Skip to contentSkip to conversation

PCI: Fixes and cleanups for native PCIe and ACPI hotplug

PATCH RESEND Superseded Mika Westerberg 3 participants 20 messages Apr 3, 2018 – Apr 11, 2018

Subsystems (3)

v4 of 8 Superseded Latest is v8 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v4 cover PCI: Fixes and cleanups for native PCIe and ACPI hotplug

[Resending this with linux-pci ML address corrected]

Hi,

When Thunderbolt host router is configured to be in native enumeration mode it is only present in the system if there is something connected to the ports. This pretty much follows how the BIOS assisted mode works.

In native enumeration mode the Thunderbolt host controller (NHI) and USB host controller (xHCI) are not hot-added using native PCIe hotplug but instead they will be hotplugged via BIOS triggered ACPI Notify() to the root port. This is done to preserve resources since NHI and xHCI only need 1 MB of MMIO space and no additional buses. Currently Linux does not support this very well and ends up failing the hotplug in one way or another. More detailed explanation is in changelog of patch [4/9].

This series fixes this issue and in addition includes fixes for few other issues found during testing on a system that has Thunderbolt controller in native PCIe enumeration mode. However, the fixes here are not in any way Thunderbolt specific and should be applicable to other systems as well.

The previous versions of the patch series can be found here:

v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg80876.html
v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg69186.html
v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg80607.html

Changes from v3:

- Added Andy's tag to patches [1-5]
- Improved changelog and subject line of patch [1/9] to match better what it is trying to solve
- Improved comment in patch [1/9]
- Improved changelog of patches [2/9] and [4/9] accordingly to match better why they are needed
- Added cleanup patches [6-9/9]

Changes from v2:

- Added Rafael's tag to patch [1/5]
- Updated changelog of patch [1/5] to include more details about how the problem can be observed from dmesg and lspci output

Changes from v1:

- Drop 'cmax - max ?: 1' and use similar construct than we use in second pass loop in patch [1/5]
- Drop unnecessary parentheses in patch [1/5]
- Added Rafael's tag to patches [2-5/5]

Mika Westerberg (9):
PCI: Take all bridges into account when calculating bus numbers for extension
PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources
PCI: pciehp: Clear Presence Detect and Data Link Layer Status Changed on resume ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Mark stale PCI devices disconnected
PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop
PCI: Document return value of pci_scan_bridge() and pci_scan_bridge_extend()
PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message
ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop unnecessary parentheses

 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h      |  1 +
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h       |  2 +-
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c   | 13 +++++-
 drivers/pci/probe.c                | 33 +++++++++------
 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c            | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 7 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#1 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 1/9 PCI: Take all bridges into account when calculating bus numbers for extension

When distributing extra buses between hotplug bridges for future extension we currently fail to take into account the fact that there might be non-hotplug bridges on the bus after the hotplug bridges. In this particular system we have following topology:

01:00.0 --+- 02:00.0 -- Thunderbolt host controller

            +- 02:01.0 (HotPlug+)
            \- 02:02.0 -- xHCI host controller

Now, pci_scan_child_bus_extend() is supposed to distribute remaining bus numbers to the hotplug bridge at 02:01.0 but only after all bridges on that bus have been been accounted for. Since we don't check upfront that there will be another non-hotplug bridge after the hotplug bridge 02:01.0 it will inadvertently extend over the bus space of the non-hotplug bridge:

pci 0000:01:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 02-39]
...
pci_bus 0000:04: [bus 04-39] extended by 0x35
pci_bus 0000:04: bus scan returning with max=39
pci_bus 0000:04: busn_res: [bus 04-39] end is updated to 39
pci 0000:02:02.0: scanning [bus 00-00] behind bridge, pass 1 pci_bus 0000:3a: scanning bus
pci_bus 0000:3a: bus scan returning with max=3a
pci_bus 0000:3a: busn_res: [bus 3a] end is updated to 3a pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:02 [bus 02-39] pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:01 [bus 01-39] pci_bus 0000:02: bus scan returning with max=3a
pci_bus 0000:02: busn_res: [bus 02-39] end can not be updated to 3a

Resulting 'lspci -t' output looks like this:

  +-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-3a]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
                             ^^   +-01.0-[04-39]--
                                  \-02.0-[3a]----00.0
                                          ^^

The xHCI host controller (3a:00.0) behind downstream bridge at 02:02.0 is not usable anymore.

