, "control": { "run-oob": true } }The "control" key is introduced to store this extra flag. "control" field is used to store arguments that are shared by all the commands, rather than command specific arguments. Let "run-oob" be the first.
Note that in the patch I exported
qmp_dispatch_check_obj()to be used to check the request earlier, and at the same time allowed "id" field to be there since actually we always allow that.Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 2 ++ monitor.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++- trace-events | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h +2
-0@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ bool qmp_command_is_enabled(const QmpCommand *cmd);const char *qmp_command_name (const QmpCommand *cmd);bool qmp_has_success_response (const QmpCommand *cmd);QObject *qmp_build_error_object (Error *err); +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp); +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict);typedef void (*qmp_cmd_callback_fn )(QmpCommand *cmd,void *opaque);monitor.c +46
-3@@ -1110,6 +1110,44 @@ static void qmp_caps_apply(Monitor *mon, QMPCapabilityList *list) } } +/* +* Return true if check successful, or false otherwise. When false is +* returned, detailed error will be in errp if provided. +*/ +static bool qmp_cmd_oob_check (Monitor *mon,QDict *req,Error **errp) +{ +const char *command; +QmpCommand *cmd; + + command =qdict_get_try_str (req,"execute" ); +if (!command) { +error_setg (errp,"Command field 'execute' missing" ); +return false; + } + + cmd =qmp_find_command (mon->qmp.commands, command); +if (!cmd) { +error_set (errp,ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND , +"The command %s has not been found" , command); +return false; + } + +if (qmp_is_oob (req)) { +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +error_setg (errp,"Please enable Out-Of-Band first " +"for the session during capabilities negociation" ); +return false; + } +if (!(cmd->options &QCO_ALLOW_OOB )) { +error_setg (errp,"The command %s does not support OOB" , + command); +return false; + } + } + +return true; +} +void qmp_qmp_capabilities (bool has_enable,QMPCapabilityList *enable,Error **errp) {@@ -4001,6 +4039,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one ();if (req_obj) { +trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" );monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh);@@ -4024,17 +4063,31 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); }if (err) { -monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); -qobject_decref (req); -return ; + goto err; + } + +/* Check against the request in general layout */ + qdict =qmp_dispatch_check_obj (req, &err); +if (!qdict) { + goto err; }monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4078
Quoted 10 lines
monitor.c +4
-6- qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +/* Check against OOB specific */ +if (!qmp_cmd_oob_check (mon, qdict, &err)) { + goto err; + }This check happens before
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(), where there is now dead code forCOMMAND_NOT_FOUNDerror handling (changing the error description), since it will error here.
Quoted 1 line
A solution is to move the error manipulation code to
monitor_qmp_respond():
So yes, now it'll be checked earlier now since the allow-oob is bound to per command, then we'll need that info earlier here. While I kept the other check untouched since there'll be other places that calls qmp_dispatch() too.
I'm just wondering would there be any problem even without below change?
Thanks,
Quoted 181 lines
monitor.c +8
-0@@ -3997,6 +3997,18 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon, QObject *rsp,qdict_put_obj (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"id" , id); } +if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { + qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" ); +if (qdict + && !g_strcmp0 (qdict_get_try_str (qdict,"class" ), +QapiErrorClass_str (ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND ))) { +/* Provide a more useful error message */ +qdict_del (qdict,"desc" ); + qdict_put_str(qdict, "desc", "Expecting capabilitiesnegotiation"
monitor.c +4
-1+ " with 'qmp_capabilities'"); + } + } +monitor_json_emitter (mon, rsp); }@@ -4022,7 +4034,6 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj, bool oob_cmd) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id; -QDict *qdict =NULL ;bool need_resume;req = req_obj->req;monitor.c +0
-12@@ -4045,18 +4056,6 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj, bool oob_cmd) cur_mon = old_mon; -if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { - qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" ); -if (qdict - && !g_strcmp0 (qdict_get_try_str (qdict,"class" ), -QapiErrorClass_str (ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND ))) { -/* Provide a more useful error message */ -qdict_del (qdict,"desc" ); -qdict_put_str (qdict,"desc" ,"Expecting capabilities negotiation" -" with 'qmp_capabilities'" ); - } - } -/* Respond if necessary */ monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp,NULL , id);Quoted 120 lines
monitor.c +25
-0+ + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); + +/* When OOB is enabled, the "id" field is mandatory. */ +if (qmp_oob_enabled (mon) && !id) { +error_setg (&err,"Out-Of-Band capability requires that " +"every command contains an 'id' field" ); + goto err; + } + +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); req_obj->mon = mon;@@ -4042,6 +4095,14 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) req_obj->req = req; req_obj->need_resume = false; +if (qmp_is_oob (qdict)) { +/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ +trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) + ?:"" ); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +return ; + } +/* Protect qmp_requests and fetching its length. */ qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);@@ -4078,6 +4139,11 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +return ; + +err: +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); }static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size)qapi/qmp-dispatch.c +32
-1@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@#include "qapi/qmp/json-parser.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h" +#include "qapi/qmp/qbool.h" -static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) {const QDictEntry *ent;const char *arg_name;@@ -50,6 +51,14 @@ static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj(const QObject *request, Error **errp) "QMP input member 'arguments' must be an object");return NULL ; } + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"id" )) { +continue ; + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"control" )) { +if (qobject_type (arg_obj) !=QTYPE_QDICT ) { +error_setg (errp, +"QMP input member 'control' must be a dict" ); +return NULL ; + } }else {error_setg (errp,"QMP input member '%s' is unexpected" , arg_name);@@ -120,6 +129,28 @@ QObject *qmp_build_error_object(Error *err) error_get_pretty(err)); } +/* +* Detect whether a request should be run out-of-band, by quickly +* peeking at whether we have: { "control": { "run-oob": True } }. By +* default commands are run in-band. +*/ +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict) +{ +QBool *bool_obj; + + dict =qdict_get_qdict (dict,"control" ); +if (!dict) { +return false; + } + + bool_obj =qobject_to_qbool (qdict_get (dict,"run-oob" )); +if (!bool_obj) { +return false; + } + +return qbool_get_bool (bool_obj); +} +QObject *qmp_dispatch (QmpCommandList *cmds,QObject *request) {Error *err =NULL ;trace-events +2
-1@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ monitor_protocol_event_queue(uint32_t event, void *qdict, uint64_t rate) "event= handle_hmp_command(void *mon, const char *cmdline) "mon %p cmdline: %s" handle_qmp_command(void *mon, const char *req) "mon %p req: %s" monitor_suspend(void *ptr, int cnt) "mon %p: %d" +monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band(const char *id) "%s" +monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band(const char *id) "%s" # dma-helpers.c dma_blk_io(void *dbs, void *bs, int64_t offset, bool to_dev) "dbs=%p bs=%p offset=%" PRId64 " to_dev=%d" --2.14.3
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 18/23] qmp: support out-of-band (oob) execution
Hi
Quoted 131 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 130 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 112 lines · Peter Xu
Having "allow-oob" to true for a command does not mean that this command will always be run in out-of-band mode. The out-of-band quick path will only be executed if we specify the extra "run-oob" flag when sending the QMP request:
{ "execute": "command-that-allows-oob", "arguments": { ... }, "control": { "run-oob": true } }The "control" key is introduced to store this extra flag. "control" field is used to store arguments that are shared by all the commands, rather than command specific arguments. Let "run-oob" be the first.
