Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "net: phy: fix resume handling" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 2 participants 4 messages Feb 28, 2018 – Mar 16, 2018

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

net: phy: fix resume handling

to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
net-phy-fix-resume-handling.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From foo@baz Wed Feb 28 16:23:28 CET 2018

From: Russell King <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:45:36 +0000
Subject: net: phy: fix resume handling

From: Russell King <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f5e64032a799d4f54decc7eb6aafcdffb67f9ad9 ]

When a PHY has the BMCR_PDOWN bit set, it may decide to ignore writes to other registers, or reset the registers to power-on defaults. Micrel PHYs do this for their interrupt registers.

The current structure of phylib tries to enable interrupts before resuming (and releasing) the BMCR_PDOWN bit. This fails, causing Micrel PHYs to stop working after a suspend/resume sequence if they are using interrupts.

Fix this by ensuring that the PHY driver resume methods do not take the phydev->lock mutex themselves, but the callers of phy_resume() take that lock. This then allows us to move the call to phy_resume() before we enable interrupts in phy_start().

---
 drivers/net/phy/at803x.c     |    4 ----
 drivers/net/phy/phy.c        |    9 +++------
 drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c |   10 ++++++----
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
drivers/net/phy/at803x.c +0 -4
@@ -239,14 +239,10 @@ static int at803x_resume(struct phy_devi
 {
 	int value;
 
-	mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
-
 	value = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
 	value &= ~(BMCR_PDOWN | BMCR_ISOLATE);
 	phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR, value);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
drivers/net/phy/phy.c +3 -6
@@ -828,7 +828,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_stop);
  */
 void phy_start(struct phy_device *phydev)
 {
-	bool do_resume = false;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
@@ -841,6 +840,9 @@ void phy_start(struct phy_device *phydev
 		phydev->state = PHY_UP;
 		break;
 	case PHY_HALTED:
+		/* if phy was suspended, bring the physical link up again */
+		phy_resume(phydev);
+
 		/* make sure interrupts are re-enabled for the PHY */
 		if (phydev->irq != PHY_POLL) {
 			err = phy_enable_interrupts(phydev);
@@ -849,17 +851,12 @@ void phy_start(struct phy_device *phydev
 		}
 
 		phydev->state = PHY_RESUMING;
-		do_resume = true;
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
 
-	/* if phy was suspended, bring the physical link up again */
-	if (do_resume)
-		phy_resume(phydev);
-
 	phy_trigger_machine(phydev, true);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_start);
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c +6 -4
@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ static int mdio_bus_phy_resume(struct de
 	if (!mdio_bus_phy_may_suspend(phydev))
 		goto no_resume;
 
+	mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
 	ret = phy_resume(phydev);
+	mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -1026,7 +1028,9 @@ int phy_attach_direct(struct net_device
 	if (err)
 		goto error;
 
+	mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
 	phy_resume(phydev);
+	mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
 	phy_led_triggers_register(phydev);
 
 	return err;
@@ -1157,6 +1161,8 @@ int phy_resume(struct phy_device *phydev
 	struct phy_driver *phydrv = to_phy_driver(phydev->mdio.dev.driver);
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&phydev->lock));
+
 	if (phydev->drv && phydrv->resume)
 		ret = phydrv->resume(phydev);
 
@@ -1639,13 +1645,9 @@ int genphy_resume(struct phy_device *phy
 {
 	int value;
 
-	mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
-
 	value = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
 	phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR, value & ~BMCR_PDOWN);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(genphy_resume);

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.14/arm-8731-1-fix-csum_partial_copy_from_user-stack-mismatch.patch queue-4.14/net-phy-fix-resume-handling.patch

maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines

When a PHY has the BMCR_PDOWN bit set, it may decide to ignore writes to other registers, or reset the registers to power-on defaults. Micrel PHYs do this for their interrupt registers.

The current structure of phylib tries to enable interrupts before resuming (and releasing) the BMCR_PDOWN bit. This fails, causing Micrel PHYs to stop working after a suspend/resume sequence if they are using interrupts.

Quoted 4 lines

Fix this by ensuring that the PHY driver resume methods do not take the phydev->lock mutex themselves, but the callers of phy_resume() take that lock. This then allows us to move the call to phy_resume() before we enable interrupts in phy_start().

Hi Greg

This patch introduces some issues. You don't want this patch on its own, you want it in combination with:

Fixes 9c2c2e62df3f ("net: phy: Restore phy_resume() locking assumption")

Which went into David Millers net tree yesterday and should be making its way towards stable.

I suggest you hold off on this patch, until you can do both at the same time.

Andrew

author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 19 lines · Andrew Lunn
Quoted 9 lines

When a PHY has the BMCR_PDOWN bit set, it may decide to ignore writes to other registers, or reset the registers to power-on defaults. Micrel PHYs do this for their interrupt registers.

The current structure of phylib tries to enable interrupts before resuming (and releasing) the BMCR_PDOWN bit. This fails, causing Micrel PHYs to stop working after a suspend/resume sequence if they are using interrupts.

Quoted 4 lines

Fix this by ensuring that the PHY driver resume methods do not take the phydev->lock mutex themselves, but the callers of phy_resume() take that lock. This then allows us to move the call to phy_resume() before we enable interrupts in phy_start().

Hi Greg

This patch introduces some issues. You don't want this patch on its own, you want it in combination with:

Quoted 7 lines
Fixes 9c2c2e62df3f ("net: phy: Restore phy_resume() locking assumption")

Which went into David Millers net tree yesterday and should be making its way towards stable.

I suggest you hold off on this patch, until you can do both at the same time.

Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped this.

greg k-h

author maintainer
#3 lore raw
Quoted 22 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 21 lines · Andrew Lunn
Quoted 9 lines

When a PHY has the BMCR_PDOWN bit set, it may decide to ignore writes to other registers, or reset the registers to power-on defaults. Micrel PHYs do this for their interrupt registers.

The current structure of phylib tries to enable interrupts before resuming (and releasing) the BMCR_PDOWN bit. This fails, causing Micrel PHYs to stop working after a suspend/resume sequence if they are using interrupts.

Quoted 4 lines

Fix this by ensuring that the PHY driver resume methods do not take the phydev->lock mutex themselves, but the callers of phy_resume() take that lock. This then allows us to move the call to phy_resume() before we enable interrupts in phy_start().

Hi Greg

This patch introduces some issues. You don't want this patch on its own, you want it in combination with:

Fixes 9c2c2e62df3f ("net: phy: Restore phy_resume() locking assumption")
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Which went into David Millers net tree yesterday and should be making its way towards stable.

I suggest you hold off on this patch, until you can do both at the same time.

Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped this.

And now both are queued up for 4.14.y, thanks.

greg k-h