To fix this reserve at least one bus for each bridge during scanning of already configured bridges. Then we use this information in the second scan to correct the available extra bus space for hotplug bridges.

After this change the 'lspci -t' output is what is expected:

  +-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-39]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
                                  +-01.0-[04-38]--
                                  \-02.0-[39]----00.0
Fixes 1c02ea810065 ("PCI: Distribute available buses to hotplug-capable bridges")
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/probe.c +12 -3
index ef5377438a1e..8c4715df62e7 100644
@@ -2561,7 +2561,14 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
 	for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus) {
 		cmax = max;
 		max = pci_scan_bridge_extend(bus, dev, max, 0, 0);
-		used_buses += cmax - max;
+		/*
+		 * Reserve one bus for each bridge now to avoid
+		 * extending hotplug bridges too much during the second
+		 * scan below.
+		 */
+		used_buses++;
+		if (cmax - max > 1)
+			used_buses += cmax - max - 1;
 	}
 
 	/* Scan bridges that need to be reconfigured */
@@ -2584,12 +2591,14 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
 			 * bridges if any.
 			 */
 			buses = available_buses / hotplug_bridges;
-			buses = min(buses, available_buses - used_buses);
+			buses = min(buses, available_buses - used_buses + 1);
 		}
 
 		cmax = max;
 		max = pci_scan_bridge_extend(bus, dev, cmax, buses, 1);
-		used_buses += max - cmax;
+		/* One bus is already accounted so don't add it again */
+		if (max - cmax > 1)
+			used_buses += max - cmax - 1;
 	}
 
 	/*
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 1/9] PCI: Take all bridges into account when calculating bus numbers for extension

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: 1c02ea810065 PCI: Distribute available buses to hotplug-capable bridges.

The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 93.5345)

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15.

v4.16: Build OK!
v4.15.15: Build OK!

--
Thanks,
Sasha

#3 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 2/9 PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources

In reply to Mika Westerberg

When hot-adding a PCIe switch the way we currently distribute resources does not always work well because devices connected to the switch might need to have their MMIO resources aligned to something else than the default 1 MB boundary. For example Intel Gigabit ET2 quad port server adapter includes PCIe switch leading to 4 x GbE NIC devices that want to have their MMIO resources aligned to 2 MB boundary instead.

The current resource distribution code does not take this alignment into account and might try to add too much resources for the extension hotplug bridge(s). The resulting bridge window is too big which makes the resource assignment operation fail, and we are left with a bridge window with minimal amount (1 MB) of MMIO space.

Here is what happens when an Intel Gigabit ET2 quad port server adapter is hot-added:

pci 0000:39:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x53300000-0x6a0fffff]

                                          ^^^^^^^^^^
  pci 0000:3a:01.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x53400000-0x547fffff]
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^

The above shows that the downstream bridge (3a:01.0) window is aligned to 2 MB instead of 1 MB as is the upstream bridge (39:00.0) window. The remaining MMIO space (0x15a00000) is assigned to the hotplug bridge (3a:04.0) but it fails:

pci 0000:3a:04.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x15a00000] pci 0000:3a:04.0: BAR 14: failed to assign [mem size 0x15a00000]

The MMIO resource is calculated as follows:

start = 0x54800000
end = 0x54800000 + 0x15a00000 - 1 = 0x6a1fffff

This results bridge window [mem 0x54800000 - 0x6a1fffff] and it ends after the upstream bridge window [mem 0x53300000-0x6a0fffff] explaining the above failure. Because of this Linux falls back to the default allocation of 1 MB as can be seen from 'lspci' output:

39:00.0 Memory behind bridge: 53300000-6a0fffff [size=366M]
3a:01.0 Memory behind bridge: 53400000-547fffff [size=20M] 3a:04.0 Memory behind bridge: 53300000-533fffff [size=1M]

The hotplug bridge 3a:04.0 only occupies 1 MB MMIO window which is clearly not enough for extending the PCIe topology later if more devices are to be hot-added.