Note that in the patch I exported
qmp_dispatch_check_obj()to be used to check the request earlier, and at the same time allowed "id" field to be there since actually we always allow that.Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h | 2 ++ monitor.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++- trace-events | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)include/qapi/qmp/dispatch.h +2
-0@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ bool qmp_command_is_enabled(const QmpCommand *cmd);const char *qmp_command_name (const QmpCommand *cmd);bool qmp_has_success_response (const QmpCommand *cmd);QObject *qmp_build_error_object (Error *err); +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp); +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict);typedef void (*qmp_cmd_callback_fn )(QmpCommand *cmd,void *opaque);monitor.c +46
-3@@ -1110,6 +1110,44 @@ static void qmp_caps_apply(Monitor *mon, QMPCapabilityList *list) } } +/* +* Return true if check successful, or false otherwise. When false is +* returned, detailed error will be in errp if provided. +*/ +static bool qmp_cmd_oob_check (Monitor *mon,QDict *req,Error **errp) +{ +const char *command; +QmpCommand *cmd; + + command =qdict_get_try_str (req,"execute" ); +if (!command) { +error_setg (errp,"Command field 'execute' missing" ); +return false; + } + + cmd =qmp_find_command (mon->qmp.commands, command); +if (!cmd) { +error_set (errp,ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND , +"The command %s has not been found" , command); +return false; + } + +if (qmp_is_oob (req)) { +if (!qmp_oob_enabled (mon)) { +error_setg (errp,"Please enable Out-Of-Band first " +"for the session during capabilities negociation" ); +return false; + } +if (!(cmd->options &QCO_ALLOW_OOB )) { +error_setg (errp,"The command %s does not support OOB" , + command); +return false; + } + } + +return true; +} +void qmp_qmp_capabilities (bool has_enable,QMPCapabilityList *enable,Error **errp) {@@ -4001,6 +4039,7 @@ static void monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher(void *data)QMPRequest *req_obj =monitor_qmp_requests_pop_one ();if (req_obj) { +trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) ?:"" );monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj);/* Reschedule instead of looping so the main loop stays responsive */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh);@@ -4024,17 +4063,31 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)error_setg (&err,QERR_JSON_PARSING ); }if (err) { -monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); -qobject_decref (req); -return ; + goto err; + } + +/* Check against the request in general layout */ + qdict =qmp_dispatch_check_obj (req, &err); +if (!qdict) { + goto err; }monitor.c static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) · line 4078
Quoted 10 lines
monitor.c +4
-6- qdict =qobject_to_qdict (req); -if (qdict) { - id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); -qobject_incref (id); -qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); - }/* else will fail qmp_dispatch() */ +/* Check against OOB specific */ +if (!qmp_cmd_oob_check (mon, qdict, &err)) { + goto err; + }This check happens before
monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(), where there is now dead code forCOMMAND_NOT_FOUNDerror handling (changing the error description), since it will error here.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
A solution is to move the error manipulation code to
monitor_qmp_respond():So yes, now it'll be checked earlier now since the allow-oob is bound to per command, then we'll need that info earlier here. While I kept the other check untouched since there'll be other places that calls
qmp_dispatch()too.I'm just wondering would there be any problem even without below change?
Not a problem, just less descriptive error. And we should remove the dead code.
It's best imho to apply the below change. I will send a patch.
Quoted 186 lines
Thanks,
Quoted 170 lines
monitor.c +8
-0@@ -3997,6 +3997,18 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(Monitor *mon, QObject *rsp,qdict_put_obj (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"id" , id); } +if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { + qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" ); +if (qdict + && !g_strcmp0 (qdict_get_try_str (qdict,"class" ), +QapiErrorClass_str (ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND ))) { +/* Provide a more useful error message */ +qdict_del (qdict,"desc" ); + qdict_put_str(qdict, "desc", "Expecting capabilitiesnegotiation"
monitor.c +4
-1+ " with 'qmp_capabilities'"); + } + } +monitor_json_emitter (mon, rsp); }@@ -4022,7 +4034,6 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj, bool oob_cmd) {Monitor *mon, *old_mon;QObject *req, *rsp =NULL , *id; -QDict *qdict =NULL ;bool need_resume;req = req_obj->req;monitor.c +0
-12@@ -4045,18 +4056,6 @@ static void monitor_qmp_dispatch_one(QMPRequest *req_obj, bool oob_cmd) cur_mon = old_mon; -if (mon->qmp.commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) { - qdict =qdict_get_qdict (qobject_to (QDict, rsp),"error" ); -if (qdict - && !g_strcmp0 (qdict_get_try_str (qdict,"class" ), -QapiErrorClass_str (ERROR_CLASS_COMMAND_NOT_FOUND ))) { -/* Provide a more useful error message */ -qdict_del (qdict,"desc" ); -qdict_put_str (qdict,"desc" ,"Expecting capabilities negotiation" -" with 'qmp_capabilities'" ); - } - } -/* Respond if necessary */ monitor_qmp_respond (mon, rsp,NULL , id);Quoted 114 lines
monitor.c +25
-0+ + id =qdict_get (qdict,"id" ); + +/* When OOB is enabled, the "id" field is mandatory. */ +if (qmp_oob_enabled (mon) && !id) { +error_setg (&err,"Out-Of-Band capability requires that " +"every command contains an 'id' field" ); + goto err; + } + +qobject_incref (id); +qdict_del (qdict,"id" ); req_obj =g_new0 (QMPRequest,1 ); req_obj->mon = mon;@@ -4042,6 +4095,14 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens) req_obj->req = req; req_obj->need_resume = false; +if (qmp_is_oob (qdict)) { +/* Out-Of-Band (OOB) requests are executed directly in parser. */ +trace_monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band (qobject_get_try_str (req_obj->id) + ?:"" ); +monitor_qmp_dispatch_one (req_obj); +return ; + } +/* Protect qmp_requests and fetching its length. */ qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);@@ -4078,6 +4139,11 @@ static void handle_qmp_command(JSONMessageParser *parser, GQueue *tokens)/* Kick the dispatcher routine */ qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); +return ; + +err: +monitor_qmp_respond (mon,NULL , err,NULL ); +qobject_decref (req); }static void monitor_qmp_read (void *opaque,const uint8_t *buf,int size)qapi/qmp-dispatch.c +32
-1@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@#include "qapi/qmp/json-parser.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qdict.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qjson.h" +#include "qapi/qmp/qbool.h" -static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) +QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj (const QObject *request,Error **errp) {const QDictEntry *ent;const char *arg_name;@@ -50,6 +51,14 @@ static QDict *qmp_dispatch_check_obj(const QObject *request, Error **errp) "QMP input member 'arguments' must be an object");return NULL ; } + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"id" )) { +continue ; + }else if (!strcmp (arg_name,"control" )) { +if (qobject_type (arg_obj) !=QTYPE_QDICT ) { +error_setg (errp, +"QMP input member 'control' must be a dict" ); +return NULL ; + } }else {error_setg (errp,"QMP input member '%s' is unexpected" , arg_name);@@ -120,6 +129,28 @@ QObject *qmp_build_error_object(Error *err) error_get_pretty(err)); } +/* +* Detect whether a request should be run out-of-band, by quickly +* peeking at whether we have: { "control": { "run-oob": True } }. By +* default commands are run in-band. +*/ +bool qmp_is_oob (QDict *dict) +{ +QBool *bool_obj; + + dict =qdict_get_qdict (dict,"control" ); +if (!dict) { +return false; + } + + bool_obj =qobject_to_qbool (qdict_get (dict,"run-oob" )); +if (!bool_obj) { +return false; + } + +return qbool_get_bool (bool_obj); +} +QObject *qmp_dispatch (QmpCommandList *cmds,QObject *request) {Error *err =NULL ;trace-events +2
-0@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ monitor_protocol_event_queue(uint32_t event, void *qdict, uint64_t rate) "event= handle_hmp_command(void *mon, const char *cmdline) "mon %p cmdline: %s" handle_qmp_command(void *mon, const char *req) "mon %p req: %s" monitor_suspend(void *ptr, int cnt) "mon %p: %d" +monitor_qmp_cmd_in_band(const char *id) "%s" +monitor_qmp_cmd_out_of_band(const char *id) "%s"Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines
trace-events +0
-1# dma-helpers.c dma_blk_io(void *dbs, void *bs, int64_t offset, bool to_dev) "dbs=%p bs=%p offset=%" PRId64 " to_dev=%d" --2.14.3
--
Marc-André Lureau--
Peter Xu
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
PATCH v8 19/23 qmp: isolate responses into io thread
In reply to Peter XuFor those monitors who have enabled IO thread, we'll offload the responding procedure into IO thread. The main reason is that chardev is not thread safe, and we need to do all the read/write IOs in the same thread. For use_io_thr=true monitors, that thread is the IO thread.
