Resolve conflicts in expandattribute.
PATCH v2 1/1 Resolve conflicts in expandattribute.
This commit resolves conflicts in values of expandattribute statements in policy language and expandtypeattribute in CIL.
For example, these statements resolve to false in policy language:
expandattribute hal_audio true;
expandattribute hal_audio false;
Similarly, in CIL these also resolve to false.
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) true)
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) false)
Motivation
When Android combines multiple .cil files from system.img and vendor.img it's possible to have conflicting expandattribute statements.
This change deals with this scenario by resolving the value of the corresponding expandtypeattribute to false. The rationale behind this override is that true is used for reduce run-time lookups, while false is used for tests which must pass.
--- checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 8 ++++---- libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +4 -4
@@ -1182,10 +1182,6 @@ int expand_attrib(void) goto exit; } -if (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR ) { -yyerror2 ("%s already has the expandattribute option specified" , id); - goto exit; - }if (ebitmap_set_bit (&attrs, attr->s.value -1 , TRUE)) {yyerror ("Out of memory!" ); goto exit;
@@ -1213,6 +1209,10 @@ int expand_attrib(void) attr =hashtab_search (policydbp->p_types.table, policydbp->sym_val_to_name[SYM_TYPES ][i]); attr->flags |= flags; +if ((attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ) && + (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_FALSE )) { + attr->flags &= ~TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ; + } } rc =0 ;
libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +6 -15
@@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ exit:return rc; } -int cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) +void cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) { -int rc =SEPOL_ERR ;struct cil_typeattribute *attr =NULL ;if (FLAVOR (datum) ==CIL_TYPEATTRIBUTE ) {
@@ -279,16 +278,12 @@ int cil_type_used(struct cil_symtab_datum *datum, int used) attr->used |= used;if ((attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ) && (attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE )) { -cil_log (CIL_ERR ,"Conflicting use of expandtypeattribute. " -"Expandtypeattribute may be set to true or false " -"but not both. \n" ); - goto exit; +cil_log (CIL_WARN ,"Conflicting use of expandtypeattribute. " +"Expandtypeattribute was set to both true or false for %s. " +"Resolving to false. \n" , attr->datum.name); + attr->used &= ~CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ; } } - -return SEPOL_OK ; -exit: -return rc; }int cil_resolve_permissionx (struct cil_tree_node *current,struct cil_permissionx *permx,void *extra_args)
@@ -488,11 +483,7 @@ int cil_resolve_expandtypeattribute(struct cil_tree_node *current, void *extra_a goto exit; } used = expandattr->expand ?CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE :CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE ; - rc =cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); -if (rc !=SEPOL_OK ) { - goto exit; - } - +cil_type_used (attr_datum, used);cil_list_append (expandattr->attr_datums,CIL_TYPE , attr_datum); }
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
Quoted 42 lines · Tri Vo
This commit resolves conflicts in values of expandattribute statements in policy language and expandtypeattribute in CIL.
For example, these statements resolve to false in policy language:
expandattributehal_audiotrue;
expandattributehal_audiofalse;Similarly, in CIL these also resolve to false.
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) true)
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) false)Motivation
When Android combines multiple .cil files from system.img and vendor.img it's possible to have conflicting expandattribute statements.This change deals with this scenario by resolving the value of the corresponding expandtypeattribute to false. The rationale behind this override is that true is used for reduce run-time lookups, while false is used for tests which must pass.
Signed-off-by Tri Vo <[email protected]>--- checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 8 ++++---- libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-4@@ -1182,10 +1182,6 @@ int expand_attrib(void) goto exit; } -if (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR ) { -yyerror2 ("%s already has the expandattribute option specified" , id); - goto exit; - }if (ebitmap_set_bit (&attrs, attr->s.value -1 , TRUE)) {yyerror ("Out of memory!" ); goto exit;
checkpolicy/policy_define.c int expand_attrib(void) · line 1211
Quoted 3 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-0@@ -1213,6 +1209,10 @@ int expand_attrib(void) attr =hashtab_search (policydbp->p_types.table, policydbp->sym_val_to_name[SYM_TYPES ][i]); attr->flags |= flags;
I'd like to see a comment here. The CIL case is much easier to understand because the error messages contain information about what's going on.