Fix this by substracting properly aligned non-hotplug downstream bridge window size from the remaining resources used for extension. After this change the resource allocation looks like:

39:00.0 Memory behind bridge: 53300000-6a0fffff [size=366M]

    3a:01.0 Memory behind bridge: 53400000-547fffff [size=20M]
    3a:04.0 Memory behind bridge: 54800000-6a0fffff [size=345M]

This matches the expectation. All the extra MMIO resource space (345 MB) is allocated to the extension hotplug bridge (3a:04.0).

Fixes 1a5767725cec ("PCI: Distribute available resources to hotplug-capable bridges")
---
 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c +40 -1
index 3cce29a069e6..f1e6172734f0 100644
@@ -1882,6 +1882,7 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 	resource_size_t available_mmio, resource_size_t available_mmio_pref)
 {
 	resource_size_t remaining_io, remaining_mmio, remaining_mmio_pref;
+	resource_size_t io_start, mmio_start, mmio_pref_start;
 	unsigned int normal_bridges = 0, hotplug_bridges = 0;
 	struct resource *io_res, *mmio_res, *mmio_pref_res;
 	struct pci_dev *dev, *bridge = bus->self;
@@ -1946,11 +1947,16 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 			remaining_mmio_pref -= resource_size(res);
 	}
 
+	io_start = io_res->start;
+	mmio_start = mmio_res->start;
+	mmio_pref_start = mmio_pref_res->start;
+
 	/*
 	 * Go over devices on this bus and distribute the remaining
 	 * resource space between hotplug bridges.
 	 */
 	for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus) {
+		resource_size_t align;
 		struct pci_bus *b;
 
 		b = dev->subordinate;
@@ -1968,7 +1974,7 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 				available_io, available_mmio,
 				available_mmio_pref);
 		} else if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
-			resource_size_t align, io, mmio, mmio_pref;
+			resource_size_t io, mmio, mmio_pref;
 
 			/*
 			 * Distribute available extra resources equally
@@ -1981,11 +1987,13 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 			io = div64_ul(available_io, hotplug_bridges);
 			io = min(ALIGN(io, align), remaining_io);
 			remaining_io -= io;
+			io_start += io;
 
 			align = pci_resource_alignment(bridge, mmio_res);
 			mmio = div64_ul(available_mmio, hotplug_bridges);
 			mmio = min(ALIGN(mmio, align), remaining_mmio);
 			remaining_mmio -= mmio;
+			mmio_start += mmio;
 
 			align = pci_resource_alignment(bridge, mmio_pref_res);
 			mmio_pref = div64_ul(available_mmio_pref,
@@ -1993,9 +2001,40 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 			mmio_pref = min(ALIGN(mmio_pref, align),
 					remaining_mmio_pref);
 			remaining_mmio_pref -= mmio_pref;
+			mmio_pref_start += mmio_pref;
 
 			pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(b, add_list, io,
 							       mmio, mmio_pref);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * For normal bridges, track start of the parent
+			 * bridge window to make sure we align the
+			 * remaining space which is distributed to the
+			 * hotplug bridges properly.
+			 */
+			resource_size_t aligned;
+			struct resource *res;
+
+			res = &dev->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES + 0];
+			io_start += resource_size(res);
+			aligned = ALIGN(io_start,
+					pci_resource_alignment(dev, res));
+			if (aligned > io_start)
+				remaining_io -= aligned - io_start;
+
+			res = &dev->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES + 1];
+			mmio_start += resource_size(res);
+			aligned = ALIGN(mmio_start,
+					pci_resource_alignment(dev, res));
+			if (aligned > mmio_start)
+				remaining_mmio -= aligned - mmio_start;
+
+			res = &dev->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES + 2];
+			mmio_pref_start += resource_size(res);
+			aligned = ALIGN(mmio_pref_start,
+					pci_resource_alignment(dev, res));
+			if (aligned > mmio_pref_start)
+				remaining_mmio_pref -= aligned - mmio_pref_start;
 		}
 	}
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 2/9] PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: 1a5767725cec PCI: Distribute available resources to hotplug-capable bridges.