We do this isolation in similar pattern as what we have done to the request queue: we first create one response queue for each monitor, then instead of replying directly in the main thread, we queue the responses and kick the IO thread to do the rest of the job for us.
A funny thing after doing this is that, when the QMP clients send "quit" to QEMU, it's possible that we close the IOThread even earlier than replying to that "quit". So another thing we need to do before cleaning up the monitors is that we need to flush the response queue (we don't need to do that for command queue; after all we are quitting) to make sure replies for handled commands are always flushed back to clients.
--- monitor.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
monitor.c +95 -1
@@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ typedef struct {QemuMutex qmp_queue_lock;/* Input queue that holds all the parsed QMP requests */ GQueue *qmp_requests; +/* Output queue contains all the QMP responses in order */ +GQueue *qmp_responses; } MonitorQMP;/*
@@ -205,6 +207,7 @@ struct Monitor {bool skip_flush;bool use_io_thr; +/* We can't access guest memory when holding the lock */ QemuMutex out_lock;QString *outbuf;guint out_watch;
@@ -227,6 +230,8 @@ static struct {IOThread *mon_iothread;/* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from IO thread */ QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh; +/* Bottom half to deliver the responses back to clients */ +QEMUBH *qmp_respond_bh; } mon_global;/* QMP checker flags */
@@ -416,7 +421,8 @@ int monitor_fprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, ...)return 0 ; } -static void monitor_json_emitter (Monitor *mon,const QObject *data) +static void monitor_json_emitter_raw (Monitor *mon, +QObject *data) {QString *json;
@@ -430,6 +436,71 @@ static void monitor_json_emitter(Monitor *mon, const QObject *data)QDECREF (json); } +static void monitor_json_emitter (Monitor *mon,QObject *data) +{ +if (mon->use_io_thr) { +/* +* If using IO thread, we need to queue the item so that IO +* thread will do the rest for us. Take refcount so that +* caller won't free the data (which will be finally freed in +* responder thread). +*/ +qobject_incref (data); +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_responses, (void *)data); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_respond_bh); + }else { +/* +* If not using monitor IO thread, then we are in main thread. +* Do the emission right away. +*/ +monitor_json_emitter_raw (mon, data); + } +} + +struct QMPResponse { +Monitor *mon; +QObject *data; +}; +typedef struct QMPResponse QMPResponse ; + +/* +* Return one QMPResponse. The response is only valid if +* response.data is not NULL. +*/ +static QMPResponse monitor_qmp_response_pop_one (void ) +{ +Monitor *mon; +QObject *data =NULL ; + +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + data =g_queue_pop_head (mon->qmp.qmp_responses); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +if (data) { +break ; + } + } +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +return (QMPResponse ) { .mon = mon, .data = data }; +} + +static void monitor_qmp_bh_responder (void *opaque) +{ +QMPResponse response; + +while (true) { + response =monitor_qmp_response_pop_one (); +if (!response.data) { +break ; + } +monitor_json_emitter_raw (response.mon, response.data); +qobject_decref (response.data); + } +} +static MonitorQAPIEventConf monitor_qapi_event_conf[QAPI_EVENT__MAX ] = {/* Limit guest-triggerable events to 1 per second */ [QAPI_EVENT_RTC_CHANGE ] = {1000 *SCALE_MS },
@@ -616,6 +687,7 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush, mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; mon->qmp.qmp_requests =g_queue_new (); + mon->qmp.qmp_responses =g_queue_new (); }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)
@@ -630,6 +702,7 @@ static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->out_lock);qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); +g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_responses); } char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,
@@ -4367,6 +4440,15 @@ static void monitor_iothread_init(void) mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =aio_bh_new (qemu_get_aio_context (), monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher,NULL ); + +/* +* Unlike the dispatcher BH, this must be run on the monitor IO +* thread, so that monitors that are using IO thread will make +* sure read/write operations are all done on the IO thread. +*/ + mon_global.qmp_respond_bh =aio_bh_new (monitor_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_bh_responder, +NULL ); }void monitor_init_globals (void )
@@ -4505,9 +4587,19 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void)*/ iothread_stop (mon_global.mon_iothread); +/* +* After we have IOThread to send responses, it's possible that +* when we stop the IOThread there are still replies queued in the +* responder queue. Flush all of them. Note that even after this +* flush it's still possible that out buffer is not flushed. +* It'll be done in below monitor_flush() as the last resort. +*/ +monitor_qmp_bh_responder (NULL ); +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) {QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry); +monitor_flush (mon);monitor_data_destroy (mon);g_free (mon); }
@@ -4516,6 +4608,8 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void)/* QEMUBHs needs to be deleted before destroying the IOThread. */ qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =NULL ; +qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_respond_bh); + mon_global.qmp_respond_bh =NULL ;iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 19/23] qmp: isolate responses into io thread
Hi
Quoted 4 lines · Peter Xu
For those monitors who have enabled IO thread, we'll offload the responding procedure into IO thread. The main reason is that chardev is not thread safe, and we need to do all the read/write IOs in the same thread. For use_io_thr=true monitors, that thread is the IO thread.