Maybe something like:
/*
* if an expandattr rule conflicts, set the expandattr to false. False always
* works, at the expense of performance for run-time attribute resolution. */
Quoted 57 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +4
-0+if ((attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ) && + (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_FALSE )) { + attr->flags &= ~TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ; + } } rc =0 ;libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +6
-16@@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ exit:return rc; } -int cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) +void cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) { -int rc =SEPOL_ERR ;struct cil_typeattribute *attr =NULL ;if (FLAVOR (datum) ==CIL_TYPEATTRIBUTE ) {@@ -279,16 +278,12 @@ int cil_type_used(struct cil_symtab_datum *datum, int used) attr->used |= used;if ((attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ) && (attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE )) { -cil_log (CIL_ERR ,"Conflicting use of expandtypeattribute. " -"Expandtypeattribute may be set to true or false " -"but not both. \n" ); - goto exit; +cil_log (CIL_WARN ,"Conflicting use of expandtypeattribute. " +"Expandtypeattribute was set to both true or false for %s. " +"Resolving to false. \n" , attr->datum.name); + attr->used &= ~CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ; } } - -return SEPOL_OK ; -exit: -return rc; }int cil_resolve_permissionx (struct cil_tree_node *current,struct cil_permissionx *permx,void *extra_args)@@ -488,11 +483,7 @@ int cil_resolve_expandtypeattribute(struct cil_tree_node *current, void *extra_a goto exit; } used = expandattr->expand ?CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE :CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE ; - rc =cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); -if (rc !=SEPOL_OK ) { - goto exit; - } - +cil_type_used (attr_datum, used);cil_list_append (expandattr->attr_datums,CIL_TYPE , attr_datum); } --
Quoted 2 lines
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
Overall this looks good, just add that comment.
Well see if anyone else has more feedback.
Quoted 50 lines · William Roberts
Quoted 42 lines · Tri Vo
This commit resolves conflicts in values of expandattribute statements in policy language and expandtypeattribute in CIL.
For example, these statements resolve to false in policy language:
expandattributehal_audiotrue;
expandattributehal_audiofalse;Similarly, in CIL these also resolve to false.
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) true)
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) false)Motivation
When Android combines multiple .cil files from system.img and vendor.img it's possible to have conflicting expandattribute statements.This change deals with this scenario by resolving the value of the corresponding expandtypeattribute to false. The rationale behind this override is that true is used for reduce run-time lookups, while false is used for tests which must pass.
Signed-off-by Tri Vo <[email protected]>--- checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 8 ++++---- libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-4@@ -1182,10 +1182,6 @@ int expand_attrib(void) goto exit; } -if (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR ) { -yyerror2 ("%s already has the expandattribute option specified" , id); - goto exit; - }if (ebitmap_set_bit (&attrs, attr->s.value -1 , TRUE)) {yyerror ("Out of memory!" ); goto exit;checkpolicy/policy_define.c int expand_attrib(void) · line 1211
Quoted 3 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-0@@ -1213,6 +1209,10 @@ int expand_attrib(void) attr =hashtab_search (policydbp->p_types.table, policydbp->sym_val_to_name[SYM_TYPES ][i]); attr->flags |= flags;I'd like to see a comment here. The CIL case is much easier to understand because the error messages contain information about what's going on.
Quoted 6 lines
Maybe something like:
/*
* if an expandattr rule conflicts, set the expandattr to false. False always
* works, at the expense of performance for run-time attribute resolution. */
I would actually prefer a warning.
Quoted 56 lines
Quoted 56 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +4
-0+if ((attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ) && + (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_FALSE )) { + attr->flags &= ~TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ; + } } rc =0 ;libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +6
-15@@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ exit:return rc; } -int cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) +void cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) { -int rc =SEPOL_ERR ;struct cil_typeattribute *attr =NULL ;if (FLAVOR (datum) ==CIL_TYPEATTRIBUTE ) {@@ -279,16 +278,12 @@ int cil_type_used(struct cil_symtab_datum *datum, int used) attr->used |= used;if ((attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ) && (attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE )) { -cil_log (CIL_ERR ,"Conflicting use of expandtypeattribute. " -"Expandtypeattribute may be set to true or false " -"but not both. \n" ); - goto exit; +cil_log (CIL_WARN ,"Conflicting use of expandtypeattribute. " +"Expandtypeattribute was set to both true or false for %s. " +"Resolving to false. \n" , attr->datum.name); + attr->used &= ~CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ; } } - -return SEPOL_OK ; -exit: -return rc; }int cil_resolve_permissionx (struct cil_tree_node *current,struct cil_permissionx *permx,void *extra_args)@@ -488,11 +483,7 @@ int cil_resolve_expandtypeattribute(struct cil_tree_node *current, void *extra_a goto exit; } used = expandattr->expand ?CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE :CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE ; - rc =cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); -if (rc !=SEPOL_OK ) { - goto exit; - } - +cil_type_used (attr_datum, used);cil_list_append (expandattr->attr_datums,CIL_TYPE , attr_datum); }
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
--
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-googOverall this looks good, just add that comment.