The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 7.3001)

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15.

v4.16: Build OK!
v4.15.15: Build OK!

--
Thanks,
Sasha

#5 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 3/9 PCI: pciehp: Clear Presence Detect and Data Link Layer Status Changed on resume

In reply to Mika Westerberg

After suspend/resume cycle the Presence Detect or Data Link Layer Status Changed bits might be set and if we don't clear them those events will not fire anymore and nothing happens for instance when a device is now hot-unplugged.

Fix this by clearing those bits in a newly introduced function pcie_reenable_notification(). This should be fine because immediately after we check if the adapter is still present by reading directly from the status register.

---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h      |  2 +-
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c |  2 +-
 drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c  | 13 ++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h +1 -1
index 636ed8f4b869..5abf864eae35 100644
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev);
 int pcie_init_notification(struct controller *ctrl);
 int pciehp_enable_slot(struct slot *p_slot);
 int pciehp_disable_slot(struct slot *p_slot);
-void pcie_enable_notification(struct controller *ctrl);
+void pcie_reenable_notification(struct controller *ctrl);
 int pciehp_power_on_slot(struct slot *slot);
 void pciehp_power_off_slot(struct slot *slot);
 void pciehp_get_power_status(struct slot *slot, u8 *status);
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c +1 -1
index 332b723ff9e6..44a6a63802d5 100644
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int pciehp_resume(struct pcie_device *dev)
 	ctrl = get_service_data(dev);
 
 	/* reinitialize the chipset's event detection logic */
-	pcie_enable_notification(ctrl);
+	pcie_reenable_notification(ctrl);
 
 	slot = ctrl->slot;
 
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c +12 -1
index 18a42f8f5dc5..98ea75aa32c7 100644
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pcie_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return handled;
 }
 
-void pcie_enable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
+static void pcie_enable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
 {
 	u16 cmd, mask;
 
@@ -697,6 +697,17 @@ void pcie_enable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
 		 pci_pcie_cap(ctrl->pcie->port) + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, cmd);
 }
 
+void pcie_reenable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Clear both Presence and Data Link Layer Changed to make sure
+	 * those events still fire after we have re-enabled them.
+	 */
+	pcie_capability_write_word(ctrl->pcie->port, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
+				   PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
+	pcie_enable_notification(ctrl);
+}
+
 static void pcie_disable_notification(struct controller *ctrl)
 {
 	u16 mask;
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 3/9] PCI: pciehp: Clear Presence Detect and Data Link Layer Status Changed on resume

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all

The bot has also determined it's probably a bug fixing patch. (score: 43.1022)

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126.

v4.16: Build OK!
v4.15.15: Build OK!
v4.14.32: Build OK!
v4.9.92: Build OK!
v4.4.126: Build OK!

Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

#7 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 4/9 ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used

In reply to Mika Westerberg

When a system is using native PCIe hotplug for Thunderbolt and the controller is not enabled for full RTD3 (runtime D3) it will be only present in the system when there is a device connected. This pretty much follows the BIOS assisted hotplug behaviour.

Thunderbolt host router integrated PCIe switch has two additional PCIe downstream bridges that lead to NHI (Thunderbolt host controller) and xHCI (USB 3 host controller) respectively. These downstream bridges are not marked being hotplug capable. Reason for that is to preserve resources. Otherwise the OS would distribute remaining resources between all downstream bridges making these two bridges consume precious resources of the actual hotplug bridges.

Now, because these two bridges are not marked being hotplug capable the OS will not enable hotplug interrupt for them either and will not receive interrupt when devices behind them are hot-added. Solution to this is that the BIOS sends ACPI Notify() to the root port let the OS know it needs to rescan for added and/or removed devices.