Actually, the chr write path is suppose to be somewhat thread safe (chr_write_lock).
Secondly, the function responsible to write monitor data has some thread-safety, it's called monitor_flush_locked(), because you need the mon->out_lock.
I think that patch is making things more complicated than they need to be. You should be able to call monitor_json_emitter/monitor_puts() directly from any thread, it will queue the data, start writing, and add a watch if necessary in the appropriate context.
Am I missing something?
Quoted 196 lines
We do this isolation in similar pattern as what we have done to the request queue: we first create one response queue for each monitor, then instead of replying directly in the main thread, we queue the responses and kick the IO thread to do the rest of the job for us.
A funny thing after doing this is that, when the QMP clients send "quit" to QEMU, it's possible that we close the IOThread even earlier than replying to that "quit". So another thing we need to do before cleaning up the monitors is that we need to flush the response queue (we don't need to do that for command queue; after all we are quitting) to make sure replies for handled commands are always flushed back to clients.
Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)monitor.c +95
-2@@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ typedef struct {QemuMutex qmp_queue_lock;/* Input queue that holds all the parsed QMP requests */ GQueue *qmp_requests; +/* Output queue contains all the QMP responses in order */ +GQueue *qmp_responses; } MonitorQMP;/* @@ -205,6 +207,7 @@ struct Monitor {bool skip_flush;bool use_io_thr; +/* We can't access guest memory when holding the lock */ QemuMutex out_lock;QString *outbuf;guint out_watch;@@ -227,6 +230,8 @@ static struct {IOThread *mon_iothread;/* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from IO thread */ QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh; +/* Bottom half to deliver the responses back to clients */ +QEMUBH *qmp_respond_bh; } mon_global;/* QMP checker flags */ @@ -416,7 +421,8 @@ int monitor_fprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, ...)return 0 ; } -static void monitor_json_emitter (Monitor *mon,const QObject *data) +static void monitor_json_emitter_raw (Monitor *mon, +QObject *data) {QString *json;@@ -430,6 +436,71 @@ static void monitor_json_emitter(Monitor *mon, const QObject *data)QDECREF (json); } +static void monitor_json_emitter (Monitor *mon,QObject *data) +{ +if (mon->use_io_thr) { +/* +* If using IO thread, we need to queue the item so that IO +* thread will do the rest for us. Take refcount so that +* caller won't free the data (which will be finally freed in +* responder thread). +*/ +qobject_incref (data); +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +g_queue_push_tail (mon->qmp.qmp_responses, (void *)data); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +qemu_bh_schedule (mon_global.qmp_respond_bh); + }else { +/* +* If not using monitor IO thread, then we are in main thread. +* Do the emission right away. +*/ +monitor_json_emitter_raw (mon, data); + } +} + +struct QMPResponse { +Monitor *mon; +QObject *data; +}; +typedef struct QMPResponse QMPResponse ; + +/* +* Return one QMPResponse. The response is only valid if +* response.data is not NULL. +*/ +static QMPResponse monitor_qmp_response_pop_one (void ) +{ +Monitor *mon; +QObject *data =NULL ; + +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); + QTAILQ_FOREACH(mon, &mon_list, entry) { +qemu_mutex_lock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); + data =g_queue_pop_head (mon->qmp.qmp_responses); +qemu_mutex_unlock (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock); +if (data) { +break ; + } + } +qemu_mutex_unlock (&monitor_lock); +return (QMPResponse ) { .mon = mon, .data = data }; +} + +static void monitor_qmp_bh_responder (void *opaque) +{ +QMPResponse response; + +while (true) { + response =monitor_qmp_response_pop_one (); +if (!response.data) { +break ; + } +monitor_json_emitter_raw (response.mon, response.data); +qobject_decref (response.data); + } +} +static MonitorQAPIEventConf monitor_qapi_event_conf[QAPI_EVENT__MAX ] = {/* Limit guest-triggerable events to 1 per second */ [QAPI_EVENT_RTC_CHANGE ] = {1000 *SCALE_MS },@@ -616,6 +687,7 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon, bool skip_flush, mon->skip_flush = skip_flush; mon->use_io_thr = use_io_thr; mon->qmp.qmp_requests =g_queue_new (); + mon->qmp.qmp_responses =g_queue_new (); }static void monitor_data_destroy (Monitor *mon)@@ -630,6 +702,7 @@ static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->out_lock);qemu_mutex_destroy (&mon->qmp.qmp_queue_lock);g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_requests); +g_queue_free (mon->qmp.qmp_responses); } char *qmp_human_monitor_command(const char *command_line, bool has_cpu_index,@@ -4367,6 +4440,15 @@ static void monitor_iothread_init(void) mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =aio_bh_new (qemu_get_aio_context (), monitor_qmp_bh_dispatcher,NULL ); + +/* +* Unlike the dispatcher BH, this must be run on the monitor IO +* thread, so that monitors that are using IO thread will make +* sure read/write operations are all done on the IO thread. +*/ + mon_global.qmp_respond_bh =aio_bh_new (monitor_get_aio_context (), + monitor_qmp_bh_responder, +NULL ); }void monitor_init_globals (void )@@ -4505,9 +4587,19 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void)*/ iothread_stop (mon_global.mon_iothread); +/* +* After we have IOThread to send responses, it's possible that +* when we stop the IOThread there are still replies queued in the +* responder queue. Flush all of them. Note that even after this +* flush it's still possible that out buffer is not flushed. +* It'll be done in below monitor_flush() as the last resort. +*/ +monitor_qmp_bh_responder (NULL ); +qemu_mutex_lock (&monitor_lock); QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(mon, &mon_list, entry, next) {QTAILQ_REMOVE (&mon_list, mon, entry); +monitor_flush (mon);monitor_data_destroy (mon);g_free (mon); }@@ -4516,6 +4608,8 @@ void monitor_cleanup(void)/* QEMUBHs needs to be deleted before destroying the IOThread. */ qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh); mon_global.qmp_dispatcher_bh =NULL ; +qemu_bh_delete (mon_global.qmp_respond_bh); + mon_global.qmp_respond_bh =NULL ;iothread_destroy (mon_global.mon_iothread); mon_global.mon_iothread =NULL ; --2.14.3
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 19/23] qmp: isolate responses into io thread
Quoted 15 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 4 lines · Peter Xu
For those monitors who have enabled IO thread, we'll offload the responding procedure into IO thread. The main reason is that chardev is not thread safe, and we need to do all the read/write IOs in the same thread. For use_io_thr=true monitors, that thread is the IO thread.
Actually, the chr write path is suppose to be somewhat thread safe (
chr_write_lock).Secondly, the function responsible to write monitor data has some thread-safety, it's called
monitor_flush_locked(), because you need themon->out_lock.
Quoted 6 lines
I think that patch is making things more complicated than they need to be. You should be able to call monitor_json_emitter/monitor_puts() directly from any thread, it will queue the data, start writing, and add a watch if necessary in the appropriate context.
Am I missing something?
