Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm: replace S_IRUGO with 0444

PATCH In review Paul McQuade 2 participants 5 messages Apr 7, 2018

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 mm: replace S_IRUGO with 0444

Fix checkpatch warnings about S_IRUGO being less readable than providing the permissions octal as '0444'.

---
 mm/cleancache.c |  8 ++++----
 mm/cma_debug.c  | 12 ++++++------
 mm/dmapool.c    |  2 +-
 mm/frontswap.c  |  8 ++++----
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
mm/cleancache.c +4 -4
index f7b9fdc79d97..90d259e69496 100644
@@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int __init init_cleancache(void)
 	struct dentry *root = debugfs_create_dir("cleancache", NULL);
 	if (root == NULL)
 		return -ENXIO;
-	debugfs_create_u64("succ_gets", S_IRUGO, root, &cleancache_succ_gets);
-	debugfs_create_u64("failed_gets", S_IRUGO,
+	debugfs_create_u64("succ_gets", 0444, root, &cleancache_succ_gets);
+	debugfs_create_u64("failed_gets", 0444,
 				root, &cleancache_failed_gets);
-	debugfs_create_u64("puts", S_IRUGO, root, &cleancache_puts);
-	debugfs_create_u64("invalidates", S_IRUGO,
+	debugfs_create_u64("puts", 0444, root, &cleancache_puts);
+	debugfs_create_u64("invalidates", 0444,
 				root, &cleancache_invalidates);
 #endif
 	return 0;
mm/cma_debug.c +6 -6
index 275df8b5b22e..6494c7a7d257 100644
@@ -178,17 +178,17 @@ static void cma_debugfs_add_one(struct cma *cma, int idx)
 	debugfs_create_file("free", S_IWUSR, tmp, cma,
 				&cma_free_fops);
 
-	debugfs_create_file("base_pfn", S_IRUGO, tmp,
+	debugfs_create_file("base_pfn", 0444, tmp,
 				&cma->base_pfn, &cma_debugfs_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("count", S_IRUGO, tmp,
+	debugfs_create_file("count", 0444, tmp,
 				&cma->count, &cma_debugfs_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("order_per_bit", S_IRUGO, tmp,
+	debugfs_create_file("order_per_bit", 0444, tmp,
 				&cma->order_per_bit, &cma_debugfs_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("used", S_IRUGO, tmp, cma, &cma_used_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("maxchunk", S_IRUGO, tmp, cma, &cma_maxchunk_fops);
+	debugfs_create_file("used", 0444, tmp, cma, &cma_used_fops);
+	debugfs_create_file("maxchunk", 0444, tmp, cma, &cma_maxchunk_fops);
 
 	u32s = DIV_ROUND_UP(cma_bitmap_maxno(cma), BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(u32));
-	debugfs_create_u32_array("bitmap", S_IRUGO, tmp, (u32*)cma->bitmap, u32s);
+	debugfs_create_u32_array("bitmap", 0444, tmp, (u32 *)cma->bitmap, u32s);
 }
 
 static int __init cma_debugfs_init(void)
mm/dmapool.c +1 -1
index 4d90a64b2fdc..6d4b97e7e9e9 100644
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ show_pools(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 	return PAGE_SIZE - size;
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(pools, S_IRUGO, show_pools, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(pools, 0444, show_pools, NULL);
 
 /**
  * dma_pool_create - Creates a pool of consistent memory blocks, for dma.
mm/frontswap.c +4 -4
index fec8b5044040..3b41425d34cd 100644
@@ -486,11 +486,11 @@ static int __init init_frontswap(void)
 	struct dentry *root = debugfs_create_dir("frontswap", NULL);
 	if (root == NULL)
 		return -ENXIO;
-	debugfs_create_u64("loads", S_IRUGO, root, &frontswap_loads);
-	debugfs_create_u64("succ_stores", S_IRUGO, root, &frontswap_succ_stores);
-	debugfs_create_u64("failed_stores", S_IRUGO, root,
+	debugfs_create_u64("loads", 0444, root, &frontswap_loads);
+	debugfs_create_u64("succ_stores", 0444, root, &frontswap_succ_stores);
+	debugfs_create_u64("failed_stores", 0444, root,
 				&frontswap_failed_stores);
-	debugfs_create_u64("invalidates", S_IRUGO,
+	debugfs_create_u64("invalidates", 0444,
 				root, &frontswap_invalidates);
 #endif
 	return 0;
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#1 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 mm: Replace S_IWUSR with 0200

Fix checkpatch warnings about S_IWUSR being less readable than providing the permissions octal as '0200'.

---
 mm/cma_debug.c  | 4 ++--
 mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
mm/cma_debug.c +2 -2
index 6494c7a7d257..f0af3f93d1e4 100644
@@ -172,10 +172,10 @@ static void cma_debugfs_add_one(struct cma *cma, int idx)
 
 	tmp = debugfs_create_dir(name, cma_debugfs_root);
 
-	debugfs_create_file("alloc", S_IWUSR, tmp, cma,
+	debugfs_create_file("alloc", 0200, tmp, cma,
 				&cma_alloc_fops);
 
-	debugfs_create_file("free", S_IWUSR, tmp, cma,
+	debugfs_create_file("free", 0200, tmp, cma,
 				&cma_free_fops);
 
 	debugfs_create_file("base_pfn", 0444, tmp,
mm/compaction.c +1 -1
index 88d01a50a015..50d0000a6afd 100644
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_compact_node(struct device *dev,
 
 	return count;
 }
-static DEVICE_ATTR(compact, S_IWUSR, NULL, sysfs_compact_node);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(compact, 0200, NULL, sysfs_compact_node);
 
 int compaction_register_node(struct node *node)
 {
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#2 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 mm: replace S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR with 0600

In reply to Paul McQuade

Fix checkpatch warnings about S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR being less readable than providing the permissions octal as '0600'.

---
 mm/failslab.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/failslab.c +1 -1
index 1f2f248e3601..b135ebb88b6f 100644
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ __setup("failslab=", setup_failslab);
 static int __init failslab_debugfs_init(void)
 {
 	struct dentry *dir;
-	umode_t mode = S_IFREG | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR;
+	umode_t mode = S_IFREG | 0600;
 
 	dir = fault_create_debugfs_attr("failslab", NULL, &failslab.attr);
 	if (IS_ERR(dir))
Signature · 1 line
2.16.2
#3 lore raw
In reply to Paul McQuade
Quoted 2 lines · Paul McQuade

Fix checkpatch warnings about S_IRUGO being less readable than providing the permissions octal as '0444'.

Hey Paul.

I sent a cleanup a couple weeks ago to Andrew Morton for the same thing.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/26/638

Andrew said he'd wait until after -rc1 is out.

btw: checkpatch can do this substitution automatically

cheers, Joe

#4 lore raw

Cool, thanks! I didn't know that.

Quoted 17 lines · On Sat 7 Apr 2018, 21:11 Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 2 lines · Paul McQuade

Fix checkpatch warnings about S_IRUGO being less readable than providing the permissions octal as '0444'.

Hey Paul.

I sent a cleanup a couple weeks ago to Andrew Morton for the same thing.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/26/638

Andrew said he'd wait until after -rc1 is out.

btw: checkpatch can do this substitution automatically

cheers, Joe