Here is how the mechanism is supposed to work when a Thunderbolt endpoint is connected to one of the ports. In case of a standard USB-C device only the xHCI is hot-added otherwise steps are the same.

1. Initially there is only the PCIe root port that is controlled by the pciehp driver

00:1b.0 (Hotplug+) --

2. Then we get native PCIe hotplug interrupt and once it is handled the topology looks as following

00:1b.0 (Hotplug+) -- 01:00.0 --+- 02:00.0 --

                                  +- 02:01.0 (HotPlug+)
                                  \- 02:02.0 --

3. Bridges 02:00.0 and 02:02.0 are not marked as hotplug capable and they don't have anything behind them currently. Bridge 02:01.0 is hotplug capable and used for extending the topology. At this point the required PCIe devices are enabled and ACPI Notify() is sent to the root port. The resulting topology is expected to look like

00:1b.0 (Hotplug+) -- 01:00.0 --+- 02:00.0 -- Thunderbolt host controller

                                  +- 02:01.0 (HotPlug+)
                                  \- 02:02.0 -- xHCI host controller

However, the current ACPI hotplug implementation scans the whole 00:1b.0 hotplug slot and everything behind it regardless whether native PCIe is used or not, and it expects that the BIOS has configured bridge resources upfront. If that's not the case it assigns resources using minimal allocation (everything currently found just barely fit) preventing future extension. In addition to that, if there is another native PCIe hotplug going on we may find the new PCIe switch only partially ready (all links are not fully trained yet) confusing pciehp when it finally starts to enumerate for new devices.

To make this work better with the native PCIe hotplug driver (pciehp), we let it handle all slot management and resource allocation for hotplug bridges and restrict ACPI hotplug to non-hotplug bridges.

---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h      |  1 +
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h +1 -0
index e438a2d734f2..8dcfd623ef1d 100644
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ struct acpiphp_attention_info
 
 #define SLOT_ENABLED		(0x00000001)
 #define SLOT_IS_GOING_AWAY	(0x00000002)
+#define SLOT_IS_NATIVE		(0x00000004)
 
 /* function flags */
 
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +58 -15

102 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 4/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126.

v4.16: Build OK!
v4.15.15: Build OK!
v4.14.32: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
66476ebea943 ("ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used")

v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
437eb7bf7b28 ("ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Make device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp() public") 66476ebea943 ("ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used")

v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
437eb7bf7b28 ("ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Make device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp() public") 66476ebea943 ("ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used")

Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

#9 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 5/9 ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Mark stale PCI devices disconnected

In reply to Mika Westerberg

Following PCIehp mark the unplugged PCI devices disconnected. This makes sure PCI core code leaves the now missing hardware registers alone.

---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +5 -0
index 43afeac7f5f3..5d7be06bba7f 100644
@@ -642,6 +642,11 @@ static void trim_stale_devices(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		alive = pci_device_is_present(dev);
 
 	if (!alive) {
+		pci_dev_set_disconnected(dev, NULL);
+		if (pci_has_subordinate(dev))
+			pci_walk_bus(dev->subordinate, pci_dev_set_disconnected,
+				     NULL);
+
 		pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
 		if (adev)
 			acpi_bus_trim(adev);
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#10 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 6/9 PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop

In reply to Mika Westerberg

There is a special case where there is only single bridge on the bus. In that case we just assign all resources to it. Currently this is done as a part of the resource distribution loop but it does not have to be there, and moving it outside actually improves readability.

While there we can add hotplug_bridges == 1 && normal_bridges == 0 to the same block because they are dealt the same way.