Yes there are the locks either in monitor code and chardev code to protect write operations. However I don't know enough to be sure of its safety. Considering that, having the whole chardev operations separated into the other IOThread seems to be the only safe approach to me for now.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 19/23] qmp: isolate responses into io thread
Hi
Quoted 21 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 20 lines · Marc-André Lureau
Hi
Quoted 4 lines · Peter Xu
For those monitors who have enabled IO thread, we'll offload the responding procedure into IO thread. The main reason is that chardev is not thread safe, and we need to do all the read/write IOs in the same thread. For use_io_thr=true monitors, that thread is the IO thread.
Actually, the chr write path is suppose to be somewhat thread safe (
chr_write_lock).Secondly, the function responsible to write monitor data has some thread-safety, it's called
monitor_flush_locked(), because you need themon->out_lock.I think that patch is making things more complicated than they need to be. You should be able to call monitor_json_emitter/monitor_puts() directly from any thread, it will queue the data, start writing, and add a watch if necessary in the appropriate context.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Am I missing something?
Yes there are the locks either in monitor code and chardev code to protect write operations. However I don't know enough to be sure of its safety. Considering that, having the whole chardev operations separated into the other IOThread seems to be the only safe approach to me for now.
I have studied the code in more details, and I'll propose to revert this patch early in 2.13. I'll send a 2.13 RFC qmp series shortly.
Signature · 1 line
Marc-André Lureau
PATCH v8 20/23 monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
In reply to Peter XuStart to use dedicate IO thread for QMP monitors that are not using MUXed chardev.
--- monitor.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
monitor.c +4 -1
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@#include "net/slirp.h" #include "chardev/char-fe.h" #include "chardev/char-io.h" +#include "chardev/char-mux.h" #include "ui/qemu-spice.h" #include "sysemu/numa.h" #include "monitor/monitor.h"
@@ -4533,8 +4534,10 @@ static void monitor_qmp_setup_handlers_bh(void *opaque)void monitor_init (Chardev *chr,int flags) {Monitor *mon =g_malloc (sizeof (*mon)); +/* Enable IOThread for QMPs that are not using MUX chardev backends. */ +bool use_io_thr = (!CHARDEV_IS_MUX (chr)) && (flags &MONITOR_USE_CONTROL ); -monitor_data_init (mon, false, false); +monitor_data_init (mon, false, use_io_thr);qemu_chr_fe_init (&mon->chr, chr, &error_abort); mon->flags = flags;
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
Quoted 35 lines · Peter Xu
Start to use dedicate IO thread for QMP monitors that are not using MUXed chardev.
Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- monitor.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)monitor.c +4
-1@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@#include "net/slirp.h" #include "chardev/char-fe.h" #include "chardev/char-io.h" +#include "chardev/char-mux.h" #include "ui/qemu-spice.h" #include "sysemu/numa.h" #include "monitor/monitor.h" @@ -4533,8 +4534,10 @@ static void monitor_qmp_setup_handlers_bh(void *opaque)void monitor_init (Chardev *chr,int flags) {Monitor *mon =g_malloc (sizeof (*mon)); +/* Enable IOThread for QMPs that are not using MUX chardev backends. */ +bool use_io_thr = (!CHARDEV_IS_MUX (chr)) && (flags &MONITOR_USE_CONTROL ); -monitor_data_init (mon, false, false); +monitor_data_init (mon, false, use_io_thr);qemu_chr_fe_init (&mon->chr, chr, &error_abort); mon->flags = flags;
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
Quoted 4 lines · Christian Borntraeger
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
My fault. Sorry. I should have done iotests before submission.
Now I'm trying to fix those iotest issues.
I'm not extremely familiar with block, so the progress is a bit slow, but I'll do it asap (though I'll possibly need some help from the block team, since there are some not-easy ones for me).
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 4 lines · Christian Borntraeger
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
Quoted 7 lines
My fault. Sorry. I should have done iotests before submission.
Now I'm trying to fix those iotest issues.
I'm not extremely familiar with block, so the progress is a bit slow, but I'll do it asap (though I'll possibly need some help from the block team, since there are some not-easy ones for me).
As this patch also seems to trigger something else for Eric, can we revert this patch for the time being and re-apply as soon as we have solutions for the issues?
After all a hard hang in the iotest can break CI environments (as you run into timeouts).
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
Quoted 13 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 10 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 4 lines · Christian Borntraeger
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
My fault. Sorry. I should have done iotests before submission.
Now I'm trying to fix those iotest issues.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I'm not extremely familiar with block, so the progress is a bit slow, but I'll do it asap (though I'll possibly need some help from the block team, since there are some not-easy ones for me).
As this patch also seems to trigger something else for Eric, can we revert this patch for the time being and re-apply as soon as we have solutions for the issues?
After all a hard hang in the iotest can break CI environments (as you run into timeouts).
I'm fine with it if it helps.
Then I can work in background to solved existing problems, then we turn it on again in 2.13 when ready (but still it might break things - at least it can be during dev cycle rather than softfreeze).
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
Quoted 18 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 17 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 13 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 4 lines · Christian Borntraeger
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
My fault. Sorry. I should have done iotests before submission.
Now I'm trying to fix those iotest issues.
I'm not extremely familiar with block, so the progress is a bit slow, but I'll do it asap (though I'll possibly need some help from the block team, since there are some not-easy ones for me).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
As this patch also seems to trigger something else for Eric, can we revert this patch for the time being and re-apply as soon as we have solutions for the issues?
After all a hard hang in the iotest can break CI environments (as you run into timeouts).
I'm fine with it if it helps.
OK. I'm running a revert of commit 3fd2457d18edf5736f713dfe1ada9c87a9badab1 through my buildtests and will push it to master assuming it passes.
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
In reply to Peter XuQuoted 21 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 20 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 4 lines · Christian Borntraeger
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
Quoted 7 lines
My fault. Sorry. I should have done iotests before submission.
Now I'm trying to fix those iotest issues.
I'm not extremely familiar with block, so the progress is a bit slow, but I'll do it asap (though I'll possibly need some help from the block team, since there are some not-easy ones for me).
As this patch also seems to trigger something else for Eric, can we revert this patch for the time being and re-apply as soon as we have solutions for the issues?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
After all a hard hang in the iotest can break CI environments (as you run into timeouts).
I'm fine with it if it helps.
Then I can work in background to solved existing problems, then we turn it on again in 2.13 when ready (but still it might break things - at least it can be during dev cycle rather than softfreeze).
Strangely enough, reverting 3fd2457d18edf5736f713dfe1 now causes make check errors... :-/
GTESTER check-qtest-s390x
GTESTER check-qtest-i386
**
ERROR:/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/qmp-test.c:97:test_qmp_protocol: assertion failed: (entry)
GTester: last random seed: R02S1cbb7e297cc349b33ae39f10dd92764a
**
ERROR:/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/qmp-test.c:190:test_qmp_oob: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(resp, "return"))
GTester: last random seed: R02S7afc5ab63f6f29401d702dceb1f8030b
make: *** [/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/Makefile.include:880: check-qtest-s390x] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
^Cmake: *** [/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/Makefile.include:880: check-qtest-i386] Interrupt
Do we have patches depending on this change?