Well see if anyone else has more feedback.
The CIL part looks good.
Jim
Signature · 2 lines
James Carter <[email protected]> National Security Agency
Quoted 65 lines · On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:06 AM, jwcart2 <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 55 lines · William Roberts
Quoted 44 lines · Tri Vo
This commit resolves conflicts in values of expandattribute statements in policy language and expandtypeattribute in CIL.
For example, these statements resolve to false in policy language:
expandattributehal_audiotrue;
expandattributehal_audiofalse;Similarly, in CIL these also resolve to false.
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) true)
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) false)Motivation
When Android combines multiple .cil files from system.img and vendor.img it's possible to have conflicting expandattribute statements.This change deals with this scenario by resolving the value of the corresponding expandtypeattribute to false. The rationale behind this override is that true is used for reduce run-time lookups, while false is used for tests which must pass.
Signed-off-by Tri Vo <[email protected]>--- checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 8 ++++---- libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-4@@ -1182,10 +1182,6 @@ int expand_attrib(void) goto exit; } -if (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR ) { - yyerror2("%s already has the expandattribute option specified", id); - goto exit; - } if (ebitmap_set_bit(&attrs, attr->s.value - 1, TRUE)) {yyerror ("Out of memory!" );goto exit;checkpolicy/policy_define.c int expand_attrib(void) · line 1212
Quoted 4 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-0@@ -1213,6 +1209,10 @@ int expand_attrib(void) attr =hashtab_search (policydbp->p_types.table, policydbp->sym_val_to_name[SYM_TYPES ][i]); attr->flags |= flags;I'd like to see a comment here. The CIL case is much easier to understand because the error messages contain information about what's going on.
Quoted 8 lines
Maybe something like:
/*
* if an expandattr rule conflicts, set the expandattr to false. False
always
* works, at the expense of performance for run-time attribute
resolution.
*/
Quoted 1 line
I would actually prefer a warning.
Good point. That would make it consistent with the CIL code. I like this suggestion much better than just a comment.
Quoted 87 lines
Quoted 70 lines
Quoted 70 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +4
-0+if ((attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ) && + (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_FALSE )) { + attr->flags &= ~TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ; + } }rc = 0;libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-3@@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ exit:return rc; } -int cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) +void cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) { -int rc =SEPOL_ERR ;struct cil_typeattribute *attr =NULL ;if (FLAVOR (datum) ==CIL_TYPEATTRIBUTE ) {@@ -279,16 +278,12 @@ int cil_type_used(struct cil_symtab_datum *datum, int used) attr->used |= used;if ((attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ) && (attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE )) { - cil_log(CIL_ERR, "Conflicting use ofexpandtypeattribute. "
- "Expandtypeattribute may be set
to true or false "libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-2- "but not both. \n"); - goto exit; + cil_log(CIL_WARN, "Conflicting use ofexpandtypeattribute. "
+ "Expandtypeattribute was set to
both true or false for %s. "
+ "Resolving to false. \n",attr->datum.name);libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-4+ attr->used &= ~CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ; } } - -return SEPOL_OK ; -exit: -return rc; } int cil_resolve_permissionx(struct cil_tree_node *current, struct
cil_permissionx*permx, void*extra_args)libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +0
-0@@ -488,11 +483,7 @@ int cil_resolve_expandtypeattribute(struct
cil_tree_node*current, void*extra_agoto exit; } used = expandattr->expand ? CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE :
CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE;libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-5- rc =cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); -if (rc !=SEPOL_OK ) { - goto exit; - } - +cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); cil_list_append(expandattr->attr_datums, CIL_TYPE,attr_datum); }Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
--
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-googOverall this looks good, just add that comment.