---
 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c +17 -11
index f1e6172734f0..b5eefd20d78d 100644
@@ -1951,6 +1951,22 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 	mmio_start = mmio_res->start;
 	mmio_pref_start = mmio_pref_res->start;
 
+	/*
+	 * There is only one bridge on the bus so it gets all available
+	 * resources which it can then distribute to the possible
+	 * hotplug bridges below.
+	 */
+	if ((hotplug_bridges == 0 && normal_bridges == 1) ||
+	    (hotplug_bridges == 1 && normal_bridges == 0)) {
+		dev = list_first_entry(&bus->devices, struct pci_dev, bus_list);
+		if (dev->subordinate) {
+			pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(dev->subordinate,
+				add_list, available_io, available_mmio,
+				available_mmio_pref);
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Go over devices on this bus and distribute the remaining
 	 * resource space between hotplug bridges.
@@ -1963,17 +1979,7 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 		if (!b)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!hotplug_bridges && normal_bridges == 1) {
-			/*
-			 * There is only one bridge on the bus (upstream
-			 * port) so it gets all available resources
-			 * which it can then distribute to the possible
-			 * hotplug bridges below.
-			 */
-			pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(b, add_list,
-				available_io, available_mmio,
-				available_mmio_pref);
-		} else if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
+		if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
 			resource_size_t io, mmio, mmio_pref;
 
 			/*
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 6/9] PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 13.3696)

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126.

v4.16: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
b4e4f66ae0d5 ("PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources")

v4.15.15: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
b4e4f66ae0d5 ("PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources")

v4.14.32: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
2e4a9cf5b125 ("PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop") b4e4f66ae0d5 ("PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources")

v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
2e4a9cf5b125 ("PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop") b4e4f66ae0d5 ("PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources")

v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
2e4a9cf5b125 ("PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop") b4e4f66ae0d5 ("PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources")

Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

Reviewed-by on v4 6/9
#12 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 6/9] PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop

In reply to Mika Westerberg
Quoted 51 lines · CEST Mika Westerberg

There is a special case where there is only single bridge on the bus. In that case we just assign all resources to it. Currently this is done as a part of the resource distribution loop but it does not have to be there, and moving it outside actually improves readability.

While there we can add hotplug_bridges == 1 && normal_bridges == 0 to the same block because they are dealt the same way.

---
 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c +16 -5
index f1e6172734f0..b5eefd20d78d 100644
@@ -1951,6 +1951,22 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 	mmio_start = mmio_res->start;
 	mmio_pref_start = mmio_pref_res->start;
 
+	/*
+	 * There is only one bridge on the bus so it gets all available
+	 * resources which it can then distribute to the possible
+	 * hotplug bridges below.
+	 */
+	if ((hotplug_bridges == 0 && normal_bridges == 1) ||
+	    (hotplug_bridges == 1 && normal_bridges == 0)) {
+		dev = list_first_entry(&bus->devices, struct pci_dev, bus_list);
+		if (dev->subordinate) {
+			pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(dev->subordinate,
+				add_list, available_io, available_mmio,
+				available_mmio_pref);
+		}
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Go over devices on this bus and distribute the remaining
 	 * resource space between hotplug bridges.
@@ -1963,17 +1979,7 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
 		if (!b)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!hotplug_bridges && normal_bridges == 1) {
-			/*
-			 * There is only one bridge on the bus (upstream
-			 * port) so it gets all available resources
-			 * which it can then distribute to the possible

drivers/pci/setup-bus.c static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, · line 1985

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c +1 -6
-			 * hotplug bridges below.
-			 */
-			pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(b, add_list,
-				available_io, available_mmio,
-				available_mmio_pref);
-		} else if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
+		if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge) {
 			resource_size_t io, mmio, mmio_pref;
 
 			/*
#13 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 7/9 PCI: Document return value of pci_scan_bridge() and pci_scan_bridge_extend()

In reply to Mika Westerberg

It is not immediately clear what the two functions actually return so add kernel-doc comment explaining it a bit better.

---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/pci/probe.c +4 -0
index 8c4715df62e7..079eea6680bb 100644
@@ -983,6 +983,8 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
  * already configured by the BIOS and after we are done with all of
  * them, we proceed to assigning numbers to the remaining buses in
  * order to avoid overlaps between old and new bus numbers.
+ *
+ * Return: New subordinate number covering all buses behind this bridge.
  */
 static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
 				  int max, unsigned int available_buses,
@@ -1215,6 +1217,8 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
  * already configured by the BIOS and after we are done with all of
  * them, we proceed to assigning numbers to the remaining buses in
  * order to avoid overlaps between old and new bus numbers.
+ *
+ * Return: New subordinate number covering all buses behind this bridge.
  */
 int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int max, int pass)
 {
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
Reviewed-by on v4 7/9
#14 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 7/9] PCI: Document return value of pci_scan_bridge() and pci_scan_bridge_extend()

Quoted 24 lines · CEST Mika Westerberg

It is not immediately clear what the two functions actually return so add kernel-doc comment explaining it a bit better.