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 20/23] monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed
Quoted 49 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 21 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 20 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Quoted 4 lines · Christian Borntraeger
As Max Reitz said, this breaks several qemu iotests. I can reproduce that on s390 e.g. with ./check -qcow2 030 in the qemu-iotest.
Why was this merged?
Quoted 7 lines
My fault. Sorry. I should have done iotests before submission.
Now I'm trying to fix those iotest issues.
I'm not extremely familiar with block, so the progress is a bit slow, but I'll do it asap (though I'll possibly need some help from the block team, since there are some not-easy ones for me).
As this patch also seems to trigger something else for Eric, can we revert this patch for the time being and re-apply as soon as we have solutions for the issues?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
After all a hard hang in the iotest can break CI environments (as you run into timeouts).
I'm fine with it if it helps.
Then I can work in background to solved existing problems, then we turn it on again in 2.13 when ready (but still it might break things - at least it can be during dev cycle rather than softfreeze).
Strangely enough, reverting
3fd2457d18edf5736f713dfe1now causes make check errors... :-/GTESTER check-qtest-s390x
GTESTER check-qtest-i386
**
ERROR:/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/qmp-test.c:97:test_qmp_protocol: assertion failed: (entry)
GTester: last random seed: R02S1cbb7e297cc349b33ae39f10dd92764a
**
ERROR:/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/qmp-test.c:190:test_qmp_oob: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(resp, "return"))
GTester: last random seed: R02S7afc5ab63f6f29401d702dceb1f8030b
make: *** [/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/Makefile.include:880: check-qtest-s390x] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
^Cmake: *** [/home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/tests/Makefile.include:880: check-qtest-i386] Interrupt
Quoted 1 line
Do we have patches depending on this change?
It's the new OOB tests that's failing. I'm preparing a patchset that reverts the enablement patch, along with those tests.
Now I'm testing that branch with more platforms and also all raw+qcow2 iotests. After that's solid, I'll post that out soon if it goes smoothly.
Hopefully that would fix all problems so far.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
PATCH v8 21/23 qmp: add command "x-oob-test"
In reply to Peter XuThis command is only used to test OOB functionality. It should not be used for any other purposes.
--- qapi/misc.json | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ qmp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
qapi/misc.json +18 -0
@@ -3264,3 +3264,21 @@ ## { 'event': 'COMMAND_DROPPED' , 'data': { 'id': 'any', 'reason': 'CommandDropReason' } } + +## +# @x-oob-test: +# +# Test OOB functionality. When send this command with lock=true, +# it'll try to hang the dispatcher. When send it with lock=false, +# it'll try to notify the locked thread to continue. Note: it should +# only be used by QMP test program rather than anything else. +# +# Since: 2.12 +# +# Example: +# +# { "execute": "x-oob-test", +# "arguments": { "lock": true } } +## +{ 'command': 'x-oob-test', 'data' : { 'lock': 'bool' }, + 'allow-oob': true }
qmp.c +16 -0
@@ -770,3 +770,19 @@ MemoryInfo *qmp_query_memory_size_summary(Error **errp)return mem_info; } + +static QemuSemaphore x_oob_test_sem; + +static void __attribute__((constructor))x_oob_test_init (void ) +{ +qemu_sem_init (&x_oob_test_sem,0 ); +} + +void qmp_x_oob_test (bool lock,Error **errp) +{ +if (lock) { +qemu_sem_wait (&x_oob_test_sem); + }else { +qemu_sem_post (&x_oob_test_sem); + } +}
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 21/23] qmp: add command "x-oob-test"
Quoted 16 lines · Peter Xu
This command is only used to test OOB functionality. It should not be used for any other purposes.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Fam Zheng <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- qapi/misc.json | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ qmp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)qapi/misc.json +0
-0
qapi/misc.json line 3271
Quoted 8 lines
qapi/misc.json +5
-0@@ -3264,3 +3264,21 @@ ## { 'event': 'COMMAND_DROPPED' , 'data': { 'id': 'any', 'reason': 'CommandDropReason' } } + +## +# @x-oob-test: +# +# Test OOB functionality. When send this command with lock=true,
s/send/sending/
qapi/misc.json line 3272
Quoted 1 line
qapi/misc.json +1
-0+# it'll try to hang the dispatcher. When send it with lock=false,
s/send/sending/
qapi/misc.json line 3284
Quoted 12 lines
qapi/misc.json +12
-0+# it'll try to notify the locked thread to continue. Note: it should +# only be used by QMP test program rather than anything else. +# +# Since: 2.12 +# +# Example: +# +# { "execute": "x-oob-test", +# "arguments": { "lock": true } } +## +{ 'command': 'x-oob-test', 'data' : { 'lock': 'bool' }, + 'allow-oob': true }
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
PATCH v8 22/23 tests: qmp-test: verify command batching
In reply to Peter XuOOB introduced DROP event for flow control. This should not affect old QMP clients. Add a command batching check to make sure of it.
--- tests/qmp-test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
tests/qmp-test.c +22 -0
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static void test_qmp_protocol(void)QTestState *qts;const QListEntry *entry;QString *qstr; +int i; qts =qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake (common_args);
@@ -139,6 +140,27 @@ static void test_qmp_protocol(void) g_assert_cmpint(qdict_get_int(resp, "id"), ==, 2);QDECREF (resp); +/* +* Test command batching. In current test OOB is not enabled, we +* should be able to run as many commands in batch as we like. +* Using 16 (>8, which is OOB queue length) to make sure OOB won't +* break existing clients. Note: this test does not control the +* scheduling of QEMU's QMP command processing threads so it may +* not really trigger batching inside QEMU. This is just a +* best-effort test. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i <16 ; i++) { +qtest_async_qmp (qts,"{ 'execute': 'query-version' }" ); + } +/* Verify the replies to make sure no command is dropped. */ +for (i =0 ; i <16 ; i++) { + resp =qtest_qmp_receive (qts); +/* It should never be dropped. Each of them should be a reply. */ +g_assert (qdict_haskey (resp,"return" )); +g_assert (!qdict_haskey (resp,"event" )); +QDECREF (resp); + } +qtest_quit (qts); }
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 22/23] tests: qmp-test: verify command batching
Quoted 12 lines · Peter Xu
OOB introduced DROP event for flow control. This should not affect old QMP clients. Add a command batching check to make sure of it.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- tests/qmp-test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)tests/qmp-test.c +1
-0+/*
tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 153
Quoted 10 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +10
-0+* Test command batching. In current test OOB is not enabled, we +* should be able to run as many commands in batch as we like. +* Using 16 (>8, which is OOB queue length) to make sure OOB won't +* break existing clients. Note: this test does not control the +* scheduling of QEMU's QMP command processing threads so it may +* not really trigger batching inside QEMU. This is just a +* best-effort test. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i <16 ; i++) { +qtest_async_qmp (qts,"{ 'execute': 'query-version' }" );
Would the test be any more robust if we could generate a single string to send all at once, rather than multiple separate calls to qtest_async_qmp() (the overhead in generating separate strings means the monitor may have made progress before we send the next string). But that can be a followup, if you want to pursue the idea.
tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 161
Quoted 8 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +8
-0+ } +/* Verify the replies to make sure no command is dropped. */ +for (i =0 ; i <16 ; i++) { + resp =qtest_qmp_receive (qts); +/* It should never be dropped. Each of them should be a reply. */ +g_assert (qdict_haskey (resp,"return" )); +g_assert (!qdict_haskey (resp,"event" )); +QDECREF (resp);
Should we also be sending unique ids, and ensure that the responses arrive with ids in the same order? Again, idea for a followup.