Well see if anyone else has more feedback.The CIL part looks good.
Jim
--
James Carter <[email protected]>
National Security Agency
Quoted 66 lines · William Roberts
Quoted 65 lines · On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:06 AM, jwcart2 <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 63 lines · William Roberts
Quoted 44 lines · Tri Vo
This commit resolves conflicts in values of expandattribute statements in policy language and expandtypeattribute in CIL.
For example, these statements resolve to false in policy language:
expandattributehal_audiotrue;
expandattributehal_audiofalse;Similarly, in CIL these also resolve to false.
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) true)
(expandtypeattribute (hal_audio) false)Motivation
When Android combines multiple .cil files from system.img and vendor.img it's possible to have conflicting expandattribute statements.This change deals with this scenario by resolving the value of the corresponding expandtypeattribute to false. The rationale behind this override is that true is used for reduce run-time lookups, while false is used for tests which must pass.
Signed-off-by Tri Vo <[email protected]>--- checkpolicy/policy_define.c | 8 ++++---- libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-4@@ -1182,10 +1182,6 @@ int expand_attrib(void) goto exit; } -if (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR ) { - yyerror2("%s already has the expandattribute option specified", id); - goto exit; - } if (ebitmap_set_bit(&attrs, attr->s.value - 1, TRUE)) {yyerror ("Out of memory!" );goto exit;checkpolicy/policy_define.c int expand_attrib(void) · line 1212
Quoted 4 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +0
-0@@ -1213,6 +1209,10 @@ int expand_attrib(void) attr =hashtab_search (policydbp->p_types.table, policydbp->sym_val_to_name[SYM_TYPES ][i]); attr->flags |= flags;I'd like to see a comment here. The CIL case is much easier to understand because the error messages contain information about what's going on.
Maybe something like:
/*
* if an expandattr rule conflicts, set the expandattr to false. False
always
* works, at the expense of performance for run-time attribute
resolution.
*/
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
I would actually prefer a warning.
Good point. That would make it consistent with the CIL code. I like this suggestion much better than just a comment.
Sounds good. I'll add a warning.
Quoted 88 lines
Quoted 88 lines
Quoted 71 lines
Quoted 71 lines
checkpolicy/policy_define.c +4
-0+if ((attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ) && + (attr->flags &TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_FALSE )) { + attr->flags &= ~TYPE_FLAGS_EXPAND_ATTR_TRUE ; + } }rc = 0;libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-3@@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ exit:return rc; } -int cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) +void cil_type_used (struct cil_symtab_datum *datum,int used) { -int rc =SEPOL_ERR ;struct cil_typeattribute *attr =NULL ;if (FLAVOR (datum) ==CIL_TYPEATTRIBUTE ) {@@ -279,16 +278,12 @@ int cil_type_used(struct cil_symtab_datum *datum, int used) attr->used |= used;if ((attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ) && (attr->used &CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE )) { - cil_log(CIL_ERR, "Conflicting use ofexpandtypeattribute. "
- "Expandtypeattribute may be set
to true or false "libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-2- "but not both. \n"); - goto exit; + cil_log(CIL_WARN, "Conflicting use ofexpandtypeattribute. "
+ "Expandtypeattribute was set to
both true or false for %s. "
+ "Resolving to false. \n",attr->datum.name);libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-4+ attr->used &= ~CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE ; } } - -return SEPOL_OK ; -exit: -return rc; } int cil_resolve_permissionx(struct cil_tree_node *current, struct
cil_permissionx*permx, void*extra_args)libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +0
-0@@ -488,11 +483,7 @@ int cil_resolve_expandtypeattribute(struct
cil_tree_node*current, void*extra_agoto exit; } used = expandattr->expand ? CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_TRUE :
CIL_ATTR_EXPAND_FALSE;libsepol/cil/src/cil_resolve_ast.c +1
-5- rc =cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); -if (rc !=SEPOL_OK ) { - goto exit; - } - +cil_type_used (attr_datum, used); cil_list_append(expandattr->attr_datums, CIL_TYPE,attr_datum); }Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
--
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-googOverall this looks good, just add that comment.
Well see if anyone else has more feedback.The CIL part looks good.
Jim
--
James Carter <[email protected]>
National Security Agency