---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
drivers/pci/probe.c +2 -0
index 8c4715df62e7..079eea6680bb 100644
@@ -983,6 +983,8 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
  * already configured by the BIOS and after we are done with all of
  * them, we proceed to assigning numbers to the remaining buses in
  * order to avoid overlaps between old and new bus numbers.
+ *
+ * Return: New subordinate number covering all buses behind this bridge.
  */
 static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
 				  int max, unsigned int available_buses,

drivers/pci/probe.c static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, · line 1224

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/pci/probe.c +2 -0
@@ -1215,6 +1217,8 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
  * already configured by the BIOS and after we are done with all of
  * them, we proceed to assigning numbers to the remaining buses in
  * order to avoid overlaps between old and new bus numbers.
+ *
+ * Return: New subordinate number covering all buses behind this bridge.
  */
 int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int max, int pass)
 {
#15 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 8/9 PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message

In reply to Mika Westerberg

There is a sanity checker in the end of pci_scan_child_bus_extend() that tries to detect badly configured bridges. For example given the below topology:

  +-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-3a]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
                                  +-01.0-[04-39]--
                                  \-02.0-[3a]----00.0

The sanity checker notices this and logs following messages:

pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:02 [bus 02-39] pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:01 [bus 01-39]

This is not really helpful to users and the information above is not even correct (0000:02 is a bus not bridge). Make this a bit more understandable by changing the sanity checker to log following message in place of the above two messages:

pci 0000:02:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign [bus 3a] for them

While there update the comment on top of the sanity checker block to make it clear that it is not only restricted to CardBus.

---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/probe.c +5 -9
index 079eea6680bb..70b07a0e00b8 100644
@@ -1175,20 +1175,16 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
 		(is_cardbus ? "PCI CardBus %04x:%02x" : "PCI Bus %04x:%02x"),
 		pci_domain_nr(bus), child->number);
 
-	/* Has only triggered on CardBus, fixup is in yenta_socket */
+	/* Check that all devices are accessible */
 	while (bus->parent) {
 		if ((child->busn_res.end > bus->busn_res.end) ||
 		    (child->number > bus->busn_res.end) ||
 		    (child->number < bus->number) ||
 		    (child->busn_res.end < bus->number)) {
-			dev_info(&child->dev, "%pR %s hidden behind%s bridge %s %pR\n",
-				&child->busn_res,
-				(bus->number > child->busn_res.end &&
-				 bus->busn_res.end < child->number) ?
-					"wholly" : "partially",
-				bus->self->transparent ? " transparent" : "",
-				dev_name(&bus->dev),
-				&bus->busn_res);
+			dev_info(&dev->dev,
+				 "devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign %pR for them\n",
+				 &child->busn_res);
+			break;
 		}
 		bus = bus->parent;
 	}
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#16 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 8/9] PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message

Quoted 13 lines · CEST Mika Westerberg

There is a sanity checker in the end of pci_scan_child_bus_extend() that tries to detect badly configured bridges. For example given the below topology:

  +-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-3a]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
                                  +-01.0-[04-39]--
                                  \-02.0-[3a]----00.0

The sanity checker notices this and logs following messages:

pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:02 [bus 02-39] pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:01 [bus 01-39]

Quoted 6 lines

This is not really helpful to users and the information above is not even correct (0000:02 is a bus not bridge). Make this a bit more understandable by changing the sanity checker to log following message in place of the above two messages:

pci 0000:02:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign [bus 3a] for them

FWIW, I prefer to use passive voice in messages, like

devices behind bridge are unusable, because [bus 3a] cannot be assigned for them

Quoted 40 lines

While there update the comment on top of the sanity checker block to make it clear that it is not only restricted to CardBus.