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 22/23] tests: qmp-test: verify command batching
Quoted 23 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 11 lines · Peter Xu
OOB introduced DROP event for flow control. This should not affect old QMP clients. Add a command batching check to make sure of it.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- tests/qmp-test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)tests/qmp-test.c +1
-0+/* tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 153
Quoted 10 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +10
-0+* Test command batching. In current test OOB is not enabled, we +* should be able to run as many commands in batch as we like. +* Using 16 (>8, which is OOB queue length) to make sure OOB won't +* break existing clients. Note: this test does not control the +* scheduling of QEMU's QMP command processing threads so it may +* not really trigger batching inside QEMU. This is just a +* best-effort test. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i <16 ; i++) { +qtest_async_qmp (qts,"{ 'execute': 'query-version' }" );
Quoted 5 lines
Would the test be any more robust if we could generate a single string to send all at once, rather than multiple separate calls to
qtest_async_qmp()(the overhead in generating separate strings means the monitor may have made progress before we send the next string). But that can be a followup, if you want to pursue the idea.
Yes, a single string would be nicer.
As the comment said (which was actually pointed out by Stefan), the test is only a best effort test considering that we cannot really control how the QEMU QMP internal handles the requests. E.g., even if we send the strings in one write() call, it's still only buffered on the receiver's side only, and it'll be QEMU who decide how to fetch the buffer content.
I can fix this up if there is a new post, or do it separately otherwise along with the other suggestion below.
Quoted 10 lines
tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 161
Quoted 9 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +8
-0+ } +/* Verify the replies to make sure no command is dropped. */ +for (i =0 ; i <16 ; i++) { + resp =qtest_qmp_receive (qts); +/* It should never be dropped. Each of them should be a reply. */ +g_assert (qdict_haskey (resp,"return" )); +g_assert (!qdict_haskey (resp,"event" )); +QDECREF (resp);
Quoted 2 lines
Should we also be sending unique ids, and ensure that the responses arrive with ids in the same order? Again, idea for a followup.
Yes, it can be better. Will apply the same idea as above, depending on the fate of current series.
Quoted 2 lines
Reviewed-by Eric Blake <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
PATCH v8 23/23 tests: qmp-test: add oob test
In reply to Peter XuTest the new OOB capability. Here we used the new "x-oob-test" command. Firstly, we send a lock=true and oob=false command to hang the main thread. Then send another lock=false and oob=true command (which will be run inside parser this time) to free that hanged command.
--- tests/qmp-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
tests/qmp-test.c +65 -0
@@ -164,6 +164,70 @@ static void test_qmp_protocol(void)qtest_quit (qts); } +/* Tests for Out-Of-Band support. */ +static void test_qmp_oob (void ) +{ +QDict *resp; +int acks =0 ; +const char *cmd_id; + + global_qtest =qtest_init_without_qmp_handshake (common_args); + +/* Ignore the greeting message. */ + resp =qmp_receive (); +g_assert (qdict_get_qdict (resp,"QMP" )); +QDECREF (resp); + +/* Try a fake capability, it should fail. */ + resp =qmp ("{ 'execute': 'qmp_capabilities', " +" 'arguments': { 'enable': [ 'cap-does-not-exist' ] } }" ); +g_assert (qdict_haskey (resp,"error" )); +QDECREF (resp); + +/* Now, enable OOB in current QMP session, it should success. */ + resp =qmp ("{ 'execute': 'qmp_capabilities', " +" 'arguments': { 'enable': [ 'oob' ] } }" ); +g_assert (qdict_haskey (resp,"return" )); +QDECREF (resp); + +/* +* Try any command that does not support OOB but with OOB flag. We +* should get failure. +*/ + resp =qmp ("{ 'execute': 'query-cpus'," +" 'control': { 'run-oob': true } }" ); +g_assert (qdict_haskey (resp,"error" )); +QDECREF (resp); + +/* +* Firstly send the "x-oob-test" command with lock=true and +* oob=false, it should hang the dispatcher and main thread; +* later, we send another lock=false with oob=true to continue +* that thread processing. Finally we should receive replies from +* both commands. +*/ +qmp_async ("{ 'execute': 'x-oob-test'," +" 'arguments': { 'lock': true }, " +" 'id': 'lock-cmd'}" ); +qmp_async ("{ 'execute': 'x-oob-test', " +" 'arguments': { 'lock': false }, " +" 'control': { 'run-oob': true }, " +" 'id': 'unlock-cmd' }" ); + +/* Ignore all events. Wait for 2 acks */ +while (acks <2 ) { + resp =qmp_receive (); + cmd_id =qdict_get_str (resp,"id" ); +if (!g_strcmp0 (cmd_id,"lock-cmd" ) || + !g_strcmp0 (cmd_id,"unlock-cmd" )) { + acks++; + } +QDECREF (resp); + } + +qtest_end (); +} +static int query_error_class (const char *cmd) { static struct {
@@ -343,6 +407,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])g_test_init (&argc, &argv,NULL );qtest_add_func ("qmp/protocol" , test_qmp_protocol); +qtest_add_func ("qmp/oob" , test_qmp_oob);qmp_schema_init (&schema);add_query_tests (&schema);
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 23/23] tests: qmp-test: add oob test
Quoted 2 lines · Peter Xu
Test the new OOB capability. Here we used the new "x-oob-test" command. Firstly, we send a lock=true and oob=false command to hang the main
s/Firstly/First/
Quoted 11 lines
thread. Then send another lock=false and oob=true command (which will be run inside parser this time) to free that hanged command.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- tests/qmp-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)+ /* Now, enable OOB in current QMP session, it should success. */
s/success/succeed/
tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 203
Quoted 3 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +3
-0+ +/* +* Firstly send the "x-oob-test" command with lock=true and
s/Firstly/First/
Quoted 13 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +13
-0+* oob=false, it should hang the dispatcher and main thread; +* later, we send another lock=false with oob=true to continue +* that thread processing. Finally we should receive replies from +* both commands. +*/ +qmp_async ("{ 'execute': 'x-oob-test'," +" 'arguments': { 'lock': true }, " +" 'id': 'lock-cmd'}" ); +qmp_async ("{ 'execute': 'x-oob-test', " +" 'arguments': { 'lock': false }, " +" 'control': { 'run-oob': true }, " +" 'id': 'unlock-cmd' }" ); +
tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 226
Quoted 10 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +10
-0+/* Ignore all events. Wait for 2 acks */ +while (acks <2 ) { + resp =qmp_receive (); + cmd_id =qdict_get_str (resp,"id" ); +if (!g_strcmp0 (cmd_id,"lock-cmd" ) || + !g_strcmp0 (cmd_id,"unlock-cmd" )) { + acks++; + } +QDECREF (resp); + }
Can you make the reply order deterministic? Perhaps by having the lock command insert a sleep after locking but before replying, so that the unlock always gets to reply first? But that can be a followup.