---
 drivers/pci/probe.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/probe.c +5 -9
index 079eea6680bb..70b07a0e00b8 100644
@@ -1175,20 +1175,16 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
 		(is_cardbus ? "PCI CardBus %04x:%02x" : "PCI Bus %04x:%02x"),
 		pci_domain_nr(bus), child->number);
 
-	/* Has only triggered on CardBus, fixup is in yenta_socket */
+	/* Check that all devices are accessible */
 	while (bus->parent) {
 		if ((child->busn_res.end > bus->busn_res.end) ||
 		    (child->number > bus->busn_res.end) ||
 		    (child->number < bus->number) ||
 		    (child->busn_res.end < bus->number)) {
-			dev_info(&child->dev, "%pR %s hidden behind%s bridge %s %pR\n",
-				&child->busn_res,
-				(bus->number > child->busn_res.end &&
-				 bus->busn_res.end < child->number) ?
-					"wholly" : "partially",
-				bus->self->transparent ? " transparent" : "",
-				dev_name(&bus->dev),
-				&bus->busn_res);
+			dev_info(&dev->dev,
+				 "devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign %pR for them\n",
+				 &child->busn_res);
+			break;
 		}
 		bus = bus->parent;
 	}
#17 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 8/9] PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message

Quoted 19 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 18 lines · CEST Mika Westerberg

There is a sanity checker in the end of pci_scan_child_bus_extend() that tries to detect badly configured bridges. For example given the below topology:

  +-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-3a]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
                                  +-01.0-[04-39]--
                                  \-02.0-[3a]----00.0

The sanity checker notices this and logs following messages:

pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:02 [bus 02-39] pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:01 [bus 01-39]

This is not really helpful to users and the information above is not even correct (0000:02 is a bus not bridge). Make this a bit more understandable by changing the sanity checker to log following message in place of the above two messages:

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

pci 0000:02:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign [bus 3a] for them

FWIW, I prefer to use passive voice in messages, like

devices behind bridge are unusable, because [bus 3a] cannot be assigned for them

Works for me :)

I'll update the message accordingly then.

#18 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v4 9/9 ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop unnecessary parentheses

In reply to Mika Westerberg

There is no need for them and it makes the code look uglier than it should. Remove them.

---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +2 -2
index 5d7be06bba7f..ce8716c022f0 100644
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
 		if (!dev) {
 			/* Do not set SLOT_ENABLED flag if some funcs
 			   are not added. */
-			slot->flags &= (~SLOT_ENABLED);
+			slot->flags &= ~SLOT_ENABLED;
 			continue;
 		}
 	}
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void disable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
 	list_for_each_entry(func, &slot->funcs, sibling)
 		acpi_bus_trim(func_to_acpi_device(func));
 
-	slot->flags &= (~SLOT_ENABLED);
+	slot->flags &= ~SLOT_ENABLED;
 }
 
 static bool slot_no_hotplug(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
Reviewed-by on v4 9/9
#19 lore raw

Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 9/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop unnecessary parentheses

Quoted 23 lines · CEST Mika Westerberg

There is no need for them and it makes the code look uglier than it should. Remove them.

---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +1 -1
index 5d7be06bba7f..ce8716c022f0 100644
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void enable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
 		if (!dev) {
 			/* Do not set SLOT_ENABLED flag if some funcs
 			   are not added. */
-			slot->flags &= (~SLOT_ENABLED);
+			slot->flags &= ~SLOT_ENABLED;
 			continue;
 		}
 	}

drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c static void disable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot) · line 559

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c +1 -1
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void disable_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
 	list_for_each_entry(func, &slot->funcs, sibling)
 		acpi_bus_trim(func_to_acpi_device(func));
 
-	slot->flags &= (~SLOT_ENABLED);
+	slot->flags &= ~SLOT_ENABLED;
 }
 
 static bool slot_no_hotplug(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)