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 23/23] tests: qmp-test: add oob test
Quoted 50 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 2 lines · Peter Xu
Test the new OOB capability. Here we used the new "x-oob-test" command. Firstly, we send a lock=true and oob=false command to hang the main
s/Firstly/First/
Quoted 11 lines
thread. Then send another lock=false and oob=true command (which will be run inside parser this time) to free that hanged command.
Reviewed-by Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Peter Xu <[email protected]>--- tests/qmp-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)+ /* Now, enable OOB in current QMP session, it should success. */
s/success/succeed/
tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 203
Quoted 3 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +3
-0+ +/* +* Firstly send the "x-oob-test" command with lock=true and s/Firstly/First/
Quoted 13 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +13
-0+* oob=false, it should hang the dispatcher and main thread; +* later, we send another lock=false with oob=true to continue +* that thread processing. Finally we should receive replies from +* both commands. +*/ +qmp_async ("{ 'execute': 'x-oob-test'," +" 'arguments': { 'lock': true }, " +" 'id': 'lock-cmd'}" ); +qmp_async ("{ 'execute': 'x-oob-test', " +" 'arguments': { 'lock': false }, " +" 'control': { 'run-oob': true }, " +" 'id': 'unlock-cmd' }" ); +tests/qmp-test.c static void test_qmp_protocol(void) · line 226
Quoted 10 lines
tests/qmp-test.c +10
-0+/* Ignore all events. Wait for 2 acks */ +while (acks <2 ) { + resp =qmp_receive (); + cmd_id =qdict_get_str (resp,"id" ); +if (!g_strcmp0 (cmd_id,"lock-cmd" ) || + !g_strcmp0 (cmd_id,"unlock-cmd" )) { + acks++; + } +QDECREF (resp); + }
Quoted 3 lines
Can you make the reply order deterministic? Perhaps by having the lock command insert a sleep after locking but before replying, so that the unlock always gets to reply first? But that can be a followup.
Yes, I could. I'm just afraid that sleep might be undeterministic too in some extreme cases, since IMHO it'll still depend on other things (e.g., the scheduler of host, resources/workload on the host, etc.) to make sure the order of the two commands will be exactly what we want.
So, even if current test seems to be undetermistic on the order of received responses, IMHO it's very good on the other hand that it is very determinstic on the test result...
Quoted 2 lines
Reviewed-by Eric Blake <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Quoted 14 lines · Peter Xu
Based-on: <[email protected]>
The series is based on the following series:
[PATCH v2 0/9] chardev: qio related non-default context support (actually patch 9 is based on version 2.1, Dan's version)
This version only contains some trivial changes, most of the work is posted separately in either the QIO or CHARDEV series.
Four days until soft freeze. Hmm...
Please review. Thanks,
Quoted 7 lines
v8:
- fix up doc patch as suggested [Eric]
- rename functions in form ofX_get_Y()orX_bh()[Stefan]
- English fixes [Stefan]
- make sure to kick iothread after suspend count update [Stefan]
- remove the hack to remove fd inmonitor_init(), since now we have the QIO/CHARDEV series to solve the root problem.
Still a lot that I had to clean up (in part due to conflicts with other pending patches that also touch qapi), but given the utility of this feature, and the impending deadline for freeze, I've gone ahead and done the cleanup work. Your patches are now stages on my QAPI tree.
git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git qapi
http://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qapi
Note that I had some ideas for followup patches (mainly strengthening the testsuite, which is typically safe early on in freeze because it is not introducing features but strengthening the quality of the release).
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Quoted 7 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Based-on: <[email protected]>
The series is based on the following series:
[PATCH v2 0/9] chardev: qio related non-default context support (actually patch 9 is based on version 2.1, Dan's version)
[1]
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 8 lines
This version only contains some trivial changes, most of the work is posted separately in either the QIO or CHARDEV series.
Four days until soft freeze. Hmm...
Please review. Thanks,
Quoted 7 lines
v8:
- fix up doc patch as suggested [Eric]
- rename functions in form ofX_get_Y()orX_bh()[Stefan]
- English fixes [Stefan]
- make sure to kick iothread after suspend count update [Stefan]
- remove the hack to remove fd inmonitor_init(), since now we have the QIO/CHARDEV series to solve the root problem.Still a lot that I had to clean up (in part due to conflicts with other pending patches that also touch qapi), but given the utility of this feature, and the impending deadline for freeze, I've gone ahead and done the cleanup work. Your patches are now stages on my QAPI tree.
Quoted 6 lines
git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.gitqapi
http://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qapiNote that I had some ideas for followup patches (mainly strengthening the testsuite, which is typically safe early on in freeze because it is not introducing features but strengthening the quality of the release).
I really appreciate very much on your work and time on the series.
I've noted down all the review comments, including the test enhancements (which I'll do in a proper way soon). I'll avoid replying to every review comments since all of them are sane.
Note that this series will depend on the chardev fixes ([1] above) in Paolo's tree. They'll possibly not be needed for compilation, but might be needed for further tests. Hope that won't be a big problem.
Thanks again!
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Based-on: <[email protected]>
The series is based on the following series:
[PATCH v2 0/9] chardev: qio related non-default context support (actually patch 9 is based on version 2.1, Dan's version)
I see Dan already submitted a pull request for (some of) your qio work; see commit 3ef91576. Are there any more outstanding qio patches that have to land first?
Quoted 13 lines
This series was born from this one:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-08/msg04310.htmlThe idea comes from Markus Armbruster and the discussion we had in the thread. It's not a super ideal solution (I believe Markus had been thinking hard to keep everything in order meanwhile trying to satisfy the migration requirement), but AFAIU it's currently the best.
What is OOB?
============
Signature · 3 lines
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Based-on: <[email protected]>
The series is based on the following series:
[PATCH v2 0/9] chardev: qio related non-default context support (actually patch 9 is based on version 2.1, Dan's version)
I see Dan already submitted a pull request for (some of) your qio work; see commit
3ef91576. Are there any more outstanding qio patches that have to land first?
AFAIK, there isn't anymore qio stuff pending merge - just the chardev series Paolo has queued.
Regards,
Daniel
Signature · 3 lines
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Quoted 9 lines · Daniel P. Berrangé
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Blake
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Xu
Based-on: <[email protected]>
The series is based on the following series:
[PATCH v2 0/9] chardev: qio related non-default context support (actually patch 9 is based on version 2.1, Dan's version)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I see Dan already submitted a pull request for (some of) your qio work; see commit
3ef91576. Are there any more outstanding qio patches that have to land first?AFAIK, there isn't anymore qio stuff pending merge - just the chardev series Paolo has queued.
Yes, there are still chardev patches that used the new QIO code queued in Paolo's tree. There can be either 8/9 patches there, dpending on whether Paolo has queued the 9th patch from Dan.
Thanks,
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu